$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

계량 서지정보를 이용한 지식구조 분석방법 및 연구관리에 관한 연구동향 : 정부출연연구소 사례를 중심으로
Knowledge Structures and Research Management based on Bibliographic Analysis : A Case of Government-funded Research Institutes in Korea 원문보기

한국경영과학회지 = Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, v.40 no.4, 2015년, pp.65 - 81  

정우성 (포항공과대학교 산업경영공학과) ,  양현채 (포항공과대학교 기술경영대학원)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

As research management is growing in importance for research organizations, their disciplinary structures need to be interpreted. However, it is not only difficult but ambiguous to detect causal relations between subjects because diverse disciplines interacting with each other lead the development o...

주제어

질의응답

핵심어 질문 논문에서 추출한 답변
인과성 예측이란 무엇인가? 실증자료를 이용하여 하위 시스템들이 보유한 상관관계를 추정하는 것은 널리 사용되고 있는 방법이다. 인과성 예측(predictive causality)[83]은 하위 시스템이 보유한 관계를 밝히는 방법의 하나로, 두 하위 시스템이 보유한 시계열(time series) 자료로 두 시스템의 시간적 관계를 추정한다. 변수 X 와 Y가 주어졌을 때, 변수 Y의 과거값 만을 사용하여 Yt+1을 예측하고, 변수 X와 Y의 과거 값을 모두 포함하여 Yt+1을 예측할 수 있을 것이다.
시스템에 존재하는 인과성을 추정하는 두 가지 방법은 무엇인가? 시스템에 존재하는 인과성은 두 가지 방법으로 추정할 수 있다[5]. 확인적 접근(confirmatory approach)과 탐색적 접근(exploratory approach)이 그것이다. 확인적 접근은 어떤 인과성 모델이 미리 주어지고, 실증자료를 이용해 이 모델의 타당성을 측정하는 것이다[1].
서지정보 중, 인용 혹은 공저자와 같은 정보는 어떤 단점을 갖고 있는가? 또한 Fairclough and Thelwall[27]은 피인용 횟수와 같은 정보가 과학적 성공을 표현하는 간접 지표이긴 하지만 비교적 객관적 방법으로 측정할 수 있는 장점이 있다고 언급했다. 하지만 인용정보는 출판이 이루어진 후 이용이 되기까지 시간이 걸리는 단점도 있다[27]. 그리고 인용이나 공저자정보는 기관이나 부서와 같이 한정된 범위에서 이동하는 정보를 추적하기에 어려움이 따른다. 물론 기관 내부에서 수행되는 세미나 혹은 회의를 통해 정보가 이동할 가능성이 높으나 그 양을 산정하기 어려운 문제가 있다. 대신 논문 출판량을 통해 어떤 영역에서 연구가 활발하게 수행되고 있는지를 판단할 수 있으므로[57] 논문 생산량의 변화를 이용한다면 시간차를 두고 발전하는 두 학문의 연관성을 살펴 볼 수 있을 것이다.
질의응답 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (88)

  1. 박윤서, "서비스품질과 고객만족간의 인과관계 실증 분석", 한국경영과학회지, 제36권, 제4호(2011), pp.143-160. 

  2. 박철순, "개방형 혁신 네트워크의 동태적 모형", 한국경영과학회지, 제40권, 제1호(2015), pp.5-19. 

  3. 유경옥, 김향미, 김재욱, "연결망 분석을 이용한 마케팅 분야의 고객가치 연구의 진화 및 발전과정에 관한 연구", 한국경영과학회지, 제38권, 제2호(2013), pp.1-24. 

  4. 정치영, 이재영, "SNA 기반 네트워크 파워를 이용한 지상전장정보체계 전투력 효과측정 모델제안", 한국경영과학회지, 제36권, 제4호(2011), pp.1-16. 

  5. Abdul Razak, F. and H.J. Jensen, "Quantifying 'Causality' in Complex Systems : Understanding Transfer Entropy," PLoS ONE, Vol.9, No.6(2014), e99462. 

