$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

거절 민감성과 연속적 언쟁의 역기능적 의사소통
Rejection Sensitivity and Dysfunctional Communication Patterns of Serial Arguing 원문보기

한국콘텐츠학회논문지 = The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, v.19 no.11, 2019년, pp.247 - 261  

이상은 (상명대학교 디지털이미지학과)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

요구-철회 커뮤니케이션은 연속적 언쟁에서 나타나는 주요한 역기능적 의사소통 패턴이다. 본 연구는 이러한 요구-철회 패턴이 연속적 언쟁의 지속성을 어떻게 증가시키는지 이에 영향을 주는 요인을 밝히고자 한다. 본 연구는 거절 민감성이 파트너의 부정 행동 인식과 긍정적인 상관관계를 형성하고 이는 연속적 언쟁 시 나타나는 요구-철회 패턴에 정의 영향을 끼칠 것이며 이러한 일련의 과정이 연속적 언쟁이 해결되었다고 인식할 가능성을 낮출 것으로 가정했다. 직렬 매개모형을 분석한 결과 연속적 언쟁이 해결되었다고 인식하는 것과 상관없이 거절 민감성은 연속적 언쟁이 상호 합의를 수반했다는 인식에 부정적인 영향을 끼치는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 부적 상관관계는 부분적으로 개인의 거절 민감성이 연인관계에 있는 파트너가 일반적으로 부정 행동을 하는 것으로 인식할 가능성을 높임으로써 연속적 언쟁 시 자기 요구-파트너 철회의 의사소통을 발생시키기 때문인 것으로 나타났다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Demand/withdraw communication is an important dysfunctional pattern of serial arguing. This study aims at addressing factors that affect the ways in which self-demand/partner-withdraw pattern increases the likelihood of persistence of serial arguing. We posit that sensitivity to rejection is positiv...

주제어

표/그림 (7)

참고문헌 (48)

  1. R. Trapp and N. Hoff, " A model of serial arguments in interpersonal relationships," Argumentation and Avocacy, Vol.22, No.1, pp.1-11, 1985. 

  2. J. P. Caughlin and R. S. Malis, "Demand/Withdraw communication between parents and adolescents: Connections with self-esteem and substance use," Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol.21, No.1, pp.125-148, 2004. 

  3. R. S. Malis and M. E. Roloff, "Demand/withdraw patterns in serial arguments: Implications for well-being: Human Communication Research, Vol.32, No.2, pp.198-216, 2006. 

  4. K. L. Johnson and M. E. Roloff, "Serial arguing and relational quality: determinants and consequences of perceived resolvability," Communication Research, Vol.25, No.3, pp.327-343, 1998. 

  5. K. Carr, P. Schrodt, and A. M. Ledbetter, "Rumination, conflict intensity, and perceived resolvability as predictors motivation and likelihood of continuing serial arguments," Western Journal of Communication, Vol.76, No.5, pp.408-502, 2012. 

  6. K. L. Johnson and M. E. Roloff, "The influence of argumentative role (initiator vs. resistor) on perceptions of serial argument resolvability and relational harm," Argumentation, Vol.14, No.1, pp.1-15, 2000. 

  7. Q. Zhang, "Emotion matters in serial arguments: The effects of anger and compassion on perceived resolvability and relationship confidence in dating relationships," Communication Research Report, Vol.31, No.1, pp.102-109, 2014. 

  8. J. L. Bevan and L. Sparks, "The relationship between accurate and benevolently biased serial argument perceptions and individual negative health perceptions," Communication Research, Vol.41, No,2, pp.1-25, 2012. 

  9. R. M. Reznik and M. E. Roloff, "Getting off to a bad start: Relationship between communication during an initial episode of a serial argument and argument frequency," Communication Studies, Vol.62, No.3, pp.291-306, 2011. 

  10. J. L Bevan, A. Finan and A. Kaminsky, "Modeling serial arguments in close relationships: The serial argument process model," Human Communication Research, Vol.34, No.4, pp.600-624, 2008 

  11. Q. Zhang, L. Xie, and G. A. Maier, "The interpersonal effects of perceived partner anger and conflict strategies in serial arguments: Perceived resolvability and rumination as sense making mediators," Ohio Communication Journal, Vol.51, pp.141-167, 2013. 

