본 연구는 축구경기 중 심판판정의 신뢰도를 높이고 불공정한 판정을 줄이기 위해 심판들에 대한 선수들의 인지도를 조사하여 심판상호간의 신뢰회복과 경기발전의 개선책을 목적으로 두고 2012년도 현재 J시에 소재하고 대한축구협회 축구선수로 등록된 초?중?고 280명에게 설문조사를 실시하였다. 통계프로그램은 SPSS Ver 21.00와 AMOS Ver 18.0을 이용하여 자료를 분석하였으며, 사용된 측정도구의 신뢰도를 검증하기 위하여 탐색적요인분석(Expioratory ...
본 연구는 축구경기 중 심판판정의 신뢰도를 높이고 불공정한 판정을 줄이기 위해 심판들에 대한 선수들의 인지도를 조사하여 심판상호간의 신뢰회복과 경기발전의 개선책을 목적으로 두고 2012년도 현재 J시에 소재하고 대한축구협회 축구선수로 등록된 초?중?고 280명에게 설문조사를 실시하였다. 통계프로그램은 SPSS Ver 21.00와 AMOS Ver 18.0을 이용하여 자료를 분석하였으며, 사용된 측정도구의 신뢰도를 검증하기 위하여 탐색적요인분석(Expioratory factor analysis), 확인적요인분석(Confirmatory factor analysis), 신뢰도분석(Reliability analysis)을 실시하였고, 집단간 차이를 분석하기 위해 일원배치분산분석을 실시하였으며, 사후검정은 LSD를 통하여 차이를 분석하였다. 심판판정이 경기력에 미치는 영향을 분석하기 위하여 선형회귀분석을 실시하였고 이러한 절차를 통해 얻어진 결론은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 소속에 따른 심판판정에 대한 인식도와 경기력에서는 전문성, 정확성, 활동성, 협력성, 태도, 신뢰성, 영향력, 경기력 모두에서 유의한 차이가 나타났다. 둘째, 포지션에 따른 심판판정에 대한 인식도와 경기력에서는 인지된 경기력요인을 제외한 모든 요인에서 FW가 가장 높게 나타났으며, 정확성, 활동성, 협력성, 인지된 경기력에서 유의한 차이를 보이고 있다. 이를 제외한 전문성, 태도, 신뢰성, 영향력에서는 유의한 차이가 발견되지 않았다. 셋째, 경력에 따른 심판판정에 대한 인식도와 경기력에서는 전문성, 정확성, 활동성, 협력성, 태도, 신뢰성, 영향력, 경기력 모두에서 집단간의 차이는 발견되지 않았다. 넷째, 심판판정이 선수의 인지된 경기력에 미치는 영향으로 전문성이 가장 중요한 변인으로 나타났고 정확성, 활동성, 협력성, 태도, 신뢰성, 영향력 등의 나머지 요인들은 심판판정이 선수들의 경기력에 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났다.
본 연구는 축구경기 중 심판판정의 신뢰도를 높이고 불공정한 판정을 줄이기 위해 심판들에 대한 선수들의 인지도를 조사하여 심판상호간의 신뢰회복과 경기발전의 개선책을 목적으로 두고 2012년도 현재 J시에 소재하고 대한축구협회 축구선수로 등록된 초?중?고 280명에게 설문조사를 실시하였다. 통계프로그램은 SPSS Ver 21.00와 AMOS Ver 18.0을 이용하여 자료를 분석하였으며, 사용된 측정도구의 신뢰도를 검증하기 위하여 탐색적요인분석(Expioratory factor analysis), 확인적요인분석(Confirmatory factor analysis), 신뢰도분석(Reliability analysis)을 실시하였고, 집단간 차이를 분석하기 위해 일원배치분산분석을 실시하였으며, 사후검정은 LSD를 통하여 차이를 분석하였다. 심판판정이 경기력에 미치는 영향을 분석하기 위하여 선형회귀분석을 실시하였고 이러한 절차를 통해 얻어진 결론은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 소속에 따른 심판판정에 대한 인식도와 경기력에서는 전문성, 정확성, 활동성, 협력성, 태도, 신뢰성, 영향력, 경기력 모두에서 유의한 차이가 나타났다. 둘째, 포지션에 따른 심판판정에 대한 인식도와 경기력에서는 인지된 경기력요인을 제외한 모든 요인에서 FW가 가장 높게 나타났으며, 정확성, 활동성, 협력성, 인지된 경기력에서 유의한 차이를 보이고 있다. 이를 제외한 전문성, 태도, 신뢰성, 영향력에서는 유의한 차이가 발견되지 않았다. 셋째, 경력에 따른 심판판정에 대한 인식도와 경기력에서는 전문성, 정확성, 활동성, 협력성, 태도, 신뢰성, 영향력, 경기력 모두에서 집단간의 차이는 발견되지 않았다. 넷째, 심판판정이 선수의 인지된 경기력에 미치는 영향으로 전문성이 가장 중요한 변인으로 나타났고 정확성, 활동성, 협력성, 태도, 신뢰성, 영향력 등의 나머지 요인들은 심판판정이 선수들의 경기력에 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났다.
