• 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보


Introduction: In the mass spectrometry-based proteomics, biological samples are analyzed to identify proteins by mass spectrometer and database search. Database search is the process to select the best matches to the experimental mass spectra among the amino acid sequence database and we identify the protein as the matched sequence. The match score is defined to find the matches from the database and declare the highest scored hit as the most probable protein. According to the score definition, search result varies. In this study, the difference among search results of different search engines or different databases was investigated, in order to suggest a better way to identify more proteins with higher reliability. Materials and Methods: The protein extract of human mesenchymal stem cell was separated by several bands by one-dimensional electrophorysis. One-dimensional gel was excised one by one, digested by trypsin and analyzed by a mass spectrometer, FT LTQ. The tandem mass (MS/MS) spectra of peptide ions were applied to the database search of X!Tandem, Mascot and Sequest search engines with IPI human database and SwissProt database. The search result was filtered by several threshold probability values of the Trans-Proteomic Pipeline (TPP) of the Institute for Systems Biology. The analysis of the output which was generated from TPP was performed. Results and Discussion: For each MS/MS spectrum, the peptide sequences which were identified from different conditions such as search engines, threshold probability, and sequence database were compared. The main difference of peptide identification at high threshold probability was caused by not the difference of sequence database but the difference of the score. As the threshold probability decreases, the missed peptides appeared. Conversely, in the extremely high threshold level, we missed many true assignments. Conclusion and Prospects: The different identification result of the search engines was mainly caused by the different scoring algorithms. Usually in proteomics high-scored peptides are selected and low-scored peptides are discarded. Many of them are true negatives. By integrating the search results from different parameter and different search engines, the protein identification process can be improved.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. Alves, G., Wu, W.W., Wang, G., Shen, R.F. and Yu, Y.K. (2008) Enhancing peptide identification confidence by combining search methods. J. Proteome Res. 7(8), 3102-13 
  2. Craig, R., Beavis, R.C. (2004) TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 20, 1466-1467 
  3. Dancik, V., Addona, T.A., Clauser, K.R., Vath, J.E. and Pevzner, P.A. (1999) De Novo Peptide Sequencing via Tandem Mass Spectrometry. J. Comp. Biol. 6, 327-342 
  4. Elias, J.E., Gibbons, F.D., King, O.D., Roth, F.P. and Gygi, S.P. (2004) Intensity-based protein identification by machine learning from a library of tandem mass spectra. Nat. Biotech. 22, 214-219 
  5. Eng, J.K., McCormack, A.L., Yates, JR III (1994) An Approach to Correlate Tandem Mass Spectral Data of Peptides with Amino Acid Sequences in a Protein Database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom 5, 976-989 
  6. Eng, J.K., Fischer, B., Grossmann, J. and MacCoss, M.J. (2008) A Fast SEQUEST Cross Correlation Algorithm. J. Proteome Res. 7, 4598-4602 
  7. Geer, L.Y., Markey, S.P., Kowalak, J.A., Wagner, L., Xu, M., Maynard, D.M., Yang, X., Shi, W. and Bryant, S.H. (2004) Open mass spectrometry search algorithm, J. Proteome Res. 3(5), 958-64 
  8. Keller ,A., Eng, J., Zhang, N., Li, X. and Aebersold, R. (2005) A uniform proteomics MS/MS analysis platform utilizing open XML file formats. Mol. Sys. Biol. 2, 1-8 
  9. Nesvizhskii, A.I., Keller, A., Kolker, E. and Aebersold, R. (2003) A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 75, 4646-4658 
  10. Kersey, P.J., Duarte, J., Williams, A., Karavidopoulou, Y., Birney, E. and Apweiler, R. (2004) The International Protein Index : an integrated database for proteomics experiments, Proteomics, 4(7), 1985-8 
  11. O'Donovan, C., Martin, M.J., Gattiker, A., Gastelger, E., Bairoch, A. and Apweiler, R. (2002) High-quality protein knowledge resource: SWISS-PROT and TrEMBL. Brief Bioinform. 3(3), 275-84 
  12. Omenn, G.S., States, D.J., et al. (2005) Overview of the HUPO Plasma Proteome Project: results from the pilot phase with 35 collaborating laboratories and multiple analytical groups, generating a core dataset of 3020 proteins and a publicly-available database, Proteomics 5(13), 3226-45 
  13. Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A.I., Kolker, E. and Aebersold, R. (2002) Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 74, 5383-5392 
  14. Kapp, E.A., Schutz, F., Connolly, L.M., Chakel, J.A., Meza, J.E., Miller, C.A., Fenyo, D., Eng, J.K., Adkins, J.N., and Omenn, G,S. (2005) An evaluation, comparison, and accurate benchmarking of several publicly available MS/MS search algorithms: sensitivity and specificity analysis. Proteomics 5, 3475-90 
  15. Perkins, D.N., Pappin, D.J.C., Creasy, D.M. and Cottrell, J.S. (1999) Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 20, 3551-3567 

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 없음


원문 PDF 다운로드

  • ScienceON :

원문 URL 링크

원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다. (원문복사서비스 안내 바로 가기)

상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

이 논문과 연관된 기능

DOI 인용 스타일