Yoo, Jun Sang
(Department of Physical Therapy, Sinwoohospital)
,
Ha, Hyun Geun
(Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Smasung Medical Center)
,
Jeong, Ju Ri
(Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Smasung Medical Center)
,
Ko, Young Jun
(Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Smasung Medical Center)
,
Lee, Wan-hee
(Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Welfare, Sahmyook University)
Objective: This study surveyed the perceptions of physical therapists on muscle re-education through visual feedback obtained from rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI). Design: Survey. Methods: For this study, 500 physical therapists who participated in a refresher training held by the Seoul Cit...
Objective: This study surveyed the perceptions of physical therapists on muscle re-education through visual feedback obtained from rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI). Design: Survey. Methods: For this study, 500 physical therapists who participated in a refresher training held by the Seoul City Association in March 2015 were selected for a questionnaire-based survey. Subjects were randomly selected targets physiotherapists who participated in a refresher training.The questionnaire had 21 items in total. Questions 1 to 15 could be answered by everyone. However, questions 16 to 21 could be answered only by people who used RUSI. Results: The majority of respondents were aged 20 to 30 years. Respondents in their twenties, thirties, forties, and fifties accounted for 32.4%, 40.2%, 21.9%, and 5.6%respectively. Therapists with careers spanning one to 5 years accounted for 27.8%, while those with careers spanning 5 to 10 years and 10 to 15 years accounted for 34.6% and 17.0%, respectively. Those with careers over 20 years accounted for 9.2%. The types of work have not been various including work related to the nervous system (49.0%), the musculoskeletal system (41.5%), sports (0.7%), juvenile physical therapy (4.2%), and others (4.6%). Conclusions: In this study, we examined the perceptions of physical therapists on rehabilitation ultrasound imaging used in muscle re-education. We also examined how to use this technique. Many therapists who participated in the refresher training were found to be unaware of RUSI. In the future, further investigations on RUSI for muscle re-education are required through refresher training or training lectures at the national level.
Objective: This study surveyed the perceptions of physical therapists on muscle re-education through visual feedback obtained from rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI). Design: Survey. Methods: For this study, 500 physical therapists who participated in a refresher training held by the Seoul City Association in March 2015 were selected for a questionnaire-based survey. Subjects were randomly selected targets physiotherapists who participated in a refresher training.The questionnaire had 21 items in total. Questions 1 to 15 could be answered by everyone. However, questions 16 to 21 could be answered only by people who used RUSI. Results: The majority of respondents were aged 20 to 30 years. Respondents in their twenties, thirties, forties, and fifties accounted for 32.4%, 40.2%, 21.9%, and 5.6%respectively. Therapists with careers spanning one to 5 years accounted for 27.8%, while those with careers spanning 5 to 10 years and 10 to 15 years accounted for 34.6% and 17.0%, respectively. Those with careers over 20 years accounted for 9.2%. The types of work have not been various including work related to the nervous system (49.0%), the musculoskeletal system (41.5%), sports (0.7%), juvenile physical therapy (4.2%), and others (4.6%). Conclusions: In this study, we examined the perceptions of physical therapists on rehabilitation ultrasound imaging used in muscle re-education. We also examined how to use this technique. Many therapists who participated in the refresher training were found to be unaware of RUSI. In the future, further investigations on RUSI for muscle re-education are required through refresher training or training lectures at the national level.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
문제 정의
In this study, we examined the perceptions of physical therapists on rehabilitation ultrasound imaging used in muscle re-education. We also examined how to use this technique.
가설 설정
Figure 3. Question : Do you think that any way appropriate to the training methods through the rehabilitative ultrasound image?
Figure 2. Question : Do you think that information you about the rehabilitative ultrasound image needed for muscle re-education?
Figure 1. Question: Do physical therapy in certain areas?
제안 방법
Accordingly, this study was conducted to determine the perceptions, basic objective data, and current state of RUSI used for muscle re-education through visual feedback.
대상 데이터
For this study, 500 physical therapists who participated in a refresher training held by the Seoul City Association in March 2015 were selected for a questionnaire-based survey. Subjects were randomly selected targets physiotherapists who participated in a refresher training.
The closed questions were restructured for the setting in Korea and consisted of perceptions on the results of training that incorporated ultrasound imaging and general information. The questionnaire consists of 21 items in total. Items 1 to 8 address general information while items 9 to 15 are about the use and perception of ultrasound imaging.
