최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기인지과학 = Korean journal of cognitive science, v.30 no.4, 2019년, pp.219 - 238
김이영 (공주대학교) , 어윤경 (공주대학교)
The objective of the current study is to explore psychological factors that can encourage elementary school students to read. Specifically, the current study verified the effect of manipulating the construal level, which is known to influence goal achievement, on the reading volume of the students. ...
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
독서가 특히 중요한 시기는 언제인가? | 인간의 인지기능 형성과 발달에 필수적인 독서가 특히 중요한 시기는 초등학생부터 고등학생 시기로(Carver, 1990) 알려져 있다. 이 시기에 독서를 많이 한 사람은 성인이 되었을 때도 더 뛰어난 인지 능력을 지니게 되고(Scarborough, Dobrich, & Hager, 1991) 그렇지 않은 사람은 상대적으로 더 낮은 인지 능력을 지니게 되는데, 어린 시절에 발생했던 인지 능력 격차보다 2배 이상 증가한 격차를 보인다(Stanovich, 2009). | |
독서할 수 있다는 것은 무엇을 의미하는가? | 독서 능력은 인간이 가진 고유의 능력 중 하나로(Wise, Sevcil, Morris, Lovett, & Wolf, 2007) 단순히 문자를 읽어 해석하거나 의미전달로 그치는 것이 아니다. 독서할 수 있다는 것은 문자라는 상징 기호를 인간의 발성기관을 통해 만들어지는 음성으로 변환할 수 있는 능력이 있다는 것이고(Wolf, 1984), 그 발음에 해당하는 단어가 이 세계에 있는 것들 중 무엇을 지칭하는 것인지 안다는 것이다(Wolf & Gow, 1986). 또한 각각이 지칭하는 것들이 이어져서 만들어지는 문장을 이해할 수 있다는 것이며(Katzir, Kim, Wolf, O’Brien, Kennedy, Lovett, & Morris, 2006), 그 문장이 만들어 지는 문법적 구조를 이해했다는 것이다(Wise et al., 2010). | |
현시대는 멀티미디어를 활용하여 과거보다 쉽고 빠르게 다양한 정보와 지식을 획득하는 시대임에도 독서의 중요성이 줄어들지 않는 이유는? | 그러나 이러한 환경 속에서도 독서의 중요성은 전혀 줄어들지 않았다 (Baron, 2017; Levine, Waite, & Bowman, 2013; Loh & Kanai, 2014). 왜냐하면, 정보를 수동적으로 획득하는 것과 정보를 처리하고, 정교화하고, 정보들을 조합하여 새로운 정보를 만들어내는 인지 능력은 전혀 다른 차원의 것이기 때문이다(Hartanto & Yang, 2016). 즉 이 시대는 다양한 정보에 대한 접근성이 용이해진 정보화 시대이지, 인지능력을 향상시키는 독서를 하지 않고 가만히 있어도 두뇌가 발달하고(Uncapher & Wagner, 2018), 기억력과 주의력과 같은 인지능력이 향상되는 시대가 아니라는 것이다(Fjortoft, Gettig, & Verdone, 2018). |
김동일, 김희주, 김희은, 안성진 (2018). 난독증 및 읽기 부진 학생 대상 프로그램의 효과 분석. 아시아교육연구, 19(2), 403-427.
김상인 (2015). 난화기법이 난독증(dyslexia) 학생의 심리안정과 난독증 감소에 미치는 효과. 예술 심리치료연구, 11, 21-43.
김선희, 박현숙 (2003). 반구 자극 중재가 난독증 아동의 읽기 향상에 미치는 효과. 특수교육학연구, 38(2), 57-84.
김혜정 (2014). 국어교육 제재 선정과 독서 목록 구성에 대한 일고. 국어교육연구, 55.
변우열 (1996). 중고등학교 필독도서목록에 관한 연구. 한국도서관 정보학회지, 24, 243-274.
