ASEAN 국가는 광대한 연안과 수 천 개의 섬들로 이루어져 있어 기후변화로 인한 해수면 상승은 국가의 존립에 큰 위기요인이다. 이로 인해 ASEAN 각 국가가 입게 되는 피해를 최소한으로 줄이기 위해서는 범국가적인 온실가스 배출량을 감축하기 위한 노력이 중요하다. 기후변화에 대비하기 위한 다양한 방안 중 하나인 바이오연료는 이를 화석연료를 대체함으로써 환경에 미치는 영향을 최소화하고 온실가스 감축 효과를 불러올 수 있다. 바이오연료 선진국인 유럽과 미국, 브라질은 이 분야에 대한 연구와 개발 및 투자가 이전부터 활발하게 진행되고 있었던 반면 ASEAN 국가에서 관련 정책이 제정 된 것은 긴 시간이 지나지 않았다. 따라서, 본 연구에서는 바이오연료 선진국 중, 바이오에탄올 중심의 미국과 브라질, 바이오디젤 중심의 유럽 연합(EU)의 의무혼합제도와 바이오연료 보급 정책을 각각 살펴보았다. 또한 이를 바탕으로 현재 시행되고 있는 ASEAN 국가의 바이오연료 활용방안과 전망을 모색하였다.
ASEAN 국가는 광대한 연안과 수 천 개의 섬들로 이루어져 있어 기후변화로 인한 해수면 상승은 국가의 존립에 큰 위기요인이다. 이로 인해 ASEAN 각 국가가 입게 되는 피해를 최소한으로 줄이기 위해서는 범국가적인 온실가스 배출량을 감축하기 위한 노력이 중요하다. 기후변화에 대비하기 위한 다양한 방안 중 하나인 바이오연료는 이를 화석연료를 대체함으로써 환경에 미치는 영향을 최소화하고 온실가스 감축 효과를 불러올 수 있다. 바이오연료 선진국인 유럽과 미국, 브라질은 이 분야에 대한 연구와 개발 및 투자가 이전부터 활발하게 진행되고 있었던 반면 ASEAN 국가에서 관련 정책이 제정 된 것은 긴 시간이 지나지 않았다. 따라서, 본 연구에서는 바이오연료 선진국 중, 바이오에탄올 중심의 미국과 브라질, 바이오디젤 중심의 유럽 연합(EU)의 의무혼합제도와 바이오연료 보급 정책을 각각 살펴보았다. 또한 이를 바탕으로 현재 시행되고 있는 ASEAN 국가의 바이오연료 활용방안과 전망을 모색하였다.
ASEAN countries consist of vast coastal areas and thousands of islands that are vulnerable to the effects of climate change on sea level rise. It is believed that this will play an important role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions globally in order to minimize the damage suffered by ASEAN countrie...
ASEAN countries consist of vast coastal areas and thousands of islands that are vulnerable to the effects of climate change on sea level rise. It is believed that this will play an important role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions globally in order to minimize the damage suffered by ASEAN countries. To overcome this issue, biofuels have been used to minimize the impact on the environment by replacing fossil fuels and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In those cases of United States, Brazil and Europe, where biofuels are highly utilized, research, development and investment in this field have been actively conducted in the past. In ASEAN countries, however, it has not been a long time since the biofuel policies were established. To overcome this problem, we investigated the renewable fuel policy in the United States, Brazil and the European Union. Based on this, we suggested the utilization plan and prospect of biofuel policy in ASEAN countries.
ASEAN countries consist of vast coastal areas and thousands of islands that are vulnerable to the effects of climate change on sea level rise. It is believed that this will play an important role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions globally in order to minimize the damage suffered by ASEAN countries. To overcome this issue, biofuels have been used to minimize the impact on the environment by replacing fossil fuels and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In those cases of United States, Brazil and Europe, where biofuels are highly utilized, research, development and investment in this field have been actively conducted in the past. In ASEAN countries, however, it has not been a long time since the biofuel policies were established. To overcome this problem, we investigated the renewable fuel policy in the United States, Brazil and the European Union. Based on this, we suggested the utilization plan and prospect of biofuel policy in ASEAN countries.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
제안 방법
However, it was confirmed that there are limitations to enforcement of policies due to technical limits. Thus, this study is conducted to find a method for complementing this. The current size and status of the cellulosic bioethanol market are very limited to replace targets of each country (Kim, 2016).
8% fuel blending by 2030, and it is based on advanced biofuels that exclude the first generation (conventional) fuels unlike the existing RED (EU Commission, 2018). The obligation of life cycle GHG emission reduction for fuel suppliers was added to the existing RED and the detailed criteria on which cases are to be included in GHG emission were set. These criteria include1) nitrogen dioxide emission from soil during farming;2) emission during extraction of vegetable oil; and3) emission during transportation and distribution of final fuel.
