혁신역량과 혁신성과에 영향을 주는 요인에 관한 연구: 해외시장진출 중소기업을 대상으로 A Study on Factors Affecting Innovation Capability and Innovation Performance: Focused on SMEs Entering Overseas Market원문보기
본 연구에서는 해외에 진출한 중견기업을 대상으로 혁신성공요인과 혁신성과를 알아보고자 하였다. 보다 구체적으로는 경영자, 조직, 종업원 차원의 요인과 관련하여 리더십, 운영시스템, 변화주도행위를 혁신역량에의 영향 변수로 설정하였으며 혁신역량이 혁신성과에 미치는 영향을 실증 연구를 통해 파악해 보고자 하였다. 더불어 혁신역량에의 영향요인과 혁신성과에 미치는 영향이 본국과 해외진출국가 에서 어떠한 차이가 나는지를 알아보았다. 실증 분석 결과 혁신영향요인 모두 혁신역량에 긍정적 영향을 미치고 있었으며, 혁신역량은 혁신성과에 긍정적 영향을 미치고 있었다. 영향력의 정도에 있어서는 운영시스템, 리더십, 변화주도행위의 순으로 나타났다. 국가간 차이에 있어서는 중국의 경우 운영시스템, 리더십, 변화주도행위의 순이나 큰 차이는 없는 것으로 나타났다. 한국의 경우는 운영시스템과 리더십은 긍정적 영향을 미치나, 종업원의 개별적 변화주도행위는 혁신역량에 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구 결과는 해외 진출 기업에게 있어서는 현지 특성에 맞는 혁신역량 강화 노력이 필요하다는 점과 한국의 경우 보다 고도화된 혁신역량 및 혁신성과의 창출을 위해서 종업원 개인의 변화주도행위를 이끌어 내도록 하는 추가적인 활동이 요구됨을 보여주고 있다.
본 연구에서는 해외에 진출한 중견기업을 대상으로 혁신성공요인과 혁신성과를 알아보고자 하였다. 보다 구체적으로는 경영자, 조직, 종업원 차원의 요인과 관련하여 리더십, 운영시스템, 변화주도행위를 혁신역량에의 영향 변수로 설정하였으며 혁신역량이 혁신성과에 미치는 영향을 실증 연구를 통해 파악해 보고자 하였다. 더불어 혁신역량에의 영향요인과 혁신성과에 미치는 영향이 본국과 해외진출국가 에서 어떠한 차이가 나는지를 알아보았다. 실증 분석 결과 혁신영향요인 모두 혁신역량에 긍정적 영향을 미치고 있었으며, 혁신역량은 혁신성과에 긍정적 영향을 미치고 있었다. 영향력의 정도에 있어서는 운영시스템, 리더십, 변화주도행위의 순으로 나타났다. 국가간 차이에 있어서는 중국의 경우 운영시스템, 리더십, 변화주도행위의 순이나 큰 차이는 없는 것으로 나타났다. 한국의 경우는 운영시스템과 리더십은 긍정적 영향을 미치나, 종업원의 개별적 변화주도행위는 혁신역량에 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구 결과는 해외 진출 기업에게 있어서는 현지 특성에 맞는 혁신역량 강화 노력이 필요하다는 점과 한국의 경우 보다 고도화된 혁신역량 및 혁신성과의 창출을 위해서 종업원 개인의 변화주도행위를 이끌어 내도록 하는 추가적인 활동이 요구됨을 보여주고 있다.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the factors affecting innovation capability and innovation performance of midsize company entering overseas market. More specifically, in terms of managerial, organizational, and employee - level factors, we set leadership, operating system, and taking cha...
