정직성과 신뢰는 수의사의 전문직업성(professionalism)을 구성하는 핵심요소일 뿐만 아니라, 수의학교육에서는 수의학 전문교육 결과의 정당성을 보장하는 근거가 되는 중요한 가치이다. 의학교육에서는 의과대학에서의 학습부정 경험이 추후 의사로서 일할 때 발생하는 비윤리적인 행위와 관련이 있다고 밝혀져 있다. 본 연구에서는 서울시내 수의과대학 학생 528명(A대학: 184명, B대학: 344명)의 학습부정과 학습윤리에 대한 태도를 조사하여 분석하였다. 학생들은 학습윤리가 향후 학문윤리에 중요한 영향을 미칠 수 있다고 평가하였다(88.4%). 가장 흔하게 발견되는 학습부정행위는 보고서 작성시 표절(A대학: 71.7%, B대학: 69.5%)과 실습 시 데이터 위조행위(A대학: 40.2%, B대학: 31.7%) 등이었으며, 학생들은 학교 내 학문윤리 문화의 부재가 학습부정행위의 원인이 된다고 지적하였다. 회귀분석 결과 학습윤리에 대한 지식과 동료 학생들의 학습부정행위에 대한 인식이 수의과대학 학생들의 학습부정행위 빈도에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구 결과를 통해 수의과대학 학생들의 학습윤리 교육이 저학년부터 전 과정에 거쳐 보다 유연한 형식의 프로그램으로 진행되어야 하며, 교수진과 학문 커뮤니티의 학문윤리 환경 조성이 중요하다는 점을 도출하였다.
정직성과 신뢰는 수의사의 전문직업성(professionalism)을 구성하는 핵심요소일 뿐만 아니라, 수의학교육에서는 수의학 전문교육 결과의 정당성을 보장하는 근거가 되는 중요한 가치이다. 의학교육에서는 의과대학에서의 학습부정 경험이 추후 의사로서 일할 때 발생하는 비윤리적인 행위와 관련이 있다고 밝혀져 있다. 본 연구에서는 서울시내 수의과대학 학생 528명(A대학: 184명, B대학: 344명)의 학습부정과 학습윤리에 대한 태도를 조사하여 분석하였다. 학생들은 학습윤리가 향후 학문윤리에 중요한 영향을 미칠 수 있다고 평가하였다(88.4%). 가장 흔하게 발견되는 학습부정행위는 보고서 작성시 표절(A대학: 71.7%, B대학: 69.5%)과 실습 시 데이터 위조행위(A대학: 40.2%, B대학: 31.7%) 등이었으며, 학생들은 학교 내 학문윤리 문화의 부재가 학습부정행위의 원인이 된다고 지적하였다. 회귀분석 결과 학습윤리에 대한 지식과 동료 학생들의 학습부정행위에 대한 인식이 수의과대학 학생들의 학습부정행위 빈도에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구 결과를 통해 수의과대학 학생들의 학습윤리 교육이 저학년부터 전 과정에 거쳐 보다 유연한 형식의 프로그램으로 진행되어야 하며, 교수진과 학문 커뮤니티의 학문윤리 환경 조성이 중요하다는 점을 도출하였다.
Academic integrity guarantees the professional integrity and validity of the education and qualifications offered by the veterinary schools. In this study, we analyzed the responses of 528 veterinary students of two veterinary schools in Seoul regarding their awareness about, knowledge of, and frequ...
Academic integrity guarantees the professional integrity and validity of the education and qualifications offered by the veterinary schools. In this study, we analyzed the responses of 528 veterinary students of two veterinary schools in Seoul regarding their awareness about, knowledge of, and frequency of engaging in academic misconduct. A total of 88.4 percent of the participants agreed that cheating and plagiarism by undergraduates would influence their future academic misconduct. The most common form of academic misconduct was plagiarism (71.7% in the A school, 69.5% in the B school), with falsification (40.2% in the A school, 31.7% in the B school) also reported at a high rate. Students indicated the lack of a culture of academic integrity as the main reason for academic misconduct. According to the regression analysis students' awareness and knowledge of academic integrity and their perception of peers' academic misconduct predicted a significant amount of variance of the frequency of academic misconduct. The findings of this study support that academic integrity should be learned in a flexible format from an early stage of professional development in veterinary curriculum. In parallel with the efforts of faculty, a community approach may be likely to improve the academic environment in terms of integrity.
