포지션과 경력에 따른 대학축구선수의 경기 전 경쟁 상태불안과 자신감 및 심리적 요인과의 관계 The Competition State Anxiety according to their Positions and Game Experiences before Game of College Football Players and its Relation with their Self-confidence and Psychological Factors원문보기
본 연구의 목적은 포지션과 경력에 따른 대학축구선수의 경기 전 경쟁 상태불안과 자신감 및 심리적 요인과의 관계를 분석, 파악하는 것이었다. 본 연구의 피험자는 대한 축구협회에 등록되어 있는 축구선수로 제46회 전국춘계대학축구연맹전(2010년 2월18일 ～ 3월5일)에 출전한 전국 대학 축구선수들을 CSAI-2; Martens(1990)가 개발한 스포츠 경쟁 상태불안(CSAI-2) 검사지와 상태스포츠자신감(state sport confidenc) 검사지 그리고 심리적 요인 검사지의 3개 모두 자기평가기입방식(self-administering method)이며, 측정 시간은 10분에서 15분 정도밖에 소요되지 않았고 경기 전 1시간 전에 실시되었다. 검사지는 신뢰성이 있는 327부를 이용하여 ...
본 연구의 목적은 포지션과 경력에 따른 대학축구선수의 경기 전 경쟁 상태불안과 자신감 및 심리적 요인과의 관계를 분석, 파악하는 것이었다. 본 연구의 피험자는 대한 축구협회에 등록되어 있는 축구선수로 제46회 전국춘계대학축구연맹전(2010년 2월18일 ～ 3월5일)에 출전한 전국 대학 축구선수들을 CSAI-2; Martens(1990)가 개발한 스포츠 경쟁 상태불안(CSAI-2) 검사지와 상태스포츠자신감(state sport confidenc) 검사지 그리고 심리적 요인 검사지의 3개 모두 자기평가기입방식(self-administering method)이며, 측정 시간은 10분에서 15분 정도밖에 소요되지 않았고 경기 전 1시간 전에 실시되었다. 검사지는 신뢰성이 있는 327부를 이용하여 SPSS V.17.0의 프로그램으로 자료 분석의 목적에 따라 전사적 통계처리를 실시하였고, 응답자의 일반적 사항에 대해 빈도 분석(frequency)을 실시하였으며, 각 도구의 타당도를 알아보기 위해 요인분석(factor analysis)과 신뢰도(reliability)는 Cronbach's α 계수를 이용하였다. 경력과 포지션의 평균(M) 및 표준편차(SD)를 산출하였으며 차이를 검증하기위해 일원배치 분산분석(one-way ANOVA)를 실시하였다. 통계적으로 유의 한 차이가 나타난 변인에 대해서는 Scheffe' Method의 사후검증(post-hoc test)을 실시하였다. 유의 수준은 5%(α=0.05)로 설정하였다. 본 장에서는 포지션과 경력이 경쟁 상태불안과 자신감 및 심리적 요인과의 관계를 규명하기 위한 연구가설과 방법에 소정의 절차에 따라 자료를 수집하여 분석한 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 도출하였다. 1. 포지션에 따른 경쟁 상태불안에 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 2. 대학축구선수의 포지션에 따른 자신감에 유의한 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 3. 대학축구선수의 포지션에 따른 심리적 요인에 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 4. 대학축구선수의 경력에 따른 경쟁 상태불안에 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 5. 대학축구선수의 경력에 따른 자신감에 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 6. 대학축구선수의 경력에 따른 심리적 요인에 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 7. 대학축구선수의 배경변인인 포지션과 경력에 따른 경쟁 상태불안, 자신감, 심리적 요인은 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 8. 대학축구선수의 독립변수인 경쟁 상태불안, 자신감, 심리적 요인은 각각 다른 분포의 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다.
본 연구의 목적은 포지션과 경력에 따른 대학축구선수의 경기 전 경쟁 상태불안과 자신감 및 심리적 요인과의 관계를 분석, 파악하는 것이었다. 본 연구의 피험자는 대한 축구협회에 등록되어 있는 축구선수로 제46회 전국춘계대학축구연맹전(2010년 2월18일 ～ 3월5일)에 출전한 전국 대학 축구선수들을 CSAI-2; Martens(1990)가 개발한 스포츠 경쟁 상태불안(CSAI-2) 검사지와 상태스포츠자신감(state sport confidenc) 검사지 그리고 심리적 요인 검사지의 3개 모두 자기평가기입방식(self-administering method)이며, 측정 시간은 10분에서 15분 정도밖에 소요되지 않았고 경기 전 1시간 전에 실시되었다. 검사지는 신뢰성이 있는 327부를 이용하여 SPSS V.17.0의 프로그램으로 자료 분석의 목적에 따라 전사적 통계처리를 실시하였고, 응답자의 일반적 사항에 대해 빈도 분석(frequency)을 실시하였으며, 각 도구의 타당도를 알아보기 위해 요인분석(factor analysis)과 신뢰도(reliability)는 Cronbach's α 계수를 이용하였다. 경력과 포지션의 평균(M) 및 표준편차(SD)를 산출하였으며 차이를 검증하기위해 일원배치 분산분석(one-way ANOVA)를 실시하였다. 통계적으로 유의 한 차이가 나타난 변인에 대해서는 Scheffe' Method의 사후검증(post-hoc test)을 실시하였다. 유의 수준은 5%(α=0.05)로 설정하였다. 본 장에서는 포지션과 경력이 경쟁 상태불안과 자신감 및 심리적 요인과의 관계를 규명하기 위한 연구가설과 방법에 소정의 절차에 따라 자료를 수집하여 분석한 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 도출하였다. 1. 포지션에 따른 경쟁 상태불안에 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 2. 대학축구선수의 포지션에 따른 자신감에 유의한 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 3. 대학축구선수의 포지션에 따른 심리적 요인에 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 4. 대학축구선수의 경력에 따른 경쟁 상태불안에 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 5. 대학축구선수의 경력에 따른 자신감에 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 6. 대학축구선수의 경력에 따른 심리적 요인에 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 7. 대학축구선수의 배경변인인 포지션과 경력에 따른 경쟁 상태불안, 자신감, 심리적 요인은 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 8. 대학축구선수의 독립변수인 경쟁 상태불안, 자신감, 심리적 요인은 각각 다른 분포의 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다.
