[학위논문]한국·중국·일본 조선해양산업 경쟁력에 관한 실증연구 : 포터의 다이아몬드 모델을 중심으로 (An) empirical study for competitiveness of Korean, Chinese and Japanese shipbuilding and marine industries : focusing the Michael Porter's Diamond Model원문보기
본 연구에서는 한국, 중국, 일본 조선해양산업 경쟁력에 관한 실증분석을 통하여 한국 조선해양산업의 경쟁우위 전략을 모색하고자 하였다. 본 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위해 선행연구와 조선해양산업 관련 각종 자료를 활용하여 문헌연구하고 이를 바탕으로 이론적 근거를 마련하여 연구를 진행하였다.
본 연구의 실증분석 결과는 첫째, 한국 조선해양산업은 포터의 다이아몬드 모델에 의한 "요소조건, 수요조건, 연관 및 지원산업, 기업전략, 구조 및...
본 연구에서는 한국, 중국, 일본 조선해양산업 경쟁력에 관한 실증분석을 통하여 한국 조선해양산업의 경쟁우위 전략을 모색하고자 하였다. 본 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위해 선행연구와 조선해양산업 관련 각종 자료를 활용하여 문헌연구하고 이를 바탕으로 이론적 근거를 마련하여 연구를 진행하였다.
본 연구의 실증분석 결과는 첫째, 한국 조선해양산업은 포터의 다이아몬드 모델에 의한 "요소조건, 수요조건, 연관 및 지원산업, 기업전략, 구조 및 경쟁"요인에서 중국 및 일본 보다 다수의 경쟁요인에서 우위에 있는 것으로 평가되었다. 둘째, 가격경쟁력, 기술경쟁력, 비가격경쟁력, 인적자원경쟁력, 정부정책이 한국 조선해양산업 경쟁력에 통계적으로 유의한 수준의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타나 설정된 가설이 채택되었다.
본 연구에서는 한국, 중국, 일본 조선해양산업 경쟁력에 관한 실증분석을 통하여 한국 조선해양산업의 경쟁우위 전략을 모색하고자 하였다. 본 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위해 선행연구와 조선해양산업 관련 각종 자료를 활용하여 문헌연구하고 이를 바탕으로 이론적 근거를 마련하여 연구를 진행하였다.
본 연구의 실증분석 결과는 첫째, 한국 조선해양산업은 포터의 다이아몬드 모델에 의한 "요소조건, 수요조건, 연관 및 지원산업, 기업전략, 구조 및 경쟁"요인에서 중국 및 일본 보다 다수의 경쟁요인에서 우위에 있는 것으로 평가되었다. 둘째, 가격경쟁력, 기술경쟁력, 비가격경쟁력, 인적자원경쟁력, 정부정책이 한국 조선해양산업 경쟁력에 통계적으로 유의한 수준의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타나 설정된 가설이 채택되었다.
The purpose of this study was to empirically analyze the competitive edges of the ship-building and marine industries of Korea, China and Japan and thereupon, explore the ways for the Korean ship-building and marine industry to sharpen its competitive edge. For this purpose, the researcher reviewed ...
The purpose of this study was to empirically analyze the competitive edges of the ship-building and marine industries of Korea, China and Japan and thereupon, explore the ways for the Korean ship-building and marine industry to sharpen its competitive edge. For this purpose, the researcher reviewed preceding studies and various relevant data to build a theoretical ground for the study. The empirical analysis took 3 steps. First, based on Porter's Diamond Model, the factors of competitive edges of the ship-building and marine industries were comparatively analyzed among Korea, China and Japan; the data produced from 2003 to 2011 were used for the comparative analysis. Thus, competitive advantages and disadvantages were determined for each nation. Second, an empirical analysis was conducted for the Korean ship-building and marine industry workers for the first time in order to analyze the effects of such independent variables as price, technology, non-price factors, human resources and government policy on the dependent variable or the competitive edge of the Korean ship-building and marine industry; to this end, hypotheses were set up to be tested. The results of this empirical analysis can be summarized as follows: First, it was found that the Korean ship-building and marine industry had some comparative advantage over its Chinese or Japanese counterpart in terms of such factors of Porter's Diamond Model as 'production factors, demand factors, associated and supporting industries, business strategies, structure and competition,' Merely, the Korean ship-building and marine industry had some comparative disadvantage against its Chinese counterpart in terms of such factors as cost structure, wage level and manpower, and against its Japanese counterpart in terms of marine market share, financial support and marine plant facility industry. Second, as a result of the empirical analysis, the hypothesis that 'the competitive edge of the Korean ship-building and marine industry would be affected significantly by price competitiveness, technological competitiveness, non-price competitiveness, human resources competitiveness and government policy' was adopted. On the other hand, while the hypothesis that 'the competitive edge of the Korean ship-building and marine industry would be affected most significantly by technological competitiveness' was adopted, the hypothesis that 'the government policy would have the least effect' was rejected; the least significant factor was found 'price competitiveness.' The suggestions from this study can be summarized up as follows: First, it has been confirmed that the source of the competitiveness of the Korean ship-building and marine industry is technological competitiveness. So, in order to sharpen its global competitive edge, it is necessary to make investments in an energy-saving vessel of a new concept, acquire the high-end core technologies and strengthen the human resources development system. Second, it has been confirmed that the factors of the comparative disadvantages for the Korean ship-building and marine industry are poor marine transportation industry, financing support and marine plant industry. In case of marine transportation industry and financing support, the government should reform its policies. On the other hand, in case of marine plant facilities, the Korean ship-building and marine industry is requested to increase the ratio of localization through an organic cooperation with relevant companies, universities and public research institutes. Third, since it was found that the Korean ship-building and marine industry was not properly supported by regional cluster policies and industry-academy-research cooperation, it is necessary to construct an organic cooperative system among ship-building and marine industry, material suppliers, universities and public research institutes. This study is deemed limited in the following aspects: First, since Porter's Diamond Model was designed to reflect the conditions in the United States, its validity may well be limited when it applies to the comparative analysis of competitive edges among Korean, Chinese or Japanese ship-building and marine industries. Second, since Porter's Diamond Model focuses on such endogenous variables as production factors, demand factors, associated and support industries, company strategies, structure and competition, this study is less focused on such exogenous variables as accidental events and government's roles. Third, although the ship-building and marine industry workers were surveyed, the mutual relationships among price competitiveness, technological competitiveness, non-price competitiveness, human resources competitiveness and government policies were not properly analyzed. Such limits of this study will be able to be overcome by the future studies focusing on the following aspects; First, analysis of each competition factor of the Korean ship-building and marine industry, second, research into Japan's efforts to recovery its ship-building and marine industry and China's catching up strategies, third, additional empirical research into the competitive factors of Korean, Chinese and Japanese ship-building and marine industries.
