Research groups in the field of urban environmental issues and crisis management have focused their attention on two major challenges. The former tries to find effective responses to the climate crisis, and the latter stresses appropriate ways geared towards environmental governance. In short, respo...
Research groups in the field of urban environmental issues and crisis management have focused their attention on two major challenges. The former tries to find effective responses to the climate crisis, and the latter stresses appropriate ways geared towards environmental governance. In short, responding to the climate crisis implies the ends, and the development of environmental governance examines the means. The temporal scope of the study covers from 1995 to 2023, the last 30 years. This period can be said to be the period when environmental governance in local communities has been in full swing. The spatial scope spans Chungcheongbuk-do and related watersheds. The key contents deal with representative environmental governance cases in the Chungbuk and its neighboring region. Among 280 environmental cases, 14 representative environmental governance cases are selected through screening, categorization, and integration processes. The research methodology basically involves five steps: firstly, standardization of environmental governance cases; secondly, establishment of analysis factors and attributing classification; thirdly, comparative * A thesis for the degree of Doctor in February 2024. analyses and implications; fourthly, development of environmental governance evaluation indicators; fifthly, surveying experts and verifying implications, sixthly, setting the direction of environmental governance development and meta-governance construction, and seventhly, presenting couples of meta-governance models for climate crisis response. Concerned with research findings, this study derives seven principles and directions for building meta-governance in response to the climate crisis. First of all, there must be a societal consensus or commitment on the need to build meta-governance. Here, meta-governance functions as powerful tools for mobilizing broad participation and cooperation to address the climate crisis. Secondly, it is necessary to build consensus on the principles of win-win and cooperation. This study emphasizes the fact that major stakeholders should do their best for the proposed inclusive community that respects and considers different perspectives, viewpoints, interests, and political views. Thirdly, the meta-governance system should encompass the functions of policy consultation and action cooperation. Policy councils and action networks involving various units can be organized by sector, issue, and region. Fourthly, this study urges establishing action cooperation business platforms to lead the carbon-neutral citizen action movement. It should present joint action plans and common processes, link sectoral action activities with comprehensive action activities, and establish a virtuous cycle business structure to increase activity. Fifthly, this study examines alternative ways to organize, broaden and deepen the participation of a wide range of citizens and various social groups. Appropriate incentives can be provided to villages, schools, churches, civic organizations, and others, and voluntary actions can be encouraged according to the conditions and characteristics of the participating organizations. The final task is given to integrating them into the decision-making process of the meta-governance system. Sixthly, this study proposes that an efficient and rational governance system should be organized. It should be civil society-led and supported by the executive branch. In addition, it should have basic staffing and budgeting, and be able to share information and make resources available. Seventhly, institutionalization measures such as the enactment of relevant ordinances should be prepared for the stable operation of meta-governance. Finally, in terms of case application, this study presents a series of meta-governance construction plans that can be applied to the Chungbuk region along with policy environment analyses based on the TOWS principles. For the future plans and actions, this study urges concrete ways to build meta-governance as practical alternatives in responding to the climate crisis. In the future, it expects that detailed studies and discussions on building regional, sectoral, and issue-specific governance are required. It is also necessary to support the establishment of meta-governance at the national level through case studies of environmental governance across the country. Keywords: climate crisis, climate crisis response, environmental governance, meta-governance, cooperation system, implementation plan
Research groups in the field of urban environmental issues and crisis management have focused their attention on two major challenges. The former tries to find effective responses to the climate crisis, and the latter stresses appropriate ways geared towards environmental governance. In short, responding to the climate crisis implies the ends, and the development of environmental governance examines the means. The temporal scope of the study covers from 1995 to 2023, the last 30 years. This period can be said to be the period when environmental governance in local communities has been in full swing. The spatial scope spans Chungcheongbuk-do and related watersheds. The key contents deal with representative environmental governance cases in the Chungbuk and its neighboring region. Among 280 environmental cases, 14 representative environmental governance cases are selected through screening, categorization, and integration processes. The research methodology basically involves five steps: firstly, standardization of environmental governance cases; secondly, establishment of analysis factors and attributing classification; thirdly, comparative * A thesis for the degree of Doctor in February 2024. analyses and implications; fourthly, development of environmental governance evaluation indicators; fifthly, surveying experts and verifying implications, sixthly, setting the direction of environmental governance development and meta-governance construction, and seventhly, presenting couples of meta-governance models for climate crisis response. Concerned with research findings, this study derives seven principles and directions for building meta-governance in response to the climate crisis. First of all, there must be a societal consensus or commitment on the need to build meta-governance. Here, meta-governance functions as powerful tools for mobilizing broad participation and cooperation to address the climate crisis. Secondly, it is necessary to build consensus on the principles of win-win and cooperation. This study emphasizes the fact that major stakeholders should do their best for the proposed inclusive community that respects and considers different perspectives, viewpoints, interests, and political views. Thirdly, the meta-governance system should encompass the functions of policy consultation and action cooperation. Policy councils and action networks involving various units can be organized by sector, issue, and region. Fourthly, this study urges establishing action cooperation business platforms to lead the carbon-neutral citizen action movement. It should present joint action plans and common processes, link sectoral action activities with comprehensive action activities, and establish a virtuous cycle business structure to increase activity. Fifthly, this study examines alternative ways to organize, broaden and deepen the participation of a wide range of citizens and various social groups. Appropriate incentives can be provided to villages, schools, churches, civic organizations, and others, and voluntary actions can be encouraged according to the conditions and characteristics of the participating organizations. The final task is given to integrating them into the decision-making process of the meta-governance system. Sixthly, this study proposes that an efficient and rational governance system should be organized. It should be civil society-led and supported by the executive branch. In addition, it should have basic staffing and budgeting, and be able to share information and make resources available. Seventhly, institutionalization measures such as the enactment of relevant ordinances should be prepared for the stable operation of meta-governance. Finally, in terms of case application, this study presents a series of meta-governance construction plans that can be applied to the Chungbuk region along with policy environment analyses based on the TOWS principles. For the future plans and actions, this study urges concrete ways to build meta-governance as practical alternatives in responding to the climate crisis. In the future, it expects that detailed studies and discussions on building regional, sectoral, and issue-specific governance are required. It is also necessary to support the establishment of meta-governance at the national level through case studies of environmental governance across the country. Keywords: climate crisis, climate crisis response, environmental governance, meta-governance, cooperation system, implementation plan
주제어
#climate crisis climate crisis response environmental governance meta-governance cooperation system implementation plan
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.