본 연구는 부산지역 20대를 대상으로 COVID-19 발생으로 인한 식습관 및 식생활의 변화에 대해 연구하였고 또한 COVID-19 발생으로 인한 가정간편식 및 배달음식의 섭취 빈도와 형태를 파악하여 COVID-19 뿐만 아니라 앞으로 혹시 모를 펜데믹 상황에 스스로 식품을 선택하고 관리할 수 있도록 20대를 위한 영양교육의 기초 자료를 구축하고자 수행되었다.
본 조사는 부산지역 20대를 대상으로 설문조사를 수행하였고, 수집한 자료는 총 180부였으나, 이 중 부적절한 응답을 제외하고 총 162부를 최종적으로 분석에 사용하...
본 연구는 부산지역 20대를 대상으로 COVID-19 발생으로 인한 식습관 및 식생활의 변화에 대해 연구하였고 또한 COVID-19 발생으로 인한 가정간편식 및 배달음식의 섭취 빈도와 형태를 파악하여 COVID-19 뿐만 아니라 앞으로 혹시 모를 펜데믹 상황에 스스로 식품을 선택하고 관리할 수 있도록 20대를 위한 영양교육의 기초 자료를 구축하고자 수행되었다.
본 조사는 부산지역 20대를 대상으로 설문조사를 수행하였고, 수집한 자료는 총 180부였으나, 이 중 부적절한 응답을 제외하고 총 162부를 최종적으로 분석에 사용하였다.
조사 대상자들은 여성 90명과 72명의 남성으로 조사되었으며 직업은 ‘학생’ 65.4%, ‘직장인’ 25.3%로 나타났다. ‘주거형태’의 경우 69.1%가 ‘가족과 함께 집에서’ 거주하는 것으로 나타났고 28.4%가 ‘자취(기숙사)’로 나타났다. ‘비대면 수업 혹은 재택근무 경험이 있는 사람’이 77.8% 나타났다. COVID-19 이후 ‘신체활동 변화’로 ‘유사하다’가 42.0%, ‘감소했다’가 40.7%로 나타났으며 또한 ‘COVID-19 이후 체중변화’의 경우 ‘유사하다’ 48.1%. ‘증가했다’ 41.4%로 나타났다.
조사 대상자의 식습관 분석의 결과 ‘3끼 규칙적인 식사를 한다’의 경우 COVID-19 이전 2.74점, COVID-19 이후 2.51점으로 유의적인 차이를 보였다(p<0.001). 또한 ‘과일(1개 이상) 생과일 주스(1잔 이상)를 매일 섭취한다’가 COVID-19 이전과 이후 각각 2.86점, 2.72점으로 나타났으며 통계적으로 유의적인 차이를 보였다(p<0.05). 마지막으로 ‘식사할 때 영양 지식을 활용한다’의 경우 COVID-19 이전 2.73점, COVID-19 이후 2.92점으로 통계적으로 유의적인 차이가 나타났다(p<0.01). ‘곡류를 매일 2-4회 이상 섭취한다’, ‘물을 충분하게 마신다’, ‘과식하지 않고 언제나 적당량 섭취한다’를 제외한 나머지 항목들은 모두 COVID-19 발생 이후가 점수가 낮았으나, 유의적인 차이는 보이지 않았다.
조사 대상자의 식행동 분석의 결과로는 COVID-19 발생 전후로 유의미한 차이를 보이지 않았다.
COVID-19 이전과 이후의 가정간편식의 이용 빈도를 보자면 COVID-19 이전 ‘주 1-2회’가 30.9%로 가장 높게 나타났으며 ‘월 2-3회’ 30.2%, ‘월 1회 이하’ 24.7% 순으로 나타났고 COVID-19 이후의 경우 ‘주 1-2회’가 31.5%로 가장 높게 나타났으며 ‘월 2-3회’ 22.8%, ‘주 3-4회’ 19.8% 순으로 나타나 유의적인 차이가 나타났는데(p<0.05), 이는 COVID-19 발생 이후 가정간편식의 섭취 빈도가 증가한 것을 확인할 수 있다. COVID-19 이전과 이후의 배달음식의 이용 빈도조사 결과, COVID-19 이전 ‘월 2-3회’ 42.0%로 가장 높게 나타났으며 ‘주 1-2회’ 31.5%, ‘월 1회 이하’ 14.8%로 나타났고 COVID-19 이후의 경우 ‘주 1-2회’가 37.0%로 가장 높게 나타났고 ‘월 2-3회’ 24.1%, ‘주 3-4회’ 22.8% 순으로 나타나 유의적인 차이가 있었고(p<0.01), COVID-19 발생 이후 가정간편식의 섭취가 증가한 것을 알 수 있다.
