목적 : 방사선조사후 세포의 생존 분획은 세포집락 측정기법으로 확인하는 것이 표준이나 많은 비용과 시간이 소요되는 단점을 갖고 있다. 이에 생존 세포의 tetrazolium염의 자색 formazan 침전물로의 환원시키는 능력에 그 기반을 둔 MTT 기법을 사용하여 세포집락 측정기법을 대체하기 위한 기법으로서의 유용성과 그 실행상의 최적조건을 규명하고자 하였다. 방법 : PCI-1, SNU-1066, NCI-H630, RKO등의 세포주에 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 Gy의 방사선을 조사한 후 세포집락 측정 기법과 MTT기법으로 세포 생존 분획을 조사하였다. 세포집락 측정기법은 $25\;cm^2$폴리스티렌 배양 플라스크에 방사선량에 따라 다른 수의 세포를 분주한 후 24시간 동안 배양 후 방사선을 조사하였고 이를 $10\~14$일 동안 배양 후 염색하여 생성된 세포집락의 수를 측정하였다. MTT기법은 침전물의 용해과정이 필요없는 Premix WST-1 시약을 이용하여 시행하였다. MTT기법은 각각의 세포주에서 세포수와 흡광도간의 선형관계와 최적 실험조건을 확인한 이후 시행하였다. 이 기법은 방사선을 조사받은 세포에서는 지수적 성장을 회복한 이후와 방사선을 조사받지 않은 세포는 4회 이상의 세포분열을 거친 후에 시행하였다. 세포집락 측정기법 및 MTT기법을 통하여 얻은 세포 생존율을 구한 후 이를 지표로 비교하였다. 결과 : 각 기법으로 얻은 세포 생존율의 표준편차는 $5\%$ 내외였다. 2가지 방법으로 구한 세포 생존율은 t-test로 비교하였을 때 $0\~4\;Gy$에서는 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었으며 회귀분석 결과는 선형적 관계가 있었다$(R^2=0.975-0.992)$. MTT 기법의 시행에 최적인 세포수는 배양효율에 따라 다른 것으로 나타났는데, 배양효율이 $30\%$ 이상이면 300개 이하가, $30\%$ 미만인 경우는 $500\~1,000$개가 적당한 것으로 확인되었다. MTT기법은 6 배가시간 경과 이후에 시행하는 것이 세포집락 측정기법과 가장 근접하였으며 적어도 4 배가시간 이후에 시행하는 것이 필요할 것으로 사료되었다. 이에 따르면 배가시간이 3일 이하인 세포주가 세포 민감성 측정방법으로서 MTT 기법이 세포 집락 측정 기법을 대체하여 사용하기에 적합한 것으로 사료되었다. 결론 : 이상에서, MTT기법을 이용하여 방사선조사 후의 세포생존을 측정하기 위해서는 예비실험을 통해 각 세포주에서의 최적의 조건을 찾는 것이 필수적이며 이 조건하에서 MTT기법을 시행해야만 방사선에 의한 세포 민감성 측정에 이용될 수 있음을 확인하였다.
