Confliction relation regarding meanings has been applied into and distributed onto conversation in our daily life and our thought structures of the extent to which it has influenced. Given that this have been seen as deep application and wide distribution, close attention has been paid to antonym ov...
Confliction relation regarding meanings has been applied into and distributed onto conversation in our daily life and our thought structures of the extent to which it has influenced. Given that this have been seen as deep application and wide distribution, close attention has been paid to antonym over long time in sites of language educating, dictionary publishing, and linguistics in which semantics has come up with a focus.
Antonym vocabularies where confliction relation has been formed begun to be inquired in terms of building concepts and determining categories, accordingly succeeded in being settled down into one of semantics sectors. In present there is an arising demand of the extent to which studies should go, and in which studies should not stay at modern Korean but run back to middle Korean of the extent.
Not only does antonym connect to a relation in static meaning words of a certain language but dynamic meaning words in accordance with situation and occurrence. Subsequently, studies on prescriptive antonym and situational antonym are a demand arising therefrom. Therefore, this study is intended to explore how antonym’s features are presented and how antonym vocabularies in middle and modern Korean are characterized and applied.
Firstly, we find out research methods on antonym upon which execution is made and in which there are structural semantics access, corpus access, communicative access, and conceptual semantics access. Close attention is paid to conceptual semantics access because it exceeds limit of structural semantics access which features an independent and static system, instead it opens the view based on conceptualization and interpretation about antonym.
Determining categories on prescriptive antonym results in first antonym, second one, third one, for which Lee Kwang-ho’s study (2009, 2015) is employed. Existing categories by semantics categorization has duplicates in distinguishing sub-categories. This is why this study categorizes as aforesaid.
First antonym, suited to “single allocation” through verifying whether it is positive and negative, is qualified as [-negative degree]. Second antonym, also suited to “single allocation”, is qualified as [+positive degree]. Third antonym is suited to “multiple allocation”.
Antonym in dependent upon situation is not static or fixed meaning which is prescriptive in dictionaries but dynamic or variable meaning in real conversation occasions, for which it is named situational antonym or contextual antonym.
It elicits characteristics and application of vocabularies in middle and modern Korean, not only placing inquiry on historic flow which categorizes prescriptive antonym into first antonym, second one, third one, but also placing inquiry on form variable which sets situational antonym.
Necessity of situational antonym is ease of comprehending when modern Korean is focused. On the contrary when middle Korean is focused, situational antonym can be on clear comprehension only if confliction relation is on clear view in the same context.
Confliction relation regarding meanings has been applied into and distributed onto conversation in our daily life and our thought structures of the extent to which it has influenced. Given that this have been seen as deep application and wide distribution, close attention has been paid to antonym over long time in sites of language educating, dictionary publishing, and linguistics in which semantics has come up with a focus.
Antonym vocabularies where confliction relation has been formed begun to be inquired in terms of building concepts and determining categories, accordingly succeeded in being settled down into one of semantics sectors. In present there is an arising demand of the extent to which studies should go, and in which studies should not stay at modern Korean but run back to middle Korean of the extent.
Not only does antonym connect to a relation in static meaning words of a certain language but dynamic meaning words in accordance with situation and occurrence. Subsequently, studies on prescriptive antonym and situational antonym are a demand arising therefrom. Therefore, this study is intended to explore how antonym’s features are presented and how antonym vocabularies in middle and modern Korean are characterized and applied.
Firstly, we find out research methods on antonym upon which execution is made and in which there are structural semantics access, corpus access, communicative access, and conceptual semantics access. Close attention is paid to conceptual semantics access because it exceeds limit of structural semantics access which features an independent and static system, instead it opens the view based on conceptualization and interpretation about antonym.
Determining categories on prescriptive antonym results in first antonym, second one, third one, for which Lee Kwang-ho’s study (2009, 2015) is employed. Existing categories by semantics categorization has duplicates in distinguishing sub-categories. This is why this study categorizes as aforesaid.
First antonym, suited to “single allocation” through verifying whether it is positive and negative, is qualified as [-negative degree]. Second antonym, also suited to “single allocation”, is qualified as [+positive degree]. Third antonym is suited to “multiple allocation”.
Antonym in dependent upon situation is not static or fixed meaning which is prescriptive in dictionaries but dynamic or variable meaning in real conversation occasions, for which it is named situational antonym or contextual antonym.
It elicits characteristics and application of vocabularies in middle and modern Korean, not only placing inquiry on historic flow which categorizes prescriptive antonym into first antonym, second one, third one, but also placing inquiry on form variable which sets situational antonym.
Necessity of situational antonym is ease of comprehending when modern Korean is focused. On the contrary when middle Korean is focused, situational antonym can be on clear comprehension only if confliction relation is on clear view in the same context.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.