현 정부는 벤처 및 창업 활성화를 통한'창조경제'실현을 주요 정책과제로 발표하였으며. 이러한 창조경제의 구현을 통한 새로운 일자리 창출 및 창업정책 활성화를 위해서 창업교육은 무엇보다 중요한 과제라 할 수 있다. 교육과학기술부(현, 교육부)는 2012년부터 중장기적인 발전과제로 전국 61개 대학에 창업교육센터를 설치하여 창업문화 확산 및 창업교육 활성화를 위한 다양한 정책을 추진하고 있다. 본 연구는 산학협력선도대학(LINC) 지원사업 초기 61개 대학에 설치된 창업교육센터 운영현황 및 실태조사를 통해 창업 관련 분야의 정책 및 실무적 시사점을 제시하고자 한다. 연구목적을 달성하기 위해 본 연구는 해외 선진국의 창업교육센터 현황에 대한 선행연구를 통해 창업교육센터 운영현황 및 실태조사에 대한 설문지를 개발하였으며, 국내 창업교육센터를 대상으로 한 조사를 통해 창업교육센터의 조직구성 및 운영 현황, 창업교육 강좌현황, 학생창업 지원 및 창업문화 확산 등에 대한 실태를 분석하였다. 이러한 사례분석을 통해 향후 국내 대학 창업교육센터의 효과적인 운영 및 창의적인 창업교육프로그램 개발에 대한 시사점을 제시하였다.
현 정부는 벤처 및 창업 활성화를 통한'창조경제'실현을 주요 정책과제로 발표하였으며. 이러한 창조경제의 구현을 통한 새로운 일자리 창출 및 창업정책 활성화를 위해서 창업교육은 무엇보다 중요한 과제라 할 수 있다. 교육과학기술부(현, 교육부)는 2012년부터 중장기적인 발전과제로 전국 61개 대학에 창업교육센터를 설치하여 창업문화 확산 및 창업교육 활성화를 위한 다양한 정책을 추진하고 있다. 본 연구는 산학협력선도대학(LINC) 지원사업 초기 61개 대학에 설치된 창업교육센터 운영현황 및 실태조사를 통해 창업 관련 분야의 정책 및 실무적 시사점을 제시하고자 한다. 연구목적을 달성하기 위해 본 연구는 해외 선진국의 창업교육센터 현황에 대한 선행연구를 통해 창업교육센터 운영현황 및 실태조사에 대한 설문지를 개발하였으며, 국내 창업교육센터를 대상으로 한 조사를 통해 창업교육센터의 조직구성 및 운영 현황, 창업교육 강좌현황, 학생창업 지원 및 창업문화 확산 등에 대한 실태를 분석하였다. 이러한 사례분석을 통해 향후 국내 대학 창업교육센터의 효과적인 운영 및 창의적인 창업교육프로그램 개발에 대한 시사점을 제시하였다.
Recently our government has presented the realization of 'Creative Economy' as a primary goal of the state administration through encouraging start-ups and ventures. Activation of entrepreneurship education is an important task for a national job creation and entrepreneurship activation policy. Sinc...
Recently our government has presented the realization of 'Creative Economy' as a primary goal of the state administration through encouraging start-ups and ventures. Activation of entrepreneurship education is an important task for a national job creation and entrepreneurship activation policy. Since 2012, as a mid and long term project, the Korea Ministry of Education has led to activate creative entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial culture within university by installing entrepreneurship centers respectively in 61 universities. In this study, we provide future entrepreneurship improvement subject and policy implication through the case analysis of entrepreneurship center operation and management. In order to achieve the research purpose, we will examine the program and condition of successful entrepreneurship centers in overseas universities and explore the factors that can enhance domestic entrepreneurship center development and operational effectiveness by analyzing 61 university-entrepreneurship center survey. First, primary research was conducted through survey focusing on organization and operation of centers, entrepreneurship education, startup support for students and entrepreneurship culture activation to proceed with comparative analysis. Through this case study, we expect to be able to derive policy implications for the effective operation of entrepreneurship center and the nurture of creative entrepreneurial young generation.