목적 : 방사선조사후 세포의 생존 분획은 세포집락 측정기법으로 확인하는 것이 표준이나 많은 비용과 시간이 소요되는 단점을 갖고 있다. 이에 생존 세포의 tetrazolium염의 자색 formazan 침전물로의 환원시키는 능력에 그 기반을 둔 MTT 기법을 사용하여 세포집락 측정기법을 대체하기 위한 기법으로서의 유용성과 그 실행상의 최적조건을 규명하고자 하였다. 방법 : PCI-1, SNU-1066, NCI-H630, RKO등의 세포주에 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 Gy의 방사선을 조사한 후 세포집락 측정 기법과 MTT기법으로 세포 생존 분획을 조사하였다. 세포집락 측정기법은 $25\;cm^2$ 폴리스티렌 배양 플라스크에 방사선량에 따라 다른 수의 세포를 분주한 후 24시간 동안 배양 후 방사선을 조사하였고 이를 $10\~14$일 동안 배양 후 염색하여 생성된 세포집락의 수를 측정하였다. MTT기법은 침전물의 용해과정이 필요없는 Premix WST-1 시약을 이용하여 시행하였다. MTT기법은 각각의 세포주에서 세포수와 흡광도간의 선형관계와 최적 실험조건을 확인한 이후 시행하였다. 이 기법은 방사선을 조사받은 세포에서는 지수적 성장을 회복한 이후와 방사선을 조사받지 않은 세포는 4회 이상의 세포분열을 거친 후에 시행하였다. 세포집락 측정기법 및 MTT기법을 통하여 얻은 세포 생존율을 구한 후 이를 지표로 비교하였다. 결과 : 각 기법으로 얻은 세포 생존율의 표준편차는 $5\%$ 내외였다. 2가지 방법으로 구한 세포 생존율은 t-test로 비교하였을 때 $0\~4\;Gy$에서는 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었으며 회귀분석 결과는 선형적 관계가 있었다$(R^2=0.975-0.992)$. MTT 기법의 시행에 최적인 세포수는 배양효율에 따라 다른 것으로 나타났는데, 배양효율이 $30\%$ 이상이면 300개 이하가, $30\%$ 미만인 경우는 $500\~1,000$개가 적당한 것으로 확인되었다. MTT기법은 6 배가시간 경과 이후에 시행하는 것이 세포집락 측정기법과 가장 근접하였으며 적어도 4 배가시간 이후에 시행하는 것이 필요할 것으로 사료되었다. 이에 따르면 배가시간이 3일 이하인 세포주가 세포 민감성 측정방법으로서 MTT 기법이 세포 집락 측정 기법을 대체하여 사용하기에 적합한 것으로 사료되었다. 결론 : 이상에서, MTT기법을 이용하여 방사선조사 후의 세포생존을 측정하기 위해서는 예비실험을 통해 각 세포주에서의 최적의 조건을 찾는 것이 필수적이며 이 조건하에서 MTT기법을 시행해야만 방사선에 의한 세포 민감성 측정에 이용될 수 있음을 확인하였다.
Purpose : The measurement of radiation survival using a clonogenic assay, the established standard, can be difficult and time consuming. In this study, We have used the MTT assay, based on the reduction of a tetrazolium salt to a purple formazan precipitate by living cells, as a substitution for clo...
Purpose : The measurement of radiation survival using a clonogenic assay, the established standard, can be difficult and time consuming. In this study, We have used the MTT assay, based on the reduction of a tetrazolium salt to a purple formazan precipitate by living cells, as a substitution for clonogenic assay and have examined the optimal condition for performing this assay in determination of radiation sensitivity. Materials and Methods : Four human cancer cell lines - PCI-1, SNU-1066, NCI-H630 and RKO cells have been used. For each cell line, a clonogenic assay and a MTT assay using Premix WST-1 solution, which is one of the tetrazolium salts and does not require washing or solubilization of the precipitate were carried out after irradiation of 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 Gy. For clonogenic assay, cells in $25\;cm^2$ flasks were irradiated after overnight incubation and the resultant colonies containing more than 50 cells were scored after culturing the cells for $10\~14$ days. For MTT assay, the relationship between absorbance and cell number, optimal seeding cell number, and optimal timing of assay was determined. Then, MTT assay was performed when the irradiated cells had regained exponential growth or when the non-irradiated cells had undergone four or more doubling times. Results : There was minimal variation in the values gained from these two methods with the standard deviation generally less than $5\%$, and there were no statistically significant differences between two methods according to t-test in low radiation dose (below 6 Gy). The regression analyses showed high linear correlation with the $R^2$ value of $0.975\~0.992$ between data from the two different methods. The optimal cell numbers for MTT assay were found to be dependent on plating efficiency of used cell line. Less than 300 cells/well were appropriate for cells with high plating efficiency (more than $30\%$). For cells with low plating efficiency (less than $30\%$), 500 cells/well or more were appropriate for assay. The optimal time for MTT assay was after 6 doubling times for the results compatible with those of clonogenic assay, at least after 4 doubling times was required for valid results. In consideration of practical limits of assay (12 days, in this study) cells with doubling time more than 3 days were inappropriate for application. Conclusion : In conclusion, it is found that MTT assay can successfully replace clonogenic assay of tested cancer cell lines after irradiation only if MTT assay was undertaken with optimal assay conditions that included plating efficiency of each cell line and doubling time at least.