The purpose of this study is to investigate the factors affecting innovation capability and innovation performance of midsize company entering overseas market. More specifically, in terms of managerial, organizational, and employee - level factors, we set leadership, operating system, and taking charge at work as variables influencing innovation capability and tried to understand the effect of innovation capability on innovation performance through empirical studies. In addition, we examined the differences in the influence factors on innovation capability and the effect on innovation performance in the home country and overseas countries. As a result of the empirical analysis, all of the influence factors had a positive effect on the innovation capability and the innovation capability had a positive effect on the innovation performance. The degree of influence was in the order of operating system, leadership and taking charge at work. In China, there is no significant difference in the order of operating system, leadership and taking charge at work. In the case of Korea, operating system and leadership have a positive effect, but the employee's taking charge at work does not affect innovation capability. The results of this study are as follows. First, it is necessary to enhance innovation capability in accordance with local characteristics. In Korea, there are additional activities to induce employee's taking charge at work is required for improved innovation capability and innovation performance.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the factors affecting innovation capability and innovation performance of midsize company entering overseas market. More specifically, in terms of managerial, organizational, and employee - level factors, we set leadership, operating system, and taking charge at work as variables influencing innovation capability and tried to understand the effect of innovation capability on innovation performance through empirical studies. In addition, we examined the differences in the influence factors on innovation capability and the effect on innovation performance in the home country and overseas countries. As a result of the empirical analysis, all of the influence factors had a positive effect on the innovation capability and the innovation capability had a positive effect on the innovation performance. The degree of influence was in the order of operating system, leadership and taking charge at work. In China, there is no significant difference in the order of operating system, leadership and taking charge at work. In the case of Korea, operating system and leadership have a positive effect, but the employee's taking charge at work does not affect innovation capability. The results of this study are as follows. First, it is necessary to enhance innovation capability in accordance with local characteristics. In Korea, there are additional activities to induce employee's taking charge at work is required for improved innovation capability and innovation performance.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
문제 정의
One of the main objectives of this study is to determine whether the factors influencing innovation capability and the effect of innovation capability on innovation performance differ among countries.
The success of a technological innovation activity is so important that it determines the success and failure of the enter-prise, and technological innovation activity is the most important driver to create a competitive advantage in the market. Since the company that is the subject of this study is a manufacturing company that manufactures products based on technology, it is appropriate to grasp the innovation performance from the viewpoint of technological innovation.
The purpose of this study is to identify the factors affecting innovation capability and the relationship between innovation capability and innovation performance. In addition, this study would like to analyze the differences between the influential factors in the home market and overseas market.
가설 설정
In this study, we first try to understandwhat factors influence the innovation capability as a prerequisite for innovation performance. Based on many previous studies, we hypothesized that the variables of managerial factor, organizational factor, and employee factor affect innovation capability and that innovation capability affects innovation performance. In particular, study was conducted on SMEs that are in different environments in many aspects such as organization, system, management resources and employees compared with large corporations.
H1: Managerial leadership will have a positive impact on the innovation capabilities.
H2: Organizational operating system will have a positive impact on the innovation capabilities.
H3: Employee’s taking charge at work will have a positive impact on the innovation capabilities.
H4: Innovation capabilities have a positive impact on the innovation performance.
제안 방법
Data collection for this study was conducted through a face - to - face interview based on a structured questionnaire. A survey was conducted for Korean employees in domestic headquarters and Chinese employees working in Chinese manufacturing plants.
He conducted his research on technology innovation capability in learning, R&D, manufacturing, marketing, organizational, strategic and resource ex-ploiting capability and divided innovation performance into three categories: sales growth rate, innovation rate, product competitiveness and resource allocation function.
In particular, study was conducted on SMEs that are in different environments in many aspects such as organization, system, management resources and employees compared with large corporations. In addition, by examining the hypothesis of research on the home market and the overseas market, this study tried to understand the difference in the influence of innovation success factors on innovation capability and innovation performance.
The purpose of this study is to identify the factors affecting innovation capability and the relationship between innovation capability and innovation performance. In addition, this study would like to analyze the differences between the influential factors in the home market and overseas market.
In this study, x2, CFI, NNFI and RMSEA were used to evaluate the overall fit of the model. However x2 was statistically significant, it tend to be sensitive to sample size and model complexity.
The concept of this paper consists of manager level’s leadership, organization level’s operation system, employee level’s taking charge at work, innovation capability and innovation performance.
