[논문]Korean Cultural Adaptation of WHODAS 2.0 (36-Item Version): Reliability and Linking to ICF

Song, Ju Min; Lee, Hae Jung

doi:10.18857/jkpt.2018.30.6.246

[국내논문] Korean Cultural Adaptation of WHODAS 2.0 (36-Item Version): Reliability and Linking to ICF 원문보기

Journal of Korean Physical Therapy : JKPT = 대한물리치료학회지, v.30 no.6, 2018년, pp.246 - 255

Song, Ju Min (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Welfare, Silla University) , Lee, Hae Jung (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Welfare, Silla University)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Purpose: This study was to conduct a Korean cultural adaptation of the WHO disability assessment schedule (WHODAS) 2.0: 36-item version. Methods: An internationally standardized process of translation and cultural adaptation of an instrument was used to develop a Korean version of WHODAS 2.0: 36-item version. Linking each item into the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) was also conducted in order to ensure the concepts in the translated instrument were compatible with ICF. All translated versions of the instrument, linking results and feedback from participants were used for the final adaptation of the Korean version of the instrument. The Korean version of the instrument was assessed twice on different occasions to examine Inter- and intra-rater reliability, and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. Results: Twelve participants were involved in the translation and linking process. Ninety-five volunteers were invited to participate to examine the reliability of the instrument. Fifty participants completed the self-rated version of the instrument and 45 finished the interviewer version. The Korean WHODAS 2.0: 36-item version was found to have excellent reliability: self-rated version and interviewer version reliability coefficients were ICC=0.92 and ICC=0.94, respectively. Thirty-four items of the translated instrument were to be linked to ICF categories. Some adaptation was made; details and a familiar example were added to help respondents answer the questions. Conclusion: The study results show that the adaptation of the 36-item version of WHODAS 2.0 to Korean was successful and the instrument is ready for use in testing its psychometric properties.

주제어

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

문제 정의

Excellent inter-rater reliability was observed in this study. This result is consistent with those in previous studies.

제안 방법

The purposes of this study were to develop a Korean version of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 (K-WHODAS 2.0: 36-item) using a standardized process of translation and adaptation of instruments, to link each of the items in the Korean version to ICF and to test the reliability of K-WHODAS 2.0: 36-item.
The interval between occasions was 3 to 7 days depending on participant’s availability. On completion of the second test, an interview was conducted to collect information on any misunderstanding of the intended meaning in each item and to examine the results for missing or multiple responses for each item. All collected information was adapted for final development.
On completion of the second test, an interview was conducted to collect information on any misunderstanding of the intended meaning in each item and to examine the results for missing or multiple responses for each item. All collected information was adapted for final development.
A respondent should be informed of a couple of concepts before testing: degree of difficulty was to be interpreted as increased effort, discomfort or pain, slowness, or changes in the way the person does the activity; health condition was meant to include diseases, illnesses, injuries, mental or emotional problems, problems with alcohol, or problems with drugs. Averaging was done for good and bad days for the last 30 days; if an item was not experienced in the past 30 days, it was to be rated as N/A.
The demographic characteristics and simple scores from the WHODAS 2.0: 36-item self-rated version was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for the K-WHODAS 2.
0: 36-item self-rated version was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for the K-WHODAS 2.0: 36-item instrument across two measurement occasions to examine the reliability of the instrument. All analyses in the study were performed using IBM SPSS version 24.
This study was conducted to develop a Korean version of the 36- item WHODAS 2.0 instrument following a standardized process of translation and adaptation of instrument. The developed K-WHODAS 2.