Purpose : The measurement of radiation survival using a clonogenic assay, the established standard, can be difficult and time consuming. In this study, We have used the MTT assay, based on the reduction of a tetrazolium salt to a purple formazan precipitate by living cells, as a substitution for clonogenic assay and have examined the optimal condition for performing this assay in determination of radiation sensitivity. Materials and Methods : Four human cancer cell lines - PCI-1, SNU-1066, NCI-H630 and RKO cells have been used. For each cell line, a clonogenic assay and a MTT assay using Premix WST-1 solution, which is one of the tetrazolium salts and does not require washing or solubilization of the precipitate were carried out after irradiation of 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 Gy. For clonogenic assay, cells in $25\;cm^2$ flasks were irradiated after overnight incubation and the resultant colonies containing more than 50 cells were scored after culturing the cells for $10\~14$ days. For MTT assay, the relationship between absorbance and cell number, optimal seeding cell number, and optimal timing of assay was determined. Then, MTT assay was performed when the irradiated cells had regained exponential growth or when the non-irradiated cells had undergone four or more doubling times. Results : There was minimal variation in the values gained from these two methods with the standard deviation generally less than $5\%$, and there were no statistically significant differences between two methods according to t-test in low radiation dose (below 6 Gy). The regression analyses showed high linear correlation with the $R^2$ value of $0.975\~0.992$ between data from the two different methods. The optimal cell numbers for MTT assay were found to be dependent on plating efficiency of used cell line. Less than 300 cells/well were appropriate for cells with high plating efficiency (more than $30\%$). For cells with low plating efficiency (less than $30\%$), 500 cells/well or more were appropriate for assay. The optimal time for MTT assay was after 6 doubling times for the results compatible with those of clonogenic assay, at least after 4 doubling times was required for valid results. In consideration of practical limits of assay (12 days, in this study) cells with doubling time more than 3 days were inappropriate for application. Conclusion : In conclusion, it is found that MTT assay can successfully replace clonogenic assay of tested cancer cell lines after irradiation only if MTT assay was undertaken with optimal assay conditions that included plating efficiency of each cell line and doubling time at least.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
문제 정의
This study has examined the use of the MTT assay as an alternative to the clonogenic assay and the optimal condition for performing this assay for the determination of radiation sensitivity.
제안 방법
The contr이 SNU-1066 plates were inoculated with 500 cells, with higher cell numbers for the irradiated plates. After an ovemight incubation in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37℃, irradiation was carried out at room temperature over a dose range of 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 Gy in PCI-1 cells and 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 Gy in NCI-H630, RKO and SNU-1066 cells using a Mark I Cs-137 irradiator (J.L. Shepherd & ass. Glendale, CA, USA). After culturing the cells for 10—14 days in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37℃, the resultant colonies were fixed with 100% methanol and stained with 0.
대상 데이터
All experiments were done in triplicate.
성능/효과
From the data of this study, the optimal timing of measurement of survival fraction in MTT assay were after 6 doubling times, at least, more than 4 doubling times were required for obtaining compatible results with the results from the clonogenic assay. In consideration of the assay condition; with the small volume of media (0.
The MTT assay used in this study gave reproducible results with the standard deviation being generally less than 5% except NQ-H630 (about 10%). These range of standard deviation may be due to variation in growth in culture of different cell inocula as well as experimental error.
Finally, the results from the plate with 625 cells/well were most appropriate for comparison with the results of the clonogenic assay. There were no significant differences between clonogenic assaays and MTT assays with the survival fraction of 0.315 (±0.017) for clonogenic assay and 0.338 (±0.051) at the radiation dose of 2 Gy, 0.075 (±0.004) for clonogenic assay and 0.111 (±0.029) for MTT assay at 4 Gy. Data for doses of 6 or 10 Gy showed statistical differences between two methods.
Finally, the results from the plate with 300 cells/well were most appropriate for comparison with the results of the clonogenic assay. There were no significant differences between clonogenic assays and MTT assays with the survival fraction of 0.775 (±0.008)2) for clonogenic assay and 0.711 (±0.059) at the radiation dose of 2 Gy, 0.279 (±0.009) for clonogenic assay and 0.268 (±0.057) for MTT assay at 4 Gy, 0.136 (±0.019), 0.042 (±0.037) for clonogenic assay and 0.105 (±0.028), 0.056 (±0.056) for MTT assay at 6 Gy, 10 Gy, respectively.
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.