대상 데이터
The survey was conducted from December 15, 2016 to January 1, 2017 and a total of 768 questionnaires were collected, and 747 items were used in the analysis, except for those whose responses were inadequate or inaccurate.
데이터처리
In this study, to increase the reliability of the research, the construct to be studied was measured as multiple items and the struc- tural equation model was performed using AMOS 19.0 to verify the relationship between them.
The reliability of the items was evaluated by Cronbach Alpha coefficient. In addition, confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to verify convergent validity and discrim- inant validity (Anderson and Gerbing 1988;Fornell and Larcker 1981).
이론/모형
In order to measure the constructs used in this study, several measurement items were used. In order to select and elaborate the measurement items, factor analysis was performed through principal component analysis and varimax rotation method.
성능/효과
As for the influence of three independent variables, it was found that the operating system had the greatest influence on the innovation capability and the leadership influenced the next and the taking charge at work had the similar effect.
First, it is found that managerial leadership, organization’s operating system and employees’ taking charge at work have a positive effect on firm’s innovation capability.
Fourth, the necessity of efforts to cultivate innovation capability in accordance with the market environment of the company was suggested. In the case of overseas markets, the fact that systematic and transparent operating system is most effective for cultivating innovation capability is to provide the practical implications for companies that are struggling to achieve innovation performance in overseas markets.
It is found that leadership, operating system and taking charge at work have a positive effect on innovation capability and innovation capability has a positive effect on innovation performance.
Second, The important finding is that it is important not only the interest and leadership of the CEO but also the system and support of the whole organization to increase the innovation capability. Also, these activities should also be linked to employees’ individual innovation activities.
Second, innovation capability has a positive effect on innovation performance such as product and process innovation.
참고문헌 (47)
Adler, P. S. and A. Shenhar (1990). "Adapting Your Technological Base: The Organizational Challenge," Sloan Management Review 25, 25-37.
Akman, G. and C. Yilmaz (2008). "Innovative Capability, Innovation Strategy and Market Orientation: An Empirical Analysis in Turkish Software Industry," International Journal of Innovation Management 12(1), 69-111.
Anderson, J. C. and D. W. Gerbing (1988). "Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach," Psychological Bulletin 103(3), 411-423.
Bindhl, U. K. and S. K. Parkter (2010). "Proactive Work Behavior: Forward-Thinking and Change-Oriented Action in Organizations," Institute of Work Psychology, United Kingdom.
Brentani, U. D. (1989). "Success and Failure in New Industrial Service," Journal of Product Innovation Management 6(4), 239-258.
Burgelman, R. A., C. M. Christensen, and S. C. Wheelwright (2004). Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation, Mcgraw-Hill.
Burns, T. E. and G. M. Stalker (1961). "The Management of Innovation," University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
Champy, J. A. and D. Amoudse (1992). "The Leadership Challenge of Reengineering," Insight Quarterly: The Executive Journal of Business Reengineering 4(2), 17-25.
Chen, C. J. (2009). "Technology Commercialization, Incubator and Venture Capital, and New Venture Performance," Journal of Business Research 23(1), 1-18.
Damanpour, F. (1991). "Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators," Academy of Management Journal 34, 555-590.
Dess, G. G. and G. T. Lumpkin (2005). "The Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation in Stimulating Effective Corporate Entrepreneurship," Academy of Management Executive 19(1), 147-156 .
Draft, R. L. (1978). "A Dual-Core Modes of Organizational Innovation," Academy of Management Journal 21, 193-200.
Fishammar, J. and S. A. Horte (2005). "Managing External Information in Manufacturing Firms; The Impact on Innovation Performance," Journal of Product Innovation Management 22(3), 251-266.
Fornell, C. and D. F. Larcker (1981). "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error," Journal of Marketing Research, 39-50.
Guan, J. and N. Ma (2003). "Innovative Capability and Export Performance of Chinese Firms," Technovation 23, 737-747.