COVID-19 이후 가정간편식의 이용 실태조사 결과 ‘섭취 장소’는 ‘집’ 80.2%로 가장 높았고 ‘함께 섭취하는 사람’의 경우 ‘혼자’가 56.8%로 가장 높았다. ‘가정간편식을 구입하는 데에 사용하는 한 달 비용’에는 ‘10,000원 이상-50,000원 미만’으로 46.9%로 가장 높았다. ‘선택 기준’으로는 ‘맛’이 53.1%로 가장 높았으며 ‘구입하는 이유’로는 ‘편의성’이 70.4%로 가장 높게 나타났다. 가정간편식을 ‘주로 섭취하는 끼니’는 ‘저녁’이 51.9%로 가장 높았으며 ‘만족도’는 5점 만점을 기준으로 3.45점으로 나타났다. 가정간편식을 섭취하는 종류로는 ‘면류’가 23.2%로 가장 높았고 ‘도시락’ 14.8%, ‘즉석밥’ 11.8% 순으로 나타났다.
COVID-19 이후 배달음식의 이용 실태를 보자면 ‘섭취 장소’는 ‘집’이 41.4%로 가장 높았고 ‘함께 섭취하는 사람’의 경우 ‘혼자’가 87.0%로 가장 높게 나타났다. ‘구입하는 데에 사용하는 한 달 비용’으로는 ‘50,000원 미만-100,000원 이상’이 32.7%로 가장 높게 나타났다. 배달음식 ‘선택 기준’은 ‘맛’이 75.3%로 가장 높았으며 ‘구입하는 이유’로는 ‘편의성’이 49.9%로 가장 높았다. 또한 ‘주로 섭취하는 끼니’는 ‘저녁’이 60.5%로 가장 높았으며 ‘배달 주문 방법’으로는 ‘스마트폰 어플리케이션’이 96.9%로 가장 높게 나타났다. 마지막으로 배달음식의 ‘만족도’는 5점을 만점으로 하여 평균 3.91점으로 나타났다. 주로 섭취하는 배달음식의 종류로는 ‘패스트푸드’가 35.2%로 가장 높았고 ‘분식’ 15.8%, ‘한식’ 12.8% 순으로 나타났다.
COVID-19 발생 이전, 이후로 가정간편식 및 배달음식 섭취 빈도와 비대면 수업 혹은 재택근무 경험 대한 비교 분석을 살펴보자면 먼저 가정간편식의 경우 ‘비대면 수업 혹은 재택근무 경험’이 ‘없다’라고 답한 사람의 경우 ‘주 1-2회’와 ‘주 3-4회’ 및 ‘주 5-6회’의 합이 58.4%로 나타났고, ‘있다’라고 답한 경우 ‘주 1-2회’와 ‘주 3-4회’ 및 ‘주 5-6회’의 합이 60.2%로 비대며 수업 혹은 재택근무 경험이 ‘있다’라고 답한 대상자가 가정간편식 섭취 비율이 더 높게 나타났지만 유의적이 차이는 없었다. 또한 배달음식의 경우 비대면 수업 혹은 재택근무 경험’이 ‘없다’라고 답한 응답자의 경우 ‘주 1-2회’와 ‘주 3-4회’ 및 ‘주 5-6회’의 합이 69.4%로 나타났고 ‘있다’라고 응답한 대상자 중 ‘주 1-2회’와 ‘주 3-4회’ 및 ‘주 5-6회’의 합이 67.4%로 비대면 수업 혹은 재택근무 경험이 ‘있다’고 답한 응답자의 비율이 더 높은 것으로 나타났으나 유의적인 차이는 없었다. 배달음식 선택 시 영양관련 표시 및 영양교육의 필요성에 대한 조사에서 ‘배달음식에 영양관련 표시가 필요하다’는 전체 87.0%가 ‘네’라고 답하였고 여성의 겨우 ‘네’라고 답한 응답자가 92.2%, 남성의 경우 ‘네’라고 답한 응답자가 80.6%로 여성이 높게 나타났다(p<0.05). 다음 ‘배달음식에 영양 관련 표시가 있을 경우 메뉴 선택에 도움이 될 것이다’라는 질문에 ‘네’ 84.6%로 가장 높게 나타났다. ‘우리나라 영양교육 제도가 잘 마련되어 있다’고 생각하는 지에 대한 질문에 ‘아니요’ 52.5%, ‘네’ 47.5%로 나타났다. 또한 ‘학교 및 전문기관에서 영양표시에 관한 교육을 받은 적 있는지’에 대한 질문에는 ‘네’ 58.0%로 가장 높게 나타났으며 ‘영양교육이 필요하다고 생각’하는 지에 대한 질문에는 ‘필요하다’ 58.0%로 가장 높게 나타났다. 또한 ‘영양 표시에 관한 교육이 필요하다고 생각하는 이유’에는 ‘올바른 식품 섭취와 건강증진을 위해’가 40.7%로 나타났으며 여성의 경우 ‘올바른 식품 섭취와 건강증진을 위해’가 54.2%로 가장 높았고 남성의 경우 ‘올바른 영양지식 습득을 위해’ 43.9%로 가장 높게 나타났다(p<0.001). 마지막으로 ‘효율적인 영양교육 방법’에 대한 질문에 ‘학교나 직장에서 영양 표시 교육을 받을 수 있도록 한다’가 58.6%로 가장 높게 나타났다.
