최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기과학교육연구지 : 경북대학교 과학교육연구소 = Journal of science education, v.40 no.3, 2016년, pp.203 - 218
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of reflective thinking-based laboratory report on learners' metacognition and inquiry skills. In a general physics experiment class consisting of 11 experiments, 20 college students used reflective thinking-based laboratory report, and then th...
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
과학 수업의 본질은 무엇인가? | 실험활동은 과학 과목을 다른 과목과 구분 짓는 독특한 요소로서(Kim & Oh, 1998) 과학 수업에서 매우 중요한 비중을 차지하고 있다. 학생의 과학탐구능력을 신장시키는 것이 과학 수업의 본질인데(Kang et al., 2009), 과학과 교육과정에서 과학과의 목표를 기술하며 탐구능력을 언급할 때 이 탐구능력은 과학 수업에서의 실험활동과 연계되어 탐구능력을 향상시키는 방법의 하나로 실험 수업이 강조되는 경우가 많다(Bybee, 2000). | |
요리책 식의 실험은 무엇인가 | , 2003), Hofstein & Lunetta(1982)는 실험 수업이 학생의 과학적 이해와 흥미, 동기 유발에 효과적이며 과학 실험 실습 능력과 문제해결능력, 과학의 본성에 대한 이해를 향상시킨다고 보았다. 하지만 제시된 실험 절차에 따라서 단지 실험을 진행하는 소위 ‘요리책’ 식 실험에 대해서는 부정적인 견해가 존재한다(Abrahams & Millar, 2008; Hofstein & Lunetta, 2004; Marzin & de Vries, 2013; Millar, 2004). | |
요리책 식의 실험의 문제점은 무엇인가? | , 2004), 교사가 제시한 실험과정을 그대로 따라하는 비탐구적 수업이다(Yang & Cho, 2005). 이와 같이 실험절차가 제시된 실험에서는 학습자가 스스로 문제를 발견하거나 해결할 수 있는 기회가 주어지지 않으며(Yoon et al., 2004), 학생의 과학적 사고를 향상시키는 기회가 제공되기 어렵다(Yang, Kim & Cho, 2007). |
Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does Practical Work Really Work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945-1969.
Berg, C. A. R., Bergendahl, V. C. B., Lundberg, B. K. S., & Tibell, L. A. E. (2003). Benefiting from an open-ended experiment? A comparison of attitudes to, and outcomes of, an expository versus an open-inquiry version of the same experiment. International Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 351-372.
Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1999). Reflection in service learning: Making meaning of experience. Educational Horizons, 77(4), 179-185.
Bybee, R. W. (2000). Achieving science literacy. Science Teacher, 62(7), 28-33.
Dewey, J. (2011). How we think. (H.-W. Jung, Trans.). Seoul: Hakeesisub. (Original work published 1910)
Driver, R. (1989). Student’s conceptions and learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 481-490.
Given, B. K. (2002). Teaching to the brain's natural learning systems. Washington, D.C.: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Gupta, V. (2001). Aims of laboratory teaching. CDTL Brief, 4(1), 1-3.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 201-217.
Hofstein, I., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education:Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54.
Jeong, A. J. (2011). The effects of metacognition strategy based on reflective self-assessment on the understanding of the genetic concept and metacognition ability of high school students (Master's thesis). Korea National University of Education.
Kang, M., Im, Y., Kim, M., & Kim, J. (2009). The difference between two scaffolding types in academic achievement and science inquiry skills for WISE-based science education. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 21(1), 1-19.
Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065-1084.
Kim, J., & Oh, W. K. (1988). The problems which appeared in 13 year old pupils performing experiment of textbook: Pupils suggested aims, their identifying relevant variables, and the relations between the suggested aims and the drawn conclusions. Journal of the Korea Association for Research in Science Education, 18(1), 35-42.
Kim, S. (2009). The effects of metacognitive ability and the question-generation strategy on the type of question and academic achievement in the blended learning environment (Master's thesis). Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Kwon, J., & Kim, B. (1994). The development of an instrument for the measurement of science process skills of the Korean elementary and middle school students. Journal of the Korea Association for Research in Science Education, 14(3), 251-264.
Larson, A. (1991). "Rerun" your labs. The Science Teacher, 58(6), 72.
Lee, E. J. (2010). A study of direct teaching strategy of inquiry skills applying meta-cognition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
Lee, Y., & Im, S. (2011). An analysis of pre-service science teachers' reflective thinking about scientific experiment in experimental journal writings. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(2), 198-209.
Manen, M. V. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6(3), 205-228.
Marzin, P., & de Vries, E. (2013). Students’ design of a biometric procedure in upper secondary school. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 361-376.
Millar, R. (2004, October). The role of practical work in the teaching and learning of science. Paper prepared for the Committee: High School Science Laboratories: Role and Vision, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.
Rozen, M. T., & Kramarski, B. (2014). Metacognition, motivation and emotions:Contribution of self-regulated learning to solving mathematical problems. Global Education Review, 1(4), 76-95.
Schraw, G., & Dennisun, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognition awareness. Contemporary Education Psychology, 19(4), 460-475.
Sohn, E. (2003). Reflective thinking and professionalism. Student Life Research, 28, 31-54.
White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition:Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-118.
Yang, I.-H., & Cho, H.-J. (2005). Review on the aims of laboratory activities in school science. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 24(3), 268-280.
Yang, I., Kim, S., & Cho, H. (2007). Analysis of the types of laboratory instruction in elementary and secondary schools science. Journal of the Korea Association for Research in Science Education, 27(3), 235-241.
Yoon, D.-G., Kim, S.-H., Cha, H., Lee, K.-J., & Chung, W.-H. (2004). Application effects of biology modules for improving science high school students' creativity and science thinking. Journal of the Korea Association for Research in Science Education, 24(3), 556-564.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.