따라서 본 연구의 목적은 국가대표 수준급 대학 우수 야구 투수를 대상으로 한 3차원영상분석을 통한 데이터를 가지고 직구 커브볼에 대한 구간별 운동학적 패턴을 비교 분석하여 자료를 제시하는데 있다. 본 연구는 부산 D대학교 우완 오버핸드 투수 가운데 국가대표 2명과 수준급 대학선수 2명, 총 4명을 대상으로 직구 커브 투구시 구간별로 나타나는 여러 운동학적 변인의 차이를 비교 분석한 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 직구 및 커브볼 투구시 구간별, 국면별 투구시간은 거의 비슷하게 나타냈으며, 직구의 총 소요시간은 1.78${\pm}$0.07초이며 커브 총 소요시간은 1.77${\pm}$0.11초로 나타났다. 직구 및 커브볼 투구시 Z(상 하)방향에 대한 신체 중심의 위치변화는 구간별, 국면별 거의 차이가 나지 않았다. 직구 및 커브볼 투구시 왼쪽 다리의 무릎높이는 각각 $125.38{\pm}11.85cm,\;124.95{\pm}11.63cm$로 큰 차이가 없었다. 신장대비율(%H)로는 직구, 커브 각각 68.42${\pm}$5.53(%H), 68.40${\pm}$5.45(%H)로 나타났다. 직구 및 커브볼 투구시 스트라이드 거리는 각각 140.35${\pm}$4.96cm, 144.83${\pm}$1.69cm로 커브 투구시 더 많은 스트라이드 거리를 보였다. 직구 및 커브볼 투구시 왼쪽 슬관절ST 구간과 LKU 구간, HBP 구간에서는 별 차이가 없었지만 LFC, MCP, BRP구간에서는 직구보다 커브 투구시 슬관절 각도가 더 굴곡 된 것으로 나타났다. 직구 및 커브볼 투구시 오른팔 견관절 각도는 ST 구간과 LKU구간, HBP 구간에서는 별차이가 없었다. 직구 및 커브볼 투구시 오른팔 주관절 각도는 ST 구간과 LKU구간, HBP 구간에서는 별차이 가 없었다. LFC구간과 MCP구간에서는 직구보다 커브가 다소 많이 굴곡되었고, BRP구간에서 는 직구, 커브 모두 다 근소한 차로 신전 된 것으로 나타났다. 직구 및 커브볼 투구시 오른팔 수관절 각도는 LFC 구간과 MCP 구간에서는 커브가 직구보다 더 신전되었다. 그리고 BRP 구간은 직구가 커브보다 더 신전 된 것으로 나타났다.
따라서 본 연구의 목적은 국가대표 수준급 대학 우수 야구 투수를 대상으로 한 3차원 영상분석을 통한 데이터를 가지고 직구 커브볼에 대한 구간별 운동학적 패턴을 비교 분석하여 자료를 제시하는데 있다. 본 연구는 부산 D대학교 우완 오버핸드 투수 가운데 국가대표 2명과 수준급 대학선수 2명, 총 4명을 대상으로 직구 커브 투구시 구간별로 나타나는 여러 운동학적 변인의 차이를 비교 분석한 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 직구 및 커브볼 투구시 구간별, 국면별 투구시간은 거의 비슷하게 나타냈으며, 직구의 총 소요시간은 1.78${\pm}$0.07초이며 커브 총 소요시간은 1.77${\pm}$0.11초로 나타났다. 직구 및 커브볼 투구시 Z(상 하)방향에 대한 신체 중심의 위치변화는 구간별, 국면별 거의 차이가 나지 않았다. 직구 및 커브볼 투구시 왼쪽 다리의 무릎높이는 각각 $125.38{\pm}11.85cm,\;124.95{\pm}11.63cm$로 큰 차이가 없었다. 신장대비율(%H)로는 직구, 커브 각각 68.42${\pm}$5.53(%H), 68.40${\pm}$5.45(%H)로 나타났다. 직구 및 커브볼 투구시 스트라이드 거리는 각각 140.35${\pm}$4.96cm, 144.83${\pm}$1.69cm로 커브 투구시 더 많은 스트라이드 거리를 보였다. 직구 및 커브볼 투구시 왼쪽 슬관절 ST 구간과 LKU 구간, HBP 구간에서는 별 차이가 없었지만 LFC, MCP, BRP구간에서는 직구보다 커브 투구시 슬관절 각도가 더 굴곡 된 것으로 나타났다. 직구 및 커브볼 투구시 오른팔 견관절 각도는 ST 구간과 LKU구간, HBP 구간에서는 별차이가 없었다. 직구 및 커브볼 투구시 오른팔 주관절 각도는 ST 구간과 LKU구간, HBP 구간에서는 별차이 가 없었다. LFC구간과 MCP구간에서는 직구보다 커브가 다소 많이 굴곡되었고, BRP구간에서 는 직구, 커브 모두 다 근소한 차로 신전 된 것으로 나타났다. 직구 및 커브볼 투구시 오른팔 수관절 각도는 LFC 구간과 MCP 구간에서는 커브가 직구보다 더 신전되었다. 그리고 BRP 구간은 직구가 커브보다 더 신전 된 것으로 나타났다.
