본 연구에서는 제주황기(Astragalus nakaianus)의 분류학적 위치를 명확히 하고 한국산 재배황기(A. mongholicus cultivar)의 올바른 학명을 부여하기 위하여 외부형태형질과 ITS 그리고 5구간의 cp non-coding DNA의 염기서열을 조사하였다. 또한 9개의 마이크로새털라이트 마커를 이용하여 3집단 61개체에 대한 유전적 구조가 분석되었다. 그 결과, 남한산 재배황기와 A. mongholicus var. dahuricus 사이에서는 형태와 ITS 염기서열상에서 유의한 차이점이 없었다. 제주황기는 A. mongholicus var. mongholicus 그리고 var. dahuricus와 줄기의 습성, 식물체의 길이, 엽축의 길이, 소엽의 길이 등에서 형태적으로 차이를 보였다. ITS와 cp non-coding 구간 염기서열에서 제주황기는 황기(A. mongholicus)와 차이점을 보이지 않았지만, 마이크로새털라이트 분석에서 제주황기와 남한산 재배황기간에 뚜렷하게 구분된 구조를 보였다. 이러한 결과들을 보았을 때, 한국산 재배황기는 A. mongholicus var. dahuricus로 처리해야 하며 제주황기는 A. mongholicus의 변종으로서 취급되어야 한다.
본 연구에서는 제주황기(Astragalus nakaianus)의 분류학적 위치를 명확히 하고 한국산 재배황기(A. mongholicus cultivar)의 올바른 학명을 부여하기 위하여 외부형태형질과 ITS 그리고 5구간의 cp non-coding DNA의 염기서열을 조사하였다. 또한 9개의 마이크로새털라이트 마커를 이용하여 3집단 61개체에 대한 유전적 구조가 분석되었다. 그 결과, 남한산 재배황기와 A. mongholicus var. dahuricus 사이에서는 형태와 ITS 염기서열상에서 유의한 차이점이 없었다. 제주황기는 A. mongholicus var. mongholicus 그리고 var. dahuricus와 줄기의 습성, 식물체의 길이, 엽축의 길이, 소엽의 길이 등에서 형태적으로 차이를 보였다. ITS와 cp non-coding 구간 염기서열에서 제주황기는 황기(A. mongholicus)와 차이점을 보이지 않았지만, 마이크로새털라이트 분석에서 제주황기와 남한산 재배황기간에 뚜렷하게 구분된 구조를 보였다. 이러한 결과들을 보았을 때, 한국산 재배황기는 A. mongholicus var. dahuricus로 처리해야 하며 제주황기는 A. mongholicus의 변종으로서 취급되어야 한다.
To clarify the taxonomic position for Astragalus nakaianus and provide correct scientific name for A. mongholicus cultivar in South Korea, we examined external morphological characters and sequence variations from ITS and five cp non-coding DNA regions. Genetic structure was also analyzed for 61 ind...
To clarify the taxonomic position for Astragalus nakaianus and provide correct scientific name for A. mongholicus cultivar in South Korea, we examined external morphological characters and sequence variations from ITS and five cp non-coding DNA regions. Genetic structure was also analyzed for 61 individuals from three populations using nine microsatellite loci. We found no significant difference between the South Korean cultivar and A. mongholicus var. dahuricus when morphology and ITS sequences were considered. Morphologically, A. nakaianus specimens varied somewhat from A. mongholicus var. mongholicus and var. dahuricus in habit, plant height, and lengths of leaf axis and leaflet. Although sequence data from ITS and cp noncoding DNA regions could not distinguished A. nakaianus from A. mongholicus, microsatellite analysis revealed strong structuring between the cultivar and A. nakaianus. Therefore, we conclude that the South Korean A. mongholicus cultivar should be treated as A. mongholicus var. dahuricus and that A. nakaianus should be merged into A. mongholicus as a variety, i.e., A. mongholicus var. nakaianus.
