$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

기술기반창업기업의 기업활동이 기업성장에 미치는 영향
The Effect of Technology-Based Entrepreneurship(TBE) Activities on Firms Growth 원문보기

벤처창업연구= Asia-Pacific journal of business and venturing, v.14 no.6, 2019년, pp.59 - 76  

이명종 (창업진흥원 조사연구실) ,  주영진 (충북대학교 경영학부)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

대부분의 기술기반창업기업이 죽음의 계곡(VoD: valley of death)을 극복하지 못하고 쇠퇴하거나 소멸하는 과정을 겪게 된다. 본 연구는 기술기반창업기업의 성장차원을 구분하고, 기술기반창업기업의 기업활동이 기업성장에 미치는 영향력의 시간 흐름에 따른 변화를 확인할 목적으로 수행되었다. 본 연구는 다수의 성장지표에 대한 탐색적요인분석(EFA: exploratory factor analysis)을 통해 규모와 수익으로 구분된 2차원의 성장차원을 확인하였으며, 규모와 수익으로 구분된 4가지 상태와 폐업을 포함한 5가지 상태의 이산적 기업성장상태를 정의하였다. 기술기반창업기업의 기업활동이 기업성장에 미치는 영향은 고용활동, 마케팅활동, 연구개발활동, 재무활동, 일반관리활동 등 5가지 대표적인 기업활동을 독립변수로 하고, 이산적 기업성장상태(규모×수익, 폐업)를 종속변수로 한 다항로짓모형(MNL: multi-nomial logit model)을 이용하여 분석하였다. 시간 흐름에 따른 기술기반창업기업의 성장단계는 창업생존율이 급격하게 저하되는 주요 기간을 고려하여 창업초기, 창업중기, 창업후기 등의 3단계로 업력을 범주화하였다. 본 연구의 분석자료는 정부·공공기관의 창업지원기업에 대한 2차자료를 바탕으로 하였으며, 분석대상은 업력 10년 이내의 기술기반창업기업으로 하였다. 분석결과 기술기반창업기업의 고용활동과 마케팅활동은 창업초기와 중기의 활동이 기업성장상태에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 고용활동은 긍정적 영향과 부정적 영향을 함께 미치는 반면, 마케팅활동은 규모와 수익 성장에 긍정적 영향만을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 연구개발활동, 재무활동, 일반관리활동은 기업성장 전 과정에서 기업성장상태에 긍정적 영향과 부정적 영향을 함께 미치는 기업활동으로 나타났다. 아울러 기업의 고유특성인 창업자 창업당시 연령, 기업의 업종 및 소재지역은 성장단계에 따라 기업성장상태에 차별적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 확인되었다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Most technology-based entrepreneurship(TBE) go through an process of decline or disappear without overcoming the valley of death(VoD). The purpose of this study is to identify the growth dimension of TBE and to test the influence of firms activities on firms growth over time. This study identified t...