성능/효과
However, none of the therapists and used or are currently using the technique at their work places. Regarding the information on the use of RUSI for muscle re-education, the questions related to use in clinical trials, basic information on ultrasound imaging, handling machines, and the morphology of muscle accounted for 68.9%, 61.4%, 41.4%, and 33.5% of the questions, respectively (Figure 2).
In the future, further investigations on RUSI for muscle re-education are required through refresher training or training lectures at the national level. The results from this study can be used as the basic data for increasing awareness on ultrasound imaging, and to establish a manual by which therapists can use the technique easily and a manual for important of muscles re-education.
When asked about how the therapists would utilize RUSI even if they did not currently use it, 61.0%, 43.4%, 37.1%, and 26.7% of the therapists answered that they will use it for motivating patients, obtaining biofeedback, checking results from rehabilitation therapy, and application to various therapeutic environments.
참고문헌 (21)
Mitsiopoulos N, Baumgartner RN, Heymsfield SB, Lyons W, Gallagher D, Ross R. Cadaver validation of skeletal muscle measurement by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1998;85:115-22.
Lee HJ, Kim MK, Ha HG, Lee WH. Comparison of muscle architecture of lower Extremity using rehabilitative ultrasound image in young adults: a comparative study of muscle cross-sectional area of lower extremity of seoul and Hanoi in Vietnam. J Korean Soc Phys Ther 2014;26:324-30.
Kim MK, Ko YJ, Lee HJ, Ha HG, Lee WH. Ultrasound imaging for age-related differences of lower extremity muscle architecture. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci 2015;4:38-43.
Takai Y, Katsumata Y, Kawakami Y, Kanehisa H, Fukunaga T. Ultrasound method for estimating the cross-sectional area of the psoas major muscle. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011;43:2000-4.
Mckiernan S, Chiarelli P, Warren-Forward H. A survey of diagnostic ultrasound within the physiotherapy profession for the design of future training tools. Radiography 2010;17:121-5.
Teyn D. Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging symposium, May 8-10, 2006, San Antonio, Texas. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2006;36:A1-17.
Whittaker JL, Warner MB, Stokes MJ. Ultrasound imaging transducer motion during clinical maneuvers: respiration, active straight leg raise test and abdominal drawing in. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010;36:1288-97.
Koh EK, Jung DY. Effect of visual and palpation feedback on muscle activity of gluteus maximus an motion of pelvic rotation during clam exercise. J Korean Soc Phys Ther 2013;25:337-42.
Potter CL, Cairns MC, Stokes M. Use of ultrasound imaging by physiotherapists: a pilot study to survey use, skills and training. Man Ther 2012;17:39-46.
Temes WC, Temes Clifton A, Hilton V, Girard L, Strait N, Karduna A. Reliability and validity of thickness measurements of the supraspinatus muscle of the shoulder: an ultrasonography study. J Sport Rehabil 2014. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2013-0023.
Lee DY, Choi WJ, Lee SW. The effect of focus of attention by electroencephalogram-feedback on balance in young adults. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci 2012;1:13-6.
Ko YJ, Ha HG, Jeong J, Lee WH. Variations in lateral abdominal muscle thickness during abdominal drawing-in maneuver in three positions in a young healthy population. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci 2014;3:101-6.
Lee KB, Kim JG, Park HG, Kim JE, Kim HS, Lee WH. Correlation between lateral abdominal, rectus femoris, and triceps brachii muscle thickness and endurance during prone bridge exercise in healthy young adults. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci 2015;4:11-6.
Lariviere C, Gagnon D, De Oliveira E Jr, Henry SM, Mecheri H, Dumas JP. Reliability of ultrasound measures of the transversus abdominis: effect of task and transducer position. PM R 2013;5: 104-13.
Henry SM, Westervelt KC. The use of real-time ultrasound feedback in teaching abdominal hollowing exercises to healthy subjects. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2005;35:338-45.
Secoli R, Milot MH, Rosati G, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Effect of visual distraction and auditory feedback on patient effort during robot-assisted movement training after stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011;8:21.
Worsley PR, Kitsell F, Samuel D, Stokes M. Validity of measuring distal vastus medialis muscle using rehabilitative ultrasound imaging versus magnetic resonance imaging. Man Ther 2014; 19:259-63.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.