본 연구결과가 COVID-19 발생으로 가정간편식 및 배달음식의 섭취가 증가한 것으로 나타났기에 COVID-19가 부산지역 일부 20대의 식습관과 식행동에 영향을 준 것으로 확인되었다. 또한 배달음식의 선택 시 영양표시가 도움이 되며, 영양교육 제도의 확대와 홍보의 필요성을 확인할 수 있다. 이를 통해 COVID-19와 같은 펜데믹 상황에 식습관과 식행동을 스스로 조절하고 선택할 수 있는 20대를 위한 영양교육 및 프로그램 개발의 필요성을 확인할 수 있었다.
본 연구는 부산지역 20대를 대상으로 COVID-19 발생으로 인한 식습관 및 식생활의 변화에 대해 연구하였고 또한 COVID-19 발생으로 인한 가정간편식 및 배달음식의 섭취 빈도와 형태를 파악하여 COVID-19 뿐만 아니라 앞으로 혹시 모를 펜데믹 상황에 스스로 식품을 선택하고 관리할 수 있도록 20대를 위한 영양교육의 기초 자료를 구축하고자 수행되었다.
본 조사는 부산지역 20대를 대상으로 설문조사를 수행하였고, 수집한 자료는 총 180부였으나, 이 중 부적절한 응답을 제외하고 총 162부를 최종적으로 분석에 사용하였다.
조사 대상자들은 여성 90명과 72명의 남성으로 조사되었으며 직업은 ‘학생’ 65.4%, ‘직장인’ 25.3%로 나타났다. ‘주거형태’의 경우 69.1%가 ‘가족과 함께 집에서’ 거주하는 것으로 나타났고 28.4%가 ‘자취(기숙사)’로 나타났다. ‘비대면 수업 혹은 재택근무 경험이 있는 사람’이 77.8% 나타났다. COVID-19 이후 ‘신체활동 변화’로 ‘유사하다’가 42.0%, ‘감소했다’가 40.7%로 나타났으며 또한 ‘COVID-19 이후 체중변화’의 경우 ‘유사하다’ 48.1%. ‘증가했다’ 41.4%로 나타났다.
조사 대상자의 식습관 분석의 결과 ‘3끼 규칙적인 식사를 한다’의 경우 COVID-19 이전 2.74점, COVID-19 이후 2.51점으로 유의적인 차이를 보였다(p<0.001). 또한 ‘과일(1개 이상) 생과일 주스(1잔 이상)를 매일 섭취한다’가 COVID-19 이전과 이후 각각 2.86점, 2.72점으로 나타났으며 통계적으로 유의적인 차이를 보였다(p<0.05). 마지막으로 ‘식사할 때 영양 지식을 활용한다’의 경우 COVID-19 이전 2.73점, COVID-19 이후 2.92점으로 통계적으로 유의적인 차이가 나타났다(p<0.01). ‘곡류를 매일 2-4회 이상 섭취한다’, ‘물을 충분하게 마신다’, ‘과식하지 않고 언제나 적당량 섭취한다’를 제외한 나머지 항목들은 모두 COVID-19 발생 이후가 점수가 낮았으나, 유의적인 차이는 보이지 않았다.
조사 대상자의 식행동 분석의 결과로는 COVID-19 발생 전후로 유의미한 차이를 보이지 않았다.