이홍재, 김미라, 남기춘 (1998). 난독증의 이해: 난독증의 분류와 평가. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 17(1), 1-24.
Baron, N. S. (2017). Reading in a digital age. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(2), 15-20.
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323-370.
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2011). Matthew effects in young readers: Reading comprehension and reading experience aid vocabulary development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(5), 431-443.
Carver, R. P. (1990). Intelligence and reading ability in Grades 2-12. Intelligence, 14(4), 449-455.
Chomsky, C. (1972). Stages in language development and reading exposure. Harvard Educational Review, 42(1), 1-33.
Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1998). What reading does for the mind. American Educator, 22, 8-17.
de Jonge, P., & de Jong, P. F. (1996). Working memory, intelligence and reading ability in children. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(6), 1007-1020.
Dhar, R., & Kim, E. Y. (2007). Seeing the forest or the trees: Implications of construal level theory for consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 96-100.
Fjortoft, N., Gettig, J., & Verdone, M. (2018). Smartphones, memory, and pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 82(3), 7054-7054.
Fujita, K. (2008). Seeing the forest beyond the trees: A construal-level approach to self-control. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(3), 1475-1496.
Fujita, K., Henderson, M. D., Eng, J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2006). Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psychological Science, 17(4), 278-282.
Fujita, K., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Levin-Sagi, M. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 351-367.
Gable, S. L., & Haidt, J. (2005). What (and why) is positive psychology? Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 103-110.
Hansen, J., & Trope, Y. (2013). When time flies: How abstract and concrete mental construal affect the perception of time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(2), 336-347.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (2003). The early catastrophe: The 30 million word gap by age 3. American Educator, 27(1), 4-9.
Hartanto, A., & Yang, H. (2016). Is the smartphone a smart choice? The effect of smartphone separation on executive functions. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 329-336.
Hirsch Jr, E. D., & Moats, L. C. (2001). Overcoming the language gap. American Educator, 25(2), 4-9.
Johnson, J., Fabian, V., & Pascual-Leone, J. (1989). Quantitative hardware stages that constrain language development. Human Development, 32(5), 245-271.
Katzir, T., Kim, Y., Wolf, M., O’Brien, B., Kennedy, B., Lovett, M., & Morris, R. (2006). Reading fluency: The whole is more than the parts. Annals of dyslexia, 56(1), 51-82.
Kirby, J. R., Desrochers, A., Roth, L., & Lai, S. S. V. (2008). Longitudinal predictors of word reading development. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49(2), 103-110.
Lee, L., & Ariely, D. (2006). Shopping goals, goal concreteness, and conditional promotions. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(1), 60-70.
Levine, L. E., Waite, B. M., & Bowman, L. L. (2013). Use of instant messaging predicts self-report but not performance measures of inattention, impulsiveness, and distractibility. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(12), 898-903.
Liberman, N., Sagristano, M. D., & Trope, Y. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 523-534.
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5-18.
Liberman, N., Trope, Y., McCrea, S. M., & Sherman, S. J. (2007). The effect of level of construal on the temporal distance of activity enactment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(1), 143-149.
Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal level theory and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 113-117.
Loh, K. K., & Kanai, R. (2014). Higher media multi-tasking activity is associated with smaller gray-matter density in the anterior cingulate cortex. Plos one, 9(9), e106698-e106698.
McCardle, P., Cooper, J. A., Houle, G. R., Karp, N., & Paul-Brown, D. (2001). Emergent and early literacy: Current status and research directions. Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 16(4), 183-85.
McCrea, S. M., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Sherman, S. J. (2008). Construal level and procrastination. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1308-1314.
Moisala, M., Salmela, V., Hietajarvi, L., Salo, E., Carlson, S., Salonen, O., ... & Alho, K. (2016). Media multitasking is associated with distractibility and increased prefrontal activity in adolescents and young adults. NeuroImage, 134, 113-121.