  6. Balassa, B., "Trade Liberalisation and "Revealed," Comparative Advantage," The Manchester School, Vol.33, No.2(1965), pp.99-123. 

  7. Beaver, D.D., "Reflections on Scientific Collaboration (and its study) : Past, Present, and Future," Scientometrics, Vol.52, No.3(2001), pp.365-377. 

  8. Beerkens, M., "Facts and fads in academic research management : The effect of management practices on research productivity in Australia," Research Policy, Vol.42, No.9 (2013), pp.1679-1693. 

  9. Beinhocker, E.D., The Origin of Wealth : Evolution, Complexity, and the Radical Remaking of Economics, Harvard Business School Press, 2006. 

  10. Bonifati, G., " 'More is different', exaptation and uncertainty : three foundational concepts for a complexity theory of innovation," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol.19, No.8(2010), pp.743-760. 

  11. Borner, K., R. Klavans, M. Patek, A.M. Zoss, J.R. Biberstine, R.P. Light, V. Lariviere, and K.W. Boyack, "Design and update of a classification system : the UCSD map of science," PLoS ONE, Vol.7, No.7(2012), e39464. 

  12. Bressler, S.L. and A.K. Seth, "Wiener-Granger causality : a well established methodology," Neuroimage, Vol.58, No.2(2011), pp.323-329. 

  13. Burt, R.S., "Structural Holes and Good Ideas," American Journal of Sociology, Vol.110, No.2(2004), pp.349-399. 

  14. Cantner, U. and B. Rake, "International research networks in pharmaceuticals : Structure and dynamics," Research Policy, Vol.43, No.2(2014), pp.333-348. 

  15. Chavez, M., J. Martinerie, and M. Le Van Quyen, "Statistical assessment of nonlinear causality : application to epileptic EEG signals," Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Vol.124, No.2(2003), pp.113-128. 

  16. Chiesa, V., F. Frattini, V. Lazzarotti, and R. Manzini, "Designing a performance measurement system for the research activities : A reference framework and an empirical study," Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol.25, No.3(2008), pp. 213-226. 

  17. Cobo, M.J., A.G. Lopez-Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, and F. Herrera, "Science Mapping Software Tools : Review, Analysis, and Cooperative Study Among Tools," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol.62, No.7(2011), pp.1382-1402. 

  18. Coombs, R., "Core competencies and the strategic management of R&D," R&D Management, Vol.26, No.4(1996), pp.345-355. 

  19. Cooper, R., "New product portfolio management : practices and performance," Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.16, No.4(1999), pp.333-351. 

  20. Council, N.R., Industrial Research and Innovation Indicators : Report of a Workshop, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 1997. 

  21. Crawford, L. and A.H. Nahmias, "Competencies for managing change," International Journal of Project Management, Vol.28, No.4 (2010), pp.405-412. 

  22. Cunningham, P., "Policy : Set research priorities in a time of recession," Nature, Vol.502 (2013), pp.433-434. 

  23. D'Ippolito, B., M. Miozzo, and D. Consoli, "Knowledge systematisation, reconfiguration and the organisation of firms and industry : The case of design," Research Policy, Vol.43, No.8(2014), pp.1334-1352. 

  24. De Solla Price, D.J. and L. Weber, "Science since Babylon," Physics Today, Vol.14(1961), p.46. 

  25. Erdi, P., K. Makovi, Z. Somogyv, K. Strandburg, J. Tobochnik, P. Volf, and L. Zalanyi, "Prediction of emerging technologies based on analysis of the US patent citation network," Scientometrics, Vol.95, No.1(2012), pp.225-242. 

  26. Enemark, D., M.D. Mccubbins, and N. Weller, "Knowledge and networks : An experimental test of how network knowledge affects coordination," Social Networks, Vol.36(2014), pp.122-133. 

  27. Fairclough, R. and M. Thelwall, "National research impact indicators from Mendeley readers," Journal of Informetrics, Vol.9, No.4 (2015), pp.845-859. 