주제어

질의응답

핵심어 질문 논문에서 추출한 답변
죽음의 계곡이란 무엇인가? 대부분의 기술기반창업기업이 재무적, 기술적, 경영자원의 결핍 등으로 발생하는 죽음의 계곡(VoD: valley of death)을 극복하지 못하고 결국은 쇠퇴하거나 소멸하는 과정을 겪게 된다(Ries, 2011). 실제로 국내 신생기업의 약 50%가 3년 이내에 폐업하는 상황이며, 매출 또는 고용이 최근 3년 동안 20% 이상 증가하는 고성장기업 비율은 약 2% 수준에 불과한 실정이다(통계청, 2018).
제한된 연구방법론을 적용함에 따라 발견되는 몇 가지 주요한 한계점은 무엇인가? 첫 번째, 기업의 성장을 측정하기 위해 다양한 지표들을 단편적으로 사용함으로써 다각적 측면의 기업성장을 설명하기 어려운 한계가 있다(Delmar et al., 2003; Wiklund, 1999). 두 번째, 자원기반 관점의 성장영향 연구에 있어 기업성장에 대한 특정 기업활동의 영향만을 제한적으로 살펴보고 있음에 따라, 다양한 기업활동의 영향을 통합적으로 살펴볼 필요가 있다 (Wiklund et al., 2009). 세 번째, 기업의 성장은 변화의 과정으로서 시간의 흐름에 따라 기업 성장의 원인과 결과, 그리고 피드백효과가 어떻게 변화하는지 관찰할 필요가 있다(Chandler & Lyon, 2001; Davidsson & Wiklund, 2000).
기술기반창업기업의 기업활동이 기업성장에 미치는 영향을 분석하기 위해 이용한 것은 무엇인가? 본 연구는 다수의 성장지표에 대한 탐색적요인분석(EFA: exploratory factor analysis)을 통해 규모와 수익으로 구분된 2차원의 성장차원을 확인하였으며, 규모와 수익으로 구분된 4가지 상태와 폐업을 포함한 5가지 상태의 이산적 기업성장상태를 정의하였다. 기술기반창업기업의 기업활동이 기업성장에 미치는 영향은 고용활동, 마케팅활동, 연구개발활동, 재무활동, 일반관리활동 등 5가지 대표적인 기업활동을 독립변수로 하고, 이산적 기업성장상태(규모×수익, 폐업)를 종속변수로 한 다항로짓모형(MNL: multi-nomial logit model)을 이용하여 분석하였다. 시간 흐름에 따른 기술기반창업기업의 성장단계는 창업생존율이 급격하게 저하되는 주요 기간을 고려하여 창업초기, 창업중기, 창업후기 등의 3단계로 업력을 범주화하였다.
질의응답 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (96)

  1. Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B.(1990). Innovation and Small Firms, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 

  2. Aldrich, H. E.(1999). Organizations Evolving, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. 

  3. Alvarez, S. A., & Busenitz, L. W.(2001). The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory, Journal of Management, 27, 755-775. 

  4. Anthony, J. H., & Ramesh, K.(1992). Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices: A test of the life cycle hypothesis, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15, 203-227. 

  5. Auerswald, P. E., & Branscomb, L. M.(2003). Valleys of death and darwinian seas: Financing the invention to innovation transition in the United States, Journal of Technology Transfer, 28, 227-39. 

  6. Autio, E.(1997). New technology-based firms in innovation networks symplectic and generative impacts, Research Policy, 26, 263-281. 

  7. Bailetti, T.(2012). Technology entrepreneurship: Overview, definition and distinctive aspects, Technology Innovation Management Review, February, 1-15. 

  8. Bamford, C. E., Dean, T. J., & McDougall, P. P.(1997). Initial strategies and new venture growth: An examination of the effectiveness of broad vs. narrow breadth strategies, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA: Babson College. 

  9. Barbero, J. L., Casillas, J. C., & Feldman, H. D.(2011). Managerial capabilities and paths to growth as determinants of high-growth small and medium-sized enterprises, International Small Business Journal, 29(6), 671-694. 

  10. Barney, J.(1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. 

  11. Birley, S., & Westhead, P.(1990). Growth and performance contrasts between 'types' of small firms, Strategic Management Journal, 2, 535-557. 

  12. Castrogiovanni, G. J.(1996). Pre-start-up planning and the survival of new small firms, Journal of Management, 22, 801-823. 

  13. Chandler, G. N., & Hanks S. H.(1994). Founder competence, the environment, and venture performance, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18, 77-89. 

  14. Chandler, G. N., & Lyon, D. W.(2001). Issues of research design and construct measurement in entrepreneurship research: The past decade, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 101-113. 

  15. Cho, M. Y., & Yang, D. W.(2014). The empirical study on relationship between the degree of preparation and the R&D performance of technology based startup companies: Focused on the startup support program's modified effect, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 9(6), 37-46. 

  16. Coad, A.(2007). Testing the principle of 'growth of the fitter': The relationship between profits and firm growth, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 18, 370-386. 

  17. Cooper, A. C, Willard, G. E., & Woo, C. Y.(1986). Strategies of high-performing new firms: A reexamination of the niche concept, Journal of Business Venturing, 1(3), 247-260. 

  18. Cowling, M.(2004). The growth-profit nexus, Small Business Economics, 22, 610-626. 

  19. Cox, W. E.(1967). Product life cycles as marketing models, Journal of Business, 40(10), 375-384. 

  20. Criscuolo, C., Gal, P., & Menon, C.(2014). The dynamics of employment growth: New evidence from 18 countries, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, 14, Paris, OECD Publishing. 