The present study was conducted based on a survey of football players' perception of umpires during games with a view to step up reliability of umpires' decision by reducing frequency of unfair judgements, restoring by thus trust in or among umpires and improving ultimately management of games. For ...
The present study was conducted based on a survey of football players' perception of umpires during games with a view to step up reliability of umpires' decision by reducing frequency of unfair judgements, restoring by thus trust in or among umpires and improving ultimately management of games. For this purpose, questionnaires were distributed to 280 football players enrolled in elementary, middle and high schools in J City and registered with Korea Football Association as of 2012. SPSS Ver 21.00 and AMOS Ver 18.0 statistic programs were employed to analyze the data collected from the inquiry. In order to verify the reliability of the instruments used for measurement, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and reliability analysis were performed and, in order to investigate differences among the surveyed groups, one-way ANOVA was carried out. LSD was used to analyze the cause of differences as post-hoc test and linear regression analysis was also executed to find effects of umpires' judgement on the athletic performance of football players. Following outcomes could result from these processes: First, in terms of players' awareness of umpires' decision and athletic performance depending on players' membership, significant difference was found in expertise, preciseness, activeness, cooperativeness, attitude, reliability, influence and athletic performance. Second, as for relationship between players' awareness of umpires' decision and athletic performance depending on players' position, FW players scored the highest points across all factors except for athletic performance, featuring significant difference in preciseness, activeness, cooperativeness, and perceived athletic performance. But for these, no particular difference was found in expertise, attitude, reliability and influence. Third, with regard to players' awareness of umpires' decision and athletic performance depending on players' career, no significant difference was confirmed across groups in all factors including expertise, preciseness, activeness, cooperativeness, attitude, reliability, influence and athletic performance. Fourth, expertise turned out to be the most critical variance that might influence players' perception of athletic performance, while it was not affected by umpires' decision in remaining factors such as preciseness, activeness, cooperativeness, attitude, reliability and influence.
The present study was conducted based on a survey of football players' perception of umpires during games with a view to step up reliability of umpires' decision by reducing frequency of unfair judgements, restoring by thus trust in or among umpires and improving ultimately management of games. For this purpose, questionnaires were distributed to 280 football players enrolled in elementary, middle and high schools in J City and registered with Korea Football Association as of 2012. SPSS Ver 21.00 and AMOS Ver 18.0 statistic programs were employed to analyze the data collected from the inquiry. In order to verify the reliability of the instruments used for measurement, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and reliability analysis were performed and, in order to investigate differences among the surveyed groups, one-way ANOVA was carried out. LSD was used to analyze the cause of differences as post-hoc test and linear regression analysis was also executed to find effects of umpires' judgement on the athletic performance of football players. Following outcomes could result from these processes: First, in terms of players' awareness of umpires' decision and athletic performance depending on players' membership, significant difference was found in expertise, preciseness, activeness, cooperativeness, attitude, reliability, influence and athletic performance. Second, as for relationship between players' awareness of umpires' decision and athletic performance depending on players' position, FW players scored the highest points across all factors except for athletic performance, featuring significant difference in preciseness, activeness, cooperativeness, and perceived athletic performance. But for these, no particular difference was found in expertise, attitude, reliability and influence. Third, with regard to players' awareness of umpires' decision and athletic performance depending on players' career, no significant difference was confirmed across groups in all factors including expertise, preciseness, activeness, cooperativeness, attitude, reliability, influence and athletic performance. Fourth, expertise turned out to be the most critical variance that might influence players' perception of athletic performance, while it was not affected by umpires' decision in remaining factors such as preciseness, activeness, cooperativeness, attitude, reliability and influence.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.