Harrinton, H. J. (1991). Business Process Improvement; The Breakthrough Strategy for Total Quality, Productivity and Competitiveness, McGraw-Hill.
Harry, M. J. and R. Schroeder (2000). Six Sigma: The Breakthrough Management Strategy Revolutionizing the World's Top Corporations, Double day, USA.
Jang, K. S., Y. B. Kim, and I. S. Koo (2010). "A Study on the Relationship between Innovation Activity and Business Results: Focused on the Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises," Quality Policy 38(4), 512-520.
Kanter, E. (1988). "When a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, Collective, and Social Conditions for Innovation in Organization," Research in Organizational Behavior 10, 169-211.
Kim, L. S. (1997). Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning, Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Knight, K. (1967). "A Descriptive Model of the Intra-Firm Innovation Process," Journal of Business 40, 478-496.
Leem, H. S. and H. J. Lim (2013). "The Relationship between Innovation Success Factors, Innovation Outcomes, and Firm Performance: The Case of POSCO Affiliates," Productivity Review 27(4), 233-258.
Lim, J. H. and H. D. Yoon (2013). "The Impact of Technological Innovation Capability on Korean SMEs' Internalization," The Journal of Small Business Innovation 16(3), 1-19.
Metcalfe, S. (1995). "The Economic Foundations of Technology Policy: Equilibrium and Evolutionary Perspectives," in P. Stoneman (ed.), Handbook of Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Blackwell Publishers.
Marr, R. (1980). Innovation, Stuttgart, Handworterbuch der Organization, 2 Auflage, 947-959.
Morrison, E. W. and C. C. Phelps (1999). "Taking Charge at Work: Extrarole Efforts to Initiate Workplace Change," Academy of Management Journal 42(4), 403-419.
Park, M. G., H. S. Hwang, and G. S. Kim (1998). "A Comparative Study on the Key Success Factors and Perceptions of Success in Korean and US Corporate Management Innovation," Korea Association of Information Systems Academic Presentation Publication, 131-136.
Per, L. A. and O. P. John (1966). Personality: Theory & Research, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Pierce, J. and A. L. Delbecq (1997). "Organization Structure, Individual Attitude and Innovation," Academy of Management Review 2(2), 27-37.
Powell, C. T. (1995). "Total Quality Management as Competitive Advantage: A Review and Empirical Study," Strategic Management Journal 16(1), 15-37.
Prajogo, D. I. and A. S. Sohal (2003). "The Relationship between TQM practice, Quality Performance, and Innovation Performance: An Empirical Examination," International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 20(8), 901-918.
Schumpeter, A. J. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and Business Cycle, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Scott, S. G. and R. A. Bruce (1994). "Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in The Workplace," Academy of Management Journal 37(3), 580-607.
Jeong, S. W. B. H. Jin, and J. E. Chung (2015). "Antecedents and Outcomes of Exploitative and Explorative Capabilities in the Innovation Process of Korean Born Globals," The Journal of Small Business Innovation 18(1), 61-73.
Steward, T. A. (1994). "How to Lead a Revolution," Fortune New York 130(11), 48-54.
Thompson, V. A. (1965). "Bureaucracy and Innovation," Administrative Science Quarterly 10, 1-20.
Van der Meer, H. (2007). "Open Innovation-The Dutch Treat: Challenges in Thinking in Business Models," Creativity and Innovation Management 16(2), 192-202.
Wilson, D. D. and D. A. Collier (2000). "An empirical investigation of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award casual model", Decision Sciences 31(2), 361-390.
Yam, R. C. M., J. C. Guan, K. F. Pun, and E. P. Y. Tang (2004). "An Audit of Technological Innovation Capabilities in Chinese Firms: Some Empirical Finding in Beijing, China," Research Policy 33(8), 1123-1140.
Yeung, A. K., D. O. Ulrich, S. W. Nason, and M. Von Glinow (1999). Organizational Learning Capability, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Zahra, S. A. and A. P. Nielsen (2002). "Sources of Capabilities, Integration and Technology Commercialization," Strategic Management Journal 23, 377-398.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.