$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

지식검색커뮤니티 정보의 신뢰성에 관한 연구 동향 분석
Research Trends of the Credibility of Information in Social Q&A 원문보기

정보관리학회지 = Journal of the Korean society for information management, v.29 no.2 = no.84, 2012년, pp.135 - 154  

김수정 (Department of Library and Information Science, Chonbuk National University)

초록

야후 앤서(Yahoo! Answers)와 네이버 지식인과 같은 지식검색 커뮤니티는 인터넷에서 정보를 찾고 공유하는 중요한 수단으로 부상하였다. 그러나 지식검색 커뮤니티의 인기가 날로 높아지는 것과 비례하여 정보자원으로서의 유효성에 대한 우려 또한 커지고 있는 것이 주지의 사실이다. 이러한 맥락에서 본 논문은 지식검색 커뮤니티와 관련된 신뢰성 문제에 대한 선행 연구들을 정리하고 향후 연구 과제를 제시함으로써 지식검색 커뮤니티 신뢰성에 관한 연구를 활성화시키는데 도움이 되고자 한다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Social Q&A sites such as Yahoo! Answers and Naver Knowledge-iN have become a viable method for information seeking and sharing on the Web. Considering their immense popularity and growing concerns about their validity as information sources, questions about the credibility of the information provide...

주제어

참고문헌 (46)

  1. Adamic, L. A., Zhang, J., Bakshy, E., & Ackerman, M. S. (2008). Knowledge sharing and Yahoo Answers: Everyone knows something. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web, 665-674. 

  2. Agichtein, E., Castillo C., Donato, D., Gionis, A., & Mishne, G. (2008). Finding high-quality content in social media. Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 183-194. 

  3. Barry, C. L. (1994). User-defined relevance criteria: An exploratory study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(3), 149-159. 

  4. Bateman, J. (1999). Modeling the importance of end-user relevance criteria. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 36, 396-406. 

  5. Bian J., Liu, Y., Agichtein, E., & Zha, H. (2008). Finding the right facts in the crowd: factoid question answering over social media. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web, 467-476. 

  6. Bouguessa, M., Dumoulin, B., & Wang, S. (2008). Identifying authoritative actors in question-answering forums: the case of Yahoo! Answers. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 866-874. 

  7. Chen, Y., Ho, T., & Kim, Y. (2010). Knowledge market design: A field experiment on Google Answers. Journal of Public Economics Theory, 12(4), 641-664. 

  8. Dom, B., & Paranjpe, D. (2008). A bayesian technique for estimating the credibility of question answerers. Proceedings of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics on Data Mining, 399-409. 

  9. Fichman, P. (2011). A comparative assessment of answer quality on four question answering sites. Journal of Information Science, 37(5), 476-486. 

  10. Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2000). Perceptions of Internet information credibility. Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility, 77(3), 515-540. 

  11. Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2008). The credibility of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal, 72(3-4), 137-148. 

  12. Gazan, R. (2006). Specialists and synthesists in a question answering community. Proceedings of the 69th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Retrieved from http://eprints.rclis.org/handle/10760/8793 

  13. Golbeck, J., & Fleischmann, K. R. (2010). Trust in social Q&A: The impact of text and photo cues of expertise. Proceedings of the 73th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(1), 1-10. 

  14. Guo, J., Xu, S., Bao, S., & Yu, Y. (2008). Tapping on the potential of Q&A community by recommending answer providers. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 921-930. 

  15. Harper, F. M., Moy, D., & Konstan, J. A. (2009). Facts or friends?: Distinguishing informational and conversational questions in social Q&A sites. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 759-768. 

  16. Harper, F. M., Raban, D., Rafaeli, S., & Konstan, J. A. (2008). Predictors of answer quality in online Q&A sites. Proceeding of the 26th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 865-874. 

  17. Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. 

  18. Jeon, G. Y., Kim, Y. M., & Chen, Y. (2010). Re-examining price as a predictor of answer quality in an online Q&A site. Proceedings of the 28th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 325-328. 

  19. Jeon, J., Croft, B., Lee, J. H., & Park, S. (2006). A framework to predict the quality of answers with non-textual features. Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 228-235. 

