[논문]뇌종양 환자의 3차원 입체조형 치료를 위한 뇌내 주요 부위의 모델치료계획의 개발

표홍렬; 이상훈; 김귀언; 금기창; 장세경; 서창옥

뇌종양 환자의 3차원 입체조형 치료를 위한 뇌내 주요 부위의 모델치료계획의 개발
Development of Model Plans in Three Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy for Brain Tumors 원문보기

대한방사선종양학회지 = The Journal of the Korean soceity for therapeutic radiology and oncology, v.20 no.1, 2002년, pp.1 - 16

표홍렬 (연세대학교 의과대학 방사선종양학교실, 연세암센터) , 이상훈 (국민건강보험공단 일산병원 치료방사선과) , 김귀언 (연세대학교 의과대학 방사선종양학교실, 연세암센터) , 금기창 (연세대학교 의과대학 방사선종양학교실, 연세암센터) , 장세경 (연세대학교 의과대학 방사선종양학교실, 연세암센터) , 서창옥 (연세대학교 의과대학 방사선종양학교실, 연세암센터)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Purpose : Three dimensional conformal radiotherapy planning is being used widely for the treatment of patients with brain tumor. However, it takes much time to develop an optimal treatment plan, therefore, it is difficult to apply this technique to all patients. To increase the efficiency of this technique, we need to develop standard radiotherapy plant for each site of the brain. Therefore we developed several 3 dimensional conformal radiotherapy plans (3D plans) for tumors at each site of brain, compared them with each other, and with 2 dimensional radiotherapy plans. Finally model plans for each site of the brain were decide. Materials and Methods : Imaginary tumors, with sizes commonly observed in the clinic, were designed for each site of the brain and drawn on CT images. The planning target volumes (PTVs) were as follows; temporal $tumor-5.7\times8.2\times7.6\;cm$, suprasellar $tumor-3\times4\times4.1\;cm$, thalamic $tumor-3.1\times5.9\times3.7\;cm$, frontoparietal $tumor-5.5\times7\times5.5\;cm$, and occipitoparietal $tumor-5\times5.5\times5\;cm$. Plans using paralled opposed 2 portals and/or 3 portals including fronto-vertex and 2 lateral fields were developed manually as the conventional 2D plans, and 3D noncoplanar conformal plans were developed using beam's eye view and the automatic block drawing tool. Total tumor dose was 54 Gy for a suprasellar tumor, 59.4 Gy and 72 Gy for the other tumors. All dose plans (including 2D plans) were calculated using 3D plan software. Developed plans were compared with each other using dose-volume histograms (DVH), normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) and variable dose statistic values (minimum, maximum and mean dose, D5, V83, V85 and V95). Finally a best radiotherapy plan for each site of brain was selected. Results : 1) Temporal tumor; NTCPs and DVHs of the normal tissue of all 3D plans were superior to 2D plans and this trend was more definite when total dose was escalated to 72 Gy (NTCPs of normal brain 2D $plans:27\%,\;8\%\rightarrow\;3D\;plans:1\%,\;1\%$). Various dose statistic values did not show any consistent trend. A 3D plan using 3 noncoplanar portals was selected as a model radiotherapy plan. 2) Suprasellar tumor; NTCPs of all 3D plans and 2D plans did not show significant difference because the total dose of this tumor was only 54 Gy. DVHs of normal brain and brainstem were significantly different for different plans. D5, V85, V95 and mean values showed some consistent trend that was compatible with DVH. All 3D plans were superior to 2D plans even when 3 portals (fronto-vertex and 2 lateral fields) were used for 2D plans. A 3D plan using 7 portals was worse than plans using fewer portals. A 3D plan using 5 noncoplanar portals was selected as a model plan. 3) Thalamic tumor; NTCPs of all 3D plans were lower than the 2D plans when the total dose was elevated to 72 Gy. DVHs of normal tissues showed similar results. V83, V85, V95 showed some consistent differences between plans but not between 3D plans. 3D plans using 5 noncoplanar portals were selected as a model plan. 4) Parietal (fronto- and occipito-) tumors; all NTCPs of the normal brain in 3D plans were lower than in 2D plans. DVH also showed the same results. V83, V85, V95 showed consistent trends with NTCP and DVH. 3D plans using 5 portals for frontoparietal tumor and 6 portals for occipitoparietal tumor were selected as model plans. Conclusion : NTCP and DVH showed reasonable differences between plans and were through to be useful for comparing plans. All 3D plans were superior to 2D plans. Best 3D plans were selected for tumors in each site of brain using NTCP, DVH and finally by the planner's decision.