Muter, V., & Diethelm, K. (2001). The contribution of phonological skills and letter knowledge to early reading development in a multilingual population. Language learning, 51(2), 187-219.
Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., & Stevenson, J. (2004). Phonemes, Rimes, Vocabulary, and Grammatical Skills as Foundations of Early Reading Development: Evidence From a Longitudinal Study. Developmental Psychology, 40(5), 665-681.
Pfost, M., Dorfler, T., & Artelt, C. (2012). Reading competence development of poor readers in a German elementary school sample: An empirical examination of the Matthew effect model. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(4), 411-426.
Rabinovich, A., Morton, T. A., Postmes, T., & Verplanken, B. (2009). Think global, act local: The effect of goal and mindset specificity on willingness to donate to an environmental organization. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(4), 391-399.
Ritchie, S. J., & Bates, T. C. (2013). Enduring links from childhood mathematics and reading achievement to adult socioeconomic status. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1301-1308.
Scarborough, H. S., Dobrich, W., & Hager, M. (1991). Preschool literacy experience and later reading achievement. Journal of learning Disabilities, 24(8), 508-511.
Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., & Dornheim, L. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and individual differences, 25(2), 167-177.
Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive Psychology Progress: Empirical Validation of Interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410-421.
Smith, C., Constantino, R., & Krashen, S. (1997). Differences in print environment for children in Beverly Hills, Compton and Watts. Emergency Librarian, 24(4), 8-9.
Stanovich, K. E. (2009). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Journal of Education, 189(1-2), 23-55.
Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Feeman, D. J. (1984). Intelligence, cognitive skills, and early reading progress. Reading Research Quarterly, 19(3), 278-303.
Todorov, A., Goren, A., & Trope, Y. (2007). Probability as a psychological distance: Construal and preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 473-482.
Tressoldi, P. E., Stella, G., & Faggella, M. (2001). The development of reading speed in Italians with dyslexia: A longitudinal study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(5), 414-417.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463.
Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of consumer psychology, 17(2), 83-95.
Ulkumen, G., & Cheema, A. (2011). Framing goals to influence personal savings: The role of specificity and construal level. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(6), 958-969.
Uncapher, M. R., & Wagner, A. D. (2018). Minds and brains of media multitaskers: Current findings and future directions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(40), 9889-9896.
Vaessen, A., & Blomert, L. (2010). Long-term cognitive dynamics of fluent reading development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(3), 213-231.
Verhoeven, L., van Leeuwe, J., & Vermeer, A. (2011). Vocabulary growth and reading development across the elementary school years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(1), 8-25.
Wakslak, C., & Trope, Y. (2009). The effect of construal level on subjective probability estimates. Psychological Science, 20(1), 52-58.
Wilmer, H. H., Sherman, L. E., & Chein, J. M. (2017). Smartphones and cognition: A review of research exploring the links between mobile technology habits and cognitive functioning. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 605.
Wise, J. C., Sevcik, R. A., Morris, R. D., Lovett, M. W., & Wolf, M. (2007). The relationship among receptive and expressive vocabulary, listening comprehension, pre-reading skills, word identification skills, and reading comprehension by children with reading abilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 1093-1109.
Wise, J. C., Sevcik, R. A., Morris, R. D., Lovett, M. W., Wolf, M., Kuhn, M., . . . Schwanenflugel, P. (2010). The relationship between different measures of oral reading fluency and reading comprehension in second-grade students who evidence different oral reading fluency difficulties. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41(3), 340-348.
Wolf, M. (1984). Naming, reading, and the dyslexias: A longitudinal overview. Annals of dyslexia, 34(1), 87-115.
Wolf, M., & Gow, D. (1986). A longitudinal investigation of gender differences in language and reading development. First language, 6(17), 81-110.
Wolf, M., & Stoodley, C. J. (2008). Proust and the squid: The story and science of the reading brain. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.