  20. Jurczyk, P., & Agichtein, E. (2007). Discovering authorities in question answer communities by using link analysis. Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 919-922. 

  21. Kim, B., & Han, I. (2009). The role of trust belief and its antecedents in a community-driven knowledge environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(5), 1012-1026. 

  22. Kim, D. J., Park, G. W., & Lee, S. H. (2010). QualityRank: Measuring authority of answer in Q&A community using social network analysis. Journal of KIISE: Databases, 37(6), 343-350. 

  23. Kim, M. K. (2007). The current status and problems of a knowledge community in history: Focusing on Naver Knowledge-iN. Sangmyung University. The Graduation School of Education. Master Thesis. 

  24. Kim, S. (2010). Questioners' credibility judgments of answers in a question answering community site. Information Research, 15(2) paper 432. Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/ir/15-2/paper432.html 

  25. Kim, S., & Oh, S. (2009). Users' relevance criteria for evaluating answers in a social Q&A site. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 716-727. 

  26. Kleinberg, J. (1999). Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM, 46(5), 604-632. 

  27. Lazar, J., Meiselwitz, G., & Feng, J. (2007). Understanding Web credibility: A synthesis of the research literature. Foundation and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, 1(2), 139-202. 

  28. Liu, Y., & Agichtein, E. (2008). On the evolution of the Yahoo! Answers QA community. Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 737-738. 

  29. Oh, S., Warroll, A., & Yi, Y. (2011). Quality evaluation of health answers in Yahoo! Answers: A comparison between experts and users. Proceedings of the 74th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48(1), 1-3. 

  30. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., & Winograd, T. (1998). The Pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the Web. Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project. 

  31. Park, J. B., & Jeong, D. Y. (2004). An empirical study on Web-based question-answer services. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 21(3), 83-98. 

  32. Park, S., Lee, J. H., & Jeon, J. (2006). Evaluation of the documents from the Web-based question and answer service. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 40(2), 299-314. 

  33. Rieh, S. Y., & Danielson, D. R. (2007). Credibility: a multidisciplinary framework. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 307-364. 

  34. Ridings, C. M., Gefen, D., & Arinze, B. (2002). Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3/4), 271-295. 

  35. Rodrigues, E. M., & Milic-Frayling, N. (2009). Socializing or knowledge sharing? Characterizing social intent in community question answering. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 112-1136. 

  36. Self, C. S. (1996). Credibility. In M. Salwen & D. Stacks (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 421-441). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 

  37. Suryanto, M. A., Lim, E. B., Sun, A., & Chiang, R. H. L. (2009). Quality-aware collaborative question answering: methods and evaluation. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 142-151. 

  38. Taylor, L. D. (2009, May). Static avatars, social presence, and online answers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Marriott, Chicago, IL. 

  39. Taylor, R. S. (1986). Value-added processes in information systems. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 

  40. Tseng, S., & Fogg, B. J. (1999). Credibility and computing technology. Communications of the ACM, 42(5), 39-44. 

  41. Tutos, A., & Molla, D. (2010). A study on the use of search engines for answering clinical questions. Proceedings of the 4th Australasian Workshop on Health Informatics and Knowledge Management, 108, 61-68. 

  42. Wang, X., Tu, X., Feng, D., & Zhang, L. (2009). Ranking community answers by modeling question-answer relationships via analogical reasoning. Proceedings of the 32nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information retrieval, 179-186. 

  43. Wilson, P. (1983). Second-hand knowledge: An inquiry into cognitive authority. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. 

  44. Yahoo! Answers Team (2009, October 5). Did you know? Message posted to http://yanswersblog.com/index.php/archives/2009/10/05/did-you-know/ 

  45. Zhang, J., Ackerman, M. A., & Adamic, L. (2007). Expertise networks in online communities: Structure and algorithms. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, 221-230. 

  46. Zheng, X., Hu, Z., Xu, A., & Chen, D. (2012). Algorithm for recommending answer providers in community-based question and answering. Journal of Information Science, 38(1), 3-14. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

BRONZE

출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로