To clarify the taxonomic position for Astragalus nakaianus and provide correct scientific name for A. mongholicus cultivar in South Korea, we examined external morphological characters and sequence variations from ITS and five cp non-coding DNA regions. Genetic structure was also analyzed for 61 individuals from three populations using nine microsatellite loci. We found no significant difference between the South Korean cultivar and A. mongholicus var. dahuricus when morphology and ITS sequences were considered. Morphologically, A. nakaianus specimens varied somewhat from A. mongholicus var. mongholicus and var. dahuricus in habit, plant height, and lengths of leaf axis and leaflet. Although sequence data from ITS and cp noncoding DNA regions could not distinguished A. nakaianus from A. mongholicus, microsatellite analysis revealed strong structuring between the cultivar and A. nakaianus. Therefore, we conclude that the South Korean A. mongholicus cultivar should be treated as A. mongholicus var. dahuricus and that A. nakaianus should be merged into A. mongholicus as a variety, i.e., A. mongholicus var. nakaianus.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
문제 정의
Because the taxonomic position of A. nakaianus is unclear and the scientific name (A. membranaceus) that is primarily applied to a Korean A. mongholicus cultivar is illegitimate, the objectives of the present study were to determine the taxonomic position of A. nakaianus and propose the correct nomenclature for that cultivar based on morphological and genetic variations.
제안 방법
ITS: ITS sequences determined in this study were aligned and analyzed together with GenBank sequences from the A. mongholicus complex. The complete dataset included two taxa and 603 characters.
대상 데이터
, 1990). One sample each was examined from the South Korean A. mongholicus cultivar and A. nakaianus (Table 1). We also analyzed ITS sequences reported previously (Guo et al.
mongholicus complex. The complete dataset included two taxa and 603 characters. Lengths were 227 to 228 bp for the ITS1 region, 164 bp for 5.
이론/모형
nakaianus via Fst. Data were tested for significance using the AMOVA option within GenAlEx 6.4 (Peakall and Smouse, 2006).
성능/효과
(2010) in terms of the effectiveness of ITS as a species identification marker, but not in terms of its efficiency at the intra-specific level. These results suggested that both the Korean A. mongholicus cultivar and A. nakaianus should be regarded as members of the A. mongholicus complex.
참고문헌 (49)
Baldwin, B. G. 1992. Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: an example from the Compositae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1: 3-16.
Baldwin, B. G., M. J. Sanderson, J. M. Porter, M. F. Wojciechowski, C. S. Campbell and M. J. Donoghue. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 247-277.
Bowles, V. G., R. Mayerhofer, C. Davis, A. G. Good and J. C. Hall. 2010. A phylogenetic investigation of Carthamus combining sequence and microsatellite data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 287: 85-97.
Bunge, A. 1868. Generis Astragali species Gerontogeae. Memoires de l'Academie Imperiale des Sciences de Saint Petersbourg, Septieme Serie 11: 1-140.
Chaudhary, L. B., T. S. Rana and K. K. Anand. 2008. Current status of the systematics of Astragalus L. (Fabaceae) with special reference to the Himalayan species in India. Taiwania 53: 338-355.
Chen, C. J. and X. Y. Zhu. 1990. Karyotype of Astragalus penduliflorus Lam. complex (Leguminosae) and its cytotaxonomic significance. Cathaya 2: 139-150.
Choi, I. S. and B. H. Choi. Isolation and characterization of 10 microsatellite loci from Korean Astragalus mongholicus (Fabaceae). Journal of Genetics. In press.
Dong, T. T. X., X. Q. Ma, C. Clarke, Z. H. Song, Z. N. Ji, C. K. Lo and K. W. R. Tsim. 2003. Phylogeny of Astragalus in China: molecular evidence from the DNA sequences of 5S rRNA spacer, ITS, and 18S rRNA. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 51: 6709-6714.
Earl, D. A. and B. M. von Holdt. 2012. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources 4: 359-361.
