$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

[국내논문] Influence of Brand Extension on the Updated Hotel Brand Personality Congruence and Attitude toward the Extended Brand 원문보기

Culinary science & hospitality research = 한국조리학회지, v.23 no.6 = no.89, 2017년, pp.89 - 98  

Ryu, Hyungseo (President of O.T. Medical)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This research focused on recognizing and empirically testing a relationship between brand personality congruence and brand extension, which can lead to effective marketing strategies for the hotel industry. The objective of this research was to identify how customer's brand personality congruence af...

Keyword

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper 아이콘 AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

문제 정의

  • Strategic, brand differentiation and brand extension are the key methods of brand characteristics, or a brand personality , that differentiates the brand from its competitors(Jiang, Dav, & Rao, 2002; Keller & Aaker, 1992). This research focuses on recognizing and empirically testing a relationship between brand personality congruence and brand extension, which can lead to effective marketing strategies for the hotel industry. The objective of this research is to identify how brand personality congruence affects brand extension and to address how hotels should extend their brands.
  • This research focuses on recognizing and empirically testing a relationship between brand personality congruence and brand extension, which can lead to effective marketing strategies for the hotel industry. The objective of this research is to identify how brand personality congruence affects brand extension and to address how hotels should extend their brands. Many researchers have found that brand personality is the key issue in distinguishing a brand, developing an emotional side of that brand, and increasing the personal meaning of the brand to the customers (Crask & Laskey, 1990; Landon, 1974; Levy, 1959; Ouwersloot & Tudorica, 2001).
  • little research has been conducted about the relationship between brand personality and brand extension, before and after extension, in the hospitality industry. Therefore, this research is designed to empirically test a relationship between pre and post -brand personality congruence and brand extension, in the hotel industry. Findings of this study will allow us to better assess the broader impact of extension strategy for the marketer.
  • Therefore, hospitality researchers should incorporate brand personality into brand extension studies. Also, this study defined the special needs for a descriptor for hotel brand personality. The Marriott hotel brand personality items, such as the ruggedness factor, included 5 personality descriptors that have the lowest mean value among 5 brand personality factors.

가설 설정

  • H 3: Updated brand congruence positively affects one's attitude toward the extended brand.
  • H 1: Brand personality congruence is positively associated with attitude toward the core brand.
  • H 2: Attitude toward the core brand is positively associated with updated brand congruence.
본문요약 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (56)

  1. Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. Macmillan, New York, NY: Free Press. 

  2. Aaker, D. A., & Keller, L. K. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 27. 

  3. Aaker, D. & Biel, A. (1993). Brand equity & advertising: advertising's role in building strong brands. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. 

  4. Aaker, D. A. (1996). Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California Management Review, 38(3), 102-120. 

  5. Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(8), 347-356. 

  6. Aaker, J. L. (1999). The malleable self: A brand as a character, a partner and a person: Three perspectives on the question of brand personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 57(3), 492-508. 

  7. Aaker, J. L., & Maheswaran, D. (1997). The effect of cultural orientation on persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 315-328. 

  8. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. 

  9. Aron, O., & Debra, G. (2003). An exploratory perspective of service brand associations. Journal of Services Marketing, 17(5), 452-475. 

  10. Bhat, S., & Reddy, S. K. (1997). Investigating the dimensions of fit between a brand and its extension. Marketing Theory and Applications, 8, 186-94. 

  11. Bhat, S., & Reddy, S. K. (2001). The impact of parent brand attribute associations and affect on brand extension evaluation. Journal of Business Research, 53(3), 111-122. 

  12. Birdwell, A. E. (1968). A study of influence of image congruence on consumer choice. Journal of Business, 41(1), 76-88. 

  13. Boush, D. M., & Loken, B. (1991). A process-tracing study of brand extension evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(2), 16. 

  14. Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner's. 

  15. Crask, M. R., & Laskey, H. A. (1990). A positioning-based decision model for selecting advertising messages. Journal of Advertising Research, 30(4), 32-38. 

  16. De Chernatony, L., & McWilliam, G. (1990). Appreciating brands as assets through using a two-dimensional model. International Journal of Advertising, 9(2), 111-119. 

  17. DelVecchio, D., & Smith, D. C. (2005). Consumer willingness to pay price premiums for brand extensions: The role of extension category characteristics. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(4), 184-196. 

  18. Diamantopoulos, A., Smith, G., & Grime, I. (2005). The impact of brand extensions on brand personality: experimental evidence. European Journal of Marketing, 39(1), 129-149. 

  19. Doyle, P. (1994). Marketing management and strategy. Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 

  20. Epstein, W. (1977). Stability and constancy in visual perception: Mechanisms and processes. Wiley-Interscience: New York. 

