$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

목 적: 정상 장기의 부작용 확률(normal tissue complication probability, NTCP) 모델을 이용하여, 중심폐거리(central lung distance, CLD)와 최대심장거리(maximal heart distance)와 같은 이차원 방사선치료의 방사선학적 지표들과 삼차원 입체조형방사선치료의 부작용확률 사이의 관계를 평가해 보고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2006년 11월부터 2007년 8월까지 서울아산병원에서 유방암으로 진단받고 수술 후 방사선치료를 시행 받은 110명을 무작위로 추출하여 분석하였다. 방사선치료는 2문 빗면 조사법, 3문 조사법, Reverse Hockey Stick법을 사용하였고, 유방 및 흉벽에는 5,040 cGy/28회, 쇄골 상부에는 4,500 cGy/25회로 조사하였고, 유방보존술을 시행한 경우에는 원발 병소에 1,000 cGy/4회의 추가치료를 하였다. 모든 환자에서 전산화단층촬영모의치료를 시행하였고, Eclipse Planning System을 사용하여 선량 계산을 시행 후 폐와 심장의 선량 부피 곡선(dose volume histogram, DVH)을 추출하였다. 추출된 DVH를 사용하여 modified Lymam model과 relative seriality model을 통해 NTCP를 계산하고 분석하였다. 결 과: 전체 환자의 방사선 폐렴과 심장 사망의 NTCP 값은 각각 0.5%, 0.7%로 낮은 수치를 보였다. 방사선 폐렴의 NTCP는 2문 조사법과 3문 조사법에 비해 Reverse Hockey Stick 법에서 높았다(0%, 0%, 3.1%, p<0.001). 방사선 폐렴의 NTCP 값은 중심폐거리가 커질수록 증가하였고, 심장 사망의 NTCP는 최대심장거리가 커질수록 증가하였다($R^2=0.808$). 결 론: 이차원 방사선치료의 방사선학적 지표들과 삼차원 입체조형방사선치료의 NTCP 값 사이에는 밀접한 관계가 있다. 이러한 연관성을 통해 과거의 부작용학률에 대한 자료들을 이차원 방사선치료의 방사선학적 지표들을 이용하여 NTCP 모델의 관점에서 재분석하는데 유용할 것으로 생각된다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of 3-dimensional (3-D) radiotherapy and the radiographic parameters of 2-dimensional (2-D) radiotherapy such as central lung distance (CLD) and maximal heart distance (MHD). Materials and Methods: We anal...

주제어

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper 아이콘 AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

제안 방법

  • 1% in the reverse hockey stick method. Considering the ipsilateral lung as a single organ, the mean NTCPs of radiation-induced pneumonitis were 0.1%, 4.5%, and 6.4% for the 2-field, 3-field, and reverse hockey stick methods, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the NTCP between the radiation techniques (p<0.
  • 37%). However, in this study, the reverse hockey stick method treatment was done by 2-D simulation and the lung dose was evaluated not for the treatment but for this investigation. So, the high NTCP values of the reverse hockey stick method in this study, may be biased by the inappropriate dose prescription of 2-D RT.
  • Because we did not analyze the actual clinical data of complications, it is difficult to apply our results directly to the clinic. However, our main purpose of this study was to use the relationship between the NTCP and radiographic parameters to reanalyze old studies without full 3-D dose distributions. Therefore, our results are useful to reanalyze the previous 2-D-based clinical reports about breast RT complications as a viewpoint of the NTCP.
  • The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between the NTCP values of 3-D RT and radiographic parameters, such as the CLD and MHD of 2-D imaging, using several RT techniques.
  • However, our main purpose of this study was to use the relationship between the NTCP and radiographic parameters to reanalyze old studies without full 3-D dose distributions. Therefore, our results are useful to reanalyze the previous 2-D-based clinical reports about breast RT complications as a viewpoint of the NTCP.

대상 데이터

  • Twenty left-sided breast cancer patients, using the two-field (n=10) or three-field technique (n=10), were randomly selected from the group of 110 patients. We performed 2 virtual simulations for each patient (2 cm and 3 cm of the CLD).

