섬유보강 친환경 상온아스팔트 혼합물의 역학적 특성에 관한 연구 A Study on Mechanical Characteristics of Fiber Modified Emulsified Asphalt Mixture as Environmentally-Friend Paving Material원문보기
상온아스팔트 혼합물은 생산공정이나 시공 중에 naphtha나 kerosene을 사용하는 컷백 아스팔트와 같이 환경오염물질을 생성하지 않고 골재와 아스팔트 바인더를 가열하지 않기 때문에 가열아스팔트 혼합물에 비하여 환경친화적이며 경제적이다. 그러나 일반적으로 상온아스팔트 혼합물은 가열아스팔트 혼합물에 비해 내구성이나 수분민감성에서 미흡한 점이 많다. 본 연구에서는 상온아스팔트의 수분민감성과 내구성을 증진시킬 수 있는 섬유보강 상온아스팔트 혼합물(FEAM)에 대한 평가를 하였다. 최적 유화아스팔트량(OEC), 최적함수량(OWC) 그리고 최적 섬유보강제 첨가량(OFC)를 결정하기 위해서 마샬배합설계를 수정 개발하였다. 최적의 섬유보강 상온아스팔트 혼합물과 일반 상온아스팔트 혼합물을 제작하여 마샬안정도 시험, 간접인장강도 시험 및 회복탄성계수 시험을 실시하였고 그 결과를 가열아스팔트 혼합물의 결과와 비교하였다. 결과로 FEAM과 EAM 모두 마샬배합설계 기준으로 중간 교통량에 충분한 것으로 판명되었다. 또한 섬유보강에 의하여 일반 상온아스팔트 혼합물의 수분민감성과 내구성이 증진하는 효과도 얻을 수 있는 것으로 판명되었다
상온아스팔트 혼합물은 생산공정이나 시공 중에 naphtha나 kerosene을 사용하는 컷백 아스팔트와 같이 환경오염물질을 생성하지 않고 골재와 아스팔트 바인더를 가열하지 않기 때문에 가열아스팔트 혼합물에 비하여 환경친화적이며 경제적이다. 그러나 일반적으로 상온아스팔트 혼합물은 가열아스팔트 혼합물에 비해 내구성이나 수분민감성에서 미흡한 점이 많다. 본 연구에서는 상온아스팔트의 수분민감성과 내구성을 증진시킬 수 있는 섬유보강 상온아스팔트 혼합물(FEAM)에 대한 평가를 하였다. 최적 유화아스팔트량(OEC), 최적함수량(OWC) 그리고 최적 섬유보강제 첨가량(OFC)를 결정하기 위해서 마샬배합설계를 수정 개발하였다. 최적의 섬유보강 상온아스팔트 혼합물과 일반 상온아스팔트 혼합물을 제작하여 마샬안정도 시험, 간접인장강도 시험 및 회복탄성계수 시험을 실시하였고 그 결과를 가열아스팔트 혼합물의 결과와 비교하였다. 결과로 FEAM과 EAM 모두 마샬배합설계 기준으로 중간 교통량에 충분한 것으로 판명되었다. 또한 섬유보강에 의하여 일반 상온아스팔트 혼합물의 수분민감성과 내구성이 증진하는 효과도 얻을 수 있는 것으로 판명되었다
Emulsified Asphalt Mixture(EAM) is more environmentally-friendly and cost-effective than typical Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) because EAM does not produce carcinogenic substances, e.g., naphtha, kerosene, during the both of manufacturing and roadway construction process. Also, it does not require heating t...
Emulsified Asphalt Mixture(EAM) is more environmentally-friendly and cost-effective than typical Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) because EAM does not produce carcinogenic substances, e.g., naphtha, kerosene, during the both of manufacturing and roadway construction process. Also, it does not require heating the aggregates and asphalt binder. However, EAM has some disadvantages. Generally EAM has a less load bearing capacity and more moisture susceptibility than conventional HMA. The study evaluated a Fiber modified EAM (FEAM) to increase load bearing capacity and to decrease moisture susceptibility of EAM. Modified Marshall mix design was developed to find Optimum Emulsion Contents (OEC), Optimum Water Contents (OWC), and Optimum Fiber Contents (OFC). A series of test were performed on the fabricated specimen with OBC, OWC, and OFC. Tests include Marshall Stability, Indirect Tensile Strength, and Resilient modulus test. Comparison analyses were performed among EAM, Fiber modified EAM (FEAM), and typical HMA to verify the applicability of EAM and FEAM in the field. Test results indicated that both of EAM and FEAM have an enough capability to resist medium traffic volume based on the Marshall mix design criteria. Also the study found that fiber modification is effective to increase the load bearing capacity and moisture damage resistance of EAM.
Emulsified Asphalt Mixture(EAM) is more environmentally-friendly and cost-effective than typical Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) because EAM does not produce carcinogenic substances, e.g., naphtha, kerosene, during the both of manufacturing and roadway construction process. Also, it does not require heating the aggregates and asphalt binder. However, EAM has some disadvantages. Generally EAM has a less load bearing capacity and more moisture susceptibility than conventional HMA. The study evaluated a Fiber modified EAM (FEAM) to increase load bearing capacity and to decrease moisture susceptibility of EAM. Modified Marshall mix design was developed to find Optimum Emulsion Contents (OEC), Optimum Water Contents (OWC), and Optimum Fiber Contents (OFC). A series of test were performed on the fabricated specimen with OBC, OWC, and OFC. Tests include Marshall Stability, Indirect Tensile Strength, and Resilient modulus test. Comparison analyses were performed among EAM, Fiber modified EAM (FEAM), and typical HMA to verify the applicability of EAM and FEAM in the field. Test results indicated that both of EAM and FEAM have an enough capability to resist medium traffic volume based on the Marshall mix design criteria. Also the study found that fiber modification is effective to increase the load bearing capacity and moisture damage resistance of EAM.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
제안 방법
3, resilient modulus test was performed to determine optimum fiber contents. Also, it was performed on EAM and FEAM in both of dry and wet conditions, to investigate the enhancement of moisture damage resistance of fiber modification. Figure 9 shows the resilient modulus test results.
