참고문헌 (52)

1. Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2006). Over and over again: college students' views of nature of science, In L.B. Flick and N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science (pp. 389-425). The Netherlands: Springer. 

2. Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Lederman, N. G. (2000a). Improving science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science:A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665-701. 

   상세보기

3. Abd-El-Kalick, F. & Lederman, N. G. (2000b). The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057-1095. 

   상세보기

4. Akerson, V. L. & Abd-El-Khalick, F. S. (2003). Teaching elements of nature of science: Yea long case study of a fourth grade teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 1025-1049. 

   상세보기

5. Abd-El-Khalick, F. & BouJaoude, S. (1997). An exploratory study of the knowledge base for science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(7), 673-699. 

   상세보기

6. Akerson, V. L., Morrison, J. A. & McDuffie, A. R. (2006). One course is not enough: Preservice elementary teachers' retention of improved views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 194-213. 

   상세보기

7. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (AAAS) (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: A Project 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press. 

8. Bartholomew, H., Osborne, J. & Ratcliffe, M. (2004). Teaching students "ideas-about-science": Five dimensions of effective practice. Science Education, 88, 655-682. 

   상세보기

9. Benson, G. D. (1989). Epistemology and science curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21(4), 329-344. 

   상세보기

10. Brown, H. I. (1977). Perception, theory and commitment:The new philosophy of science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 

11. Buaraphan, K. (2012). Embedding nature of science in teaching about astronomy and space. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, 353-369. 

    상세보기

12. Cleminson, A. (1990). Establishing an epistemological base for science teaching in the light of contempory notions of the nature of science and how children learn science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(5), 429-445. 

    상세보기

13. Chalmers, A. F. (1982). What is this thing called science? (2nd edition). Miton Keynes: Open University Press. 

14. Chalmers, A. F. (1999). What is this thing called science? (3rd edition). Cambridge: Hackett Publishing, Inc. 

15. Dass, P. M. (2005). Understanding the nature of scientific enterprise (NOSE) through a discourse with its history:the influence of an undergraduate 'history of science' course. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(1), 87-115. 

    상세보기

16. Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development. New York: Teachers college press. 

17. Eflin, J. T., Glennan, S. & Reisch, G. (1999). The nature of science: A perspective from the philosophy of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 107-116. 

    상세보기

18. Giere, R. N. (1999). Science without laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 

19. Hashweh, M. Z. (1986). Toward an explanation of conceptual change. European Journal of Science Education, 8, 229-249. 

    상세보기

20. Hull, D. L. (1998). Science as a process: an evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 

21. Irwin, A. R. (2000). Historical case studies: Teaching the nature of science in context. Science Education, 84(1), 5-26. 

    

22. Jenkins, E. W. (1994). HPS and school science education: remediation or reconstruction? International Journal of Science Education, 16(6), 613-623. 

    상세보기

23. Kuhn, T. S. (1959). The essential tension: Traditional and innovation in scientific research. The third University of Utah Research Conference on the Identification of Scientific Talent, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, Reprinted in his The Essential Tension, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp.225-239. 

24. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolution (1st edition), Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. 

25. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolution (2nd edition), Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. 

26. Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 

27. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd Edition), Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 

28. Jenkins, E. W. (1994). HPS and school science education: remediation or reconstruction? International Journal of Science Education, 16(6), 613-623. 

    상세보기

29. Lederman, N. G. (2007, reprint 2010 by Routledge). Nature of Science: Past, present, and future. In K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah (pp.831-880), New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. 

30. Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L. & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of NOS questionnaire toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of NOS. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497-521. 

    상세보기

31. Lin, H. & Chen, C. (2002). Promoting preservice chemistry teachers' understanding about the nature of science through history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 773-792. 

    상세보기

32. Matthews, M. (1992). History, philosophy, and science teaching: The present rapprochement, Science & Education, 1, 11-47. 

    상세보기

33. Matthews, M. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Rutledge. 

34. Matthews, M. (2002). Thomas Kuhn's impact on science education: What lessons can be learned? Science Education, 88, 90-118. 

35. Matthews, M. (2004). Thomas Kuhn's impact on science education: What lessons can be learned? Science Education, 88(3), 90-118. 

    상세보기

36. Monk, M. & Osborne, J. (1997). Placing the history and philosophy of science on the curriculum: A model for the development for pedagogy. Science Education, 81(4), 405-424. 

    

37. National Research Council (NRC) (1996). National science education standards. Washington. DC: National Academic Press. 

38. Niaz, M. (1995). Cognitive conflict as a teaching strategy in solving chemistry problems: A dialectic-contstructivist perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 959-970. 

    상세보기

39. Niaz, M. & Maza, A. (2011). Nature of science in general chemistry textbooks. New York: Springer. 

40. Oh, J.-Y. & Lederman, N. G. (2014). Suggesting an explicit flow map for the nature of science. 2014 Kase International Conference (p.143), at Daegu Unversity, Korea, Feb.13-15, 2014. 

41. Oh, J.-Y. (2012). Suggesting a flow map of the nature of science for sciences education, The paper presented in the International Conference of the ICSE 2012 conference in Nanjing, China (Oct. 12-15, 2012). 

42. Oh, J.-Y. (2011). Using an enhanced conflict map in the classroom (photoelectric effect) based on Lakatosian Heuristic Principle Strategies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 1135-1166. 

    상세보기

43. Pearsall, N. R., Skipper, J. E. & Mintzes, J. J. (1997). Knowledge restructuring in the life sciences: A longitudinal study of conceptual change in biology. Science Education, 81, 193-215. 

    

44. Posner, G., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W. & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-277. 

    상세보기

45. Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G. & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 610-645. 

    상세보기

46. Schwartz, R. & Lederman, N. (2002). It's the nature of the beast: The influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 205-236. 

    상세보기

47. Sharrock, W. & Read, R. (2002). KUHN: Philosopher of scientific revolution. Malden. MA: Polity Press c/o Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 

48. Solomon, J., Duveen, J., Scott, L. and McCarthy, S. (1992). Teaching about the nature of science through history: Action research in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 409-421. 

    상세보기

49. Tsai, C.-C. (2000). Enhancing science instruction: the use of 'conflict map'. International Journal of Science Education, 22(3), 285-302. 

    상세보기

50. Tsai, C.-C. & Chang, C.-Y. (2005). Lasting effects of instruction guided by the conflict map: Experimental study of learning about the causes of the seasons. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(10), 1089-1111. 

    상세보기

51. Vigoureux, J. M. (2003). Les pommes de Newton. Paris: Albin Michel S.A., (Trans. Hee-Jung Lee, (2005), Newton's Apple, NuRim book(Seoul)). 

52. Westfall, R. S. (1971). The construction of modern science. New York: John Willey & Sons, Inc. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

오준영 (4)