  21. Davidsson, P.(1991). Continued entrepreneurship: Ability, need, and opportunity as determinants of small firm growth, Journal of Business Venturing, 6(6), 405-429. 

  22. Davidsson, P., Achtenhagen, L. & Naldi, L.(2010). Small firm growth, Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 6(2), 69-166. 

  23. Davidsson, P., Delmar, F., & Wiklund, J.(2002). Entrepreneurship as growth; growth as entrepreneurship, In: Hitt, M. A., R. D. Ireland, S.M. Camp and D. L. Sexton(Eds). Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating a New Integrated Mindset, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing, 328-342. 

  24. Davidsson, P., Delmar, F., & Wiklund, J.(2006). Entrepreneurship and the growth of firms, Edward Elgar Publishing. 

  25. Davidsson, P., & Henrekson, M.(2002). Determinants of the prevalance of start-ups and high-growth firms, Small Business Economics, 19(2), 81-104. 

  26. Davidsson, P., Lindmark, L., & Olofsson, C.(1998). The extent of overestimation of small firm job creation-an empirical examination of the regression bias, Small Business Economics, 11, 87-100. 

  27. Davidsson, P., Steffens, P., & Fitzsimmons, J.(2009). Growing profitable or growing from profits: Putting the horse in front of the cart?, Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 388-406. 

  28. Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J.(2000). Conceptual and empirical challenges in the study of firm growth, In Sexton, D. & H. Landstrom(Eds.), The Blackwell Handbook of Entrepreneurship, Oxford, MA: Blackwell Business, 26-44. 

  29. Delmar, F.(1997). Measuring growth: methodological considerations and empirical results, In: Donckels, R. & A. Miettinen(Eds.), Entrepreneurship and SME Research: On its Way to the Next Millennium, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 199-216. 

  30. Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., & Gartner, W.(2003). Arriving at the high-growth firm, Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 189-216. 

  31. Delmar, F., McKelvie, A., & Wennberg, K.(2013). Untangling the relationships among growth, profitability and survival in new firms, Technovation, 33, 276-291. 

  32. Dickinson, V.(2011). Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life dycle, The Accounting Review, 86(6), 1969-1994. 

  33. Dollinger, M. J.(1999). Entrepreneurship: strategies and resources, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 

  34. Drucker, P. F.(1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship, New York: Harper & Row. 

  35. Fagiolo, G., & Luzzi, A.(2006). Do liquidity constraints matter in explaining firm size and growth? Some evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry, Industrial and Corporate Change, 15, 1-39. 

  36. Ferrando, A., Kohler-Ulbrich, P., & Pal, R.(2007). Is the Growth of Euro Area Small and Medium-sized Enterprises Constrained by Financing Barriers?, Conference Proceedings of Financial Management Association, Barcelona, Spain. 

  37. Garnsey, E.(1995). High technology renewal and the UK investment problem, Journal of General Management, 20(4), 1-22. 

  38. Garnsey, E., Stam, E., & Heffernan, P.(2006). New firm growth: Exploring processes and paths, Industry and Innovation, 13(1), 1-20. 

  39. Gilbert, B. A., McDougall, P. P., & Audretsch, D. B.(2006). New venture growth: A review and extension, Journal of Management, 32(6), 926-950. 

  40. Greiner, L. E.(1972). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow, Harvard Business Review, May-June, 37-46. 

  41. Gruber, M., Heinemann, F., Brettel, M., & Hungeling, S.(2010). Configurations of resources and capabilities and their performance implications: An exploratory study on technology ventures, Strategic Management Journal, 30(12), 1337-1356. 

  42. Hall, R.(1993). A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage, Strategic Management Journal, 14, 607-618. 

  43. HoC(2013). Bridging the Valley of Death: Improving the Commercialisation of Research, Eighth Report of Session 2012-13, HC348 Incorporating HC1936-I and ii, Session 2010-12, House of Commons, London. 

  44. Hofer, C. W., & Charan, R.(1984). The transition to professional management: mission impossible?, American Journal of Small Business, 9(1), 1-11 

  45. Hooley, G., Greenley, G., Fahy, J., & Cadogan, J.(2005). Marketfocused resources, competitive positioning and firm performance, Journal of Marketing Management, 17(5/6), 503-520. 