For the expanded application of Marshall mix design to Fiberf modified Emulsion Asphalt Mixture (FEAM), modified Marshall mix design was developed in the study. The modification included additional processes to the original Marshall mix design, which includes: Aggregate-Emulsion coating test, Determination of Optimum Water/Fiber Content (OWC/OFC), and curing of compacted mixture.
8mm/minute) on the triplicate test samples. Indirect tensile test was performed on EAM and FEAM in both of dry and wet conditions to investigate the enhancement of moisture damage resistance from fiber modification. Also, indirect tensile test was performed on typical HMA mixtures as control mixtures.
study. The modification included additional processes to the original Marshall mix design, which includes: Aggregate-Emulsion coating test, Determination of Optimum Water/Fiber Content (OWC/OFC), and curing of compacted mixture. Detailed discussion on modified Marshall mix design is described as follows.
Modified Marshall mix design was applied to determine the Optimum Emulsion Contents (OEC) and Optimum Water Contents (OWC). The optimized mixtures were fabricated to perform various tests, e.g., Marshall stability and indirect tensile test at dry and saturated condition to evaluate the water susceptibility. Details are described in the foliowing sections.
To resolve the situation, the study utilized a fiber modifier to increase load bearing capacity and decrease moisture susceptibility of EAM. The study modified Marshall mix design (3) to find the Optimum Emulsion Contents (OEC) and Optimum Water Contents (OWC). The Optimum Fiber Contents (OFC) was determined at which the resilient modulus of mixture is maximized.
The study performed a series of mechanical tests, e.g., indirect tensile test, resilient moulus test, and Marshall stability test. Also, the experimental design investigated the effect of fiber modification on moisture damage, because the moisture susceptibility is one of the major considerations in designing asphalt mixture (9).
Also, the experimental design investigated the effect of fiber modification on moisture damage, because the moisture susceptibility is one of the major considerations in designing asphalt mixture (9). To evaluate the moisture susceptibility of mixtures, the study developed mixture saturation equipment, which is simulating the field saturated mixture condition (Figure 6).
Generally EAM has a less load bearing capacity and more moisture susceptible than conventional Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) (2). To resolve the situation, the study utilized a fiber modifier to increase load bearing capacity and decrease moisture susceptibility of EAM. The study modified Marshall mix design (3) to find the Optimum Emulsion Contents (OEC) and Optimum Water Contents (OWC).
대상 데이터
(6). The study utilized polypropylene 3010, which is produced by H Company in Kentucky, U.S. Table 3 shows the test results of polypropylene 3010.
The study utilized single source of aggregate with Nominal Maximum Aggregate Size (NMAS) of 12.5mm, Medium Setting (MS) type cationic emulsion, and polypropylene 3010 fiber. Modified Marshall mix design was applied to determine the Optimum Emulsion Contents (OEC) and Optimum Water Contents (OWC).
이론/모형
Then, the Air Void (Av), Void in Mineral Aggregate (VMA), and Void Filled with Asphalt (VFA) were computed. Marshall stability and flow were determined on the compacted samples in accordance with the test method AASHTO T245-94 (ASTM D1559-76). It should be noted that Asphalt Institute (Al) procedure recommends performing Marshall stability test on the cold mixture at the temperature of 25oC, and also recommended that the minimum criteria of Marshall stability is 250 kg (7).
Marshall stability test was performed on the EAM, FEAM, and HMA to evaluate the applicability of emulsified asphalt mixtures for the base course in terms of Marshall stability criteria. Figure 11 shows the test results.
The study utilized Aggregate-Emulsion Coating (AEC) test to determine the optimum water contents, at which the coating rate is maximized. Figure 2 illustrates the aggregate-emulsion coating test results.
Rapid Setting (RS), Medium Setting (MS), and Slow Setting (SS). The study utilized cationic medium setting emulsion, MS-2, in accordance with ASTM D3628. Typically, MS-2 is used for the aggregate mixtures.
05 increments. The test was performed in accordance with standard test method, ASTM D4123-82 (8). The schematic of test equipment and test setup are summarized in Figure 4 and Table 5, respectively.
성능/효과
Figure 9 shows the resilient modulus test results. Test results indicated that fiber modification slightly increased the resilient modulus of emulsified mixtures. However, the moisture damage resistance of emulsified mixtures was increased from 49.
Figure 7illustrates the indirect tensile test results. Test results indicated that the indirect tensile strength of EAM and FEAM exhibited 42.4 and 53.4 percent of that of HMA, respectively. Fiber modification increased indirect tensile strength of emulsified mixture by 125.
Figure 11 shows the test results. The test results indicated ih건 the Marshall stability of both EAM and FEAM are satisfactory to meet the design criteria. However, the Marshall stabilities of EAM and FEAM were 40.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.