물리적 기반의 다이내믹 시뮬레이션에 있어서 안정적이고 효율적인 제한 시스템은 매우 중요한 요소 중 하나이다. 본 논문은 기존에 널리 사용되고 있는 제한 시스템들(Lagrange Multiplier method, Baumgarte stabilization method, Post-stabilization Method, Implicit constraint enforcement method, Fast projection method)에 대한 분석과 평가를 통해 제한 시스템을 사용하고자 하는 사용자들에게 적절한 선택을 할 수 있는 지침을 제공하고자 한다. 본 논문은 기존의 제한 방법들에 대한 수학적 수식들이 설명되어 있고, 제한 오차 비교, 계산 비용, 동적 움직임 분석 등을 통해 기존 제한 시스템들 각각에 대한 평가를 제공한다.
물리적 기반의 다이내믹 시뮬레이션에 있어서 안정적이고 효율적인 제한 시스템은 매우 중요한 요소 중 하나이다. 본 논문은 기존에 널리 사용되고 있는 제한 시스템들(Lagrange Multiplier method, Baumgarte stabilization method, Post-stabilization Method, Implicit constraint enforcement method, Fast projection method)에 대한 분석과 평가를 통해 제한 시스템을 사용하고자 하는 사용자들에게 적절한 선택을 할 수 있는 지침을 제공하고자 한다. 본 논문은 기존의 제한 방법들에 대한 수학적 수식들이 설명되어 있고, 제한 오차 비교, 계산 비용, 동적 움직임 분석 등을 통해 기존 제한 시스템들 각각에 대한 평가를 제공한다.
Stable and effective constraint enforcement system is one of the crucial components for physically-based dynamic simulations. This paper presents analysis and evaluation for traditional constraint enforcement systems(Lagrange Multiplier method, Baumgarte stabilization method, Post-stabilization meth...
Stable and effective constraint enforcement system is one of the crucial components for physically-based dynamic simulations. This paper presents analysis and evaluation for traditional constraint enforcement systems(Lagrange Multiplier method, Baumgarte stabilization method, Post-stabilization method, Implicit constraint enforcement method, Fast projection method) to provide a guideline to users who need to integrate a suitable constraint enforcement system into their dynamic simulations. The mathematical formulations for traditional constraint enforcement systems are presented in this paper. This paper describes a summary of evaluation which consists of constraint error comparison, computational cost, and dynamic behavior analysis to verify the efficiency of each traditional constraint enforcement system.
Stable and effective constraint enforcement system is one of the crucial components for physically-based dynamic simulations. This paper presents analysis and evaluation for traditional constraint enforcement systems(Lagrange Multiplier method, Baumgarte stabilization method, Post-stabilization method, Implicit constraint enforcement method, Fast projection method) to provide a guideline to users who need to integrate a suitable constraint enforcement system into their dynamic simulations. The mathematical formulations for traditional constraint enforcement systems are presented in this paper. This paper describes a summary of evaluation which consists of constraint error comparison, computational cost, and dynamic behavior analysis to verify the efficiency of each traditional constraint enforcement system.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
성능/효과
In conclusion, although the formation is somewhat troublesome to implement, this paper highly recommend to use implicit constraint method to seamlessly integrate the constraint system into any physically-based dynamic systems.
Accuracy column shows the ranking for constraint error and post-stabilization method performs in the lowest error bound. In summary, post-stabilization method returns the best performance, implicit constraint method provides better performance than fast projection method, and Baumgarte method provides the worst performance in constraint error.
참고문헌 (18)
Witkin, A. and Baraff, D. (2003), "Physically based modeling", SIGGRAPH 03' Course notes.
Goldenthal, R., Harmon, D., Fattal, R., Bercovier, M. and Grinspun, E. (2007), "Efficient simulation of inextensible cloth", ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), Vol. 26 No. 3.
Barzel, R., and Barr, A. (1988), "A modeling system based on dynamic constraints", Computer Graphics, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 179-188.
Witkin, A., Fleischer, K. and Barr, A. (1987), "Energy constraints on parameterized models", Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1987, ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, Computer Graphics Proceeding, pp. 225-232.
Terzopoulos, D., Platt, J., Barr, A. and Fleischer, K. (1987), "Elastically deformable models", Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1987, ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, Computer Graphics Proceeding, pp. 205-214.
Hirota, G., Fisher, S., State, A., Fuchs, H. and Lee, C. (2001), "Simulation of deforming elastic solids in contact", SIGGRAPH 2001 Technical Sketch, In SIGGRAPH 2001 Conference Abstracts and Applications, pp. 259.
Hauth, M., Etxmuss, O. and Strasser, W. (2003), "Analysis of numerical methods for the simulation of deformable models", The Visual Computer, Vol. 9, No. 7-8, pp. 581-600.
Baraff, D. (1996), "Linear-time dynamics using Lagrange multipliers", Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1996, ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, pp. 137-146.
Baumgarte, J. (1972), "Stabilization of const- raints and integrals of motion in dynamical systems", Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics.
Cline, M. B. and Pai D. K. (2003), "Post- stabilization for rigid body simulation with contact and constraints", Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 3744-3751.
Hong, M., Choi, M., Jung, S., Welch, S. and Tropp, J. (2005), "Effective constrained dynamic simulation using implicit constraint enforcement", Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference of Robotics and Automation, pp. 4531-4536.
Provot, X. (1995), "Deformation constraints in a massspring model to describe rigid cloth behavior," Proceedings of Graphics Interface, pp. 147-154.
Baraff, D. and Witkin, A. (1998), "Large steps in cloth simulation", Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1998, ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, pp. 1-12.
Ascher, U. R., Chin, H. and Reich, S. (1994), "Stabilization of DAEs and invariant manifolds", Numerische Methematik, Vol. 67, No. 2, pp. 131-149.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.