목적: 안구운동과 주시 능력은 독서 시 외적 정보를 얻기 위한 주요한 과정이며 명료한 시생활 조건의 주요한 매개변수로 작용한다. 본 연구는 주시 거리와 노안교정 방법의 다양한 조건에 의한 읽기능력과 주시 능력을 평가하기 위하여 시행하였다. 방법: 평균 $48.1{\pm}4.2$세의 22명이 참여 하였으며, 각 피실험자는 실험에 적합한 선별검사를 실시하여 안질환이 없으며 이전에 콘택트렌즈 사용 경험이 없고 단초점 근용안경을 제외한 어떠한 형태의 노안교정 경험이 없는 대상자로 선별하였다. 읽기시간과 주시 횟수는 단초점렌즈(SV), 이중초점렌즈(BIF), 누진렌즈(PAL) 그리고 모노비젼(MV)를 한 상태에서 안구추적 시스템(Eye Tracking System, ASL Mobile Eye)을 사용하여 측정하였다. 읽기능력의 평가를 위한 원근 주시 거리는 2m, 40 cm에서 각각 시행하였다. 결과: 근거리 읽기능력의 평가에 있어서 읽기시간과 주시 횟수는 본 연구에 사용된 단초점렌즈와 노안교정안경과 모노비젼 사이에 유의한 차이를 보였으나(p<0.001), 특히나 단초점렌즈를 착용하였을 경우, 이중초점, 누진렌즈 그리고 모노비젼을 착용하였을 경우에 비해 읽기시간과 주시시간이 증가하였다. 하지만 원거리 읽기능력의 평가에서는 모든 조건에서 유사한 결과를 보였으며, 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 결론: 원거리와 근거리 시력의 교정을 목적으로 안경렌즈나 콘택트렌즈와 같은 노안교정방법의 사용은 근업시 읽기와 주시 능력에 도움이 될 수 있으나, 노안자에게 있어서 근거리 교정이 없는 단초점렌즈의 사용은 근거리에 대한 조절력 부족으로 인해 읽기시간의 증가와 주시 횟수 또한 증가함을 보였다. 추후 연구에는 본 연구에서는 노안교정의 무경험자를 대상으로 측정했으나 적응 능력을 고려한 노안교정 유경험자에 대한 연구를 기대할 수 있을 것이다.
목적: 안구운동과 주시 능력은 독서 시 외적 정보를 얻기 위한 주요한 과정이며 명료한 시생활 조건의 주요한 매개변수로 작용한다. 본 연구는 주시 거리와 노안교정 방법의 다양한 조건에 의한 읽기능력과 주시 능력을 평가하기 위하여 시행하였다. 방법: 평균 $48.1{\pm}4.2$세의 22명이 참여 하였으며, 각 피실험자는 실험에 적합한 선별검사를 실시하여 안질환이 없으며 이전에 콘택트렌즈 사용 경험이 없고 단초점 근용안경을 제외한 어떠한 형태의 노안교정 경험이 없는 대상자로 선별하였다. 읽기시간과 주시 횟수는 단초점렌즈(SV), 이중초점렌즈(BIF), 누진렌즈(PAL) 그리고 모노비젼(MV)를 한 상태에서 안구추적 시스템(Eye Tracking System, ASL Mobile Eye)을 사용하여 측정하였다. 읽기능력의 평가를 위한 원근 주시 거리는 2m, 40 cm에서 각각 시행하였다. 결과: 근거리 읽기능력의 평가에 있어서 읽기시간과 주시 횟수는 본 연구에 사용된 단초점렌즈와 노안교정안경과 모노비젼 사이에 유의한 차이를 보였으나(p<0.001), 특히나 단초점렌즈를 착용하였을 경우, 이중초점, 누진렌즈 그리고 모노비젼을 착용하였을 경우에 비해 읽기시간과 주시시간이 증가하였다. 하지만 원거리 읽기능력의 평가에서는 모든 조건에서 유사한 결과를 보였으며, 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 결론: 원거리와 근거리 시력의 교정을 목적으로 안경렌즈나 콘택트렌즈와 같은 노안교정방법의 사용은 근업시 읽기와 주시 능력에 도움이 될 수 있으나, 노안자에게 있어서 근거리 교정이 없는 단초점렌즈의 사용은 근거리에 대한 조절력 부족으로 인해 읽기시간의 증가와 주시 횟수 또한 증가함을 보였다. 추후 연구에는 본 연구에서는 노안교정의 무경험자를 대상으로 측정했으나 적응 능력을 고려한 노안교정 유경험자에 대한 연구를 기대할 수 있을 것이다.