Evanno, G., S. Regnaut and J. Goudet. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology 14: 2611-2620.
Fu, K. T., Y. C. Ho. and S. B. Ho. 1993. Astragalus. In Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, Vol. 42 (1). Fu, K. T. (eds.), Science Press, Beijing. Pp. 78-349. (in Chinese)
Guo, H. Y., W. W. Wang, N. Yang, B. L. Guo, S. Zhang, R. J. Yang, Y. Yuan, J. L. Yu, S. N. Hu, Q. S. Sun and J. Yu. 2010. DNA barcoding provides distinction between Radix Astragali and its adulterants. Science China Life Sciences 53: 992-999.
Hancock, J. M. 1999. Microsatellites and other simple sequences: genomic context and mutational mechanisms. In Microsatellites: Evolution and Applications. Goldstein, D. B. and C. Schlotterer (eds.), Oxford University Press, New York. Pp. 1-9.
Im, R. J. 1998. Flora Coreana, Vol. 4. The Science and Technology Publishing House, Pyongyang. Pp. 123-124. (in Korean)
Kazempour Osaloo, S., A. A. Maassoumi and N. Murakami. 2003. Molecular systematics of the genus Astragalus L. (Fabaceae): phylogenetic analyses of nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacers and chloroplast gene ndhF sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 242: 1-32.
Kim, S. Y., H. W. Choi, C. S. Kim, J. S. Sung, J. Lee and J. W. Bang. 2006. Cytogenetic analyses of Astragalus species. Korean Journal of Medicinal Crop Science 14: 250-254. (in Korean)
Kim, Y. G., S. Y. Son, N. S. Seong and B. H. Lee. 2000. Flowering habit, pollination patterns and seed setting in Astragalus membranaceus Bunge. Korean Journal of Crop Science 45: 171-175. (in Korean)
Korea National Arboretum. 2008. Rare Plants Data Book in Korea. Geobook, Seoul. Pp. 110. (in Korean)
Lee, T. B. 2003. Coloured Flora of Korea, Vol. 1. Hyang Mun Sa, Seoul. Pp. 636. (in Korean)
Lee, Y. N. 1981. New taxa of Korean flora: 3. Korean Journal of Botany 24: 27-30.
Lee, Y. N. 2006. New Flora of Korea, Vol. 2. Gyohaksa, Seoul. Pp. 738. (in Korean)
Lee, Y. N. and C. A. Tho. 1959. Comparative study of Astragalus membranaceus Bunge and Astragalus hallasanenesis. Journal of Korean Culture Research Institute 1: 359-366. (in Korean)
Litt, M. and J. A. Luty. 1989. A hypervariable microsatellite revealed by in vitro amplification of a dinucleotide repeat within the cardiac muscle actin gene. American Journal of Human Genetics 44: 388-396.
Lock, J. M. and K. Simpson. 1991. Legumes of West Asia, a Check List. Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew.
McNeill, J., F. R. Barrie, W. R. Buck, V. Demoulin, W. Greuter, D. L. Hawksworth, P. S. Herendeen, S. Knapp, K. Marhold, J. Prado, W. F. Prud'homme van Reine, G. F. Smith, J. H. Wiersema and N. J. Turland. 2012. International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (Melbourne Code) adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress, Melbourne, Australia, 2011. Regnum Vegetabile vol. 154. Koeltz Scientific Books, Konigstein.
Moench, C. 1794. Methodus Plantas Horti Botanici et Agri Marburgensis. Marburgi Cattorum. Pp. 167.
Mort, M. E., J. K. Archibald, C. P. Randle, N. D. Levsen, T. R. O'Leary, K. Topalov, C. M. Wiegand and D. J. Crawford. 2007. Inferring phylogeny at low taxonomic levels: utility of rapidly evolving cpDNA and nuclear ITS loci. American Journal of Botany 94:173-183.
