[논문]에니어그램 중심가치와 자기해석 수준에 따른 의류 소비자의 구매 의사결정 스타일

김수연; 안서영; 고애란

doi:10.6115/fer.2016.017

에니어그램 중심가치와 자기해석 수준에 따른 의류 소비자의 구매 의사결정 스타일
Fashion Consumers' Purchase Decision-Making Styles Related to the Enneagram Core Values and Self-Construal Levels 원문보기

Family and environment research : fer, v.54 no.2, 2016년, pp.207 - 225

김수연 (연세대학교 의류환경학과) , 안서영 (연세대학교 의류환경학과) , 고애란 (연세대학교 의류환경학과)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

This study investigated a conceptual framework of fashion consumers' purchase decision-making styles related to behavioral typology of personality. In response to critiques on fragmented and varied use of personality measurements, this study selectively tested and verified an alternative typological model of Enneagram value systems and self-construal levels that could explain the fashion consumers' typological propensities in purchase decision-making. One hundred-item measurement scale for the fashion consumers' purchase decision-making styles was developed based on the extensive literature. Three groups of fashion major students, a total of 107 participants, who respectively participated in 2-hour-long Enneagrams seminars from spring 2013 to fall 2014, were asked to re-sentence the question items to clearly reflect their Enneagram personality to make purchase decisions. Participants described their propensities in their own words about the most comfortable state during the 5-step processes of the purchase decision making process. The revised scale was distributed to 423 participants in January 2016, and the results verified the group differences in various styles in the process of purchase decision-making corresponding to the typological variables discussed in Enneagram. The correlation between Enneagram core values embodied by fashion consumers during the stages of purchase decision-making in extensive levels of self-construal were verified in the context of their fashion decision making. This study found the possibility of the typological approach toward Enneagram types of personality to be applicable to explain and predict peculiar facets of fashion consumers' purchase decision-making styles.

주제어

참고문헌 (45)

Baumgartner, H. (2002). Toward a personology of the consumer. Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (2), 286-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/341578

상세보기
Bazerman, M. H. (2001). Consumer research for consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (4), 499-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/319624

상세보기
Blodgett, J., Hill, D., & Bakir, A. (2006). Cross-cultural complaining behavior? An alternative explanation. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 19, 103-117.

상세보기
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48 (3), 306-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13

상세보기
Daniels, D. N., & Price, V. A. (2009). The essential enneagram: The definitive personality test and self-discovery guide. San Francisco, CA: HarperOne.
DeCicco, T. L., & Stroink, M. L. (2007). A third model of self-construal: The metapersonal self. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 26, 82-104.
Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2012). Self-signaling and the costs and benefits of temptation in consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (1), 15-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0490

상세보기
Eyal, T., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). Judging near and distant virtue and vice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44 (4), 1204-1209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.012

상세보기
Fowler, J. H., Baker, L. A., & Dawes, C. T. (2008). Genetic variation in political participation. American Political Science Review, 102 (02), 233-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0003055408080209

상세보기
Friedman, H. L. (1983). The self-expansiveness level form: A conceptualization and measurement of a transpersonal construct. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 15 (1), 37-50.
Fujita, K., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Levin-Sagi, M. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90 (3), 351-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.946436

상세보기
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Wicklund, R. A. (1985). Self-symbolizing and the neglect of others' perspectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 (3), 702-715. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.48.3.702

상세보기
Grace, D. (2005). Consumer disposition toward satisfaction (Cds): Scale development and validation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 13 (2), 20-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2005.11658541

상세보기
Han, D., Duhachek, A., & Agrawal, N. (2014). Emotions shape decisions through construal level: The case of guilt and shame. Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (4), 1047-1064. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/678300

상세보기
Hirschman, E. C. (1980). Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity. Journal of Consumer Research, 7 (3), 283-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/208816

상세보기
Hong, J., & Chang, H. H. (2015). "I" follow my heart and "We" rely on reasons: The impact of self-construal on reliance on feelings versus reasons in decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (6), 1392-1411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/680082
Howard, J. A., & Sheth, J. N. (1969). The theory of buyer behavior. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102-138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Kohn, M. L. (1959). Social class and parental values. American Journal of Sociology, 64 (4), 337-351.

상세보기
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1991). Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42 (5), 361-371.

