[학위논문]미국치의학교육협의회(ADEA) 치과위생사 표준역량과 미국 치위생(학)과의 역량 비교분석 A comparative analysis of competencies in American Dental Education Association(ADEA) and American Dental Hygiene Schools원문보기
본 연구는 미국치과교육협의회(ADEA, America Dental Education Association)에서 제시하는 미국치과위생사의 표준 역량을 파악하고 이를 미국 Entry-level의 학교역량과 비교하여 국내 치과위생사에게 필요한 치과위생사역량을 규명하기 위한 비교조사연구이다. 미국치과교육협의회에서 제시하는 치과위생사 표준역량을 기준으로 Entry-level에 속하는 336개의 대학(교) 중 각 학교별 치위생역량을 제시하는 109개 학교를 비교하였고, 수집된 자료의 분석은 SPSS 21.0을 이용하였다. 연구로부터 얻어진 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 전체 역량을 대상으로 기술통계한 결과 ...
본 연구는 미국치과교육협의회(ADEA, America Dental Education Association)에서 제시하는 미국치과위생사의 표준 역량을 파악하고 이를 미국 Entry-level의 학교역량과 비교하여 국내 치과위생사에게 필요한 치과위생사역량을 규명하기 위한 비교조사연구이다. 미국치과교육협의회에서 제시하는 치과위생사 표준역량을 기준으로 Entry-level에 속하는 336개의 대학(교) 중 각 학교별 치위생역량을 제시하는 109개 학교를 비교하였고, 수집된 자료의 분석은 SPSS 21.0을 이용하였다. 연구로부터 얻어진 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 전체 역량을 대상으로 기술통계한 결과 핵심역량 역량이 평균 7.53으로 가장 높은 것으로 조사되었다. 다음으로 환자관리 역량이 평균 6.18로 2순위로 나타났으며, 지역사회 참여 역량이 평균 2.30로 3순위의 역량으로 분석되었다. 4순위 역량은 건강 증진과 질병예방(평균 1.83), 5순위 역량은 전문적 성장과 발달(평균 0.66)로 조사되었다. 둘째, 평균이상 역량보유집단(상위 25%)은 환자관리가 평균 11.97로 가장 높게 조사되었다. 다음으로 핵심역량이 평균 10.63으로 나타났고, 지역사회 참여가 평균 5.00, 건강증진과 질병예방이 평균 4.37, 마지막으로 전문적 성장과 발달이 평균 1.67로 가장 낮게 조사되었다. 셋째, 평균이하 역량보유집단(하위 25%)은 핵심역량이 평균 4.36으로 가장 높게 조사되었다. 다음으로 환자관리가 평균 1.83으로 나타났고, 지역사회 참여가 평균 0.57, 건강증진과 질병예방이 평균 0.36, 마지막으로 전문적 성장과 발달이 평균 0.14로 가장 낮게 조사되었다. 넷째, 전체 역량에 따른 평균이상(상위 25%), 평균이하(하위 25%) 역량보유집단간의 핵심역량(p=.000), 건강증진과 질병예방(p=.000), 지역사회 참여(p=.000), 환자관리(p=.000), 전문적 성장과 발달(p=.000) 모두 평균이하 역량보유집단과 평균이상 역량보유집단별 통계적으로 유의미한 차이를 보이는 것으로 분석되었다. 다섯째, 지역 간의 역량 차이가 존재하는지를 알아보기 위해 one-way ANOVA test를 실시하였으며 핵심역량(p=.614), 건강증진과 질병예방(p=.967), 지역사회 참여(p=.981), 환자관리(p=.361), 전문적 성장과 발달(p=.978), 전체 역량(p=.824) 모두 지역 간의 역량이 통계적으로 유의미한 차이를 보이지 않는 것으로 분석되었다. 여섯째, 5개의 대영역(핵심역량, 건강증진과 질병예방, 지역사회 참여, 환자관리, 전문적 성장과 발달)간의 모두 정적 상관관계가 나타났다. 일곱째, 치과위생사의 핵심역량에 미치는 요인으로 지역사회 참여와 환자관리가 유의한 변수로 나타났으며, 이 모형의 설명력은 76.4%, 모형은 통계적으로 유의한 결과(p<.001)를 나타낸다. 이상의 결과를 토대로 윤리성, 의사소통, 자기개발, 비판적 사고와 판단력 등이 치과위생사에게 필요한 역량으로 나타났다. 추후 국내 치과위생사역량을 통합 및 표준화하는 작업이 필요하며 표준화된 치과위생사역량을 기반으로 한 교육과정의 개발과 통합이 이루어져야 할 것이다.