COVID-19 이전과 이후의 가정간편식의 이용 빈도를 보자면 COVID-19 이전 ‘주 1-2회’가 30.9%로 가장 높게 나타났으며 ‘월 2-3회’ 30.2%, ‘월 1회 이하’ 24.7% 순으로 나타났고 COVID-19 이후의 경우 ‘주 1-2회’가 31.5%로 가장 높게 나타났으며 ‘월 2-3회’ 22.8%, ‘주 3-4회’ 19.8% 순으로 나타나 유의적인 차이가 나타났는데(p<0.05), 이는 COVID-19 발생 이후 가정간편식의 섭취 빈도가 증가한 것을 확인할 수 있다. COVID-19 이전과 이후의 배달음식의 이용 빈도조사 결과, COVID-19 이전 ‘월 2-3회’ 42.0%로 가장 높게 나타났으며 ‘주 1-2회’ 31.5%, ‘월 1회 이하’ 14.8%로 나타났고 COVID-19 이후의 경우 ‘주 1-2회’가 37.0%로 가장 높게 나타났고 ‘월 2-3회’ 24.1%, ‘주 3-4회’ 22.8% 순으로 나타나 유의적인 차이가 있었고(p<0.01), COVID-19 발생 이후 가정간편식의 섭취가 증가한 것을 알 수 있다.
COVID-19 이후 가정간편식의 이용 실태조사 결과 ‘섭취 장소’는 ‘집’ 80.2%로 가장 높았고 ‘함께 섭취하는 사람’의 경우 ‘혼자’가 56.8%로 가장 높았다. ‘가정간편식을 구입하는 데에 사용하는 한 달 비용’에는 ‘10,000원 이상-50,000원 미만’으로 46.9%로 가장 높았다. ‘선택 기준’으로는 ‘맛’이 53.1%로 가장 높았으며 ‘구입하는 이유’로는 ‘편의성’이 70.4%로 가장 높게 나타났다. 가정간편식을 ‘주로 섭취하는 끼니’는 ‘저녁’이 51.9%로 가장 높았으며 ‘만족도’는 5점 만점을 기준으로 3.45점으로 나타났다. 가정간편식을 섭취하는 종류로는 ‘면류’가 23.2%로 가장 높았고 ‘도시락’ 14.8%, ‘즉석밥’ 11.8% 순으로 나타났다.
COVID-19 이후 배달음식의 이용 실태를 보자면 ‘섭취 장소’는 ‘집’이 41.4%로 가장 높았고 ‘함께 섭취하는 사람’의 경우 ‘혼자’가 87.0%로 가장 높게 나타났다. ‘구입하는 데에 사용하는 한 달 비용’으로는 ‘50,000원 미만-100,000원 이상’이 32.7%로 가장 높게 나타났다. 배달음식 ‘선택 기준’은 ‘맛’이 75.3%로 가장 높았으며 ‘구입하는 이유’로는 ‘편의성’이 49.9%로 가장 높았다. 또한 ‘주로 섭취하는 끼니’는 ‘저녁’이 60.5%로 가장 높았으며 ‘배달 주문 방법’으로는 ‘스마트폰 어플리케이션’이 96.9%로 가장 높게 나타났다. 마지막으로 배달음식의 ‘만족도’는 5점을 만점으로 하여 평균 3.91점으로 나타났다. 주로 섭취하는 배달음식의 종류로는 ‘패스트푸드’가 35.2%로 가장 높았고 ‘분식’ 15.8%, ‘한식’ 12.8% 순으로 나타났다.