The purpose of this paper was to make a comparative analysis for the difference of the various kinematic variation which is occurred in the each situation when pitchers throw a straight and a curve ball. Four pitchers, who are two national team players and two high level pitchers, were selected amon...
The purpose of this paper was to make a comparative analysis for the difference of the various kinematic variation which is occurred in the each situation when pitchers throw a straight and a curve ball. Four pitchers, who are two national team players and two high level pitchers, were selected among the right over hand pitchers of D university in the Busan for this paper. The data were analyzed by using 3D equipment. The results of the analysis which was about the elapsed time of the pitching, the movement of the body center-point, the highest height of the left knee, stride length, knee joint angle, shoulder joint angle, elbow joint angle and wrist joint angle in the each section(ST, LKU, HBP, LCF, MCP, BRP) were as follows : 1. Pitching time in the each section and step in the pitching for straight and curve ball was similar. The total elapsed time of the straight and curve ball was 1.78${\pm}$0.07sec and 1.77${\pm}$0.11sec in the order. 2. The position change of the body center to the Z(above below) direction did not show significant difference in the each situation of the section and step between pitching for the straight and curve ball. 3. Height of the left knee did not show significant difference as 125.38${\pm}$11.85cm and 124.95${\pm}$11.63m in the each pitching motion for straight and curve ball. The rate(%H) between height and stride length showed 68.42${\pm}$5.53(%H), 68.40${\pm}$5.45(%H) in the each pitching motion. 4. Pitching for curve ball showed longer stride length than pitching for straight ball that as the stride length was 140.35${\pm}$4.96cm and 144.8${\pm}$1.69cm. The rate(%H) between height and stride length showed 76.9${\pm}$3.77(%H), 79.39${\pm}$2.23(%H) in the each pitching motion. 5. Left knee joint angle did not show significant difference in the ST, LKU and HBP section in the each pitching motion. However, it was shown that knee joint angle was flexed much more in the LFC, MCP and BRP section in the pitching for curve ball. 6. Right shoulder joint angle did not show significant difference in the ST, LKU and HSP section. However, when pitches threw a curve ball in the LKU section. In the LFC section, the right shoulder joint angle was extended much more in the pitching for curve ball, and the angle was extended much in the MCP and BRP section in the pitching for curve ball than straight ball. 7. Right elbow joint angle did not show significant difference in the ST, LKU and HRP section in the two pitching motion. The angle had more flexion in the LFC and MCP section in the pitching for curve ball than the pitching for straight ball. The angle in the each pitching motion for straight ball and curve ball were extended by a narrow margin in the BRP section. 8. Right wrist joint angle was extended much more in the LFC and MCP section in the pitching for curve ball. In the BRP section, the angle was extended much more in the pitching for straight ball than curve ball.