본 연구는 미국치과교육협의회(ADEA, America Dental Education Association)에서 제시하는 미국치과위생사의 표준 역량을 파악하고 이를 미국 Entry-level의 학교역량과 비교하여 국내 치과위생사에게 필요한 치과위생사역량을 규명하기 위한 비교조사연구이다. 미국치과교육협의회에서 제시하는 치과위생사 표준역량을 기준으로 Entry-level에 속하는 336개의 대학(교) 중 각 학교별 치위생역량을 제시하는 109개 학교를 비교하였고, 수집된 자료의 분석은 SPSS 21.0을 이용하였다. 연구로부터 얻어진 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 전체 역량을 대상으로 기술통계한 결과 핵심역량 역량이 평균 7.53으로 가장 높은 것으로 조사되었다. 다음으로 환자관리 역량이 평균 6.18로 2순위로 나타났으며, 지역사회 참여 역량이 평균 2.30로 3순위의 역량으로 분석되었다. 4순위 역량은 건강 증진과 질병예방(평균 1.83), 5순위 역량은 전문적 성장과 발달(평균 0.66)로 조사되었다. 둘째, 평균이상 역량보유집단(상위 25%)은 환자관리가 평균 11.97로 가장 높게 조사되었다. 다음으로 핵심역량이 평균 10.63으로 나타났고, 지역사회 참여가 평균 5.00, 건강증진과 질병예방이 평균 4.37, 마지막으로 전문적 성장과 발달이 평균 1.67로 가장 낮게 조사되었다. 셋째, 평균이하 역량보유집단(하위 25%)은 핵심역량이 평균 4.36으로 가장 높게 조사되었다. 다음으로 환자관리가 평균 1.83으로 나타났고, 지역사회 참여가 평균 0.57, 건강증진과 질병예방이 평균 0.36, 마지막으로 전문적 성장과 발달이 평균 0.14로 가장 낮게 조사되었다. 넷째, 전체 역량에 따른 평균이상(상위 25%), 평균이하(하위 25%) 역량보유집단간의 핵심역량(p=.000), 건강증진과 질병예방(p=.000), 지역사회 참여(p=.000), 환자관리(p=.000), 전문적 성장과 발달(p=.000) 모두 평균이하 역량보유집단과 평균이상 역량보유집단별 통계적으로 유의미한 차이를 보이는 것으로 분석되었다. 다섯째, 지역 간의 역량 차이가 존재하는지를 알아보기 위해 one-way ANOVA test를 실시하였으며 핵심역량(p=.614), 건강증진과 질병예방(p=.967), 지역사회 참여(p=.981), 환자관리(p=.361), 전문적 성장과 발달(p=.978), 전체 역량(p=.824) 모두 지역 간의 역량이 통계적으로 유의미한 차이를 보이지 않는 것으로 분석되었다. 여섯째, 5개의 대영역(핵심역량, 건강증진과 질병예방, 지역사회 참여, 환자관리, 전문적 성장과 발달)간의 모두 정적 상관관계가 나타났다. 일곱째, 치과위생사의 핵심역량에 미치는 요인으로 지역사회 참여와 환자관리가 유의한 변수로 나타났으며, 이 모형의 설명력은 76.4%, 모형은 통계적으로 유의한 결과(p<.001)를 나타낸다. 이상의 결과를 토대로 윤리성, 의사소통, 자기개발, 비판적 사고와 판단력 등이 치과위생사에게 필요한 역량으로 나타났다. 추후 국내 치과위생사역량을 통합 및 표준화하는 작업이 필요하며 표준화된 치과위생사역량을 기반으로 한 교육과정의 개발과 통합이 이루어져야 할 것이다.
In this comparative analytic study the standard competency of American Dental Hygienists proposed by the America Dental Education Association (ADEA) was examined and compared with the competency of American school of entry-level to identify the competence required by domestic dental hygienists. Base...