COVID-19 발생 이전, 이후로 가정간편식 및 배달음식 섭취 빈도와 비대면 수업 혹은 재택근무 경험 대한 비교 분석을 살펴보자면 먼저 가정간편식의 경우 ‘비대면 수업 혹은 재택근무 경험’이 ‘없다’라고 답한 사람의 경우 ‘주 1-2회’와 ‘주 3-4회’ 및 ‘주 5-6회’의 합이 58.4%로 나타났고, ‘있다’라고 답한 경우 ‘주 1-2회’와 ‘주 3-4회’ 및 ‘주 5-6회’의 합이 60.2%로 비대며 수업 혹은 재택근무 경험이 ‘있다’라고 답한 대상자가 가정간편식 섭취 비율이 더 높게 나타났지만 유의적이 차이는 없었다. 또한 배달음식의 경우 비대면 수업 혹은 재택근무 경험’이 ‘없다’라고 답한 응답자의 경우 ‘주 1-2회’와 ‘주 3-4회’ 및 ‘주 5-6회’의 합이 69.4%로 나타났고 ‘있다’라고 응답한 대상자 중 ‘주 1-2회’와 ‘주 3-4회’ 및 ‘주 5-6회’의 합이 67.4%로 비대면 수업 혹은 재택근무 경험이 ‘있다’고 답한 응답자의 비율이 더 높은 것으로 나타났으나 유의적인 차이는 없었다. 배달음식 선택 시 영양관련 표시 및 영양교육의 필요성에 대한 조사에서 ‘배달음식에 영양관련 표시가 필요하다’는 전체 87.0%가 ‘네’라고 답하였고 여성의 겨우 ‘네’라고 답한 응답자가 92.2%, 남성의 경우 ‘네’라고 답한 응답자가 80.6%로 여성이 높게 나타났다(p<0.05). 다음 ‘배달음식에 영양 관련 표시가 있을 경우 메뉴 선택에 도움이 될 것이다’라는 질문에 ‘네’ 84.6%로 가장 높게 나타났다. ‘우리나라 영양교육 제도가 잘 마련되어 있다’고 생각하는 지에 대한 질문에 ‘아니요’ 52.5%, ‘네’ 47.5%로 나타났다. 또한 ‘학교 및 전문기관에서 영양표시에 관한 교육을 받은 적 있는지’에 대한 질문에는 ‘네’ 58.0%로 가장 높게 나타났으며 ‘영양교육이 필요하다고 생각’하는 지에 대한 질문에는 ‘필요하다’ 58.0%로 가장 높게 나타났다. 또한 ‘영양 표시에 관한 교육이 필요하다고 생각하는 이유’에는 ‘올바른 식품 섭취와 건강증진을 위해’가 40.7%로 나타났으며 여성의 경우 ‘올바른 식품 섭취와 건강증진을 위해’가 54.2%로 가장 높았고 남성의 경우 ‘올바른 영양지식 습득을 위해’ 43.9%로 가장 높게 나타났다(p<0.001). 마지막으로 ‘효율적인 영양교육 방법’에 대한 질문에 ‘학교나 직장에서 영양 표시 교육을 받을 수 있도록 한다’가 58.6%로 가장 높게 나타났다.
본 연구결과가 COVID-19 발생으로 가정간편식 및 배달음식의 섭취가 증가한 것으로 나타났기에 COVID-19가 부산지역 일부 20대의 식습관과 식행동에 영향을 준 것으로 확인되었다. 또한 배달음식의 선택 시 영양표시가 도움이 되며, 영양교육 제도의 확대와 홍보의 필요성을 확인할 수 있다. 이를 통해 COVID-19와 같은 펜데믹 상황에 식습관과 식행동을 스스로 조절하고 선택할 수 있는 20대를 위한 영양교육 및 프로그램 개발의 필요성을 확인할 수 있었다.
This study studied changes in eating habits and eating habits due to the outbreak of COVID-19 for 20-somethings in Busan region. Also, by identifying the frequency and form of consumption of home convenience meals and delivery food due to the COVID-19 outbreak, not only COVID-19 but also this was ca...
This study studied changes in eating habits and eating habits due to the outbreak of COVID-19 for 20-somethings in Busan region. Also, by identifying the frequency and form of consumption of home convenience meals and delivery food due to the COVID-19 outbreak, not only COVID-19 but also this was carried out to establish basic data for nutrition education for 20-somethings so that they can choose and manage their own food in the future.
In this survey, a survey was conducted on 20-somethings in Busan, and a total of 180 copies were collected.
The survey subjects were 90 women and 72 men, and the occupation was ‘student’ 65.4% and ‘worker’ 25.3%. In the case of ‘residence type’, 69.1% of them lived ‘at home with their family’ and 28.4% were ‘home away (dormitory)’. ‘People who have experience of non-face-to-face classes or telecommuting’ were found to be 77.8%. As for ‘changes in physical activity’ after COVID-19, 42.0% said ‘similar to’ and ‘decreased’ 40.7%, and 48.1% ‘similar’ to ‘weight change after COVID-19’. ‘Increased’ was 41.4%.
As a result of analyzing the eating habits of the subjects of the study, in the case of ‘eating three regular meals’, the score showed a significant difference at 2.74 points before COVID-19 and 2.51 points after COVID-19 (p<0.001). Also, ‘consuming more than 1 fruit and 1 cup of fresh fruit juice daily’ showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) before and after COVID-19, with a score of 2.86 and 2.72, respectively. Lastly, in the case of ‘Utilizing nutritional knowledge when eating’, a statistically significant difference was found with a score of 2.73 before COVID-19 and 2.92 after COVID-19 (p<0.01). Except for ‘I eat grains 2-4 times a day or more’, ‘I drink plenty of water’ and ‘I do not overeat and always consume an appropriate amount’, the scores for all items were low after the outbreak of COVID-19, but there was a significant difference was not seen.
