토양수분 저류구조를 갖는 4단 탱크모형에 SCE-UA전역최적화 기법을 사용하여 목적함수에 따라 보정자료 기간을 달리하여 대청댐 유역에 332회, 소양강댐 유역에 대해 472회의 보정 및 검증을 수행하였다. 그리고 증발산량 산정방법에 따른 매개변수 추정 영향을 검토하기 위해 소형 증발계 증발량, 1963 Penman, FAO-24 Penman-Monteith, FAO-56 Penman-Monteith 방법을 사용하였다. 토양수분 저류구조를 갖는 탱크모형은 표준 4단 모형보다 우수한 결과를 나타내었다. 토양수분 저류구조를 갖는 탱크모형의 매개변수 추정에 적합한 목적함수 두 가지를 확인하였다. 매개변수 추정을 위해 적절한 자료기간은 3년 정도이었으며, 평균강수량 이상인 해와 가물었던 해를 포함하는 것이좋은 결과를 보였다. 그리고 유출률이 적절하지 않은 해를 포함하는 경우에는 8년 이상으로 하는 것이 적절하다고 판단된다. 4가지 증발산량 산정 방법에 의해 추정된 증발산량을 입력으로 모형을 보정한 결과 유사한 매개변수를 나타내었으며, 1963 Penman 방법만이 근소하게 열등하였다.
토양수분 저류구조를 갖는 4단 탱크모형에 SCE-UA전역최적화 기법을 사용하여 목적함수에 따라 보정자료 기간을 달리하여 대청댐 유역에 332회, 소양강댐 유역에 대해 472회의 보정 및 검증을 수행하였다. 그리고 증발산량 산정방법에 따른 매개변수 추정 영향을 검토하기 위해 소형 증발계 증발량, 1963 Penman, FAO-24 Penman-Monteith, FAO-56 Penman-Monteith 방법을 사용하였다. 토양수분 저류구조를 갖는 탱크모형은 표준 4단 모형보다 우수한 결과를 나타내었다. 토양수분 저류구조를 갖는 탱크모형의 매개변수 추정에 적합한 목적함수 두 가지를 확인하였다. 매개변수 추정을 위해 적절한 자료기간은 3년 정도이었으며, 평균강수량 이상인 해와 가물었던 해를 포함하는 것이좋은 결과를 보였다. 그리고 유출률이 적절하지 않은 해를 포함하는 경우에는 8년 이상으로 하는 것이 적절하다고 판단된다. 4가지 증발산량 산정 방법에 의해 추정된 증발산량을 입력으로 모형을 보정한 결과 유사한 매개변수를 나타내었으며, 1963 Penman 방법만이 근소하게 열등하였다.
A Tank Model composed of 4 tanks with soil moisture structure was applied to Daecheong Dam and Soyanggang Dam watersheds. Calibration and verification were repeated 332 and 472 times for each watershed using SCE-UA global optimization method for different calibration periods and objective functions....
A Tank Model composed of 4 tanks with soil moisture structure was applied to Daecheong Dam and Soyanggang Dam watersheds. Calibration and verification were repeated 332 and 472 times for each watershed using SCE-UA global optimization method for different calibration periods and objective functions. Four different methods of evapotranspiration calculation were used and evaluated. They are pan evaporation, 1963 Penman, FAO-24 Penman-Monteith, and FAO-56 Penman-Monteith methods. Tank model with soil moisture structure showed better results than the standard tank model for daily rainfall-runoff simulation. Two types of objective function for model calibration were found. Proper calibration period are 3 years, in which dry year and flood year are included. If a calibrationperiod has an inadequate runoff rate, the period should be more than 8 years. The four methods of eyapotranspiraton computation showed similar results, but 1963 Penman method was slightly inferior to the other methods.
A Tank Model composed of 4 tanks with soil moisture structure was applied to Daecheong Dam and Soyanggang Dam watersheds. Calibration and verification were repeated 332 and 472 times for each watershed using SCE-UA global optimization method for different calibration periods and objective functions. Four different methods of evapotranspiration calculation were used and evaluated. They are pan evaporation, 1963 Penman, FAO-24 Penman-Monteith, and FAO-56 Penman-Monteith methods. Tank model with soil moisture structure showed better results than the standard tank model for daily rainfall-runoff simulation. Two types of objective function for model calibration were found. Proper calibration period are 3 years, in which dry year and flood year are included. If a calibrationperiod has an inadequate runoff rate, the period should be more than 8 years. The four methods of eyapotranspiraton computation showed similar results, but 1963 Penman method was slightly inferior to the other methods.
이상호, 박종표, 안태진, 심명필 (2002) '적설-융설모의를 포함한 탱크모형의 소양강댐에 대한 적용.' 대한토목학회 학술발표회초록집, p. 156
Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., and Smith, M. (1998). 'Crop evapotranspiration (guidelines for computer crop water requirements).' FAO Irrig. and Drain. Paper No. 56, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome
Duan, Q. (1991). A global optimization strategy for efficient and effective calibration of hydrologic Models, Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Hydrol. and Water Resour., Univ. of Arizona, Tucson
Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S. and Gupta, V.K. (1994). 'Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed model.' Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 158, pp. 265-284
Gupta, H.V., Sorooshian, S., and Yapo, P.O. (1999). 'Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic model : Comparison with multilevel expert calibration.' Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 135-143
Kotsopoulos, S., and Babajimopoulos, C. (1997). 'Analytical estimation of modified Penman equation parameters.' Journal of irrig. and . Drain. Eng., Vol. 123, No. 4, pp. 253-2256
Peck E.L. (1976). Catchment modeling and initial parameter estimation for the National Weather Service River Forecast System. NOAA Technical Memorandom NWS HYDRO-31, p. 12
Sefe, F.T. and W.C.Boughton (1982). 'Variation of model parameter values and sensitivity with type of objective function.' Journal of Hydrology (NZ), Vol 21(1), pp. 117-132
Standardization of Reference Evapotranspiration Task Committee (2002). The ASCE standardized reference evapotranspiration equation. ASCE
Sugawara M., Watanabe, I., Ozaki, E., and Katsuyama Y. (1984). Tank Model with snow component. National Research Center for Disaster Prevention, No.65, Japan
Sugawara M., Watanabe, I., Ozaki, E., and Katsuyama Y. (1986). Tank Model program for personal computer and the way to use. National Research Center for Disaster Prevention, Japan
Ward, A.D. and Elliot, W.J. (1995). Environmental hydrology. Lewis Pub., Boca Raton
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.