  28. Ferligoj, A., L. Kronegger, F. Mali, T.A.B. Snijders, and P. Doreian, "Scientific collaboration dynamics in a national scientific system," Scientometrics, Vol.104, No.3(2015), pp.985-1012. 

  29. Fleming, L. and O. Sorenson, "Technology as a complex adaptive system : evidence from patent data," Research Policy, Vol.30, No.7 (2001), pp.1019-1039. 

  30. Floricel, S. and M. Ibanescu, "Using R&D portfolio management to deal with dynamic risk," R&D Management, Vol.38, No.5(2008), pp.452-467. 

  31. Freeman, L.C., D. Roeder, and R.R. Mulholland, "Centrality in social networks : II. Experimental results," Social Networks, Vol.2, No.2(1979), pp.119-141. 

  32. Garfield, E. and R.K. Merton, "Citation indexing : Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities," Wiley New York, 1979. 

  33. Goldsmith, S. and W.D. Eggers, Governing By Network : The New Shape of The Public Sector, Brookings Institution Press, 2004. 

  34. Granger, C.W.J., "Investigating Causal Relations By Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods," Econometrica, Vol.37, No.3(1969), p.424. 

  35. Hanaki, N., R. Nakajima, and Y. Ogura, "The Dynamics of R&D Network In The It Industry," Research Policy, Vol.39, No.3(2010), pp.386-399. 

  36. Harvey, J., A. Pettigrew, and E. Ferlie, "The Determinants of Research Group Performance : Towards Mode 2?," Journal of Management Studies, Vol.39, No.6(2002), pp.747-774. 

  37. Hassan, S.U. and P. Haddawy, "Analyzing Knowledge Flows of Scientific Literature Through Semantic Links : A Case Study In The Field Of Energy," Scientometrics, Vol. 103, No.1(2015), pp.33-46. 

  38. He, S., X. Zheng, D. Zeng, K., Cui, Z. Zhang, and C. Luo, "Identifying Peer Influence In Online Social Networks Using Transfer Entropy," In Intelligence and Security Informatics, G.A. Wang, X. Zheng, M. Chau and H. Chen Eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013, pp.47-61. 

  39. Hess, D.J., "Science Studies : An Advanced Introduction," Nyu Press, 1997. 

  40. Hicklin, A., "Network Stability : Opportunity or Obstacles?," Public Organization Review, Vol.4, No.2(2004), pp.121-133. 

  41. Hirsch, J.E., "An Index To Quantify An Individual's Scientific Research Output," Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, Vol.102, No.46(2005), pp.16569-16572. 

  42. Hlavackovaschindler, K., M. Palus, M. Vejmelka, and J. Bhattacharya, "Causality Detection Based On Information-Theoretic Approaches In Time Series Analysis," Physics Reports, Vol.441, No.1(2007), pp.1-46. 

  43. Hlinka, J., D. Hartman, M. Vejmelka, J. Runge, N. Marwan, J. Kurths, and M. Palus, "Reliability of Inference of Directed Climate Networks Using Conditional Mutual Information," Entropy, Vol.15, No.6(2013), pp.2023-2045. 

  44. Hornstein, H.A., "The Integration Of Project Management and Organizational Change Management Is Now A Necessity," International Journal of Project Management, Vol.33, No. 2(2015), pp.291-298. 

  45. Kickert, W.J.M., E.H. Klijn, and J.F.M. Koppenjan, Managing Complex Networks : Strategies For The Public Sector, Sage Publications. 1997. 

  46. Kim, S.Y., "Government R&D Funding In Economic Downturns : Testing The Varieties of Capitalism Conjecture," Science and Public Policy, Vol.41, No.1(2013), pp.107-118. 

  47. Klavans, R. and K.W. Boyack, "Toward A Consensus Map of Science," Journal of The American Society For Information Science and Technology, Vol.60, No.3(2009), pp.455-476. 

  48. Kwon, O. and J.S. Yang, "Information Flow Between Stock Indices," Epl(Europhysics Letters), Vol.82, No.6(2008), p.68003. 