The purpose of this study was to empirically analyze the competitive edges of the ship-building and marine industries of Korea, China and Japan and thereupon, explore the ways for the Korean ship-building and marine industry to sharpen its competitive edge. For this purpose, the researcher reviewed preceding studies and various relevant data to build a theoretical ground for the study. The empirical analysis took 3 steps. First, based on Porter's Diamond Model, the factors of competitive edges of the ship-building and marine industries were comparatively analyzed among Korea, China and Japan; the data produced from 2003 to 2011 were used for the comparative analysis. Thus, competitive advantages and disadvantages were determined for each nation. Second, an empirical analysis was conducted for the Korean ship-building and marine industry workers for the first time in order to analyze the effects of such independent variables as price, technology, non-price factors, human resources and government policy on the dependent variable or the competitive edge of the Korean ship-building and marine industry; to this end, hypotheses were set up to be tested. The results of this empirical analysis can be summarized as follows: First, it was found that the Korean ship-building and marine industry had some comparative advantage over its Chinese or Japanese counterpart in terms of such factors of Porter's Diamond Model as 'production factors, demand factors, associated and supporting industries, business strategies, structure and competition,' Merely, the Korean ship-building and marine industry had some comparative disadvantage against its Chinese counterpart in terms of such factors as cost structure, wage level and manpower, and against its Japanese counterpart in terms of marine market share, financial support and marine plant facility industry. Second, as a result of the empirical analysis, the hypothesis that 'the competitive edge of the Korean ship-building and marine industry would be affected significantly by price competitiveness, technological competitiveness, non-price competitiveness, human resources competitiveness and government policy' was adopted. On the other hand, while the hypothesis that 'the competitive edge of the Korean ship-building and marine industry would be affected most significantly by technological competitiveness' was adopted, the hypothesis that 'the government policy would have the least effect' was rejected; the least significant factor was found 'price competitiveness.' The suggestions from this study can be summarized up as follows: First, it has been confirmed that the source of the competitiveness of the Korean ship-building and marine industry is technological competitiveness. So, in order to sharpen its global competitive edge, it is necessary to make investments in an energy-saving vessel of a new concept, acquire the high-end core technologies and strengthen the human resources development system. Second, it has been confirmed that the factors of the comparative disadvantages for the Korean ship-building and marine industry are poor marine transportation industry, financing support and marine plant industry. In case of marine transportation industry and financing support, the government should reform its policies. On the other hand, in case of marine plant facilities, the Korean ship-building and marine industry is requested to increase the ratio of localization through an organic cooperation with relevant companies, universities and public research institutes. Third, since it was found that the Korean ship-building and marine industry was not properly supported by regional cluster policies and industry-academy-research cooperation, it is necessary to construct an organic cooperative system among ship-building and marine industry, material suppliers, universities and public research institutes. This study is deemed limited in the following aspects: First, since Porter's Diamond Model was designed to reflect the conditions in the United States, its validity may well be limited when it applies to the comparative analysis of competitive edges among Korean, Chinese or Japanese ship-building and marine industries. Second, since Porter's Diamond Model focuses on such endogenous variables as production factors, demand factors, associated and support industries, company strategies, structure and competition, this study is less focused on such exogenous variables as accidental events and government's roles. Third, although the ship-building and marine industry workers were surveyed, the mutual relationships among price competitiveness, technological competitiveness, non-price competitiveness, human resources competitiveness and government policies were not properly analyzed. Such limits of this study will be able to be overcome by the future studies focusing on the following aspects; First, analysis of each competition factor of the Korean ship-building and marine industry, second, research into Japan's efforts to recovery its ship-building and marine industry and China's catching up strategies, third, additional empirical research into the competitive factors of Korean, Chinese and Japanese ship-building and marine industries.
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.