As a result of the analysis of the subjects eating behavior, there was no significant difference before and after the outbreak of COVID-19.
When looking at the frequency of use of home snacks before and after COVID-19, ‘1-2 times a week’ before COVID-19 showed the highest at 30.9%, ‘2-3 times a month’ 30.2%, and ‘less than once a month’ 24.7%, followed by ‘1-2 times a week’ at 31.5%, followed by ‘2-3 times a month’ 22.8%, and ‘3-4 times a week’ 19.8% after COVID-19. A significant difference was found (p<0.05), confirming that the frequency of consumption of home convenience food increased after the outbreak of COVID-19. As a result of the survey on the frequency of use of delivery food before and after COVID-19, ‘2-3 times a month’ was the highest at 42.0% before COVID-19, followed by ‘1-2 times a week’ 31.5% and ‘less than once a month’ 14.8%, and after COVID-19, ‘1-2 times a week’ was the highest at 37.0%, followed by ‘2-3 times a month’ 24.1%, and ‘3-4 times a week’ 22.8%, which was significant. There was a difference (p<0.01), and it can be seen that the consumption of home convenience food increased after the outbreak of COVID-19.
As a result of the survey on the use of home convenience food after COVID-19, ‘at home’ was the highest at 80.2%, and ‘people who eat together’ had the highest rate of ‘alone’ with 56.8%. In the ‘monthly cost to purchase home convenience food’, ‘more than 10,000 won - less than 50,000 won’ was the highest at 46.9%. As ‘selection criteria’, ‘taste’ was the highest at 53.1%, and ‘convenience’ was the highest at 70.4% as ‘reason to purchase’. As for ‘the main meal eaten at home’, ‘dinner’ was the highest at 51.9%, and ‘satisfaction’ was 3.45 out of 5. Among the types of home convenience meals, ‘Noodles’ was the highest at 23.2%, followed by ‘Lunch Box’ at 14.8% and ‘Instant Rice’ at 11.8%.
Looking at the actual use of delivery food after COVID-19, ‘at home’ was the highest at 41.4%, and for ‘people eating together’, ‘alone’ showed the highest at 87.0%. As for ‘monthly cost of purchase’, ‘less than 50,000 won - 100,000 won or more’ showed the highest rate at 32.7%. As for the ‘selection criteria’ for delivery food, ‘taste’ was the highest at 75.3%, and ‘convenience’ was the highest at 49.9% as ‘reason to purchase’. Also, ‘dinner’ was the highest at 60.5%, and ‘smartphone application’ showed the highest rate of 96.9% for ‘delivery order method’. Finally, the ‘satisfaction’ of delivery food was measured with a perfect score of 5, with an average score of 3.91. As for the types of delivery food consumed mainly, ‘fast food’ was the highest at 35.2%, followed by ‘sweet food’ at 15.8% and ‘Korean food’ at 12.8%.
If we look at the comparative analysis of the frequency of home convenience meals and delivery food intake and experience of non-face-to-face classes or telecommuting before and after the outbreak of COVID-19, first, those who answered ‘no experience’ in ‘non-face-to-face classes or working from home’ in the case of home convenience meals. In the case of ‘1-2 times a week’, ‘3-4 times a week’ and ‘5-6 times a week’ were 58.4%, and if you answered ‘Yes’, ‘1-2 times a week’ and a week the sum of ‘3-4 times’ and ‘5-6 times a week’ was 60.2%, and subjects who answered ‘have’ experience in class or telecommuting showed a higher rate of eating home convenience food, but there was no significant difference. In the case of delivery food, the sum of ‘1-2 times a week’, ‘3-4 times a week’ and ‘5-6 times a week’ was 69.4% of the respondents who answered ‘no experience of non-face-to-face classes or telecommuting’. Among the subjects who answered ‘Yes’, the sum of ‘1-2 times a week’, ‘3-4 times a week’ and ‘5-6 times a week’ was 67.4%, indicating that they had experience of non-face-to-face classes or telecommuting. The percentage of respondents who answered was higher, but there was no significant difference. In a survey on the need for nutrition-related labeling and nutrition education when selecting delivery food, 87.0% of all respondents who answered ‘delivery food needs nutrition-related labeling’ answered ‘yes’, and only 92.2% of women answered ‘yes’, in the case of men, 80.6% of the respondents answered ‘yes’, which was higher for women (p<0.05). When asked the question ‘If there is a nutritional label on the delivery food, it will be helpful in menu selection’, the highest response was ‘yes’ at 84.6%. When asked whether they thought that ‘Korea's nutrition education system is well established’, 52.5% answered ‘no’ and 47.5% answered ‘yes’. In addition, to the question of ‘Have you received any education on nutrition labeling at schools or specialized institutions?’, the highest response was ‘Yes’ at 58.0%, and ‘Necessary’ to the question of whether ‘Nutrition education was necessary’ was answered at 58.0. % was the highest. Also, for ‘reasons for the need for education on nutrition labeling’, ‘for correct food intake and health promotion’ was found at 40.7%, and for women, ‘for correct food intake and health promotion’ was the highest with 54.2%. It was high, and in the case of men, it was the highest at 43.9% for ‘acquiring correct nutritional knowledge’(p<0.001). Lastly, to the question of ‘effective nutrition education method’ the highest response was ‘Make it possible to receive nutrition labeling education at school or at work’ with 58.6%.