Purpose: Eye movements and fixation ability are an important procedure to obtain external information and essential means of clear vision. The purpose of this study was to determine the reading performance such as reading time and number of fixations when random text was viewed at varying distances....
Purpose: Eye movements and fixation ability are an important procedure to obtain external information and essential means of clear vision. The purpose of this study was to determine the reading performance such as reading time and number of fixations when random text was viewed at varying distances. Methods: Twenty two presbyopes were participated. All subjects were screened for their suitability to participate in the study by clinical examination, and none of the participants had previously worn contact lenses and no previous experience of wearing any types of presbyopic vision correction except single vision. The reading time and number of fixations were recorded using eye tracker while each subjects was waring four vision corrections which included single vision for distance (SV), bifocal spectacle lenses (BIF), progressive addition lenses (PAL), and monovision (MV). The reading material was presented at distance and near distance. Results: Reading time and number of fixations for near stimulus were significantly different among vision correction used in this study (p<0.001). In particular, wearing SV required longer reading time and produced longer fixation duration for near text. However, reading distance text was similarity performed across vision corrections tested and there was no statistical difference found for either reading time and number of fixations. Conclusions: Wearing presbyopic vision correction is advantageous for reading task of near stimuli, but not having near correction such as wearing SV could result in longer reading time and higher number of fixation due to lacks of accommodative ability for near task. For the future studies, it would be interesting to examine the performance of reading both at adapted and unadapted stages as examining only unadapted wearers was limitation of this study.
Purpose: Eye movements and fixation ability are an important procedure to obtain external information and essential means of clear vision. The purpose of this study was to determine the reading performance such as reading time and number of fixations when random text was viewed at varying distances. Methods: Twenty two presbyopes were participated. All subjects were screened for their suitability to participate in the study by clinical examination, and none of the participants had previously worn contact lenses and no previous experience of wearing any types of presbyopic vision correction except single vision. The reading time and number of fixations were recorded using eye tracker while each subjects was waring four vision corrections which included single vision for distance (SV), bifocal spectacle lenses (BIF), progressive addition lenses (PAL), and monovision (MV). The reading material was presented at distance and near distance. Results: Reading time and number of fixations for near stimulus were significantly different among vision correction used in this study (p<0.001). In particular, wearing SV required longer reading time and produced longer fixation duration for near text. However, reading distance text was similarity performed across vision corrections tested and there was no statistical difference found for either reading time and number of fixations. Conclusions: Wearing presbyopic vision correction is advantageous for reading task of near stimuli, but not having near correction such as wearing SV could result in longer reading time and higher number of fixation due to lacks of accommodative ability for near task. For the future studies, it would be interesting to examine the performance of reading both at adapted and unadapted stages as examining only unadapted wearers was limitation of this study.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
문제 정의
as reading text are poorly understood. This study therefore aimed to determine the reading parameters such as reading time and number of fixations when random text is viewed at varying distances.
This study demonstrated that wearing types of presbyopic correction can affect the fixation number and time when reading distance and neat texts.
제안 방법
The study involved a repeated measures design using four different visual optical corrections; SV for distance as a control vision correction, PAL, bifocal spectacle lenses (BIF), and MV. Plano lenses were prescribed for distance viewing and a+2.
The images from the eye and scene camera are then interleaved and recorded by a digital video cassette recorder (GV-D1000 NTSC, SONY). The data collected for analysis from the eye tracking system was analyzed using eye movement analysis software (Gaze Tracker) and the parameters for analysis included the number of fixations made while looking at the distance and near numbers. Fixation was defined as a static eye position lasting more than 0.
, [18] also examined how adaptation could affect head movement. In their study, they monitored extent of head movements before and after adaptation to PAL when undertaking a discrimination task at distances of 2m and 45cm and when reading text and showed that there was more head movements when adapted to PAL.