Academic integrity guarantees the professional integrity and validity of the education and qualifications offered by the veterinary schools. In this study, we analyzed the responses of 528 veterinary students of two veterinary schools in Seoul regarding their awareness about, knowledge of, and frequency of engaging in academic misconduct. A total of 88.4 percent of the participants agreed that cheating and plagiarism by undergraduates would influence their future academic misconduct. The most common form of academic misconduct was plagiarism (71.7% in the A school, 69.5% in the B school), with falsification (40.2% in the A school, 31.7% in the B school) also reported at a high rate. Students indicated the lack of a culture of academic integrity as the main reason for academic misconduct. According to the regression analysis students' awareness and knowledge of academic integrity and their perception of peers' academic misconduct predicted a significant amount of variance of the frequency of academic misconduct. The findings of this study support that academic integrity should be learned in a flexible format from an early stage of professional development in veterinary curriculum. In parallel with the efforts of faculty, a community approach may be likely to improve the academic environment in terms of integrity.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
문제 정의
This paper explores personal characteristics, educational experience, attitudes toward academic integrity and knowledge of academic misconducts in terms of how they influence academic misconduct by veterinary students. In doing so, we hope to provide insight into the development of educational environments which maintain a strong level of academic integrity and ensure the professional qualification for the graduates.
제안 방법
Four patterns of academic misconduct related to practice which veterinary students may experience, such as ‘intentionally altering or omitting data for a laboratory report’, were added.
데이터처리
It was assumed that the perception of peers’ academic misconduct, attitudes toward, and knowledge of academic misconduct would be related to the behaviors of academic misconduct. A hierarchical regression analysis was performed with the self-reported frequency of academic misconduct as the dependent variable using SPSS 20.0.
The sum of correct answers from the knowledge measurement test was used on an interval scale. The differences among two schools and subgroups of gender and different educational experience on academic integrity were tested with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t-tests. It was assumed that the perception of peers’ academic misconduct, attitudes toward, and knowledge of academic misconduct would be related to the behaviors of academic misconduct.
이론/모형
The frequency of academic misconduct, perception of peers’ academic misconduct, attitudes toward the importance and need for education were measured on five-point Likert scales. The sum of correct answers from the knowledge measurement test was used on an interval scale. The differences among two schools and subgroups of gender and different educational experience on academic integrity were tested with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t-tests.
참고문헌 (21)
Fischer BA, Zigmond MJ. Educational approaches for discouraging plagiarism. Urol Oncol Semin Ori 2011; 29: 100-103.
Hrabak M, Vujaklija A, Vodopivec I, Hren D, Marusi M, Marusi A. Academic misconduct among medical students in a post-communist country. Med Educ 2004; 38: 276-285.
Kang, MK. Guide book on Liberal Education for Undergraduates. Available at: http://liberaledu.snu.ac.kr/eduguide/sub03.htm. Accessed Aug 1, 2014.
Kisamore JL, Stone TH, Jawahar I. Academic integrity: The relationship between individual and situational factors on misconduct contemplations. J Bus Ethics 2007; 75: 381-394.
Kwon HJ, Lee Y-M, Lee YH. Development of an inventory assessing medical students' attitudes towards academic misconduct. Korean J Med Educ 2013; 25: 211-220.
Mellanby RJ, Rhind SM, Bell C, Shaw DJ, Gifford J, Fennell D, Manser C, Spratt DP, Wright MJH, Zago S, Hudson NPH. Perceptions of clients and veterinarians on what attributes constitute 'a good vet'. Vet Rec 2011; 168:616.
Papadakis MA, Hodgson CS, Teherani A, Kohatsu ND. Unprofessional behavior in medical school is associated with subsequent disciplinary action by a state medical board. Acad Med 2004; 79: 244-249.
Rennie SC and Crosby JR. Are "tomorrow's doctors" honest? Questionnaire study exploring medical students' attitudes and reported behaviour on academic misconduct. BMJ 2001; 322: 274-275.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.