  49. Lee, D.H., I.W. Seo, H.C. Choe, and H.D. Kim, "Collaboration Network Patterns and Research Performance : The Case of Korean Public Research Institutions," Scientometrics, Vol.91, No.3(2012), pp.925-942. 

  50. Lee, M. and K. Om, "Different Factors Considered In Project Selection At Public and Private R&D Institutes," Technovation, Vol. 16, No.6(1996), pp.271-275. 

  51. Leydesdorff, L. and I. Rafols, "A Global Map of Science Based on The Isi Subject Categories," Journal of The American Society For Information Science and Technology, Vol.60, No.2(2009), pp.348-362. 

  52. Leydesdorff, L., "Statistics For The Dynamic Analysis of Scientometric Data : The Evolution of The Sciences In Terms of Trajectories and Regimes," Scientometrics, Vol.96, No.3(2013), pp.731-741. 

  53. Lizier, J.T., J. Heinzle, A. Horstmann, J.D. Haynes, and M. Prokopenko, "Multivariate Information-Theoretic Measures Reveal Directed Information Structure and Task Relevant Changes In Fmri Connectivity," J Comput Neurosci, Vol.30, No.1(2011), pp.85-107. 

  54. Moller, K. and A. Rajala, "Rise of Strategic Nets-New Modes of Value Creation," Industrial Marketing Management, Vol.36, No.7 (2007), pp.895-908. 

  55. Marschinski, R. and H. Kantz, "Analysing The Information Flow Between Financial Time Series," The European Physical Journal B, Vol.30, No.2(2002), pp.275-281. 

  56. Mirabeau, L., J. Kinder, and S. Malherbe, "Archetypes of Governance For Science and Technology Labs," Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Vol.27, No.1(2014), pp.54-72. 

  57. Moed, H.F. and G. Halevi, "Multidimensional Assessment of Scholarly Research Impact," Journal of The Association For Information Science and Technology, Vol.66, No.10(2015), pp.1988-2002. 

  58. Morgan, D.L., M.B. Neal, and P. Carder, "The Stability of Core and Peripheral Networks Over Time," Social Networks, Vol.19, No.1 (1997), pp.9-25. 

  59. Morillo, F., A.A. DiAz-Faes, B. Gonzalez-Albo, and L. Moreno, "Do Networking Centres Perform Better? An Exploratory Analysis In Psychiatry and Gastroenterology/Hepatology In Spain," Scientometrics, Vol.98, No.2 (2013), pp.1401-1416. 

  60. Morris, N., "The Developing Role of Departments," Research Policy, Vol.31, No.5(2002), pp.817-833. 

  61. Oecd, Governance of Public Research : Toward Better Practices, Paris, 2003. 

  62. Penfield, T., M.J. Baker, R. Scoble, and M.C. Wykes, "Assessment, Evaluations, and Definitions of Research Impact : A Review," Research Evaluation, Vol.23, No.1(2013), pp. 21-32. 

  63. Perkmann, M., R. Fini, J.-M. Ross, A. Salter, C. Silvestri, and V. Tartari, "Accounting For Universities' Impact : Using Augmented Data To Measure Academic Engagement and Commercialization by Academic Scientists," Research Evaluation, Vol.24, No.4(2015), pp. 380-391. 

  64. Pitsis, T.S., S. Sankaran, S. Gudergan, and S.R. Clegg, "Governing Projects Under Complexity : Theory and Practice In Project Management," International Journal of Project Management, Vol.32, No.8(2014), pp.1285-1290. 

  65. Pittaway, L., M. Robertson, K. Munir, D. Denyer, and A. Neely, "Networking and Innovation : A Systematic Review of The Evidence," International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol.5-6, No.3-4(2004), pp.137-168. 

  66. Porter, A.L. and J. Youtie, "Where Does Nanotechnology Belong In The Map of Science?" Nat Nanotechnol, Vol4, No.9(2009), pp.534-536. 

  67. Prahalad, C.K. and G. Hamel, "The Core Competence of The Corporation," Harvard Business Review, Vol.68, No.3(1990), pp.79-91. 

