$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Planning of alternative countermeasures for a station blackout at a boiling water reactor using multilevel flow modeling 원문보기

Nuclear engineering and technology : an international journal of the Korean Nuclear Society, v.50 no.4, 2018년, pp.542 - 552  

Song, Mengchu (Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University) ,  Gofuku, Akio (Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Operators face challenges to plan alternative countermeasures when no procedure exists to address the current plant state. A model-based approach is desired to aid operators in acquiring plant resources and deriving response plans. Multilevel flow modeling (MFM) is a functional modeling methodology ...

주제어

참고문헌 (22)

  1. E. Hollnagel, Y. Fujita, The Fukushima disaster-systemic failures as the lack of resilience, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 45 (2013) 13-20. 

  2. W.F. Stubler, J.M. O'Hara, J.C. Higgins, J. Kramer, Human Systems Interface and Plant Modernization Process: Technical Basis and Human Factors Review Guidance, NUREG/CR-6637, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 2000. 

  3. IAEA, Defence in Depth in Nuclear Safety, IAEA, Vienna, 1996. 

  4. IAEA, Implementation of Accident Management Programmes in Nuclear Power Plants - Safety Reports Series No. 32, IAEA, Vienna, 2004. 

  5. S.J. Lee, P.H. Seong, Development of an integrated decision support system to aid cognitive activities of operators, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 39 (2007) 703-716. 

  6. R.L. Boring, K.D. Thomas, T.A. Ulrich, R.T. Lew, Computerized operator support systems to aid decision making in nuclear power plants, Procedia Manuf. 3 (2015) 5261-5268. 

  7. R.J. Mumaw, D. Swatzler, E.M. Roth, W.A. Thomas, Cognitive Skill Training for Nuclear Power Plant Operational Decision Making, NUREG/CR-6126, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 1994. 

  8. M. Lind, M.N. Larsen, Planning support and the intentionality of dynamic environments, in: Expert. Technol. Cogn. Human-Computer Coop., L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1995, pp. 255-278. 

  9. M. Lind, Modeling goals and functions of complex industrial plants, Appl. Artif. Intell. 8 (1994) 259-283. 

  10. M. Lind, An introduction to multilevel flow modeling, Nucl. Saf. Simul. 2 (2011) 22-32. 

  11. M.N. Larsen, Modelling Start-up Tasks Using Functional Models, The Technical University of Denmark, 1993. 

  12. A. Gofuku, K. Adachi, Y. Tanaka, Finding out counter actions in an anomalous plant situation based on functions and behavior, Trans. Inst. Syst. Control Inf. Eng. 11 (1998) 458-465. 

  13. A. Gofuku, Application of a derivation technique of possible counter actions to an oil refinery plant, in: Proc. 4th IJCAI Work. Eng. Probl. Qual. Reason, 1999, pp. 77-83. 

  14. A. Gofuku, T. Inoue, T. Sugihara, A technique to generate plausible counteroperation procedures for an emergency situation based on a model expressing functions of components, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 54 (2017) 578-588. 

  15. M. Lind, Control functions in MFM: basic principles, Nucl. Saf. Simul. 2 (2011), 132-129. 

  16. TEPCO, Fukushima Nuclear Accident Analysis Report, Tokyo Electric Power Company, Inc., Tokyo, 2012. http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release/betu12_e/images/120620e0104.pdf. 

  17. M. Lind, X. Zhang, Applying functional modeling for accident management of nuclear power plant, Proc. ISOFIC/ISSNP 2014 (5) (2014) 1-10. 

  18. A. Gofuku, Applications of MFM to intelligent systems for supporting plant operators and designers: function-based inference techniques, Nucl. Saf. Simul. 2 (2011) 235-246. 

  19. X. Zhang, M. Lind, O. Ravn, in: Consequence Reasoning in Multilevel Flow Modelling, IFAC Proc, 12, 2013, pp. 187-194. 

  20. S.A. Hodge, J.C. Cleveland, T.S. Kress, M. Petek, Identification and Assessment of BWR In-vessel Severe Accident Mitigation Strategies, 1992. 

  21. IAEA, The Fukushima Daiichi Accident Report by the Director General, IAEA, Vienna, 2015. 

  22. T. Inoue, A. Gofuku, A technique to prioritize plausible counter operation procedures in an accidental situation of plants, in: 8th Int. Symp. Symbiotic Nucl. Power Syst. 21st Century, 2016. 

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로