Recently our government has presented the realization of 'Creative Economy' as a primary goal of the state administration through encouraging start-ups and ventures. Activation of entrepreneurship education is an important task for a national job creation and entrepreneurship activation policy. Since 2012, as a mid and long term project, the Korea Ministry of Education has led to activate creative entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial culture within university by installing entrepreneurship centers respectively in 61 universities. In this study, we provide future entrepreneurship improvement subject and policy implication through the case analysis of entrepreneurship center operation and management. In order to achieve the research purpose, we will examine the program and condition of successful entrepreneurship centers in overseas universities and explore the factors that can enhance domestic entrepreneurship center development and operational effectiveness by analyzing 61 university-entrepreneurship center survey. First, primary research was conducted through survey focusing on organization and operation of centers, entrepreneurship education, startup support for students and entrepreneurship culture activation to proceed with comparative analysis. Through this case study, we expect to be able to derive policy implications for the effective operation of entrepreneurship center and the nurture of creative entrepreneurial young generation.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
문제 정의
Since 2012, the Ministry of Education has been implementing the Leaders in INdustry-university Cooperation(LINC) program to create & spread various leading industry-university cooperation models for the partnered growth between university and local industry, as well as cultivate competent people and support technological innovation. The purpose of this program is to improve the university education system through industry-university cooperation to cultivate LINC that would solve the employment mismatch and lead the win-win development between university and local industry. As for the major contents of the LINC program, it strive to provide opportunities of new challenge and broaden the range of selection for the youth by promoting effective cooperation between university and industry and strengthen entrepreneurship education in university to overcome the current 'growth without employment' era and create new jobs for the youth.
제안 방법
The surveys in this study is composed of two kinds. The first measures the structure and the operation status of the entrepreneurship education center, status of the opened courses, support in student entrepreneurship, and the clubs and mentoring. The second researched the operative problems of the entrepreneurship education center and the necessary factors needed for successful operation in the future.
The entrepreneurship education center supervised the entrepreneur education of the school. This study has researched the entrepreneur courses that are currently taught in schools and have classified them into liberal arts, major studies, and practical studies. As you can seen in Table 2, most of the entrepreneurship courses are composed of liberal arts(63%), and so systematic and various classes are not sufficient.
대상 데이터
The second researched the operative problems of the entrepreneurship education center and the necessary factors needed for successful operation in the future. The ultimate data was collected from the 53 centers among the 60 schools. The results of the survey were compared with the thesis of Todd et al(2006) and was analyzed with comparison to the entrepreneurship spirit center in the States regarding the current operative status and success factors.
후속연구
We hope that this work recently conducted an initial analysis of operating status and situation of the education center was, and is deemed as a regular subject empirical research and educational effects and further research is necessary for the future founding members of the faculty and students of educational centers.
참고문헌 (17)
Gartner, W. B., Bird, B. J., & Starr, J. A.(1992). Acting as if: Differentiating Entrepreneurial from Qrganizational Behavior, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(3), 13-32.
Gorman, G., Hanlon, D., & King, A.(1997). Some Research Perspectives on Entrepreneurship Education, Enterprise Education and Education for Small Business Management: a Ten-year Literature Review, International Small Business Journal, 15(3), 56-79.
Ministry of Education(2012). Basic Plan to LINC Cultivation Program.
Ministry of Education(2012). Entrepreneurship Education Center Cultivation & Support Program.
Park C. Y.(1997). Entrepreneurship and Entrepreneurship Status, IE Magazine, 51-55.
Park J. H. & Kim Y. T.(2009). A Study on the Educational Program Improvement of Graduate School of Entrepreneurial Management, Journal of Business, 22(4). 1777-1801.
Park J. H. & Park M. S.(2012). The Strategic Choice and Research Theme of Venturing Entrepreneurship, Journal of Management Education Research, 26(4), 315-339.
Ronstadt, R.(1987). The Educated Entrepreneurs: A New Era of Entrepreneurial Education is Beginning, American Journal of Small Business, 11(4), 37-53.
Solomon, G. T., Duffy, S. & Tarabishy, A.(2002). The State of Entrepreneurship Education in the United States: A Nationwide Survey and Analysis, International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 1(1), 65-86.
Todd A. Finkle., Donald F. Kuratko & Michael G. Goldsby(2006). The State of Entrepreneurship Centers in the United States: A Nationwide Survey, Journal of Small Business and Management, 44(2), 184-206.
Thomas N. G, Barra O'Cinneide, (1994) Entrepreneurship Education and Training Programmes: A Review and Evaluation-Part 1, Journal of European Industrial Training, 18(8), 3-12
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.