상세보기
Lapid-Bogda, G. (2009). Bringing out the best in everyone you coach: Use the Enneagram system for exceptional results. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Ma, Y., & Koh, A. (2001). A study on evaluation of salesperson's service and purchase behavior as related to customer's personality type. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 25 (6), 1155-1166.
Mellers, B., Schwartz, A., & Ritov, I. (1999). Emotion-based choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 128 (30), 332-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.332

상세보기
Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
Oh, H. J. (2001). The differences of apparel evaluation on consumer's personality types. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 25 (2), 249-258.
Pace, V. L., & Brannick, M. T. (2010). How similar are personality scales of the "same" construct? A meta-analytic investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 49 (7), 669-676. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.06.014

상세보기
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41 (5), 847-855. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.5.847

상세보기
Phillips, B. J., & McQuarrie, E. F. (2010). Narrative and persuasion in fashion advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (3), 368-392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/653087

상세보기
Rohan, M. J. (2000). A rose by any name? The values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4 (3), 255-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0403_4

상세보기
Saucier, G., & Srivastava, S. (2015). What makes a good structural model of personality? Evaluating the big five and alternatives. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, M. L. Cooper, R. J. Larsen, & American Psychological Association (Eds.), APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology: Vol. 4. Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 283-305). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/14343-013
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6
Schwartz, S. H., & Boehnke, K. (2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 38 (3), 230-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0092-6566(03)00069-2

상세보기
Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., et al. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103 (4), 663-688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029393

상세보기
Sherman, D. K. (2013). Self-affirmation: Understanding the effects. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7 (11), 834-845. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12072

상세보기
Simonson, I. (1989). Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (2), 158-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209205

상세보기
Solomon, M. R. (2014). Consumer behavior: Buying, having, and being. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Sproles, E. K., & Sproles, G. B. (1990). Consumer decision-making styles as a function of individual learning styles. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 24 (1), 134-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1990.tb00262.x

상세보기
Sproles, G. B., & Kendall, E. L. (1986). A methodology for profiling consumers' decision-making styles. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 20 (2), 267-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1986.tb00382.x

상세보기
St. James, Y., Handelman, J. M., & Taylor, S. F. (2011). Magical thinking and consumer coping. Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (4), 632-649. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/660163

상세보기
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117 (2), 440-463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018963

상세보기
Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17 (2), 83-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1057-7408(07)70013-x

상세보기
Venkatraman, M. P., & Price, L. L. (1990). Differentiating between cognitive and sensory innovativeness: Concepts, measurement, and implications. Journal of Business Research, 20 (4), 293-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(90)90008-2

상세보기
Verplanken, B., & Holland, R. W. (2002). Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82 (3), 434-447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.3.434

상세보기
Wang, Y., Ma, S. S., & Li, D. (2015). Customer participation in virtual brand communities: The self-construal perspective. Information & Management, 52 (5), 577-587. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.04.003

상세보기
Wesley, S., LeHew, M., & Woodside, A. G. (2006). Consumer decision-making styles and mall shopping behavior: Building theory using exploratory data analysis and the comparative method. Journal of Business Research, 59 (5), 535-548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.01.005

상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

LOADING...

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

에니어그램 중심가치와 자기해석 수준에 따른 의류 소비자의 구매 의사결정 스타일
Fashion Consumers' Purchase Decision-Making Styles Related to the Enneagram Core Values and Self-Construal Levels 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

참고문헌 (45)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

저자의 다른 논문 :

연구과제 타임라인

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

연합인증

에니어그램 중심가치와 자기해석 수준에 따른 의류 소비자의 구매 의사결정 스타일 Fashion Consumers' Purchase Decision-Making Styles Related to the Enneagram Core Values and Self-Construal Levels 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

참고문헌 (45)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

저자의 다른 논문 :

김수연 (3) 안서영 (4) 고애란 (67)

연구과제 타임라인

전체(0) 논문(0) 특허(0) 보고서(0)

전체(0) 논문(0) 특허(0) 보고서(0)

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

에니어그램 중심가치와 자기해석 수준에 따른 의류 소비자의 구매 의사결정 스타일
Fashion Consumers' Purchase Decision-Making Styles Related to the Enneagram Core Values and Self-Construal Levels 원문보기