전통 사찰의 이용 및 보존 가치에 대한 경제적 평가 - 설악산 신흥사와 가야산 해인사를 중심으로 - Economic Evaluation of Use and Conservation Values of Traditional Temples - In Case of Sinheungsa in Seolak Mountain and Hainsa in Gaya Mountain -원문보기
The traditional temples located in national parks have various functions, such as religious practice, tourist destination, and conservation for cultural and natural resources. One functions have implicit monetary values in terms of public benefits. The purpose of this study was to estimate both use ...
The traditional temples located in national parks have various functions, such as religious practice, tourist destination, and conservation for cultural and natural resources. One functions have implicit monetary values in terms of public benefits. The purpose of this study was to estimate both use and non-use conservation values for two traditional temples, Sinheungsa and Haeinsa, using the contingent valuation method. In the study, both single-bounded and double-bounded dichotomous choice methods were used in an application of Turnbull distribution-free model. A total of 659 visitors were interviewed, 350 in Sinheungsa and 309 in Haeinsa. The mean WTP (willingness to pay) for Sinheungsa using single-bounded method was 4,040 Won for the use value, 6,157 Won for the cultural conservation value, and 5,624 Won for the natural conservation value. The mean WTP for Haeinsa using single-bounded method was 6,463 Won for the use value, 8,769 Won for the cultural conservation value, and 8,013 Won for the natural conservation value. The total economic value of each temple accounted for 50% (Sinheungsa) and 80% (Haeinsa) of the total economic value of the associated national park. It was also found that the single-bounded method was more conservative than the double-bounded method in terms of value estimation. The WTP was highest for the cultural conservation value and lowest for the use values in both temples, with natural conservation values falling in the middle, which showed that people perceived traditional temples as the cultural heritage. Based on these results, it was suggested that traditional temples should be designated as an 'multiple heritage area' so that conservation can be used as the main criteria for various use programs.
The traditional temples located in national parks have various functions, such as religious practice, tourist destination, and conservation for cultural and natural resources. One functions have implicit monetary values in terms of public benefits. The purpose of this study was to estimate both use and non-use conservation values for two traditional temples, Sinheungsa and Haeinsa, using the contingent valuation method. In the study, both single-bounded and double-bounded dichotomous choice methods were used in an application of Turnbull distribution-free model. A total of 659 visitors were interviewed, 350 in Sinheungsa and 309 in Haeinsa. The mean WTP (willingness to pay) for Sinheungsa using single-bounded method was 4,040 Won for the use value, 6,157 Won for the cultural conservation value, and 5,624 Won for the natural conservation value. The mean WTP for Haeinsa using single-bounded method was 6,463 Won for the use value, 8,769 Won for the cultural conservation value, and 8,013 Won for the natural conservation value. The total economic value of each temple accounted for 50% (Sinheungsa) and 80% (Haeinsa) of the total economic value of the associated national park. It was also found that the single-bounded method was more conservative than the double-bounded method in terms of value estimation. The WTP was highest for the cultural conservation value and lowest for the use values in both temples, with natural conservation values falling in the middle, which showed that people perceived traditional temples as the cultural heritage. Based on these results, it was suggested that traditional temples should be designated as an 'multiple heritage area' so that conservation can be used as the main criteria for various use programs.
홍성권, 김재현, 조현길(2005) 이단계 이선 가상가치 평가법 을 사용한 도시녹지의 경제적 가치 평가. 한국조경학회지 32(6): 1-13
Giraud, K. L., J. B. Loomis, and R. L. Johnson(1999) Inter- nal and external scope in willingness-to-pay estimates for threatened and endangered wildlife. Journal of Environmental Management 56: 221-229
Haab, T. C. and K. E. McConnell(1997) Referendum models and negative willingness to pay: alternative solutions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32: 251-270
Hanemann, W. M.(1984) Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agriculture Economics 66: 332-341
Hanemann, W. M, J. Loomis, and B. Kanninen(1991) Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agriculture Economics 73: 1254-1263
Kristrom, B,(1990) A non-parametric approach to the estimation of welfare measures in discrete response valuation studies. Land Economics 66: 135-139
NOAA(1993) Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. Federal Register 58: 4602-4614
White, P. C.. K. W. Gregory, P. L. Lindley, and G. Richards(1997) Economic values of threatened mammals in Britain: a case study of the Otter Lutra Lutra and Water Vole Arvicola Terrestris. Biological Conservation 82: 345-354
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.