본고(本稿)는 선거가 선거기간을 전후해서 어떻게 경제에 충격을 주고 이러한 충격의 여파로 경제는 선거후에 어떻게 영향을 받는지를 "베이지안" 벡터자기회귀모형(自己回歸模型)을 이용하여 분석하였다. 계수(係數)를 수정하면서 선거기간에 대해 예측을 할 경우의 예측오차의 평균으로 선거의 충격효과를 계산해 보면 선거는 선거전, 선거분기 및 선거후분기에 본원통화(本源通貨), 물가(物價), 생산(生産), 이자율(利子率), 투자(投資) 등에 상당한 충격을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 과거의 선거(選擧), 특히 80년대 이후 선거중에는 대체로 현금통화(現金通貨) 및 본원통화(本源通貨)가 선거 기간중 증가하고 선거후 환수된다. 이에 따른 유동성(流動性)의 변화(變化)로 금리(金利)는 선거기간중 약간 하락하고 선거후 다시 증가하는 양상을 보였다. 선거기간중(選擧期間中) 생산(生産) 및 고용(雇傭)은 선거에 따른 운동원차출(運動員差出) 및 조업감소(操業減少) 등의 영향으로 감소하나, 선거후에는 선거중의 생산감소(生産減少)를 상쇄(相殺)할 만큼 증대(增大)하는 것으로 나타났다. 선거(選擧)에 따른 물가(物價)의 충격(衝擊)은 주로 선거전분기에 나타났다. 이러한 과거의 선거기간중의 양태가 1992년의 각 선거에서 되풀이되고 총선과 대통령선거가 실시될 경우를 가상해서 그 효과를 시산(試算)해 보면 선거(選擧)로 인한 상당한 유동성증대(流動性增大)가 본원통화를 중심으로 예상되는 가운데, 소비자물가(消費者物價)가 1992년중 약 2%포인트, 1993년에 2.5%포인트 상승할 것으로 나타났다. 반면 선거로 인한 소비증대(消費增大)나 생산감소(生産減少) 등의 효과는 상대적으로 작을 것으로 예상되는 한편, 자금흐름의 왜곡이 발생하여 유동성이 증가했음에도 불구하고 생산자금은 압박을 받게 되어 투자(投資)가 부진해질 것으로 나타났다. 또한 이러한 선거의 효과는 1992년중 지방자치단체장선거가 실시될 경우 크게 확대된다.
본고(本稿)는 선거가 선거기간을 전후해서 어떻게 경제에 충격을 주고 이러한 충격의 여파로 경제는 선거후에 어떻게 영향을 받는지를 "베이지안" 벡터자기회귀모형(自己回歸模型)을 이용하여 분석하였다. 계수(係數)를 수정하면서 선거기간에 대해 예측을 할 경우의 예측오차의 평균으로 선거의 충격효과를 계산해 보면 선거는 선거전, 선거분기 및 선거후분기에 본원통화(本源通貨), 물가(物價), 생산(生産), 이자율(利子率), 투자(投資) 등에 상당한 충격을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 과거의 선거(選擧), 특히 80년대 이후 선거중에는 대체로 현금통화(現金通貨) 및 본원통화(本源通貨)가 선거 기간중 증가하고 선거후 환수된다. 이에 따른 유동성(流動性)의 변화(變化)로 금리(金利)는 선거기간중 약간 하락하고 선거후 다시 증가하는 양상을 보였다. 선거기간중(選擧期間中) 생산(生産) 및 고용(雇傭)은 선거에 따른 운동원차출(運動員差出) 및 조업감소(操業減少) 등의 영향으로 감소하나, 선거후에는 선거중의 생산감소(生産減少)를 상쇄(相殺)할 만큼 증대(增大)하는 것으로 나타났다. 선거(選擧)에 따른 물가(物價)의 충격(衝擊)은 주로 선거전분기에 나타났다. 이러한 과거의 선거기간중의 양태가 1992년의 각 선거에서 되풀이되고 총선과 대통령선거가 실시될 경우를 가상해서 그 효과를 시산(試算)해 보면 선거(選擧)로 인한 상당한 유동성증대(流動性增大)가 본원통화를 중심으로 예상되는 가운데, 소비자물가(消費者物價)가 1992년중 약 2%포인트, 1993년에 2.5%포인트 상승할 것으로 나타났다. 반면 선거로 인한 소비증대(消費增大)나 생산감소(生産減少) 등의 효과는 상대적으로 작을 것으로 예상되는 한편, 자금흐름의 왜곡이 발생하여 유동성이 증가했음에도 불구하고 생산자금은 압박을 받게 되어 투자(投資)가 부진해질 것으로 나타났다. 또한 이러한 선거의 효과는 1992년중 지방자치단체장선거가 실시될 경우 크게 확대된다.
This paper analyzes the macroeconomic effects of elections on the Korean economy and their future ramifications. It measures the shocks to the Korean economy caused by elections by taking the average of sample forecast errors from four major elections held in the 1980s. The seven variables' Bayesian...