As the results of this study showed that the consumption of home convenience food and delivery food increased due to the outbreak of COVID-19, it was confirmed that COVID-19 had an effect on the eating habits and eating behavior of some 20s in Busan. In addition, nutrition labeling is helpful when selecting delivery food, and the need for expansion and publicity of the nutrition education system can be confirmed. Through this, it was possible to confirm the need to develop nutrition education and programs for 20s who can self-regulate and choose their eating habits and eating behavior in a pandemic situation such as COVID-19.
This study studied changes in eating habits and eating habits due to the outbreak of COVID-19 for 20-somethings in Busan region. Also, by identifying the frequency and form of consumption of home convenience meals and delivery food due to the COVID-19 outbreak, not only COVID-19 but also this was carried out to establish basic data for nutrition education for 20-somethings so that they can choose and manage their own food in the future.
In this survey, a survey was conducted on 20-somethings in Busan, and a total of 180 copies were collected.
The survey subjects were 90 women and 72 men, and the occupation was ‘student’ 65.4% and ‘worker’ 25.3%. In the case of ‘residence type’, 69.1% of them lived ‘at home with their family’ and 28.4% were ‘home away (dormitory)’. ‘People who have experience of non-face-to-face classes or telecommuting’ were found to be 77.8%. As for ‘changes in physical activity’ after COVID-19, 42.0% said ‘similar to’ and ‘decreased’ 40.7%, and 48.1% ‘similar’ to ‘weight change after COVID-19’. ‘Increased’ was 41.4%.
As a result of analyzing the eating habits of the subjects of the study, in the case of ‘eating three regular meals’, the score showed a significant difference at 2.74 points before COVID-19 and 2.51 points after COVID-19 (p<0.001). Also, ‘consuming more than 1 fruit and 1 cup of fresh fruit juice daily’ showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) before and after COVID-19, with a score of 2.86 and 2.72, respectively. Lastly, in the case of ‘Utilizing nutritional knowledge when eating’, a statistically significant difference was found with a score of 2.73 before COVID-19 and 2.92 after COVID-19 (p<0.01). Except for ‘I eat grains 2-4 times a day or more’, ‘I drink plenty of water’ and ‘I do not overeat and always consume an appropriate amount’, the scores for all items were low after the outbreak of COVID-19, but there was a significant difference was not seen.
As a result of the analysis of the subjects eating behavior, there was no significant difference before and after the outbreak of COVID-19.
When looking at the frequency of use of home snacks before and after COVID-19, ‘1-2 times a week’ before COVID-19 showed the highest at 30.9%, ‘2-3 times a month’ 30.2%, and ‘less than once a month’ 24.7%, followed by ‘1-2 times a week’ at 31.5%, followed by ‘2-3 times a month’ 22.8%, and ‘3-4 times a week’ 19.8% after COVID-19. A significant difference was found (p<0.05), confirming that the frequency of consumption of home convenience food increased after the outbreak of COVID-19. As a result of the survey on the frequency of use of delivery food before and after COVID-19, ‘2-3 times a month’ was the highest at 42.0% before COVID-19, followed by ‘1-2 times a week’ 31.5% and ‘less than once a month’ 14.8%, and after COVID-19, ‘1-2 times a week’ was the highest at 37.0%, followed by ‘2-3 times a month’ 24.1%, and ‘3-4 times a week’ 22.8%, which was significant. There was a difference (p<0.01), and it can be seen that the consumption of home convenience food increased after the outbreak of COVID-19.