  46. Hsu, D. H.(2008). Technology-Based Entrepreneurship, Chapter 13 in Shane, S.(ed.), Handbook of Technology and Innovation Management, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 367-387. 

  47. Hugo, O., & Garnsey, E.(2005). Problem-solving and competence creation in the early development of new firms, Managerial and Decision Economics, 26, 139-148. 

  48. Hyytinen, A., & Pajarinen, M.(2004). Is the cost of debt capital higher for younger firms?, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Discussion Paper, No. 946. 

  49. Hwang, B. S., An, J. M., & Kong, H. W.(2017). A study on the factors influencing start-up investment stage of IT-based enterprises, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 12(4), 35-46. 

  50. Kamboj. S, Goyal, P., & Rahman, Z.(2015). A resource-based view on marketing capability, operations capability and financial performance: An empirical examination of mediating role, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 189, 406-415. 

  51. Kang, W. J., Lee, B. H., & Oh, W. G.(2012). The effects of the utilization of external resources on the technological innovation performance along the stages of growth in korean ventures, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 35-45. 

  52. KOSTAT(2018). Result of corporate birth & death administration statistics as of 2017, Retrieved Agust 10, 2018 from http://kostat.go.kr/assist/synap/preview/skin/doc.html?fnsynapview371939_7&rs/assist/synap/preview. 

  53. Kwon, S. Y., & Moon, B. Y.(2009). Decomposed return on equity, future profitability, and value relevance over the firm life cycle, Korean Academic Society Of Business Administration, 38(5), 1213-1249. 

  54. Kwon, Y. S., Hwangbo, Y., & Lee, J. H.(2019). Key factors affecting a startup entrepreneur's choice of accelerator, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 14(1), 33-46. 

  55. La Rocca, M., La Rocca, T., & Cariola, A.(2011). Capital structure decisions during a firm's life cycle, Small Business Economics, 37, 101-130. 

  56. Lee, C. Y., Hwang, I. H., & Kim, J. S.(2016). The influential factors to growth intention and performance in early-stage technology-based start-up companies, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 11(2), 49-62. 

  57. Lee, E. A., Seo, J. H., & Shim, Y. S.(2019). A study on the entrepreneurial orientation and the performance of startups: The mediating effects of technological orientation and social capital, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 47-59. 

  58. Lee, H. Y., & Kim, J. S.(2018). A study on the entrepreneurial competency model in early-and late-stage technology-based ventures, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 13(4), 99-116. 

  59. Lee, Y. H., Hong, K. P., & Park, S. H.(2015). Analysis of research trends in the successful establishment of venture companies: with priority given to domestic articles between 1998 and 2014, Korean Society of Business Venturing, 10(6), 15-26. 

  60. Levie, J., & Lichtenstein, B. B.(2009). A final assessment of stages theory: Introducing a dynamic states approach to entrepreneurship, College of Management Working Papers and Reports, Paper 17. 

  61. Lippitt, G. L., & Schmidt, W. H.(1967). Crises in a developing organization, Harvard Business Review, November/December, 102-112. 

  62. Lux, D., & Rorke, M.(1991). From Invention to Innovation, Report DOE/GO-10099-810, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington. 

  63. McKelvie, A., & Wiklund, J.(2010). Advancing firm growth research: A focus on growth mode instead of growth rate, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(2), 261-288. 

  64. MOLEG(2019). Support For Small And Medium Enterprise Establishment Act, Retrieved June 12, 2019 from http://www.law.go.kr/ lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq205671&efYd20190612#0000 

  65. Montgomery, C.(1994). Corporate diversification, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 163-178. 

  66. Muller, E., & Zimmermann, V.(2009). The importance of equity finance for R&D activity, Small Business Economics, 33, 303-318. 

  67. Murphy, G. B., Trailer, J. W., & Hill, R. C.(1996). Measuring performance in entrepreneurship, Journal of Business Research, 36, 15-23. 

  68. Newbert, S. L.(2008). Value, rareness, competitive advantage and performance: A conceptual-level empirical investigation of the resource-based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 745-768. 