  68. Provan, K.G. and R.H. Lemaire, "Core Concepts and Key Ideas For Understanding Public Sector Organizational Networks : Using Research To Inform Scholarship and Practice," Public Administration Review, Vol.72, No.5(2012), pp.638-648. 

  69. Provan, K.G. and H.B. Milward, "A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness : A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.40, No.1(1995), pp.1-33. 

  70. Roussel, P.A., K.N. Saad, and T.J. Erickson, Third Generation R&D : Managing The Link To Corporate Strategy, Harvard Business School Press, 1991. 

  71. Schreiber, T., "Measuring Information Transfer," Physical Review Letters, Vol.85, No.2 (2000), pp.461-464. 

  72. Sci2 Team, Science of Science (Sci2) Tool, Indiana University and Sci Tech Strategies, [Computer Program]. Available At Http://Sci2.Cns.Iu.Edu. 2009. 

  73. Scott, J., Social Network Analysis : A Handbook, Sage Publications, 2000. 

  74. Shannon, C.E., "A Mathematical Theory of Communication," Bell System Technical Journal, Vol.27, No.3(1948), pp.379-423. 

  75. Small, H., "Tracking and Predicting Growth Areas In Science," Scientometrics, Vol.68, No.3(2006), pp.595-610. 

  76. Smith, K.G., C.J. Collins, and K.D. Clark, "Existing Knowledge, Knowledge Creation Capability, and The Rate of New Product Introduction In High-Technology Firms," The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 48, No.2(2005), pp.346-357. 

  77. Solee, R.V., S. Valverde, M.R. Casals, S.A. Kauffman, D. Farmer, and N. Eldredge, "The Evolutionary Ecology of Technological Innovations," Complexity, Vol.18, No.4(2013), pp. 15-27. 

  78. Steeg, G.V. and A. Galstyan, Information Transfer In Social Media. In Proceedings of The Proceedings of The 21St International Conference On World Wide Web (Lyon, France 2012), Acm, 2187906, (2012), pp.509-518. 

  79. Tashiro, H., A. Lau, J. Mori, N. Fujii, and Y. Kajikawa, "E-Mail Networks and Leadership Performance," Journal of The American Society For Information Science and Technology, Vol.63, No.3(2012), pp.600-606. 

  80. Teece, D.J., G. Pisano, and A. Shuen, "Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.18, No.7 (1997), pp.509-533. 

  81. Trajtenberg, M., "A Penny For Your Quotes : Patent Citations and The Value of Innovations," The Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 21, No.1(1990), pp.172-187. 

  82. Vicente, R., M. Wibral, M. Lindner, and G. Pipa, "Transfer Entropy-A Model-Free Measure of Effective Connectivity For The Neurosciences," J Comput Neurosci, Vol.30, No.1 (2011), pp.45-67. 

  83. Wiener, N., The Theory of Prediction Mcgraw-Hill : New York, Ny, Usa, (1956), pp. 165-183. 

  84. Yan, E., "Finding Knowledge Paths Among Scientific Disciplines," Journal of The Association For Information Science and Technology, Vol.65, No.11(2014), pp.2331-2347. 

  85. Yang, H. and W.-S. Jung, "A Strategic Management Approach For Korean Public Research Institutes Based On Bibliometric Investigation," Quality and Quantity, Vol.49, No.4(2014), pp.1437-1464. 

  86. Yunsook, H., "Collaboration Management Strategies and Product Development Performance," Journal of The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, Vol.39, No.3(2014), pp.93-115. 

  87. Zhang, H., P. Meltzer, and S. Davis, "Rcircos : An R Package For Circos 2D Track Plots," Bmc Bioinformatics, Vol.14, No.244(2013), pp.1-5. 

  88. Zhou, Y.B., L.Y. Lu, and M.H. Li, "Quantifying The Influence of Scientists and Their Publications : Distinguishing Between Prestige and Popularity," New Journal of Physics, Vol.14, No.3(2012). 

LOADING...

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로