As a result of the survey on the use of home convenience food after COVID-19, ‘at home’ was the highest at 80.2%, and ‘people who eat together’ had the highest rate of ‘alone’ with 56.8%. In the ‘monthly cost to purchase home convenience food’, ‘more than 10,000 won - less than 50,000 won’ was the highest at 46.9%. As ‘selection criteria’, ‘taste’ was the highest at 53.1%, and ‘convenience’ was the highest at 70.4% as ‘reason to purchase’. As for ‘the main meal eaten at home’, ‘dinner’ was the highest at 51.9%, and ‘satisfaction’ was 3.45 out of 5. Among the types of home convenience meals, ‘Noodles’ was the highest at 23.2%, followed by ‘Lunch Box’ at 14.8% and ‘Instant Rice’ at 11.8%.
Looking at the actual use of delivery food after COVID-19, ‘at home’ was the highest at 41.4%, and for ‘people eating together’, ‘alone’ showed the highest at 87.0%. As for ‘monthly cost of purchase’, ‘less than 50,000 won - 100,000 won or more’ showed the highest rate at 32.7%. As for the ‘selection criteria’ for delivery food, ‘taste’ was the highest at 75.3%, and ‘convenience’ was the highest at 49.9% as ‘reason to purchase’. Also, ‘dinner’ was the highest at 60.5%, and ‘smartphone application’ showed the highest rate of 96.9% for ‘delivery order method’. Finally, the ‘satisfaction’ of delivery food was measured with a perfect score of 5, with an average score of 3.91. As for the types of delivery food consumed mainly, ‘fast food’ was the highest at 35.2%, followed by ‘sweet food’ at 15.8% and ‘Korean food’ at 12.8%.
If we look at the comparative analysis of the frequency of home convenience meals and delivery food intake and experience of non-face-to-face classes or telecommuting before and after the outbreak of COVID-19, first, those who answered ‘no experience’ in ‘non-face-to-face classes or working from home’ in the case of home convenience meals. In the case of ‘1-2 times a week’, ‘3-4 times a week’ and ‘5-6 times a week’ were 58.4%, and if you answered ‘Yes’, ‘1-2 times a week’ and a week the sum of ‘3-4 times’ and ‘5-6 times a week’ was 60.2%, and subjects who answered ‘have’ experience in class or telecommuting showed a higher rate of eating home convenience food, but there was no significant difference. In the case of delivery food, the sum of ‘1-2 times a week’, ‘3-4 times a week’ and ‘5-6 times a week’ was 69.4% of the respondents who answered ‘no experience of non-face-to-face classes or telecommuting’. Among the subjects who answered ‘Yes’, the sum of ‘1-2 times a week’, ‘3-4 times a week’ and ‘5-6 times a week’ was 67.4%, indicating that they had experience of non-face-to-face classes or telecommuting. The percentage of respondents who answered was higher, but there was no significant difference. In a survey on the need for nutrition-related labeling and nutrition education when selecting delivery food, 87.0% of all respondents who answered ‘delivery food needs nutrition-related labeling’ answered ‘yes’, and only 92.2% of women answered ‘yes’, in the case of men, 80.6% of the respondents answered ‘yes’, which was higher for women (p<0.05). When asked the question ‘If there is a nutritional label on the delivery food, it will be helpful in menu selection’, the highest response was ‘yes’ at 84.6%. When asked whether they thought that ‘Korea's nutrition education system is well established’, 52.5% answered ‘no’ and 47.5% answered ‘yes’. In addition, to the question of ‘Have you received any education on nutrition labeling at schools or specialized institutions?’, the highest response was ‘Yes’ at 58.0%, and ‘Necessary’ to the question of whether ‘Nutrition education was necessary’ was answered at 58.0. % was the highest. Also, for ‘reasons for the need for education on nutrition labeling’, ‘for correct food intake and health promotion’ was found at 40.7%, and for women, ‘for correct food intake and health promotion’ was the highest with 54.2%. It was high, and in the case of men, it was the highest at 43.9% for ‘acquiring correct nutritional knowledge’(p<0.001). Lastly, to the question of ‘effective nutrition education method’ the highest response was ‘Make it possible to receive nutrition labeling education at school or at work’ with 58.6%.
As the results of this study showed that the consumption of home convenience food and delivery food increased due to the outbreak of COVID-19, it was confirmed that COVID-19 had an effect on the eating habits and eating behavior of some 20s in Busan. In addition, nutrition labeling is helpful when selecting delivery food, and the need for expansion and publicity of the nutrition education system can be confirmed. Through this, it was possible to confirm the need to develop nutrition education and programs for 20s who can self-regulate and choose their eating habits and eating behavior in a pandemic situation such as COVID-19.
주제어
#COVID-19 식습관 배달음식 가정간편식 영양표시 영양교육
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.