Starting in December 2004, Brazil implemented the National Program for the Production and Use of Biodiesel (PNPB)19) to increase national production of biodiesel (Brazil biofuels, 2016). The objective of this program is to require legal, administrative and normative measures, define a federal tax model for biodiesel, and establish the conditions for registering producers and importers. According to USDA (2017), the National Council on Energy Policy (CNPE)20) demanded gradual increase of Renewable Fuel Standard from B821) in 2017 to B9 in 2018 and B10-B15 in 2019.
후속연구
Furthermore, in an effort to diversify fuels and cope with climate change, each government can realize sustainable policies by setting a goal to gradually increase Renewable Fuel Standard for biofuels. It is necessary to continue with research on technologies that use cellulosic biomass and microalgae, which can replace the first generation (conventional) biomass considered as a food resource, in future. Subsidy policies, tax benefits and smooth supply of fuels will have a significant effect in the development of biofuel technologies of each country.
참고문헌 (28)
ADB. 2016. Myanmar: Energy sector assessment, strategy, and road map. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank. ISBN 978-92-9257-685-1.
APEC, 2015. APEC Energy Overview 2015. Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC). APEC#215-RE-01.15.
APEC, 2016. Energy Demand and Supply Outlook 6th Edition. Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC). APEC#216-RE-01.8. ISBN 978-981-09-8921-7.
Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF), Global Trends In Renewable Energy Investment. 2018. Frankfurt School-UNEP Center, https://fs-unepcentre.org/
Boutesteijn, C., Drabik, D., Venus, T. J. 2017. The interaction between EU biofuel policy and first-and second-generation biodiesel production. Industrial Crops and Products 106: 124-129.
Bracmort, K. 2015. The renewable fuel standard (RFS): cellulosic biofuels. Congressional Research Service 7-5700.
Brazil biofuels. 2016. https://www.transportpolicy.net/standard/brazil-fuels-biofuels/.
Cho, J.H., Lee, H.S., Yang, E.M. 2013. A foreign case study of renewable fuel standard with respect to biogas. Korea Environment Institute 17-254.
Council of the EU. 2017. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2017/12/18/promoting-renewable-energy-use-council-adopts-its-position/.
Directives. 2009. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 23 Apr. 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Driectives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, L 140/16.
Dixon, P., van Meijl, H., Rimmer, M., Shutes, L., Tabeau, A. 2016. RED versus REDD: Biofuel policy versus forest conservation. Economic Modelling 52: 366-374.
DOE (Department of Energy). 2017. https://www.afdc.energy.gov/laws/RFS.html.
EU Commission, 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/renewable-energy/renewable-energy-directive.
Frank, S., Bottcher, H., Havlik, P., Valin, H., Mosnier, A., Obersteiner, M., Schmid, E., Elbersen, B., 2013. How effective are the sustainability criteria accompanying the European Union 2020 biofuel targets?. Gcb Bioenergy 5(3): 306-314.
Goto, Y. 2012. The world is changed by resources, food and energy. Chapter 1. Fantastic resources, food crisis. Japanese Economic Newspaper Publisher, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Goto, Y. 2012. The world is changed by resources, food and energy. Chapter 2. Strength of energy diversity. Japanese Economic Newspaper Publisher, Chiyodaku, Tokyo, Japan.
Heo, S.J., Choi, J.W. 2017. Study on utilization and prospect of Lignocellulosic Bioethanol in ASEAN countries. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology 45(5): 588-598.
IRENA. 2016. Renewable Energy Outlook for ASEAN: a REmap Analysis. Abu Dhabi and ASEAN Centre for Energy (ACE), Jakarta. ISBN 978-92-95111-27-1.
IRENA. 2017a. Renewable Energy Prospects: Indonesia, a REmap analysis, International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), Abu Dhabi, www.irena.org/remap. ISBN 978-92-95111-18-9.
IRENA. 2017b. Renewables Readiness Assessment: The Philippines, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. ISBN 978-92-9260-003-7.
IRENA. 2017c. Renewable energy outlook: Thailand. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. ISBN 978-92-9260-035-8.
Kim, Y.S. 2016. Current status and prospects on Biofule Conversion Technologies and Facilities, using Lignocellulosic Biomass. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology 44(5): 622-628.
Trinh, T. A., Le, T.P.L. 2018. Biofuels potential for transportation fuels in Vietnam: A status Quo and SWOT analysis. IOP Science, 143, 012065.
USDA. 2015. Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN), Jakarta, Indonesia. ID1525.
USDA. 2017. Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN), Malaysia, MY7007.
USDA. 2017. Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN), Brazil, BR17006.
Park, T.J. 2011. Biorefinery overseas status and policy implications. Korea Environment Institute, 15-06.
Stock, J. 2017. Proposed Denial of Petitions for Rulemaking to Change the RFS Point of Obligation: Docket ID No. EPA-OAR-2016-0544. Cambridge, MA, USA.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.