  12. J. P. Caughlin and R. S. Malis, "Demand/withdraw communication between parents and adolescents: Connections with self-esteem and substance use," Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol.21, No.1, pp.125-148, 2004. 

  13. K. A. Eldridge and A. Christensen, "Demand-withdraw communication during couple conflict: A review and analysis," In P. Noller & J. A. Feeney (Eds.), Understanding marriage: Developments in the study of couple interaction, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp.289-322, 2002. 

  14. L. M. Sagrestano, C. L. Heavey, and A. Christensen, "Individual differences versus social structural approaches to explaining demand-withdraw and social influence behaviors," In K. Dindia & D. J. Canary (Eds.), Sex Differences and Similarities, pp.361-377, 2006. 

  15. J. P. Caughlin, "The demand/withdraw pattern of communication as a predictor of marital satisfaction over time: Unresolved issues and future directions," Human Communication Research, Vol.28, No.1, pp.49-85, 2002. 

  16. T. D. Afifi and P. Schrodt, "'Feeling caught' as a mediator of adolescents' and young adults' avoidance and satisfaction with their parents in divorced and non divorced households," Communication Monographs, Vol.70, No.2, pp.142-173, 2003. 

  17. M. M. McGinn, P. T. McFarland, and A. Christensen, "Antecedents and consequences of demand/withdraw," Journal of Family Psychology, Vol.23, No.5, pp.749-757, 2009. 

  18. J. P. Caughlin and A. L. Vangelisti, "An individual difference explanation of why married couples engage in the Demand/withdraw pattern of conflict," Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol.17, No.4-5, pp.523-551, 2002. 

  19. M. Givertz and S. Safford, "Longitudinal impact of communication patterns on romantic attachment and symptoms of depression," Current Psychology, Vol.30, No.2, pp.148-172, 2011. 

  20. G. Downey and S. Feldman, "Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.70, No.6, pp.1327-1343, 1996. 

  21. G. Downey, V. Mougios, O. Ayduk, B. E. London, and Y. Shoda, "Rejection sensitivity and the defensive motivational system: Insights from the startle response to rejection cues," Psychological Science, Vol.15, No.10, pp.668-673, 2004. 

  22. G. Downey, A. L. Freitas, B. Michaelis, and H. Khouri, "The self-fulfilling prophecy in close relationships: Rejection sensitivity and rejection by romantic partners," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.75, No.2, pp.545-560, 1998. 

  23. S. R Levy, O. Ayduk, and G. Downey, "The role of rejection sensitivity in people's relationships with significant others and valued social groups," In M. R. Leary (Ed.), Interpersonal rejection New York: Oxford University Press, pp.3-20, 2011. 

  24. J. C. Norona, V. Tregubenki, S. B. Boiangiu, G. Levy, M. Scharf, D. P. Welsh, and S. Shulman, "Changes in rejection sensitivity across adolescence and emerging adulthood: Associations with relationship involvement, quality and coping," Journal of Adolescence, Vol.63, pp.96-106, 2018. 

  25. O. Ayduk, G. Downey, A. Testa, and Y. Yen, "Does rejection sensitivity elicit hostility in rejection sensitive women?," Social Cognition, Vol.17, No.2, pp.245-271, 1999. 

  26. G. Downey, S. Feldman, and O. Ayduk, "Rejection sensitivity and male violence in romantic relationships,"Personal Relationships, Vol.7, No.1, pp.45-61, 2000. 

  27. J. M. Wang, A. C. Hartl, B. Laursen, and K. H. Rubin, "The high costs of low agreeableness: Low agreeableness exacerbtes interpersonal consequences of rejection sensitivity in U.S. and Chinese adolescents," Vol.67, pp.36-43, 2017. 

  28. J. Pietrzak, G. Downey, and O. Ayduk, "Rejection sensitivity as an interpersonal vulnerability," In M. Baldwin (Ed.), Interpersonal cognition, New York: Guilford Press, pp.62-84, 2005. 

