진양호소수의 효과적인 정수처리를 위한 최적응집제 주입량 결정 -콜로이드성 오염물질 처리를 위한 응집제 주입효과- Determination of Optimun Coagulant Dosage for Effective Water Treatment of Chinyang Lake -The Effect of Coagulant Dosing on Remoaval of Colloidal Pollutants-원문보기
상수원수의 효과적인 처리를 위한 최적 응집제 주입량을 결정하기 위하여 상수원수의 콜로이드성 오염물질 처리를 위한 Alum, PAC 및 PACS의 응집제 주입량별 탁도제거 및 원수특성변화를 조사한 결과는 다음과 같다. 최저 잔류탁도를 나타내는 최적 응집제 주입량은 원수의 탁도가 5NTU인 경우 Alum은 35mg/ι, PAC은 30mg/ι 및 PACS는 10mg/ι이었고, 원수의 탁도가 10NTU인 경우 Alum은 30mg/ι, PAC은 25mg/ι 및 PACS는 10mg/ι이었으며, 이때 침전시간 4분 및 8분대의 탁도제거율은 원수탁도 5NTU인 경우 Alum은 10 및 72%, PAC은 44 및 62%, PACS는 25 및 55%였고, 원수탁도 10NTU인 경우에는 Alum은 52 및 70%, PAC는 90 및 95%, PACS은 10 및 28%였다. PAC이 Alum 및 PACS에 비하여 floc형성속도와 침강성이 우수하고 탁도제거율도 높게 나타나 침전지내급수량 변동이 심하고 표면부하율이 과부하일 경우 PAC을 사용하는 것이 유리할 것으로 판단되었다. 원수의 탁도별 응집제 주입량에 따른 pH 및 알칼리도는 응집제 주입량이 증가할수록 감소되었으나 각 응집제 최대 주입량에서 pH는 음용수 수질기준인 pH 5.8이하로는 감소되지 않았으며, 알칼리도도 재탁현상이 일어날 수 있는 10mg/ι 이하로는 감소되지 않았다. 처리수준 잔류 Al은 원수탁도 5 및 10NTU인 경우 Alum과 PAC은 그 주입량이 저농도에서 고농도로 갈수록 잔류탁도가 감소함으로써 잔류 Al도 감소하였으나 PACS는 잔류탁도가 증가하는 주입량에서도 잔류 Al은 감소하였다. 수중 KMnO$_4$ 소비량은 응집제 주입량이 증가할수록 감소되었으며, 최저 잔류 탁도를 나타내는 최적 응집제 주입량에서의 KMnO$_4$ 소비량 감소율은 원수탁도 5NTU일 경우 PAC 39%, Alum 18% 및 PACS 11%였으며, 10NTU일 경우에는 PAC 42%, Alum 27% 및 PACS 36%로서 전반적으로 탁도제거율과 KMnO$_4$소비량간에는 일정한 경향이 없는 것으로 나타났다. 수중 TOC는 응집제 주입량이 증가함에 따라 약간씩 감소되었으나 응집제 주입량 30mg/ι 이후부터는 일정 수준으로 유지되었으며, 감소되는 정도는 PACS ＞PAC ＞Alum순이었다. 최저 잔류탁도를 나타내는 최적 응집제 주입량에서의 Zeta potential은 원수탁도가 5NTU일 경우 Alum, PAC 및 PACS 모두 -20mV∼-15mV사이였으며, 원수 탁도가 10NTU인 경우에는 0∼0.5mV 범위에 있는 것으로 나타나 응집제 종류 및 주입량이 상이하더라도 응집효율이 가장 양호한 상태에서의 Zeta potential은 일정한 범위내에 있는 것으로 나타났다.