In this comparative analytic study the standard competency of American Dental Hygienists proposed by the America Dental Education Association (ADEA) was examined and compared with the competency of American school of entry-level to identify the competence required by domestic dental hygienists. Based on the standard competency presented by the America Dental Education Association (ADEA) the 109 schools which provide respective dental hygiene competency among 336 universities and colleges belonging to the entry-level were compared with each other, and the collected data were processed by SPSS 21.0. The results obtained from the study are summarized as the following. First, the descriptive statistics upon overall competence were prepared and the results of survey revealed the highest average score of 7.53 for the Core competency. And it was followed by the score of 6.18 of the competency of Patients’ care and by the score of 2.30 of the competency of participation in local community. The next were the competency for health improvement & disease prevention (average score 1.83) and the competency of professional growth and development (average score 0.66). Second, the group having the competency above average level (the top 25%) was identified to have the average score of 11.97 for the competency of patients’ care. The average score of 10.63 for the core competency succeeded it and this was followed by the average score of 5.00 for the competency of participation in local community, the average score of 4.37 for the competency of health improvement & disease prevention, and the average score of 1.67 for the competency of professional growth and development. Third, the group having the competency below average level (the 25% from the bottom) was identified to have the average score of 4.36 for the core competency. The average scores of 1.83 for the competency patients’ care, 0.57 for the competency of participation in local community, 0.36 for the competency of health improvement & disease prevention, and 0.14 for the competency of professional growth and development succeeded it. Fourth, it was identified that there were statistically significant difference between two groups of the above (the top 25%) and below the average level (the 25% from the bottom) in all the competency (the core competency (p=.000), the competency of health improvement & disease prevention (p=.000), the competency of participation in local community (p=.000), the competency of patients’ care (p=.000), and the competency of professional growth and development (p=.000)). Fifth, the one-way ANOVA test was carried out to find the potential difference in competency between respective regions and the result of the test showed that there was no statistically significant difference in competency between each region (the core competency (p=.614), the competency of health improvement and disease prevention (p=.967), the competency of participation in local community (p=.981), the competency of patients’ care (p=.361), the competency of professional growth & development (p=.978), and the overall competency (p=.824)). Sixth, the static correlations between all 5 major domains (the core competency, the competency of health improvement and disease prevention, the competency of participation in local community, the competency of patients’ care, the competency of professional growth & development) were appeared. Seventh, the competency of participation in local community and patients’ care were appeared as significant variables affecting the core competency of dental hygienists with the 76.4% of explanatory power, and the model reveals the statistically significant results (p<.001). Based on these results it was identified that the ethical, communication skill, self-development efforts, and capability of critical thinking and judgment were necessary competency for the dental hygienists. Further efforts to integrate and standardize the competency of domestic dental hygienists are thus needed and based on these integrated and standardized competencies the integrated curricula to cultivate domestic dental hygienists should be developed.
In this comparative analytic study the standard competency of American Dental Hygienists proposed by the America Dental Education Association (ADEA) was examined and compared with the competency of American school of entry-level to identify the competence required by domestic dental hygienists. Based on the standard competency presented by the America Dental Education Association (ADEA) the 109 schools which provide respective dental hygiene competency among 336 universities and colleges belonging to the entry-level were compared with each other, and the collected data were processed by SPSS 21.0. The results obtained from the study are summarized as the following. First, the descriptive statistics upon overall competence were prepared and the results of survey revealed the highest average score of 7.53 for the Core competency. And it was followed by the score of 6.18 of the competency of Patients’ care and by the score of 2.30 of the competency of participation in local community. The next were the competency for health improvement & disease prevention (average score 1.83) and the competency of professional growth and development (average score 0.66). Second, the group having the competency above average level (the top 25%) was identified to have the average score of 11.97 for the competency of patients’ care. The average score of 10.63 for the core competency succeeded it and this was followed by the average score of 5.00 for the competency of participation in local community, the average score of 4.37 for the competency of health improvement & disease prevention, and the average score of 1.67 for the competency of professional growth and development. Third, the group having the competency below average level (the 25% from the bottom) was identified to have the average score of 4.36 for the core competency. The average scores of 1.83 for the competency patients’ care, 0.57 for the competency of participation in local community, 0.36 for the competency of health improvement & disease prevention, and 0.14 for the competency of professional growth and development succeeded it. Fourth, it was identified that there were statistically significant difference between two groups of the above (the top 25%) and below the average level (the 25% from the bottom) in all the competency (the core competency (p=.000), the competency of health improvement & disease prevention (p=.000), the competency of participation in local community (p=.000), the competency of patients’ care (p=.000), and the competency of professional growth and development (p=.000)). Fifth, the one-way ANOVA test was carried out to find the potential difference in competency between respective regions and the result of the test showed that there was no statistically significant difference in competency between each region (the core competency (p=.614), the competency of health improvement and disease prevention (p=.967), the competency of participation in local community (p=.981), the competency of patients’ care (p=.361), the competency of professional growth & development (p=.978), and the overall competency (p=.824)). Sixth, the static correlations between all 5 major domains (the core competency, the competency of health improvement and disease prevention, the competency of participation in local community, the competency of patients’ care, the competency of professional growth & development) were appeared. Seventh, the competency of participation in local community and patients’ care were appeared as significant variables affecting the core competency of dental hygienists with the 76.4% of explanatory power, and the model reveals the statistically significant results (p<.001). Based on these results it was identified that the ethical, communication skill, self-development efforts, and capability of critical thinking and judgment were necessary competency for the dental hygienists. Further efforts to integrate and standardize the competency of domestic dental hygienists are thus needed and based on these integrated and standardized competencies the integrated curricula to cultivate domestic dental hygienists should be developed.
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.