  69. OECD(2002). High-Growth SMEs: Their Contribution to Employment and Their Characteristics, Paris. 

  70. Oliveira, B., & Fortunato, A.(2006). Firm growth and liquidity constraints: A dynamic analysis, Small Business Economics, 27, 139-156. 

  71. Park, D. I., & Park, C. H.(2018). Enterprise competitiveness and corporate performance creation strategies by stage of growth on girm, Korean Academic Society Of Business Administration, 13(6), 177-189. 

  72. Park, J. B.(2018). A study on the influence of environments and characteristics of female entrepreneurs on early-stage startup growth: focused on manufacturing industry, Korea Society of Innovation, 13(1), 235-258. 

  73. Park, J. C.(2013). Revised trends of act for facilitating new business activities of small and medium-sized enterprises in japan, Latest Foreign Legal Information, 2013(6), 98-110, Retrieved from https://www.klri.re.kr/kor/journal/N/62/view.do 

  74. Penrose, E.(1959). The theory of the growth of the firm, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

  75. Pretorius, G. D. P., & Du Preez, N.(2013). The Migration of a Knowledge Item through the Life Cycles of Technology, Product Development and the Enterprise, SAIIe 25 Proceedings, Stellenbosch, South Africa. 

  76. Rhenman, E.(1973). Organization theory for long-range planning, London: Wiley. 

  77. Ries, E.(2011). The Lean Startup: How Today's Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Business, New York: Crown Business. 

  78. Roberts, E.(2004). A perspective on 5-0 years of the engineering management field, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51, 398-403. 

  79. Scott, M., & Bruce, R.(1987). Five stages of growth in small business, Long Range Planning, 20(3), 45-52. 

  80. Sexton, D., & Bowman-Upton, N.(1991). Entrepreneurship: creativity and growth, New York: Macmillan. 

  81. Son, H. C., Kang, S. B., Park, W. Y., Kim, Y. H., & Park, H. J.(2017). Study on the scope and economic effects of technology-based entrepreneurship, Daejeon: KISED. 

  82. Stam, E., & Wennberg, K.(2009). The roles of R&D in new firm growth, Small Business Economics, 33, 77-89. 

  83. Steigertahl, L., & Mauer, R.(2018). EU Startup Monitor, ESCP Europe Jean-Baptiste Say Institute. 

  84. Storey, D. J.(1997). Understanding the Small Business sector, London: International Thomson Business Press. 

  85. Tanabe, K., & Watanabe, C.(2005). Sources of small and medium enterprises excellent business performance in a service oriented economy, Journal of Services Research, 5, 5-20. 

  86. Tekic, Z., Cosic, I., & Penezic, N.(2009). Techology Based Entrepreneurship and the Role of the University: The Case of Serbia, ICEIRD, Thessalonika, 24-25, April. 

  87. Tuna, G., & Yildiz, S.(2016). The impact of operating expenditures on firm performance in Turkey: Evidence from technology sector, Journal Original Scientific, 62(4), 1-15. 

  88. Wade, M., & Hulland, J.(2004). Review: The resource-based view and information systems research: Review extension, and suggestions for future research, MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 107-142. 

  89. Weinzimmer, L. G., Nystron, P. C., & Freeman, S. J.(1998). Measuring organizational growth: issues, consequences and guidelines, Journal of Management, 24(2), 235-262. 

  90. Wernerfelt, B.(1984). A resource-based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180. 

  91. Wiklund, J.(1999). The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationship, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24, 37-48. 

  92. Wiklund, J., Patzelt, H., & Shepherd, D. A.(2009). Building an integrative model of small business growth, Small Business Economics, 32, 351-374. 

  93. Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. A.(2009). The effectiveness of alliances and acquisitions: The role of resource combination activities, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 193-212. 

  94. Wright, M., Liu, X., Buck, T., & Filatotchev, I.(2008). Returnee entrepreneur characteristics, science park location choice and performance: an analysis of high technology SMEs in China, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 131-155. 

  95. Yoo, J., Lee, S., & Park, S.(2019). The effect of firm life cycle on the relationship between R&D expenditures and future performance, earnings uncertainty, and sustainable growth, Suntainability, 2019, 11, 2371. 

  96. Zahra, S. A.(1991). Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An explorative study, Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 259-285. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

BRONZE

출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로