복숭아 수확시기에 낙과한 토양에서 Lactobacillus sp. D4와 D5 균주를 분리하였다. 분리한 Lactobacillus sp. D4와 D5 균주를 동정하기 위하여 형태학적 동정, 생화학적 동정 및 16S rRNA 유전자서열 분석을 수행하였다. 16S rRNA 유전자서열 분석 결과 Lactobacillus sp. D4는 Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum ATCC $14917^T$과 Lactobacillus pentosus ATCC $40997^T$에 각각 99.05%, 98.98% 일치하였으며, Lactobacillus sp. D5는 Lactobacillus pentosus ATCC $40997^T$, Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum ATCC $14917^T$에 각각 98.71%, 98.64% 일치하였다. Lactobacillus sp. D4와 D5 균주는 당 이용성 비교에서 Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC $14917^T$과 Lactobacillus pentosus ATCC $8041^T$에 비교하여 다른 결과를 나타내었다. 정확한 동정을 위하여 VITEK MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) 분석, multiplex PCR, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR을 수행하였다. 이러한 결과에 근거하여 Lactobacillus sp. D4와 D5 균주는 Lactobacillus plantarum으로 동정되었다.
복숭아 수확시기에 낙과한 토양에서 Lactobacillus sp. D4와 D5 균주를 분리하였다. 분리한 Lactobacillus sp. D4와 D5 균주를 동정하기 위하여 형태학적 동정, 생화학적 동정 및 16S rRNA 유전자서열 분석을 수행하였다. 16S rRNA 유전자서열 분석 결과 Lactobacillus sp. D4는 Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum ATCC $14917^T$과 Lactobacillus pentosus ATCC $40997^T$에 각각 99.05%, 98.98% 일치하였으며, Lactobacillus sp. D5는 Lactobacillus pentosus ATCC $40997^T$, Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum ATCC $14917^T$에 각각 98.71%, 98.64% 일치하였다. Lactobacillus sp. D4와 D5 균주는 당 이용성 비교에서 Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC $14917^T$과 Lactobacillus pentosus ATCC $8041^T$에 비교하여 다른 결과를 나타내었다. 정확한 동정을 위하여 VITEK MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) 분석, multiplex PCR, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR을 수행하였다. 이러한 결과에 근거하여 Lactobacillus sp. D4와 D5 균주는 Lactobacillus plantarum으로 동정되었다.
Strains D4 and D5 were isolated from peach-rotten soil during the peach harvest season. The isolates were identified based on morphological and biochemical characterization, and identification was determined by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Results showed that D4 has high similarity to Lactobacillus pla...
Strains D4 and D5 were isolated from peach-rotten soil during the peach harvest season. The isolates were identified based on morphological and biochemical characterization, and identification was determined by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Results showed that D4 has high similarity to Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC $14917^T$ and Lactobacillus pentosus ATCC $8041^T$ at 99.05% and 98.98%, respectively. D5 was also similar to Lactobacillus pentosus ATCC $8041^T$ and Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC $14917^T$ at 98.71% and 98.64%, respectively. In contrast, isolates showed differences in carbohydrate utilization in comparison to Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC $14917^T$ and Lactobacillus pentosus ATCC $8041^T$. In view of this we performed VITEK MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) analysis, multiplex PCR fingerprinting, and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR to further confirm the identification of D4 and D5. The results of these analyses showed that both strains were most similar to Lactobacillus plantarum.
Strains D4 and D5 were isolated from peach-rotten soil during the peach harvest season. The isolates were identified based on morphological and biochemical characterization, and identification was determined by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Results showed that D4 has high similarity to Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC $14917^T$ and Lactobacillus pentosus ATCC $8041^T$ at 99.05% and 98.98%, respectively. D5 was also similar to Lactobacillus pentosus ATCC $8041^T$ and Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC $14917^T$ at 98.71% and 98.64%, respectively. In contrast, isolates showed differences in carbohydrate utilization in comparison to Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC $14917^T$ and Lactobacillus pentosus ATCC $8041^T$. In view of this we performed VITEK MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) analysis, multiplex PCR fingerprinting, and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR to further confirm the identification of D4 and D5. The results of these analyses showed that both strains were most similar to Lactobacillus plantarum.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
제안 방법
To verify the MALDI-TOF MS analysis we molecularly characterized D4 and D5. 16S rRNA gene sequences of isolates D4 and D5 were uploaded in Eztaxon (http://eztaxon-e.ezbiocloud.net/) for phylogenetic analysis. The GenBank (http://www.
Lactobacillus sp. D4와 D5 균주는 당 이용성 비교에서 Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 14917T과 Lactobacillus pentosus ATCC 8041T에 비교하여 다른 결과를 나타내었다. 정확한 동정을 위하여 VITEK MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) 분석, multiplex PCR, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR을 수행하였다.
D4와 D5 균주를 동정하기 위하여 형태학적 동정, 생화학적 동정 및 16S rRNA 유전자서열 분석을 수행하였다.
Multiplex PCR assay was performed using recA gene-based primers: paraF (5′-GTCACAGGCATTACGAAAAC-3′), pentF (5′-CAGTGGCGCGGTTGATATC-3′), planF (5′-CCGTTT ATGCGGAACACCTA-3′), and pREV (5′-TCGGGATTAC CAAACATCAC-3′).