  29. R. M. Dailey, "Confirmation in parent-adolescent relationships and adolescent openness: Toward extending confirmation theory," Communication Monographs, Vol.73, No.4, pp.434-458, 2006. 

  30. K. N. Cissna and E. Sieburg, "Patterns of interactional confirmation an disconfirmation," In C. Wilder-Mott &J. H. Weakland (Eds.), Rigor and imagination: Essays from the legacy of Gregory Bateson New York, NY:Praeger, pp.253-282, 1981. 

  31. H. Weger, "Disconfirming communication and self-verification marriage: Associations among the demand/withdraw interaction pattern, feeling understood, and marital satisfaction," Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol.22, No.1, pp.19-31, 2005. 

  32. M. J. Beatty and J. A. Dobos, "Adult males' perceptions of confirmation and relational partner communication apprehension: Indirect effects of fathers on sons' partners," Communication Quarterly, Vol.41, No.1, pp.66-76, 1993. 

  33. G. Downey, K. R. Berenson, and J. Kang, "The adult rejection sensitivity questionnaire (ASRQ). Columbia University," 2006, Retrieved from http://socialrelations.psych.columbia.edu/measures/adultrs-questionaire. 

  34. B. M. Byrne, "Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming," (2nd ed.) New York, NY: Routledge, 2010. 

  35. K. Ellis, "Perceived parental confirmation: Development and validation of an instrument," Southern Communication Journal, Vol.67, No.4, pp.319-334, 2002. 

  36. A. Christensen and C. L. Heavey, "Gender differences in marital conflict: The demand/withdraw interaction pattern." In S. Oskamp & M. Costanzo (Eds.), Genderissues in contemporary society Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp.113-141, 1993. 

  37. S. Vuchinich, "Starting and stopping spontaneous family conflicts," Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol.49, pp.591-601, 1987. 

  38. A. Christensena and C. L. Heavey, "Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.59, No.1, pp.73-81, 1990. 

  39. A. F. Hayes, "Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach," Guilford Press, 2013. 

  40. J. L. Bevan, K. D. Tidgewell, K. C. Bardull, L. Cusanelli, M. Hartsern, and D. Holbeck, "Serial argumentation goals and their relationships with perceived resolvability and choice of conflict tactics," Communication Quarterly, Vol.55, No.1, pp.61-77, 2007. 

  41. K. L. Keck and J. A. Samp, "The dynamic nature of goals and message production as revealed in a sequential analysis of conflict interactions," Human Communication Research, Vol.33, No.1, pp.27-47, 2007. 

  42. M. S. Harper, J. W. Dickson, and D. P. Welsh, "Self-silence and rejection sensitivity in adolescent romantic relationships," Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Vol.35, No.3, pp.459-467, 2006. 

  43. V. Purdie and G. Downey, "Rejection sensitivity and adolescent girls' vulnerability to relationship-centered difficulties," Child Maltreatment, Vol.5, No.4, pp.338-349, 2000. 

  44. R. Romero-Canyas, G. Downey, K. S. Reddy, S. Rodriguez, T. Cavanaugh, and R. Pelayo, "Paying to belong: When does rejection trigger ingratiation?," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.99, No.5, pp.802-823, 2010. 

  45. J. Pietrzak, G. Downey, and O. Ayduk, "Rejection sensitivity as an interpersonal vulnerability," In M. Baldwin (Ed.), Interpersonal cognition New York: Guilford Press, pp.62-84, 2005. 

  46. R. Romero-Canyas, K. S. Reddy, S. Rodriguez, and G. Downey, "After all I've done for you: Self-silencing accommodations fuel women's post-rejection hostility," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.49, No.4, pp.732-740, 2013. 

  47. J. K. Burgoon, "Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication," Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol.12, No.1-2, pp.30-48, 1993. 

  48. J. M. Honeycutt, "Imagined interaction conflict-linkage theory: Explaining the persistence and resolution of interpersonal conflict in everyday life," Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, Vol.23, No.1, pp.3-25, 2003. 

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로