Nakai, T. 1914. Flora of Quelpeart and Wangto Island. Government General of Chosen, Seoul. Pp. 55 (in Japanese)
Nishizawa, T. and Y. Watano. 2000. Primer pairs suitable for PCRSSCP analysis of chloroplast DNA in angiosperms. Journal of Phytogeography and Taxonomy 48: 63-66.
Ohashi, H. 2001. Leguminosae. In Flora of Japan, Vol. 2b. Iwatsuki, K., D. E. Boufford and H. Ohba (eds.), Kodansha, Tokyo. Pp. 213-279.
Peakall, R. and P. Smouse. 2006. GENALEX 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288-295.
Podlech, D. 1999. New Astragali and Oxytropis from North Africa and Asia, including some new combinations and remarks on some species. Sendtnera 6: 135-174.
Pritchard, J. K., M. Stephens and P. Donnelly. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
Sang, T., D. J. Crawford and T. F. Stuessy. 1997. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 84: 1120-1136.
Shaw, J., E. Lickey, J. T. Beck, S. B. Farmer, W. Liu, J. Miller, K. C. Siripun, C. T. Winder, E. E. Schilling and R. L. Small. 2005. The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. American Journal of Botany 92: 142-166.
Shishkin, B. K. 1946. Leguminosae: Astragalus L. In Flora of the U.S.S.R., Vol. 12. Komarov, V. K. (eds.), Academy of Science of the U.S.S.R., Moskva-Leningrad. Pp. 1-681.
Taberlet, P., L. Gielly, G. Patou and J. Bouvet. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109.
Thompson, J. D., T. J. Gibson, F. Plewniak, F. Jeanmougin and D. G. Higguns. 1997. The CLUSTAL X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 24: 4876-4882.
Toh, C. A. 1971. A cytotaxonomic study on the Astragalus membranaceus and Astragalus membranaceus var. alpinus. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 3: 57-61. (in Korean)
Weising, K. N., H. Nybom, H. Wolff and G. Kahl. 2005. DNA Fingerprinting in Plants: Principles, Methods and Applications. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton. Pp. 41-45.
White, T. J., T. Bruns, S. Lee and J. Taylor. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A guide to methods and applications. Innis, M. A., D. H. Gelfaud, J. J. Sninsky and T. J. White (eds.), Academic Press, San Diego, Califonia. Pp. 315-322.
Xu, L. R. and D. Podlech. 2010. Astragalus L. In Flora of China, Vol. 10. Wu, Z.Y., P. H. Raven and D. Y. Hong (eds.), Science Press, Beijing. Pp. 328-453.
Yang, J. Y., H. K. Kim and S. J. Park. 2011. Development of genetic marker specific for Korean Hwanggi medicine (Radix Astragali). Food Science and Biotechnology 20: 1561-1567.
Yao, X. H., Q. Ye, P. W. Fritsch, B. C. Crux and H. Huang. 2008. Phylogeny of Sinojackia (Styracaceae) based on DNA sequence and microsatellite data: implications for taxonomy and conservation. Annals of Botany 101: 651-659.
Yip, P. Y. and H. S. Kwan. 2006. Molecular identification of Astragalus membranaceus at the species and locality levels. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 106: 222-229.
Zhao, Y. Z. 2006. Taxonomy and floristic geographical distribution of the Chinese medicinal Huangqi. Bulletin of Botanical Research 26: 532-538. (in Chinese)
Zhu, X. Y. 1996. An additional note on karyotype analysis of Astragalus penduliflorus Lam. complex (Fabaceae). Guihania 16: 61-63. (in Chinese)
Zhu, X. Y. 2005. Revision of the Astragalus penduliflorus complex (Leguminosae-Papilionoidae). Nordic Journal of Botany 23: 283-294.
Zhu, X. Y. and C. J. Chen. 1991. Taxonomic significance of peptides from seed proteins of Astragalus penduliflorus complex (Fabaceae) and related taxa. Cathaya 3: 65-72.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.