대상 데이터
Twenty two individuals subjects were recruited to participate in this study (mean age of 48.1 ±4.2 years). All subjects were screened for their suitability to participate in the study by clinical examination, and none of the participants had previously worn contact lenses.
This finding was not consistent with Brown and Collins’s study that measured reaction time (button press task) of different types of presbyopic vision correction on targets of different distances(4m, 66 cm, and 33 cm)[15]. The target was made up of three LED dots and can be only discriminated with direct fixation. In their study, there was no difference in reaction time across the presbyopic spectacles (bifocal and trifocal) and presbyopic contact lenses (monovision, soft bifocal, concentric bifocal, modified monovision and hard bifocal contact lenses).
데이터처리
The parameters (number of fixation and reading time) were analysed using repeated measures ANOVAs as the within-subjects variable. Where Mauchly’s test was significant, and sphericity could not be assumed, the Greenhouse Geisser correction was used.
성능/효과
modern life. This study demonstrated the advantage of having near correction on reading text at near distance but not having near correction such as wearing SV could result in longer reading time and higher number of fixation due to lacks of accommodative ability for near task. Therefore, not having near addition for presbyopes may express inefficient performance when reading at near text.
참고문헌 (22)
Patorgis C. J. Presbyopia. In: Amos JF (ed), "Diagnosis and management in vision care", Butters worth Publishers, Stoneham, England, pp. 315-327(1987).
Davies J. C., Kemp G. J., Stevens G., Frostick S. P., and Manning D. P., "Bifocal/varifocal spectacles, lighting and missed-step accidents", Safety Science, 38(3):211-226(2001).
Meister D. J. and Fisher S. W., "Progress in the spectacle correction of presbyopia. Part 1: Design and development of progressive lenses", Clin. Exp. Optom., 91(3):240-250(1988).
Sheedy J. E., "Correlation analysis of the optics of progressive addition lenses", Optom. Vis. Sci., 81(5):350-361(2004).
McGill E. and Erickson P., "Stereopsis in presbyopes wearing monovision and simultaneous vision bifocal contact lenses", Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt., 65(8):619-626(1988).
Gutkowski M. and Cassin B., "Stereopsis and monovision in the contact lens management of presbyopia", Bin. Vis. Q., 6:31-36(1991).
Back A. P., Grant T., and Hine N., "Comparative visual performance of three presbyopic contact lens corrections", Optom. Vis. Sci., 69(6):474-480(1992).
Collins M. J., Brown B., and Bowman K. J., "Contrast sensitivity with contact lens corrections for presbyopia", Ophthalmic. Physiol. Opt., 9(2):133-138(1989).
Jain S., Arora I., and Azar D. T., "Success of monovision in presbyopes: review of the literature and potential applications to refractive surgery", Surv. Ophthalmol., 40(6):491-499(1996).
Henderson J. M., Pollasek A., and Rayner K., "Covert visual attention and extrafoveal information use during object identification", Perception & Psychophysics, 45(3):196-208(1989).
Chu B. S., Wood J. M., and Collins M. J., "Influence of presbyopic vision correction on driving-related eye and head movements", Optom. Vis. Sci., 86(11):1267-1275(2009).
Brown B. and Collins M. J., "Reaction times in a complex task by presbyopic observers with spectacle and contact lens corrections", Clin. Exp. Optom., 71(3):94-99(1988).
Hutchings N., Irving E. L., Jung N, Dowling J. M., and Wells K. A., "Eye and head movement alterations in naive progressive addition lens wearers", Ophthalmic. Physiol. Opt., 27(2):142-153(2007).
Han Y., Ciuffreda K. J., Selenow A., and Ali S. R., "Dynamic interactions of eye and head movements when reading with single-vision and progressive lenses in a simulated computer-based environment", Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 44(4):1534-1545(2003).
Collins M. J., Bruce A., and Thompson B., "Adaptation to monovision", ICLC, 21(11-12):218-224(1994).
Papas E., Decenzo-Verbeten T., Fonn D., et al., "Utility of short-term evaluation of presbyopic contact lens performance", Eye Contact Lens, 35(3):144-148(2009).
Sheedy J. E., Harris M. G., Bronge M. R., Joe S. M., and Mook M. A., "Task and visual performance with concentric bifocal contact lenses", Optom. Vis. Sci., 68(7):537-541(1991).
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.