주제어

참고문헌 (24)

Rubin P, Carter SK. Combination radiation therapy and chemotherapy : A logical basis for their clinical use. CA-ACancer J for Clinicians 1976;26:274-292

상세보기
Fletcher G. Clinical dose-response curves of human malignant epithelial tumors. Br J Radiol 1973;46:1 -12

상세보기
Perez CA, Bauer M, Edelstein S. Impact of tumor control on survival' in carcinoma of the lung treated with irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1987;12:539-547
Amstrong JG, Burman C, Leibel S. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy may improve the therapeutic ratio of high dose radiation therapy for lung cancer. lnt J RadiatOncol Biol Phys 1993;26:685-689

상세보기
Boltefeld T, Burkelbach J, Boesecke R, Schegel W. Methods of image reconstruction from projections applied to conformation radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 1990;35:1423-1434

상세보기
Boyer AL. Present and future developments in radiotherapytreatment units. Semin Radiat Oncol 1995;5:146-155

상세보기
Thornton Jr AF, Hegarty TJ, Haken RKT, et al. Threedimensional treatment planning of astrocytomas : A dosimetricstudy of cerebral irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991;20:1309-1315

상세보기
Radany EH, Sandler HM, Haken RKT, et al. 3D conformal radiotherapy for malignant astrocytomas : dose escalation to 9OGy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997;39(suppl):140
Haken RKT, Frass BA, Lichter AS, Marsh LH, RadanyEH, Sandler HM. A brain tumor dose escalation protocolbased on effective dose equivalence to prior experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998;42:137-141

상세보기
Nakagawa K, Aoki Y, Fujimaki T, et al. High-dose conformal radiotherapy influenced the pattern of failure but didnot improve survival in glioblastoma multiforme. Int J RadiatOncol Bioi Phys 1998;40:1141-1149

상세보기
Burman C, Kucher GJ, Emami B, Goiten M. Fitting of normal tissue tolerance data to analytic function. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991;21:123-135
Lyman JT, Wolbarst AB. Optimization of radiation therapyIII. A method of assessing complication probabilities fromdose- volume histograms. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1987;13:103-109

상세보기
Kim HK, Thornton AF, Greenberg HS, Page MA, Junck L, Sandler HM. Results of re-irradiation of primary intracranial neoplasms with three-dimensional conformal therapy. Am J Clin Oncol (CCT) 1997;20:358-363

상세보기
Pu AT, Sandler HM, Radany EH, et al. Low grade gliomas : preliminary analysis of failure patterns among patientstreated using 3D conformal external beam irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995;31:461-466

상세보기
Sandler HM. 3D conformal radiotherapy for brain tumors. The University of Michigan experience. Front Radiat Ther Oncol Basel Karger 1996;29:250-254
Niemierko A, Urie M, Goiten M. Optimization of 3D radiation therapy with both physical and biological end points and constraints. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1992;23:99-108

상세보기
Langer M, Morrill SS, Lane R. A test of the claim thatplan rankings are determined by relative complication and tumor-control probabilities. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998;41:451-457

상세보기
Sailer SL, Rosenman JG, Symon JR, Cullip TJ, ChaneyEL. The tetrad and hexad:maximum beam separation as astarting point for noncoplanar 3D treatment planning:prostatecancer as a test case. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1994;30:439-446

상세보기
Brahme A. Dosimetric precision requirements in radiationtherapy. Acta Radiol Oncol 1984;23:370-391
Thawley SE, Panje WR, Batsakis JG, Lindberg RD. Comprehensive management of head and neck tumors. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders Company. 1987:649-662
Zaider M, Amols HI. A little to a lot or a lot to a little: Is NTCP always minimized in multiport therapy? lnt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998;41:945-950
Soderstrom S, Brahme A. Which is the most suitablenumber of photon beam portals in coplanar radiation therapy? lnt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995;33:151-159

상세보기
Mohan R, Ling CC. When becometh less more? lnt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995;33:235-237
Soderstrom S, Brahme A. Optimization of the dose delivery in few field techniques using radio biological objective functions. Med Phys 1993;20:1201-1210

상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

뇌종양 환자의 3차원 입체조형 치료를 위한 뇌내 주요 부위의 모델치료계획의 개발
Development of Model Plans in Three Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy for Brain Tumors 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

참고문헌 (24)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

연합인증

뇌종양 환자의 3차원 입체조형 치료를 위한 뇌내 주요 부위의 모델치료계획의 개발 Development of Model Plans in Three Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy for Brain Tumors 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

참고문헌 (24)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

저자의 다른 논문 :

이상훈 (26) 김귀언 (133) 금기창 (38) 장세경 (9) 서창옥 (136)

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

뇌종양 환자의 3차원 입체조형 치료를 위한 뇌내 주요 부위의 모델치료계획의 개발
Development of Model Plans in Three Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy for Brain Tumors 원문보기