$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

The Influence of Likert Scale Format on Response Result, Validity, and Reliability of Scale -Using Scales Measuring Economic Shopping Orientation- 원문보기

한국의류학회지 = Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, v.34 no.6, 2010년, pp.913 - 927  

Kim, Sae-Hee (Div. of Fashion & Beauty, Busan Kyungsang College)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This study investigates the influence of Likert scale formats such as the number of response categories and the inclusion of a mid-point from a methodological point of view using instruments that measure a fashionmarketing-related subject. Using a self-administered questionnaire, 201 respondents rat...

주제어

참고문헌 (44)

  1. Alwin, D. F. (1997). Feeling thermometers versus 7-point scales: Which are better? Sociological Methods & Research, 25(3), 318-340. 

  2. Andrews, F.M. (1984). Construct validity and error components of survey measures: A structural modeling approach. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 409-442. 

  3. Bae, J. (2002). An analysis of the validity and reliability about the utility of the neutral point response category on a likert scale. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul. 

  4. Boote, A. S. (1981). Reliability testing of psychographic scales: Five-point or seven-point? Anchored or labeled? Journal of Advertising Research, 21, 53-60. 

  5. Brown, G, Wilding, R. E. II., & Coulter, R. L. (1991). Customer evaluation of retail salespeople using the SOCO scale: A replication, extension, and application. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 9, 347-351. 

  6. Chae, S. (2005). Social research method and analysis (3rd ed.). Seoul: B&M Books. 

  7. Chang, L. (1994). A psychometric evaluation of 4-point and 6-point liken-type scales in relation to reliability and validity. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18(3), 205-215. 

  8. Chen, C., Lee, S., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Psychological Science, 6(3), 170-175. 

  9. Clarke, III. I. (2000). Extreme response style in cross-cultural research: An empirical investigation. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 15(1), 137-152. 

  10. Converse, J., & Presser, S. (1986). Survey questions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. 

  11. Cox, E. P. III. (1980). The optimal number of response alternatives for a scales: A review. Journal of Marketing Rsearch, 17, 407-422 

  12. Dawes, J. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point, and 10-point scales. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 61-77. 

  13. Finn, R. H. (1972). Effects of some variations in rating scale characteristics on the means and reliabilities of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32, 255-265. 

  14. Friedman, H. H., Wilamowsky, Y., & Friedman, L. W. (1981). A comparison of balanced and unbalanced rating scales. The Mid-Atlantic Journal of Business, 19(2), 1-7. 

  15. Garland, R. (1991). The mid-point on a rating scale: Is it desirable? Marketing Bulletine, 2, 66-70. 

  16. Garner, W. R. (1960). Rating scales, discriminability, and information transmission. The Psychological Review, 67, 342-352. 

  17. Green, P. E., & Rao, V. R. (1970). Rating scales and information recovery: How many scales and response categories to use? Journal of Marketing, 34, 33-39. 

  18. Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill. 

  19. Hancock, G. R., & Klockars, A. J. (1991). The effect of scale manipulations on validity: Targeting frequency rating scales for anticipated performance levels. Applied Ergonomics, 22, 147-154. 

  20. Hofacker, C. F. (1984). Categorical judgment scaling with ordinal assumptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 19, 91-106. 

  21. Jacoby, J., & Matell, M. S. (1971). Three-point scales always good enough. Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 495-500. 

  22. Jenkins, G, & Taber, T. (1977). A Monte Carlo study of factors affecting three indices of composite scale reliability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 392-398. 

  23. Kim, N. (2001). A comparative analysis of items election methods for developing the likert scale. Unpublished master's thesis, Yonsei University, Seoul. 

  24. Kim, S., & Rhee, E. (2004). Development of measurement scale for clothing shopping orientation (Part I). Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 28(9/10), 1253-1264. 

  25. Komorita, S. S. (1963). Attitude content, intensity, and the neutral point on a likert scale. Journal of Social Psychology, 61(December), 327-334. 

  26. Komorita, S. S., & Graham, W. K. (1965). Number of scale points and the reliability of scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 25, 987-995. 

  27. Kulas, J. T., Stachowski, A. A., & Haynes, B. A. (2008). Middle response functioning in likert-responses to personality items. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22(3), 251-259. 

  28. Lissitz, R. W., & Green, S. B. (1975). Effect of the number of scale points on reliability: A Monte Carlo approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 10-13. 

  29. Loken, B., Pirie, P., Virnig, K. A., Hinkle, R. L., & Salmon, C. T. (1987). The use of 0-10 scales in telephone surveys. Journal of the Market Research Society, 29(3), 353-362. 

  30. Lozano, L. M., Garcia-Cueto, E., & Muniz, J. (2008). Effect of the number of response categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales. European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 4(2), 73-79. 

  31. Matell, M. S., & Jacoby, J. (1971). Is there an optimal number of alternatives for likert scales items? Study I: Reliability and validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 657-674. 

  32. Matell, M. S., & Jacoby, J. (1972). Is there an optimal number of alternatives for likert scale items? Effects of testing time and scale properties. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(6), 506-509. 

  33. Mckelvie, S. J. (1978). Graphic rating scales: How many categories? British Journal of Psychology, 69, 185-202. 

  34. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. 

  35. Peabody, D. (1962). Two components in bipolar scales: Direction and extremeness. Psychological Review. 69, 65-73. 

  36. Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104, 1-15. 

  37. Ramsay, J. O. (1973). The effect of number of categories in rating scales on precision of estimation of scale values. Psychometrika, 38, 513-533. 

  38. Remmers, H. H., & Ewart, E. (1941). Reliability of multiple choice measuring instruments as a function of the Spearman-Brown prophecy formula. Journal of Educational Psychology, 32, 61-66. 

  39. Saris, W. E. (1988). Variation in response functions: A source of measurement error in attitude research. Amsterdam: Sociometric Research Foundation. 

  40. Schutz, H. G., & Rucker, M. H. (1975). A comparison of variable configurations across scale lengths: An empirical study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 35, 319-324. 

  41. Son, Y., & Chae, S. (2008). Systematic questionnaire design (2nd ed.). Seoul: B&M Books. 

  42. Stone, M. H. (2004). Substantive scale construction. In E. V. Smith Jr. & R. M. Smith (Eds.), Introduction to rasch measurement (pp. 201-225). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press. 

  43. Wildt, A. R., & Mazis, M. B. (1978). Determinants of scale response: Label versus position. Journal of Marketing Research. 15, 261-267. 

  44. Windschitl, P. D., & Wells, G. L. (1996). Measuring psychological uncertainty: Verbal versus numeric methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2(4), 343-364. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로