대상 데이터

Twelve persons participated in the translating process. Eight of them had Korean as their mother tongue and translated the 36-item WHODAS 2.
To assess the K-WHODAS 2.0: 36-item instrument’s reliability, 95 subjects participated in the study.
Fifty subjects (22 males), aged from 20 to 74 years (mean 40.82±16.10 years), completed the self-rated version of the instrument and 45 (24 males), aged from 18 to 28 years (mean 22.11± 2.45 years) were interviewed to complete the interviewer version.
Ninety-five volunteers were recruited for reliability test of the KWHODAS 2.0: 36-item instrument: 50 of them participated to examine the self-rated version and 45 volunteers to assess the interviewer version. To be included in the study, volunteers had to be over 18 years of age, and use Korean as their mother tongue.

이론/모형

The procedure used in this study followed a guideline proposed by Beaton and colleagues¹² to establish the Korean cultural adaptation of WHODAS 2.0: 36-item version. The procedure involved in the forward translation from English to Korean, and backward translation to verify the original meanings were preserved.

성능/효과

It is suggested that a broader subjects characteristics, such as that in a clinical population, should be invited to participate in further studies. In conclusion, the results suggest that the K-WHODAS 2.0: 36-item instrument was successfully developed and the instrument is deemed ready for testing its psychometric properties.

후속연구

^9,10 Participants completing the interviewer version of the instrument provided very similar general characteristics; similar in age, education and health condition. It is suggested that a broader subjects characteristics, such as that in a clinical population, should be invited to participate in further studies. In conclusion, the results suggest that the K-WHODAS 2.

참고문헌 (16)

Prodinger B, Tennant A, Stucki G. Standardized reporting of functioning information on ICF-based common metrics. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;51(1):110-7.
Worth A, Hammersley V, Knibb R et al. Patient-reported outcome measures for asthma: a systematic review. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2014;24:14020.

상세보기
Geyh S, Cieza A, Kollerits B et al. Content comparison of health-related quality of life measures used in stroke based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF): a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(5):833-51.

상세보기
Wang P, Zhang J, Liao W et al. Content comparison of questionnaires and scales used in low back pain based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(14):1167-77.

상세보기
Song J, Lee H. Mapping items of functioning questionnaires into the international classification of functioning, disability and health: stroke. J Kor Phys Ther. 2016;28(5):341-7.

원문보기 상세보기
Garin O, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Almansa J et al. Validation of the “World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2” in patients with chronic diseases. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8:51.

상세보기
Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N et al. Development the world health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(11):815-23.

상세보기
Lee H, Song J. Mapping items of functioning questionnaires into the international classification of functioning, disability and health: low back pain. J Kor Phys Ther. 2016;28(5):321-7.

원문보기 상세보기
Chiu TY, Yen CF, Chou CH et al. Development of traditional Chinese version of world health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 36 - item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: validity and reliability analyses. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35(11):2812-20.

상세보기
Silva C, Coleta I, SilvaI AG et al. Adaptation and validation of whodas 2.0 in patients with musculoskeletal pain. Rev Saude Publica. 2018;47(4):1-6.
Federici S, Bracalenti M, Meloni F et al. World health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: an international systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(23):2347-80.

상세보기
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-91.

상세보기
WHO. International classification of functioning, disability, and health: Korean version. Seoul, Ministry of Health and Welfare, 2016.
Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S et al. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(4):212-8.

상세보기
WHO. Measuring health and disability: manual for WHO disability assessment schedule (WHODAS 2.0). Malta, World Health Orgnization, 2010.
Lee H, Song J. The Korean language version of stroke impact scale 3.0: cross-cultural adaptation and translation. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2015;10(3):47-55.

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

[국내논문] Korean Cultural Adaptation of WHODAS 2.0 (36-Item Version): Reliability and Linking to ICF 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper

문제 정의

제안 방법

대상 데이터

이론/모형

성능/효과

후속연구

참고문헌 (16)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

연합인증

[국내논문] Korean Cultural Adaptation of WHODAS 2.0 (36-Item Version): Reliability and Linking to ICF 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

AI 본문요약 엑셀 다운로드 AI-Helper

문제 정의

제안 방법

대상 데이터

이론/모형

성능/효과

후속연구

참고문헌 (16)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

저자의 다른 논문 :

이해정 (20)

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper