최근 비만으로 인한 성인병의 발생 증가로 인해 체중 감량에 대한 관심이 고조되고 있다. 그러나 비만을 측정하는 방법이나 측정기기들 간에 측정치의 차이 및 측정자 간의 오차를 나타내고 있어 정확한 비만을 진단함에 있어 문제점이 제기되고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 비만 측정시 측정자 내, 측정자 간, 측정기기들 간의 오차를 알아보고자 여대생 52명을 대상으로 신체계측과 체지방 측정기기(Inbody 3.0, Caliper, TBF-531)를 이용하여 체지방 함량을 측정하였으며, 모든 계측은 두 명의 측정자가 동일한 대상자에게 두 번씩 반복...
최근 비만으로 인한 성인병의 발생 증가로 인해 체중 감량에 대한 관심이 고조되고 있다. 그러나 비만을 측정하는 방법이나 측정기기들 간에 측정치의 차이 및 측정자 간의 오차를 나타내고 있어 정확한 비만을 진단함에 있어 문제점이 제기되고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 비만 측정시 측정자 내, 측정자 간, 측정기기들 간의 오차를 알아보고자 여대생 52명을 대상으로 신체계측과 체지방 측정기기(Inbody 3.0, Caliper, TBF-531)를 이용하여 체지방 함량을 측정하였으며, 모든 계측은 두 명의 측정자가 동일한 대상자에게 두 번씩 반복하여 실시하였다. 본 연구 결과 측정자 내?
최근 비만으로 인한 성인병의 발생 증가로 인해 체중 감량에 대한 관심이 고조되고 있다. 그러나 비만을 측정하는 방법이나 측정기기들 간에 측정치의 차이 및 측정자 간의 오차를 나타내고 있어 정확한 비만을 진단함에 있어 문제점이 제기되고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 비만 측정시 측정자 내, 측정자 간, 측정기기들 간의 오차를 알아보고자 여대생 52명을 대상으로 신체계측과 체지방 측정기기(Inbody 3.0, Caliper, TBF-531)를 이용하여 체지방 함량을 측정하였으며, 모든 계측은 두 명의 측정자가 동일한 대상자에게 두 번씩 반복하여 실시하였다. 본 연구 결과 측정자 내?
The purpose of this study is to provide the reference data for estimating body composition and developing equations for prediction of percent body fat. This study was designed of two aspects: 1) Comparison of percent body fat measurements in a operator 2) Comparison of percent body fat measurements ...
The purpose of this study is to provide the reference data for estimating body composition and developing equations for prediction of percent body fat. This study was designed of two aspects: 1) Comparison of percent body fat measurements in a operator 2) Comparison of percent body fat measurements among three instruments and operators. Percent body fat of college girls(n=52) aged 20～25y was measured by Skinfold thickness and Bioelectrical impedance analysis(Inbody3.0, TBF-531). All measurements were duplicated ＆ measured by two operators. The results are summarized as follows: 1. Percent body fat observed in a operator had no significant difference. 2. There were significant differences from the three instruments and between two operators(P＜0.05). Difference of percent body fat measurements between two operators was respectively 0.2% in Inbody 3.0, 0.4% in skinfold thickness and 0.3% in TBF-531. Although the measurement values of skinfold thickness appeared to be higher than others, the difference was not significant. Difference of percent body fat measurements among the three instruments was respectively 29.7±4.1% in Inbody 3.0, 28.6±3.2% in Skinfold thickness and 26.9±4.1% in TBF-531, Inbody 3.0 appeared to be higher than others. Abdominal obesity rate was measured by Inbody 3.0 and ruler, Inbody 3.0(0.81±0.03) was higher than the ruler(0.76±0.05). Three instruments have several assumptions and limitations. Therefore, researches for developing new equations are required for Ko
The purpose of this study is to provide the reference data for estimating body composition and developing equations for prediction of percent body fat. This study was designed of two aspects: 1) Comparison of percent body fat measurements in a operator 2) Comparison of percent body fat measurements among three instruments and operators. Percent body fat of college girls(n=52) aged 20～25y was measured by Skinfold thickness and Bioelectrical impedance analysis(Inbody3.0, TBF-531). All measurements were duplicated ＆ measured by two operators. The results are summarized as follows: 1. Percent body fat observed in a operator had no significant difference. 2. There were significant differences from the three instruments and between two operators(P＜0.05). Difference of percent body fat measurements between two operators was respectively 0.2% in Inbody 3.0, 0.4% in skinfold thickness and 0.3% in TBF-531. Although the measurement values of skinfold thickness appeared to be higher than others, the difference was not significant. Difference of percent body fat measurements among the three instruments was respectively 29.7±4.1% in Inbody 3.0, 28.6±3.2% in Skinfold thickness and 26.9±4.1% in TBF-531, Inbody 3.0 appeared to be higher than others. Abdominal obesity rate was measured by Inbody 3.0 and ruler, Inbody 3.0(0.81±0.03) was higher than the ruler(0.76±0.05). Three instruments have several assumptions and limitations. Therefore, researches for developing new equations are required for Ko
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.