This Study purposed to analyze and grasp the competition state anxiety before game of college football players according to their positions and game experiences and its relation with their state sport confidence and psychological factors (the decisive factors for game performance). This Study target...
This Study purposed to analyze and grasp the competition state anxiety before game of college football players according to their positions and game experiences and its relation with their state sport confidence and psychological factors (the decisive factors for game performance). This Study targeted on the national college football players to have participated in 46th National College Sprig Football League on February 18 – March 5 2010 as the football players registered to Korea Football Association. The survey was conducted by self-administering method through all three kinds of questionnaires – the state competition state anxiety (CSAI-2), the state sport confidence and the psychological factors developed by CSAI-2; Martens (1990) - and for just 10∼15 minutes and one hour before football game. The 327 questionnaires with reliability were treated with statistics according to the purpose of analysis through SPSS Statistics 17.0, and through frequency analysis on the general items of respondents and through Cronbach’s α coefficient on factor analysis and reliability in order to know the validity of each tool. And the mean (M) of experiences and positions and the standard deviation (Sd) were calculated and One-way ANOVA was also conducted for the verification of the difference. As for the variables to show the significant difference in statistics, the post-hoc test of Scheffe’ Method was conducted and the significance level was set at 5% (α=0.05). In this Chapter, the results of the analysis on the collected data according to the prescribed procedure regarding study assumption and method in order to verify the competition state anxiety of positions and experiences and its relation with self-confidence and psychological factor are as follows: 1. The competition state anxiety according to the positions showed a significant difference; It was found that there was not any difference at physical state anxiety, while defense fielder and mid-fielder showed big difference at cognitive state anxiety and state confidence and the post-hoc test also did the significant meaning. 1) The physical competition state anxiety according to positions (goalkeeper, defense fielder and forward) did not show a significant difference; Goalkeeper was the highest at the physical state anxiety and was followed by forward, defense fielder and mid-fielder in order, and the teams did not show a significant difference in statistics; 2) The cognitive state anxiety according to positions (goalkeeper, defense fielder and forward) showed a significant difference; and Goalkeeper was the highest at the cognitive state anxiety and was followed by forward, defense fielder and mid-fielder in order, and the teams showed a significant difference in statistics. 3) The state confidence according to positions (goalkeeper, defense fielder and forward) showed a significant difference. Mid-fielder was the highest at the state confidence and was followed by forward, mid-fielder and goalkeeper in order, and the teams showed a significant difference in statistics. 2. The sport state confidence according to positions of college football players showed a significant difference; Mid-fielder was the highest at the sport state confidence, and was followed by defense fielder, forward and goalkeeper in order, and the teams did not show a significant difference in statistics. 1) The sport state confidence according to positions (goalkeeper, defense fielder and forward) did not show a significant difference; Mid-fielder was the highest at the sport state confidence and was followed by defense fielder, forward and goalkeeper in order, and the teams did not show a significant difference in statistics. 3. The psychological factor (a decisive factor on game performance) according to positions of college football players showed a significant difference; Forward was the highest at fundamental but did not show a significant difference, and forward at football intelligence, defense fielder at motive, forward at emotion and forward at mental power, and the teams showed a significant difference in statistics. 1) The fundamental according to positions (goalkeeper, defense fielder and mid-fielder) did not show a significant difference; Forward was the highest at the fundamental and was followed by mid-fielder, defense fielder and goalkeeper in order, and the teams did not show a significant difference in statistics. 2) The football intelligence according to positions (goalkeeper, defense fielder, mid-fielder and forward) showed a significant difference; Forward was the highest at the football intelligence and was followed by defense fielder, mid-fielder and goalkeeper in order, and the teams showed a significant difference in statistics. 3) The motive according to positions (goalkeeper, defense fielder, mid-fielder and forward) showed a significant difference; Defense fielder was the highest at the motive and was followed by mid-fielder, forward and goalkeeper in order, and the teams showed a significant difference in statistics. 4) The emotion according to positions (goalkeeper, defense fielder, mid-fielder and forward) showed a significant difference; and Forward was the highest at the emotion and was followed by defense fielder, mid-fielder and goalkeeper in order, and the teams showed a significant difference in statistics. 5) The mental power according to positions (goalkeeper, defense fielder, mid-fielder and forward) showed a significant difference. Forward was the highest at the mental power, and mid-fielder, defense fielder and goalkeeper in order, and the teams showed a significant difference in statistics. As a result, it’s found that goalkeeper was the lowest at the mental power compared with other positions. The post-hoc test on this area showed the significant meaning. 4. The competition state anxiety according to their experiences of college football players show
