$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

[국내논문] 대학도서관의 환경변화와 문제점의 분석 - 미국, 영국, 호주 및 캐나다를 중심으로 -
An Analysis of the Environmental Change and Problems in Academic Libraries: Cases of the U.S., U.K., Australia and Canada 원문보기

한국도서관 정보학회지 = Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, v.37 no.1, 2006년, pp.3 - 28  

곽동철 (청주대학교 인문대학 문화정보학부 문헌정보학) ,  김기래 (부산대학교 도서관) ,  윤정옥 (청주대학교 인문대학 문화정보학부 문헌정보학)

초록

본 연구의 목적은 1990년대 이후 미국, 영국, 호주 및 캐나다 등 영어권 주요국가의 대학도서관들이 인식하고 있는 고등교육의 환경변화와 그에 따른 문제점들을 살펴보는 것이다. 본 연구에서는 각기 상이한 국가제도와 문화적 전통, 고등교육체제 및 정보환경 하에 있기 때문에 생겨나는 고유한 문제점들보다는 여러 나라의 대학도서관 전반에 나타나는 공통적인 문제점들을 규명하는 데 초점을 맞추었다. 각국의 대학도서관들이 공통적으로 지적하는 문제들은 예산의 축소 도서관 역할의 변화, 도서관 콜렉션 속성의 변화, 정보기술의 발전과 기술 기반구조의 요구, 연속간행물 가격의 급등과 도서관 구매력 감소 등이다. 이 문제들은 서로 고립된 개별적 문제들이 아니라, 매우 긴밀하게 상호 연관되어 있어, 개별 도서관의 대응책보다는 국가 혹은 정부의 보다 거시적이며 광범한 차원의 이해와 전략적 대책을 요구함을 알 수 있다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The purpose of this study is to describe the problems. which academic libraries in the V.S., U.K., Australia, and Canada have faced since the 1990s. These problems are mostly caused by environmental changes in higher education. In this study, only discussed are the problems that academic libraries i...

Keyword

참고문헌 (62)

  1. Commonwealth of Australia(COA). 2002. Higher Education at the Crossroads: An Overview Paper.Canberra: Department for Education. pp.14-15. 'online' [cited 2005.9.28]: Australian Vice-chancellors'Committee(AVCC), The Council of Australia's University Presidents. 2002. 'The Way Forward' HigherEducation Action Plan for the Information Economy.'

  2. 곽동철, 윤정옥, 김기태. 2005. 대학도서관 정책 로드맵에 관한 연구. 서울: 교육인적자원부(도서관 정책 연구 : 2005-6) 

  3. Albanese. Andrew Richard. 2003. 'The Top Seven Academic Library issues.' Library Journal, 128(5): 43 

  4. University of California University Librarians and the Office of Systemwide Library Planning. 2004. 'Systemwide Strategic Directions for Libraries and Scholarly Information at the University of California: Prepared for the Systemwide Library and Scholarly Information Advisory Committee. (http://libraries.universityofcalifornia.edu> 'online' 'cited 2005.8.26' 

  5. United Kingdom. Dept. of Education and Skills(DFES) . 2004. 'Department for Education and Skills: FiveYear Strategy for Children and Learners: Presented to Parliament, by the Secretary of State for Educationand Skills, by Command of Her Majesty.' July 2004. [online] [cited 2005.8.28] 

  6. 영국 고등학교에서 최근에 인정하기 시작한 새로운 자격 과정. 주로 직업교육에 초점을 맞추고 있음. 

  7. Dolphin, Philippa. and Brophy, Peter. 2002. 'Developments in the UK.' Journal of Academic Librananship,28(4): 251-254. 

  8. Steele, Colin. 2000. Library and Information Infrastructure: International Strategic Initiatives: A DiscussionPaper. Prepared for the Coalition for Innovation in Scholarly Communication [online] [cited 2005.10.1] 

  9. Commonwealth of Australia(COA). 2002. Higher Education at the Crossroads: An Overview Paper. Canberra:Department for Education. pp.14-15. [online] [cited 2005.9.28] 

  10. Australian Vice-chancellors' Committee(AVCC), The Council of Australia's University Presidents. 2002'The Way Forward>>> Higher Education Action Plan for the InformationEconomy.'

  11. Commonwealth of Australia(COA). 2002. Higher Education at the Crossroads: An Overview Paper.Canberra: Department for Education. pp.14-15. 'online' [cited 2005.9.28]: Australian Vice-chancellors'Committee(AVCC), The Council of Australia's University Presidents. 2002. 'The Way Forward' HigherEducation Action Plan for the Information Economy.'