상수원수의 효과적인 처리를 위한 최적 응집제 주입량을 결정하기 위하여 상수원수의 콜로이드성 오염물질 처리를 위한 Alum, PAC 및 PACS의 응집제 주입량별 탁도제거 및 원수특성변화를 조사한 결과는 다음과 같다. 최저 잔류탁도를 나타내는 최적 응집제 주입량은 원수의 탁도가 5NTU인 경우 Alum은 35mg/ι, PAC은 30mg/ι 및 PACS는 10mg/ι이었고, 원수의 탁도가 10NTU인 경우 Alum은 30mg/ι, PAC은 25mg/ι 및 PACS는 10mg/ι이었으며, 이때 침전시간 4분 및 8분대의 탁도제거율은 원수탁도 5NTU인 경우 Alum은 10 및 72%, PAC은 44 및 62%, PACS는 25 및 55%였고, 원수탁도 10NTU인 경우에는 Alum은 52 및 70%, PAC는 90 및 95%, PACS은 10 및 28%였다. PAC이 Alum 및 PACS에 비하여 floc형성속도와 침강성이 우수하고 탁도제거율도 높게 나타나 침전지내급수량 변동이 심하고 표면부하율이 과부하일 경우 PAC을 사용하는 것이 유리할 것으로 판단되었다. 원수의 탁도별 응집제 주입량에 따른 pH 및 알칼리도는 응집제 주입량이 증가할수록 감소되었으나 각 응집제 최대 주입량에서 pH는 음용수 수질기준인 pH 5.8이하로는 감소되지 않았으며, 알칼리도도 재탁현상이 일어날 수 있는 10mg/ι 이하로는 감소되지 않았다. 처리수준 잔류 Al은 원수탁도 5 및 10NTU인 경우 Alum과 PAC은 그 주입량이 저농도에서 고농도로 갈수록 잔류탁도가 감소함으로써 잔류 Al도 감소하였으나 PACS는 잔류탁도가 증가하는 주입량에서도 잔류 Al은 감소하였다. 수중 KMnO$_4$ 소비량은 응집제 주입량이 증가할수록 감소되었으며, 최저 잔류 탁도를 나타내는 최적 응집제 주입량에서의 KMnO$_4$ 소비량 감소율은 원수탁도 5NTU일 경우 PAC 39%, Alum 18% 및 PACS 11%였으며, 10NTU일 경우에는 PAC 42%, Alum 27% 및 PACS 36%로서 전반적으로 탁도제거율과 KMnO$_4$소비량간에는 일정한 경향이 없는 것으로 나타났다. 수중 TOC는 응집제 주입량이 증가함에 따라 약간씩 감소되었으나 응집제 주입량 30mg/ι 이후부터는 일정 수준으로 유지되었으며, 감소되는 정도는 PACS ＞PAC ＞Alum순이었다. 최저 잔류탁도를 나타내는 최적 응집제 주입량에서의 Zeta potential은 원수탁도가 5NTU일 경우 Alum, PAC 및 PACS 모두 -20mV∼-15mV사이였으며, 원수 탁도가 10NTU인 경우에는 0∼0.5mV 범위에 있는 것으로 나타나 응집제 종류 및 주입량이 상이하더라도 응집효율이 가장 양호한 상태에서의 Zeta potential은 일정한 범위내에 있는 것으로 나타났다.
This study was performed to determine the optimum coagulant dosing amount for effective treatment of raw water. The removal rate of turbidity and the variations of water qualities according to various dosage of coagulants such as Alum, PAC and PACS were investigated. The optimum coagulant dosing amo...