This Study purposed to analyze and grasp the competition state anxiety before game of college football players according to their positions and game experiences and its relation with their state sport confidence and psychological factors (the decisive factors for game performance). This Study targeted on the national college football players to have participated in 46th National College Sprig Football League on February 18 – March 5 2010 as the football players registered to Korea Football Association. The survey was conducted by self-administering method through all three kinds of questionnaires – the state competition state anxiety (CSAI-2), the state sport confidence and the psychological factors developed by CSAI-2; Martens (1990) - and for just 10∼15 minutes and one hour before football game. The 327 questionnaires with reliability were treated with statistics according to the purpose of analysis through SPSS Statistics 17.0, and through frequency analysis on the general items of respondents and through Cronbach’s α coefficient on factor analysis and reliability in order to know the validity of each tool. And the mean (M) of experiences and positions and the standard deviation (Sd) were calculated and One-way ANOVA was also conducted for the verification of the difference. As for the variables to show the significant difference in statistics, the post-hoc test of Scheffe’ Method was conducted and the significance level was set at 5% (α=0.05). In this Chapter, the results of the analysis on the collected data according to the prescribed procedure regarding study assumption and method in order to verify the competition state anxiety of positions and experiences and its relation with self-confidence and psychological factor are as follows: 1. The competition state anxiety according to the positions showed a significant difference; It was found that there was not any difference at physical state anxiety, while defense fielder and mid-fielder showed big difference at cognitive state anxiety and state confidence and the post-hoc test also did the significant meaning. 1) The physical competition state anxiety according to positions (goalkeeper, defense fielder and forward) did not show a significant difference; Goalkeeper was the highest at the physical state anxiety and was followed by forward, defense fielder and mid-fielder in order, and the teams did not show a significant difference in statistics; 2) The cognitive state anxiety according to positions (goalkeeper, defense fielder and forward) showed a significant difference; and Goalkeeper was the highest at the cognitive state anxiety and was followed by forward, defense fielder and mid-fielder in order, and the teams showed a significant difference in statistics. 3) The state confidence according to positions (goalkeeper, defense fielder and forward) showed a significant difference. Mid-fielder was the highest at the state confidence and was followed by forward, mid-fielder and goalkeeper in order, and the teams showed a significant difference in statistics. 2. The sport state confidence according to positions of college football players showed a significant difference; Mid-fielder was the highest at the sport state confidence, and was followed by defense fielder, forward and goalkeeper in order, and the teams did not show a significant difference in statistics. 1) The sport state confidence according to positions (goalkeeper, defense fielder and forward) did not show a significant difference; Mid-fielder was the highest at the sport state confidence and was followed by defense fielder, forward and goalkeeper in order, and the teams did not show a significant difference in statistics. 3. The psychological factor (a decisive factor on game performance) according to positions of college football players showed a significant difference; Forward was the highest at fundamental but did not show a significant difference, and forward at football intelligence, defense fielder at motive, forward at emotion and forward at mental power, and the teams showed a significant difference in statistics. 1) The fundamental according to positions (goalkeeper, defense fielder and mid-fielder) did not show a significant difference; Forward was the highest at the fundamental and was followed by mid-fielder, defense fielder and goalkeeper in order, and the teams did not show a significant difference in statistics. 2) The football intelligence according to positions (goalkeeper, defense fielder, mid-fielder and forward) showed a significant difference; Forward was the highest at the football intelligence and was followed by defense fielder, mid-fielder and goalkeeper in order, and the teams showed a significant difference in statistics. 3) The motive according to positions (goalkeeper, defense fielder, mid-fielder and forward) showed a significant difference; Defense fielder was the highest at the motive and was followed by mid-fielder, forward and goalkeeper in order, and the teams showed a significant difference in statistics. 4) The emotion according to positions (goalkeeper, defense fielder, mid-fielder and forward) showed a significant difference; and Forward was the highest at the emotion and was followed by defense fielder, mid-fielder and goalkeeper in order, and the teams showed a significant difference in statistics. 5) The mental power according to positions (goalkeeper, defense fielder, mid-fielder and forward) showed a significant difference. Forward was the highest at the mental power, and mid-fielder, defense fielder and goalkeeper in order, and the teams showed a significant difference in statistics. As a result, it’s found that goalkeeper was the lowest at the mental power compared with other positions. The post-hoc test on this area showed the significant meaning. 4. The competition state anxiety according to their experiences of college football players show
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.