This paper analyzes the macroeconomic effects of elections on the Korean economy and their future ramifications. It measures the shocks to the Korean economy caused by elections by taking the average of sample forecast errors from four major elections held in the 1980s. The seven variables' Bayesian Vector Autoregression Model which includes the Monetary Base, Industrial Production, Consumption, Consumer Price, Exports, and Investment is based on the quarterly time series data starting from 1970 and is updated every quarter before forecasts are made for the next quarter. Because of this updating of coefficients, which reflects in part the rapid structural changes of the Korean economy, this study can capture the shock effect of elections, which is not possible when using election dummies with a fixed coefficient model. In past elections, especially the elections held in the 1980s, $M_2$ did not show any particular movement, but the currency and base money increased during the quarter of the election was held and the increment was partly recalled in the next quarter. The liquidity of interest rates as measured by corporate bond yields fell during the quarter the election and then rose in the following quarter, which is somewhat contrary to the general concern that interest rates will increase during election periods. Manufacturing employment fell in the quarter of the election because workers turned into campaigners. This decline in employment combined with voting holiday produce a sizeable decline in industrial production during the quarter in which elections are held, but production catches up in the next quarter and sometimes more than offsets the disruption caused during the election quarter. The major shocks to price occur in the previous quarter, reflecting the expectational effect and the relaxation of government price control before the election when we simulate the impulse responses of the VAR model, imposing the same shocks that was measured in the past elections for each election to be held in 1992 and assuming that the elections in 1992 will affect the economy in the same manner as in the 1980s elections, 1992 is expected to see a sizeable increase in monetary base due to election and prices increase pressure will be amplified substantially. On the other hand, the consumption increase due to election is expected to be relatively small and the production will not decrease. Despite increased liquidity, a large portion of liquidity in circulation being used as election funds will distort the flow of funds and aggravate the fund shortage causing investments in plant and equipment and construction activities to stagnate. These effects will be greatly amplified if elections for the head of local government are going to be held this year. If mayoral and gubernatorial elections are held after National Assembly elections, their effect on prices and investment will be approximately double what they normally will have been have only congressional and presidential elections been held. Even when mayoral and gubernatorial elections are held at the same time as congressional elections, the elections of local government heads are shown to add substantial effects to the economy for the year. The above results are based on the assumption that this year's elections will shock the economy in the same manner as in past elections. However, elections in consecutive quarters do not give the economy a chance to pause and recuperate from past elections. This year's elections may have greater effects on prices and production than shown in the model's simulations because campaigners' return to industry may be delayed. Therefore, we may not see a rapid recall of money after elections. In view of the surge in the monetary base and price escalation in the periods before and after elections, economic management in 1992 should place its first priority on controlling the monetary aggregate, in particular, stabilizing the growth of the mon
This paper analyzes the macroeconomic effects of elections on the Korean economy and their future ramifications. It measures the shocks to the Korean economy caused by elections by taking the average of sample forecast errors from four major elections held in the 1980s. The seven variables' Bayesian Vector Autoregression Model which includes the Monetary Base, Industrial Production, Consumption, Consumer Price, Exports, and Investment is based on the quarterly time series data starting from 1970 and is updated every quarter before forecasts are made for the next quarter. Because of this updating of coefficients, which reflects in part the rapid structural changes of the Korean economy, this study can capture the shock effect of elections, which is not possible when using election dummies with a fixed coefficient model. In past elections, especially the elections held in the 1980s, $M_2$ did not show any particular movement, but the currency and base money increased during the quarter of the election was held and the increment was partly recalled in the next quarter. The liquidity of interest rates as measured by corporate bond yields fell during the quarter the election and then rose in the following quarter, which is somewhat contrary to the general concern that interest rates will increase during election periods. Manufacturing employment fell in the quarter of the election because workers turned into campaigners. This decline in employment combined with voting holiday produce a sizeable decline in industrial production during the quarter in which elections are held, but production catches up in the next quarter and sometimes more than offsets the disruption caused during the election quarter. The major shocks to price occur in the previous quarter, reflecting the expectational effect and the relaxation of government price control before the election when we simulate the impulse responses of the VAR model, imposing the same shocks that was measured in the past elections for each election to be held in 1992 and assuming that the elections in 1992 will affect the economy in the same manner as in the 1980s elections, 1992 is expected to see a sizeable increase in monetary base due to election and prices increase pressure will be amplified substantially. On the other hand, the consumption increase due to election is expected to be relatively small and the production will not decrease. Despite increased liquidity, a large portion of liquidity in circulation being used as election funds will distort the flow of funds and aggravate the fund shortage causing investments in plant and equipment and construction activities to stagnate. These effects will be greatly amplified if elections for the head of local government are going to be held this year. If mayoral and gubernatorial elections are held after National Assembly elections, their effect on prices and investment will be approximately double what they normally will have been have only congressional and presidential elections been held. Even when mayoral and gubernatorial elections are held at the same time as congressional elections, the elections of local government heads are shown to add substantial effects to the economy for the year. The above results are based on the assumption that this year's elections will shock the economy in the same manner as in past elections. However, elections in consecutive quarters do not give the economy a chance to pause and recuperate from past elections. This year's elections may have greater effects on prices and production than shown in the model's simulations because campaigners' return to industry may be delayed. Therefore, we may not see a rapid recall of money after elections. In view of the surge in the monetary base and price escalation in the periods before and after elections, economic management in 1992 should place its first priority on controlling the monetary aggregate, in particular, stabilizing the growth of the mon
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.