This study was designed to examine the meaning of housing in modern Korea, and to draw the interrelationship of people and housing. In-depth interviews were conducted, and the qualitative research investigated various aspects of housing history among four individuals during the different phases of s...
This study was designed to examine the meaning of housing in modern Korea, and to draw the interrelationship of people and housing. In-depth interviews were conducted, and the qualitative research investigated various aspects of housing history among four individuals during the different phases of social and economic transitions. Each narratives showed the unique characteristics of life history, and the conceptual frameworks for interpretation were microsociological approach by Morris and Winter(1978) and pathway approach by Clapham(2005). One narrater named "K" had gone through various housing experiences since her birth in 1933 at a traditional Korean housing, and she moved to a traditional rural community. Another narrater called "S" was born in housing built during the Japanese colonization, gained wealth through the housing boom of the industrialization, and has lived in a suburban condominium. "G" spent her entire life in an urban area, had never owned a house, and lived in a house with poor quality. The other narrater named "L" had lived in a single-family home with a large yard since her childhood, and she has resided in multi-family housing by herself after having a lot of experiences of building houses. The results revealed that housing could play as a simple role as a shelter, be transformed over family life cycle, become prestige of extended family, social and family status, investment. Meaning of housing from the pathway approach were closely related to hometown, the relation to birth family at postmarriage, economic status, and housing experiences according to the social change. As a conclusion, the meaning of housing is vary, and housing conveys numerous implications including psychological, social and economic aspects.
This study was designed to examine the meaning of housing in modern Korea, and to draw the interrelationship of people and housing. In-depth interviews were conducted, and the qualitative research investigated various aspects of housing history among four individuals during the different phases of social and economic transitions. Each narratives showed the unique characteristics of life history, and the conceptual frameworks for interpretation were microsociological approach by Morris and Winter(1978) and pathway approach by Clapham(2005). One narrater named "K" had gone through various housing experiences since her birth in 1933 at a traditional Korean housing, and she moved to a traditional rural community. Another narrater called "S" was born in housing built during the Japanese colonization, gained wealth through the housing boom of the industrialization, and has lived in a suburban condominium. "G" spent her entire life in an urban area, had never owned a house, and lived in a house with poor quality. The other narrater named "L" had lived in a single-family home with a large yard since her childhood, and she has resided in multi-family housing by herself after having a lot of experiences of building houses. The results revealed that housing could play as a simple role as a shelter, be transformed over family life cycle, become prestige of extended family, social and family status, investment. Meaning of housing from the pathway approach were closely related to hometown, the relation to birth family at postmarriage, economic status, and housing experiences according to the social change. As a conclusion, the meaning of housing is vary, and housing conveys numerous implications including psychological, social and economic aspects.
구술사인 경우에는 살아온 경험을 불러내어 서술하는 것이므로 자기진술 내지 자기 표현적 성격도 있어서 심층면접을 통해 얻은 구술자료는 구술성과 주관성, 개인성을 가지며, 연구자와 구술자의 상호작용 속에서 자료가 만들어지는 공동작업의 성격을 갖는다. 따라서, 구술사를 연구할 때는 인식론적 전환이 필요하다고 하였다(윤택림, 2004).
생애사는 무엇인가?
생애사는 시간의 흐름에 따라 나타나는 가족 또는 개인의 생활변화를 기술하고 해석하기 위해 개인의 생애를 심층적으로 들여다보며 기술하는 것이다. 그러면 주거사 연구에서도 이러한 생애사적 접근이 유용할 것인가? 생애과정 관점은 개인과 가족성원의 삶과 사회단위로서의 가족생활이 시간과 역사의 맥락에서 변화하는 것을 맥락적, 과정적, 역동적으로 모두 분석하기 때문에 시간의 경과에 따른 개인과 가족의 주거생활 변화에 중요한 통찰력을 갖게 해주는 것은 분명할 것이다.
생애사는 몇 가지 인식론적 문제점을 가지는데, 그 문제점은 무엇인가?
한편, 생애사는 역사적, 문화적 맥락에서 삶의 과정에 대한 해석을 보여주는 개인적 서술이지만 몇 가지 인식론적 문제점을 가진다. 첫째는, 개인의 삶이 대표성을 지니는가이다. 그런데 이는 개인의 삶은 사회적 과정이나 구조에 의해 구성되지만, 동시에 그 구조들을 개인이 만든다는 것을 인식할 때 해결된다. 둘째는 생애사의 주관성이다. 그러나 이 또한, 모든 역사적 자료는 시작부터 주관성이 포함되어 있으며 순수한 객관성이란 존재하지 않는다는 인식을 통해 해결된다(윤택림, 2004)고 보아야 할 것이다.
참고문헌 (17)
경희주거연구회 편(2005). 주거의 의미와 사용. 서울: 경희대학교 출판국
김기옥(1997). 우리나라 소비자가 추구하는 생활표준:질적 접근법을 이용한 소비자연구. 한국가정관리학회지, 15(3), 15-32
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.