정확한 동정을 위하여 VITEK MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) 분석, multiplex PCR, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR을 수행하였다.
대상 데이터
All the LAB strains other than the isolates used in this study were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), including L. plantarum ATCC 14917T, L. pentosus ATCC 8041T, L. acidophilus ATCC 4356T, L. rhamnosus ATCC 7469T.
The collected samples were appropriately diluted serially in sterile saline solution (0.85% NaCl w/v), and isolated using a de Man-Rogosa-Sharpe (MRS; Difco) medium supplemented with 0.005% bromocresol purple (Yakuri), 0.02% sodium azide (Sigma), and 1.5% agar.
참고문헌 (30)
Akopyanz, N., Bukanov, N.O., Westblom, T.U., Kresovich, S., and Berg, D.E. 1992. DNA diversity among clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori detected by PCR-based RAPD fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 5137-5142.
Bilecen, K., Yaman, G., Ciftci, U., and Laleli, Y.R. 2015. Performances and reliability of Bruker Microflex LT and VITEK MS MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry systems for the identification of clinical microorganisms. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 516410.
Bui, T.P.N., Kim, Y.J., In, J.G., and Yang, D.C. 2011. Lactobacillus koreensis sp. nov., isolated from the traditional Korean food kimchi. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 61, 772-776.
Chen, Y.S., Yanagida, F., and Shinohara, T. 2005. Isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria from soil using an enrichment procedure. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 40, 195-200.
Choi, J.I., Yoon, K.H., Subbammal Kalichamy, S., Yoon, S.S., and Lee, J.I. 2016. A natural odor attraction between lactic acid bacteria and the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. ISME J. 10, 558-567.
Collins, M.D., Rodrigues, U., Ash, C., Aguirre, M., Farrow, J.A.E., Martinez-Murcia, A., Phillips, B.A., Williams, A.M., and Wallbanks, S. 1991. Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Lactobacillus and related lactic acid bacteria as determined by reverse transcriptase sequencing of 16S rRNA. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 77, 5-12.
Foster, A.G. 2013. Rapid identification of microbes in positive blood cultures by use of the vitek MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry system. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51, 3717-3719.
Herrero, M., Mayo, B., Gonzalez, B., and Suarez, J. 1996. Evaluation of technologically important traits in lactic acid bacteria isolated from spontaneous fermentations. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 81, 565-570.
Kim, O.S., Cho, Y.J., Lee, K., Yoon, S.H., Kim, M., Na, H., Park, S.C., Jeon, Y.S., Lee, J.H., Yi, H., et al. 2012. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 62, 716-721.
Miyashita, M., Yukphan, P., Chaipitakchonlatarn, W., Malimas, T., Sugimoto, M., Yoshino, M., Kamakura, Y., Potacharoen, W., Tanasupawat, S., Tanaka, N., et al. 2015. Lactobacillus plajomi sp. nov. and Lactobacillus modestisalitolerans sp. nov., isolated from traditional fermented foods. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 65, 2485-2490.
Siezen, R.J., Tzeneva, V.A., Castioni, A., Wels, M., Phan, H.T., Rademaker, J.L., Starrenburg, M.J., Kleerebezem, M., Molenaar, D., and van Hylckama Vlieg, J.E. 2010. Phenotypic and genomic diversity of Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from various environmental niches. Environ. Microbiol. 12, 758-773.
Siezen, R.J. and van Hylckama Vlieg, J.E.T. 2011. Genomic diversity and versatility of Lactobacillus plantarum, a natural metabolic engineer. Microb. Cell. Fact. 10, S3.
Tabatabai, M.A. and Dick, W.A. 2002. Enzymes in soil. In Burns, R.G. and Dick, R.P. (eds.) Enzymes in the environment, pp. 567-596. Marcel Dekker, New York, USA.
Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A., and Kumar, S. 2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 2725-2729.
Tanganurat, W., Quinquis, B., Leelawatcharamas, V., and Bolotin, A. 2009. Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from Thai fermented fruits and vegetables. J. Basic Microbiol. 49, 377-385.
Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., and Gibson, T.J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673-4680.
Torriani, S., Clementi, F., Vancanneyt, M., Hoste, B., Dellaglio, F., and Kersters, K. 2001a. Differentiation of Lactobacillus plantarum, L. pentosus and L. paraplantarum species by RAPD-PCR and AFLP. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 24, 554-560.
Torriani, S., Felis, G.E., and Dellaglio, F. 2001b. Differentiation of Lactobacillus plantarum, L. pentosus, and L. paraplantarum by recA gene sequence analysis and multiplex PCR assay with recA gene-derived primers. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 3450-3454.
Trias, R., Baneras, L., Montesinos, E., and Badosa, E. 2008. Lactic acid bacteria from fresh fruit and vegetables as biocontrol agents of phytopathogenic bacteria and fungi. Int. Microbiol. 11, 231-236.
Van Reenen, C.A. and Dicks, L.M. 1996. Evaluation of numerical analysis of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR as a method to differentiate Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus pentosus. Curr. Microbiol. 32, 183-187.
Xu, H., Liu, W., Zhang, W., Yu, J., Song, Y., Menhe, B., Zhang, H., and Sun, Z. 2015. Use of multilocus sequence typing to infer genetic diversity and population structure of Lactobacillus plantarum isolates from different sources. BMC Microbiol. 15, 241.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.