  12. Austen, Gaynor, et al. 2002. 'Australian University Libraries and the New Educational Environment.' Journalof Academic Librananship, 28(1/2): 63-6 

  13. Council of Ministers of Education of Canada. 1997. 'Developments in Information Technologie in Education.

  14. Statistics Canada. 2003. Education Indicators in Canada: Report of the Pan-Canadian Education IndicatorsProgram(PCEIP). 2003. Toronto. Ontario: co-published by [online] [cited 2005.11.19] 

  15. Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada. 2002. Trends in Higher Education: Summary of Findings.

  16. Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada. November 2003. The GATS and Higher Education inCanada: An Update on Canada's Position and Implications for Canadian Universities. [online] [cited 2005.11.24] 

  17. Kyrillidou, and Young. 2004. 전게자료.. Table 4. 'Expenditure Trends in ARL Libraries, 1986-2004. MedianValues for Time-Series Trends - Unadjusted dollar figures. 

  18. University of California. Systemwide Library Planning, May 15, 2002. 'The Crisis of Library Sustainability,the Opportunities of Digital Scholarly Communication, and the University of California Strategy:Background Paper for the Joint Meeting of the Systemwide Library and Scholarly Information Advisory Committee and the Standing Committee on Copyright, May 23. 2002.' [online] [cited 2005,8.25] 

  19. Jordan, Jay. 2003. 'Cooperating During Difficult Times.' Journal of Academic Librarianship. 29(6): 343-345. 

  20. Brewer, Joseph M., et al. 2004. 'Libraries Dealing with the Future Now.' ARL Bimonthly Report. 234. [online] [cited 2005.8.29] 

  21. 'The Follett Report. 1993.' Joint Funding Council's Libranes Review Group: Report. December 1993. AReport for Higher Education Funding Council for England, Scottish Higher Education Funding Council,Higher Education Funding Council for Wales, Department of Education for Northern Ireland. 

  22. Creaser, Claire, Maynard, Sally, and White. Sonya. 2004. LISU Annual Library Statistics 2004: FeaturingTrend Analysis of UK Public and Academic Libraries 1993-2003. Loughborough: LISU. [online] [cited 2005.11.4] 

  23. LISU. 2004. 전게자료. 

  24. Australian Library and Information Association(ALIA). 2002. 'Federal Budget 2002.' [online] [cited 2005. 9.27] 

  25. Australian Library and Information Association(ALIA). 2005. 'Federal Budget 2004.' [online] [cited 2005. 9.27] 

  26. Commonwealth of Australia(COA). 2002. Higher Education at the Crossroads: An Overview Paper. CanberraDepartment for Education. pp.14-15. [online] [cited 2005.9.28] 

  27. Commonwealth of Australia(COA). 2002. Higher Education at the Crossroads: An Overview Paper. CanberraDepartment for Education. pp.14-15. [online] [cited 2005.9.28] , 'h. allocation of public subsidies', p.34 

  28. ARL. 2005. 'Expenditure Trends in Canadian ARL Institutions. 1986-2004: Median Values for Time-SeriesTrend.' [online] [cited 2005.11.26] 

  29. U.S. Dept. of Education, 2005. National Center for Education Statistics. The Conditions of Education,2001-2005. 1. Participation in Education. Undergraduate Education. Past and Projectd UndergraduateEnrollment. [online] [2005.11.1] 

  30. Dolphin and Brophy. 2002.'Developments in the UK.' Journal of Academic Librananship,28(4): 251-254. 

  31. The Follett Report. 2002.'Developments in the UK.' Journal of Academic Librananship,28(4): 251-254. 

  32. LISU. 2004. 전게자료 

  33. Albanese. 2003. 'The Top Seven Academic Library issues.' Library Journal, 128(5): 43 

  34. University of California University Librarians and the Office of Systemwide Library Planning. 2004.'The Crisis of Library Sustainability,the Opportunities of Digital Scholarly Communication, and the University of California Strategy:Background Paper for the Joint Meeting of the Systemwide Library and Scholarly Information Advisory Committee and the Standing Committee on Copyright, May 23. 2002.' [online] [cited 2005,8.25] 