  21. Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing Relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343-373. 

  22. Gabor, F. (2003). Brand asset equilibrium in hotel management. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 15(6), 340-342. 

  23. Gardner, B. B., & Levy, S. J. (1955). The product and the brand. Harvard Business Review, 33(4), 33-39. 

  24. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2001). SPSS for windows. Needham Heights, MA: A Pearson Education Co. 

  25. Graeff, T. R. (1996). Image congruence affects on product evaluations: The role of self-monitoring and public/private consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 13(5), 481-499. 

  26. Hogg, M. K., Cox, A. J., & Keeling, K. (2000). The impact of self-monitoring on image congruence and product/brand evaluation. European Journal of Marketing, 34(5), 641-66. 

  27. Jiang, W., Dev, C. S., & Rao, V. R. (2002). Brand extension and customer loyalty evidence from the lodging industry. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 43(4), 5-16. 

  28. Johnson, L. W., Soutar. G, N., & Sweeney, J. C. (2000). Moderators of the brand image/perceived product quality relationship. The Journal of Brand Management, 7(6), 425-433. 

  29. Keller, L. K., & Aaker, D. A. (1992). The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(1), 35-50. 

  30. King, S. H. M. (1973). Developing new brands. London: Pitman. 

  31. Klink, R. R., & Smith, D. C. (2001). Threats to the external validity of brand extension research. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), 326-335. 

  32. Kotler, P. H. (1991). Marketing management, analysis, planning, and control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 

  33. Kotler, P. H. (2003). Marketing management. Pearson Education, Inc, 11, 193-195. 

  34. Landon, E. L. (1974). Self concept, idea self concept and consumer purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 1(2), 44-51. 

  35. Lewis, R. C., & Chambers, R. E. (2000). Marketing leadership in hospitality (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley. 

  36. Levy, S. J. (1959). Symbols for sales. Harvard Business Review, 37(4), 117-124. 

  37. Loken, B., & John, D. R. (1993). Diluting brand beliefs: When do brand extensions have negative impacts?. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 71-84. 

  38. Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row. 

  39. Oliver, R. L. (1993). Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 418-430. 

  40. Oliver, R. L., Rust, R. T., & Varki, S. (1997). Customer delight: Foundations, findings, and managerial insight. Journal of Retailing, 73(3), 311-336. 

  41. Onkvisit, S., & Shaw, J. (1987). Self-concept and image congruence: Some research and managerial implications. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 4(1), 13-23. 

  42. Ottesen, G. G., & Gronhaug, K. (2002). Market orientation and uncertain supply in upstream markets: An exploratory study. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 8(4), 209-219. 

  43. Ouwersloot, H., & Tudorica, A. (2001). Brand personality creation through advertising. Maxx Working Paper, 2(2). 

  44. Park, C. W., Milberg, S. J., & Lawson, R. (1991). Evaluation of brand extensions: The role of product feature similarity and brand concept consistency. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 185-193. 

  45. Park, C. W., Mothersbaugh, D. L., & Feick, L. (1994). Consumer knowledge assessment. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 71-82. 

  46. Ries, A., & Trout, J. (1981). Positioning: The battle for your mind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. 

  47. Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York, NY: Basic Book. 

  48. Siguaw, J. A., Mattila, A., & Austin, J. R. (1999). The brandpersonality scale. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 40(3), 48-55. 

  49. Sirgy, J. M. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 287-300. 

  50. Sirgy, J. M. (1986). A quality-of-life theory derived from Maslow’s developmental perspective: quality is related to progressive satisfaction of a hierarchy of needs, lower order and higher. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 45(3), 329-348. 

  51. Sirgy, J. M., & Samli, M, A. (1985). The question of value in social marketing: Use of a quality-of-life theory to achieve long-term life satisfaction. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 44(2), 215-229. 

  52. Springen, K., & Miller, A. (1990). Sequels for the shelf. Newsweek, (July 9), 42-43. 

  53. Sunde, L., & Brodie, R. J. (1993). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions: Further empirical results. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10, 47-53. 

  54. Tauber, E. M. (1988). Brand leverage: Strategy for growth in a cost-control world. Journal of Advertising Research, 28(4), 26-30. 

  55. Timothy, R. G. (1996). Using promotional messages to manage the effects of brand and self-image on brand evaluation. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 13(3), 4-18. 

  56. Yi, Y., & Bagozzi, R. (1989). The degree of intention formation as moderator of the attitude-behavior relationship. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52(4), 266-279. 

활용도 분석정보

상세보기
다운로드
내보내기

활용도 Top5 논문

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.

관련 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로