이론/모형

  • 2. Dose volume histogram (DVH) of a breast cancer patient and the modified Lyman model and relative seriality model.
  • RT was performed using the two-field standard tangential technique (n=47), three-field technique (n=47), or reverse hockey stick technique (n=16). All of the patients treated with the two-field technique received breast-conserving surgery.
본문요약 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (27)

  1. Favourable and unfavourable effects on long-term survival of radiotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000;355:1757-1770 

  2. Overgaard M, Hansen PS, Overgaard J, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group 82b Trial. N Engl J Med 1997;337:949-955 

  3. Overgaard M, Jensen MB, Overgaard J, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk postmenopausal breastcancer patients given adjuvant tamoxifen: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group DBCG 82c randomised trial. Lancet 1999;353:1641-1648 

  4. Das IJ, Cheng EC, Schultz DJ, Harris EE, Solin LJ. Radiation pneumonitis in megavoltage beam treatment of breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001;51:245-246 

  5. Taghian AG, Assaad SI, Niemierko A, et al. Risk of pneumonitis in breast cancer patients treated with radiation therapy and combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:1806-1811 

  6. Gyenes G, Gagliardi G, Lax I, Fornander T, Rutqvist LE. Evaluation of irradiated heart volumes in stage I breast cancer patients treated with postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:1348-1353 

  7. Harris EE, Correa C, Hwang WT, et al. Late cardiac mortality and morbidity in early-stage breast cancer patients after breast-conservation treatment. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4100-4106 

  8. Nixon AJ, Manola J, Gelman R, et al. No long-term increase in cardiac-related mortality after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy using modern techniques. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:1374-1379 

  9. Darby SC, McGale P, Taylor CW, Peto R. Long-term mortality from heart disease and lung cancer after radiotherapy for early breast cancer: prospective cohort study of about 300,000 women in US SEER cancer registries. Lancet Oncol 2005;6:557-565 

  10. Paszat LF, Mackillop WJ, Groome PA, Schulze K, Holowaty E. Mortality from myocardial infarction following postlumpectomy radiotherapy for breast cancer: a populationbased study in Ontario, Canada. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999;43:755-762 

  11. Kutcher GJ, Burman C, Brewster L, Goitein M, Mohan R. Histogram reduction method for calculating complication probabilities for three-dimensional treatment planning evaluations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991;21:137-146 

  12. Lyman JT. Complication probability as assessed from dose-volume histograms. Radiat Res Suppl 1985;8:S13-S19. 

  13. Gagliardi G, Lax I, Ottolenghi A, Rutqvist LE. Long-term cardiac mortality after radiotherapy of breast cancer: application of the relative seriality model. Br J Radiol 1996;69:839-846 

  14. Kallman P, Agren A, Brahme A. Tumour and normal tissue responses to fractionated non-uniform dose delivery. Int J Radiat Biol 1992;62:249-262 

  15. Emami B, Lyman J, Brown A, et al. Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991;21:109-122 

  16. Korreman SS, Pedersen AN, Josipovic M, et al. Cardiac and pulmonary complication probabilities for breast cancer patients after routine end-inspiration gated radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2006;80:257-262 

  17. Moon SH, Kim TJ, Eom KY, et al. Radiation-induced pulmonary toxicity following adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer. J Korean Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 2007;25:109-117 

  18. Lingos TI, Recht A, Vicini F, Abner A, Silver B, Harris JR. Radiation pneumonitis in breast cancer patients treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991;21:355-360 

  19. Pierce LJ, Butler JB, Martel MK, et al. Postmastectomy radiotherapy of the chest wall: dosimetric comparison of common techniques. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002;52:1220-1230 

  20. Burman C, Kutcher GJ, Emami B, Goitein M. Fitting of normal tissue tolerance data to an analytic function. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991;21:123-135 

  21. Rothwell RI, Kelly SA, Joslin CA. Radiation pneumonitis in patients treated for breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 1985;4:9-14 

  22. Rotstein S, Lax I, Svane G. Influence of radiation therapy on the lung-tissue in breast cancer patients: CT-assessed density changes and associated symptoms. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990;18:173-180 

  23. Rutqvist LE, Lax I, Fornander T, Johansson H. Cardiovascular mortality in a randomized trial of adjuvant radiation therapy versus surgery alone in primary breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1992;22:887-896 

  24. Cuzick J, Stewart H, Rutqvist L, et al. Cause-specific mortality in long-term survivors of breast cancer who participated in trials of radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:447-453 

  25. Vallis KA, Pintilie M, Chong N, et al. Assessment of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality after radiation therapy for early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:1036-1042 

  26. Hojris I, Andersen J, Overgaard M, Overgaard J. Late treatment-related morbidity in breast cancer patients randomized to postmastectomy radiotherapy and systemic treatment versus systemic treatment alone. Acta Oncol 2000;39:355-372 

  27. Hurkmans CW, Cho BC, Damen E, Zijp L, Mijnheer BJ. Reduction of cardiac and lung complication probabilities after breast irradiation using conformal radiotherapy with or without intensity modulation. Radiother Oncol 2002;62:163-171 

저자의 다른 논문 :

LOADING...

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

BRONZE

출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로