This study was performed to determine the optimum coagulant dosing amount for effective treatment of raw water. The removal rate of turbidity and the variations of water qualities according to various dosage of coagulants such as Alum, PAC and PACS were investigated. The optimum coagulant dosing amount to make the lowest turbidity of water were 35mg/ι t of Alum, 30mg/ι of PAC and 10mg/ι of PACS in case of 5 NTU of raw water turbidity, and 30mg/ι of Alum, 25mg/ι of PAC and 10mg/ι of PACS in case of 10 NTU of that, respectively. The removal rates of turbidity at 4 min. and 8 min. of settling time were 10 and 72% of Alum, 44 and 62% of PAC and 25 and 55% of PACS in case of 5 NTU, and 52 and 70% of Alum, 90 and 95% of PAC and 10 and 28% of PACS in case of 10 NTU, respectively. Judging from the settling capability of floc., the reaction time of floe. formation and removal efficiency of turbidity, PAC was evaluated as more effective coagulant than Alum and PACS. Also PAC was regarded as the most effective coagulant when the water supply was changed sharply and the fluctuation of the surface loading occured with wide and sharp in settling basin. pH and alkalinity of the water were decreased with increasing coagulants dosage. But pH and alkalinity were not decreased below 5.8 which is the standard for drinking water quality, and 10mg/ι which is the limit concentration of floc. breakage, respectively. Residual Al of the treated water was decreased with increasing coagulants dosage in case of 5 and 10NTU of raw water turbidity. $KMnO_4$ consumption of the water was decreased with increasing coagulants dosage. The reduction rate of $KMnO_4$ consumption at the optimum coagulants dosage were 39% of Alum. 18% of PAC and 11% of PACS in case of 5 NTU of raw water turbidity, and 42% of Alum, 27% of PAC and 36% of PACS in case of 10 NTU of that, respectively. Any relationship was not found between the removal rate of turbidity and KMnO$_4$ consumption. TOC of the water was a bit decreased with increasing coagulants dosage up to 30mg/ι but not changed above 30mg/ι of coagulants dosage. The degree of TOC reduction was increased in the order of Alum, PAC and PACS treatment. Zeta potential of the colloidal floe. at the optimum coagulants dosage was in the range of -20~-15mV in case of 5 NTU of raw water turbidity and 0~0.5mV in case of 10 NTU of that. respectively. Although the kinds and dosages of coagulants were different, zeta potential range were fixed under the conditions of the best coagulation efficiency.
This study was performed to determine the optimum coagulant dosing amount for effective treatment of raw water. The removal rate of turbidity and the variations of water qualities according to various dosage of coagulants such as Alum, PAC and PACS were investigated. The optimum coagulant dosing amount to make the lowest turbidity of water were 35mg/ι t of Alum, 30mg/ι of PAC and 10mg/ι of PACS in case of 5 NTU of raw water turbidity, and 30mg/ι of Alum, 25mg/ι of PAC and 10mg/ι of PACS in case of 10 NTU of that, respectively. The removal rates of turbidity at 4 min. and 8 min. of settling time were 10 and 72% of Alum, 44 and 62% of PAC and 25 and 55% of PACS in case of 5 NTU, and 52 and 70% of Alum, 90 and 95% of PAC and 10 and 28% of PACS in case of 10 NTU, respectively. Judging from the settling capability of floc., the reaction time of floe. formation and removal efficiency of turbidity, PAC was evaluated as more effective coagulant than Alum and PACS. Also PAC was regarded as the most effective coagulant when the water supply was changed sharply and the fluctuation of the surface loading occured with wide and sharp in settling basin. pH and alkalinity of the water were decreased with increasing coagulants dosage. But pH and alkalinity were not decreased below 5.8 which is the standard for drinking water quality, and 10mg/ι which is the limit concentration of floc. breakage, respectively. Residual Al of the treated water was decreased with increasing coagulants dosage in case of 5 and 10NTU of raw water turbidity. $KMnO_4$ consumption of the water was decreased with increasing coagulants dosage. The reduction rate of $KMnO_4$ consumption at the optimum coagulants dosage were 39% of Alum. 18% of PAC and 11% of PACS in case of 5 NTU of raw water turbidity, and 42% of Alum, 27% of PAC and 36% of PACS in case of 10 NTU of that, respectively. Any relationship was not found between the removal rate of turbidity and KMnO$_4$ consumption. TOC of the water was a bit decreased with increasing coagulants dosage up to 30mg/ι but not changed above 30mg/ι of coagulants dosage. The degree of TOC reduction was increased in the order of Alum, PAC and PACS treatment. Zeta potential of the colloidal floe. at the optimum coagulants dosage was in the range of -20~-15mV in case of 5 NTU of raw water turbidity and 0~0.5mV in case of 10 NTU of that. respectively. Although the kinds and dosages of coagulants were different, zeta potential range were fixed under the conditions of the best coagulation efficiency.
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.