  35. Dolphin and Brophy. 2002. 'Developments in the UK.' Journal of Academic Librananship,28(4): 251-254. 

  36. The Follett Report. 1993.'Developments in the UK.' Journal of Academic Librananship,28(4): 251-254. 

  37. Dolphin and Brophy. 2002.'Developments in the UK.' Journal of Academic Librananship,28(4): 251-254. 

  38. University of California. Systemwide Library Planning, May 15, 2002.'The Crisis of Library Sustainability,the Opportunities of Digital Scholarly Communication, and the University of California Strategy:Background Paper for the Joint Meeting of the Systemwide Library and Scholarly Information Advisory Committee and the Standing Committee on Copyright, May 23. 2002.' [online] [cited 2005,8.25] 

  39. CARL. 2005. 'Towards an Integrated Knowledge Ecosystem: A Canadian Research Strategy.' A ReportSubmitted to the Canadian Association of Research Libraries / L'Association des bibliotheques de recherche du Canada(CARL/ABRC). [online] [cited 2005.11.26] 

  40. Albanese. 2003.'The Top Seven Academic Library issues.' Library Journal, 128(5): 43 

  41. University of California. Systemwide Library Planning, May 15, 2002. 'The Crisis of Library Sustainability,the Opportunities of Digital Scholarly Communication, and the University of California Strategy:Background Paper for the Joint Meeting of the Systemwide Library and Scholarly Information Advisory Committee and the Standing Committee on Copyright, May 23. 2002.' [online] [cited 2005,8.25] 

  42. Breeding. Marshall. 2004. 'Integrated Library Software: A Guide to Multiusers, Multifunction Systems.'Library Technology Reports. 40(1): 1-88. 

  43. University of California. Systemwide Library Planning, May 15, 2002.'The Crisis of Library Sustainability,the Opportunities of Digital Scholarly Communication, and the University of California Strategy:Background Paper for the Joint Meeting of the Systemwide Library and Scholarly Information Advisory Committee and the Standing Committee on Copyright, May 23. 2002.' [online] [cited 2005,8.25] 

  44. U.S. Dept. of Education, 2005. National Center for Education Statistics. The Conditions of Education2001-2005. 5. Contexts of Secondary Education. College Resources: Electronic Services in Academic Library. 

  45. Albanese. 2003. 'The Top Seven Academic Library issues.' Library Journal, 128(5): 43 

  46. EdNA Reference Committee. 1999. Education and Training Action Plan for the Information Economy:Report to the Australian Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth AffairsMCEETYA. 

  47. Austen, et al. 2002. 

  48. The Follett Report. 1993.'Developments in the UK.' Journal of Academic Librananship,28(4): 251-254. 

  49. LISU. 2004. 전게자료. 

  50. The Follett Report. 1993. 'Developments in the UK.' Journal of Academic Librananship,28(4): 251-254. 

  51. LISU 2004. 전게자료. 

  52. ARL. 2005. 'Monographs and Serials Expenditures in Canadian ARL Institutions,1986-2004.'

  53. Steele. 2000. Library and Information Infrastructure: International Strategic Initiatives: A DiscussionPaper. Prepared for the Coalition for Innovation in Scholarly Communication [online] [cited 2005.10.1] 

  54. Australian Library and Information Association(ALIA). 2002. Higher Education Review: Submission 352.

  55. Houghton, John. Economics of Scholarly Communication. A Discussion Paper. Prepared for The Coalitionfor Innovation in Scholar Communication, pp. 29-34. Victoria University, Center for Strategic EconomicStudies.

  56. The Higher Education Consultancy Group and CHEMS Consulting. January 2002. A Report to the RSLP on: Barriers to Resource Sharing Among Higher Education Libraries. 

  57. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(OECD). 2004. Working Party on the InformationEconomy. Digital Broadband Content Panel and Government Discussion Session, 3 June 2004: Summaryand Conclusions. 38p 

  58. The Higher Education Consultancy Group and CHEMS Consulting. January 2002. A Report to the RSLPon: Barriers to Resource Sharing Among Higher Education Libraries. 

  59. LISU. 2004. 전게자료 

  60. Canadian Library Association. 2001. "CLA Submisssion to the House of Commons Finance Committee [online] [cited 2005.11.26] 

  61. Canadian Library Associaton. November 21, 2001. 'CLA launches Campaign for Canada's Libraries.'

  62. U.K. House Commons. Science and Technology committee. 2004. Scientific Publications: Free for All?Tenth Report of Session. 2003-04. Volume 1: Report. HC 399-1. London: The Stationary Office LimitedJuly 2004. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

활용도 분석정보

상세보기
다운로드
내보내기

활용도 Top5 논문

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

BRONZE

출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로