The purpose of this paper was to make a comparative analysis for the difference of the various kinematic variation which is occurred in the each situation when pitchers throw a straight and a curve ball. Four pitchers, who are two national team players and two high level pitchers, were selected among the right over hand pitchers of D university in the Busan for this paper. The data were analyzed by using 3D equipment. The results of the analysis which was about the elapsed time of the pitching, the movement of the body center-point, the highest height of the left knee, stride length, knee joint angle, shoulder joint angle, elbow joint angle and wrist joint angle in the each section(ST, LKU, HBP, LCF, MCP, BRP) were as follows : 1. Pitching time in the each section and step in the pitching for straight and curve ball was similar. The total elapsed time of the straight and curve ball was 1.78${\pm}$0.07sec and 1.77${\pm}$0.11sec in the order. 2. The position change of the body center to the Z(above below) direction did not show significant difference in the each situation of the section and step between pitching for the straight and curve ball. 3. Height of the left knee did not show significant difference as 125.38${\pm}$11.85cm and 124.95${\pm}$11.63m in the each pitching motion for straight and curve ball. The rate(%H) between height and stride length showed 68.42${\pm}$5.53(%H), 68.40${\pm}$5.45(%H) in the each pitching motion. 4. Pitching for curve ball showed longer stride length than pitching for straight ball that as the stride length was 140.35${\pm}$4.96cm and 144.8${\pm}$1.69cm. The rate(%H) between height and stride length showed 76.9${\pm}$3.77(%H), 79.39${\pm}$2.23(%H) in the each pitching motion. 5. Left knee joint angle did not show significant difference in the ST, LKU and HBP section in the each pitching motion. However, it was shown that knee joint angle was flexed much more in the LFC, MCP and BRP section in the pitching for curve ball. 6. Right shoulder joint angle did not show significant difference in the ST, LKU and HSP section. However, when pitches threw a curve ball in the LKU section. In the LFC section, the right shoulder joint angle was extended much more in the pitching for curve ball, and the angle was extended much in the MCP and BRP section in the pitching for curve ball than straight ball. 7. Right elbow joint angle did not show significant difference in the ST, LKU and HRP section in the two pitching motion. The angle had more flexion in the LFC and MCP section in the pitching for curve ball than the pitching for straight ball. The angle in the each pitching motion for straight ball and curve ball were extended by a narrow margin in the BRP section. 8. Right wrist joint angle was extended much more in the LFC and MCP section in the pitching for curve ball. In the BRP section, the angle was extended much more in the pitching for straight ball than curve ball.
Elliott, B. C., Gibson, B. a＆ Thurston, B.(1986), A Three-Dimensional Cinematographic Analysis of the Fastball and Curve ball Pitches in Baseball. Inter. J. of Sport Biomechanics, pp.20-28.
Elliott, B., Grove, J. R., Gibson, G., ＆ Thurston, B.(1985). A Three-Dimensional Cinematographic Analysis of Baseball Pitching Technique. The Australian Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 17(2), pp.18-13.
Feltner, M., ＆ Depena, J.(1986). Dynamacs of a the should and the Elbow Joints of the Throwing Arm During a Baseball Pitch. International Journal of Sport Biomechanics, Vol. 2, pp.227-259.
Gibson, B. J. ＆ Elliott, b. c.(1987), A T. tree Dimentinal Cinematographic Analysis of Junior Baseball Pitchers, J. of Human Movement Studies, 13 : pp.363-375.
Hay, J. G.(1985). Tbe Biomechanics of Sports techniques Englewood Cliffs, New Tersey : Prentice-hall Inc.
House, T.(1994), The Piching Edge, Illiniois, Human Kinetics Publisher pp.1-59
Pappas, A. M., Zawacki, R. M. ＆ Sullivan, T. J.(1985). Biomechanics of Baseball Pitching, Am. Sport Medicine, pp.216-222.
Schatzler, L. L.(1980). A Cinematographic Analysis of Stride Length in Highly Skilled Baseball Pitching, M. S. Thesis University of Arizona.
Shinji, S, Yasuo, I, Atsushi, O, Kynosuke, Y, ＆ Shintaro, T(1993), AThree-Demensional Cinematographic Analysis of Upper Limb Movement During Fastball and Curveball Baseball Pitchs, Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 9, pp.47-65.
Yuichi Hirano.(1987). Comparative of Study of Pitching Motions Between Skilled and Little League Baseball Pitchers. International Series of Biomechanics, Vol, 6B, pp.649-653.
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.