기저유출은 지표하를 통하여 느리게 하천으로 유입되며 하천 관리에 있어서 중요한 요소이다. 기저유출의 정확한 파악을 위하여 본 연구에서 활용된 주지하수감수곡선(MRC) 방법을 포함한 다양한 방법들이 연구되었지만, 측정 불가능한 기저유출의 특성상 정량적인 평가는 어렵다. MRC를 활용한 선행 연구들은 연구 기간 내에 존재하는 모든 감수부를 활용하였으며 이는 국내환경에서 부정확한 MRC를 유도하였다. 본 연구는 기존에 행해지던 주지하수감수곡선(MRC) 분리방법을 국내 특성을 고려하여 계절과 유황특성으로 구분하고 기저유출 분리에 적용하였다. 연구대상지역은 한강, 낙동강 그리고 금강수계에서 각 3곳의 유량관측점을 선정하여 총 9 곳이며, 수리구조물의 영향이 없도록 상류지역에서 선정하였다. MRC를 도출하기 위하여 기존에 제작된 프로그램을 사용하였으며, 관측점 별로 총 세 개의 MRC를 도출하였다. 전체 기간에 대한 MRC와 본 연구에서 구분한 계절과 유황을 고려한 MRC 두 가지이다. 유황을 고려한 MRC는 낮은 R2값과 감수곡선과 비슷한 추세의 MRC를 도출하였다. 계절을 고려한 MRC의 경우 기저유출분리에 적합한 양상을 보여주었으며 계절별 특성이 뚜렷하게 반영된 MRC를 도출하였다. 두 가지 방법에 따라 도출된 MRC를 비교하였을 때, 계절을 고려한 MRC는 기존의 MRC를 사용한 분리과정에서 과산정 되었던 기저유출량이 감소되고 안정되게 분리되었다. 유황을 고려한 MRC의 경우 그래프 상의 감수부가 다양한 감수양상을 가지고 있었으며 이에 따라 낮은 R2값의 MRC가 도출되었다. 따라서 기저유출을 분리하기 위해선 계절을 고려한 MRC가 더 높은 정확성을 보일 것으로 판단되며, 유황을 고려한 MRC의 경우, 추가적인 보정 작업을 통해서 신뢰도 높은 MRC의 도출이 필요할 것으로 판단된다.
기저유출은 지표하를 통하여 느리게 하천으로 유입되며 하천 관리에 있어서 중요한 요소이다. 기저유출의 정확한 파악을 위하여 본 연구에서 활용된 주지하수감수곡선(MRC) 방법을 포함한 다양한 방법들이 연구되었지만, 측정 불가능한 기저유출의 특성상 정량적인 평가는 어렵다. MRC를 활용한 선행 연구들은 연구 기간 내에 존재하는 모든 감수부를 활용하였으며 이는 국내환경에서 부정확한 MRC를 유도하였다. 본 연구는 기존에 행해지던 주지하수감수곡선(MRC) 분리방법을 국내 특성을 고려하여 계절과 유황특성으로 구분하고 기저유출 분리에 적용하였다. 연구대상지역은 한강, 낙동강 그리고 금강수계에서 각 3곳의 유량관측점을 선정하여 총 9 곳이며, 수리구조물의 영향이 없도록 상류지역에서 선정하였다. MRC를 도출하기 위하여 기존에 제작된 프로그램을 사용하였으며, 관측점 별로 총 세 개의 MRC를 도출하였다. 전체 기간에 대한 MRC와 본 연구에서 구분한 계절과 유황을 고려한 MRC 두 가지이다. 유황을 고려한 MRC는 낮은 R2값과 감수곡선과 비슷한 추세의 MRC를 도출하였다. 계절을 고려한 MRC의 경우 기저유출분리에 적합한 양상을 보여주었으며 계절별 특성이 뚜렷하게 반영된 MRC를 도출하였다. 두 가지 방법에 따라 도출된 MRC를 비교하였을 때, 계절을 고려한 MRC는 기존의 MRC를 사용한 분리과정에서 과산정 되었던 기저유출량이 감소되고 안정되게 분리되었다. 유황을 고려한 MRC의 경우 그래프 상의 감수부가 다양한 감수양상을 가지고 있었으며 이에 따라 낮은 R2값의 MRC가 도출되었다. 따라서 기저유출을 분리하기 위해선 계절을 고려한 MRC가 더 높은 정확성을 보일 것으로 판단되며, 유황을 고려한 MRC의 경우, 추가적인 보정 작업을 통해서 신뢰도 높은 MRC의 도출이 필요할 것으로 판단된다.
Baseflow which is one of the unmeasurable components of streamflow and slowly flows through underground is important for water resource management. Despite various separation methods from researches preceded, it is difficult to find a significant separation method for baseflow separation. This study...
Baseflow which is one of the unmeasurable components of streamflow and slowly flows through underground is important for water resource management. Despite various separation methods from researches preceded, it is difficult to find a significant separation method for baseflow separation. This study applied the MRC method and developed the improved approach to separate baseflow from total streamflow hydrograph. Previous researchers utilized the whole streamflow data of study period at once to derive synthetic MRCs causing unreliable results. This study has been proceeded with total nine areas with gauging stations. Each three areas are selected from 3 domestic major watersheds. Tool for drawing MRC had been used to draw MRCs of each area. First, synthetic MRC for whole period and two other MRCs were drawn following two different criteria. Two criteria were set by different conditions, one is flow condition and the other is seasonality. The whole streamflow was classified according to seasonality and flow conditions, and MRCs had been drawn with a specialized program. The MRCs for flow conditions had low R2 and similar trend to recession segments. On the other hand, the seasonal MRCs were eligible for the baseflow separation that properly reflects the seasonal variability of baseflow. Comparing two methods of assuming MRC for baseflow separation, seasonal MRC was more effective for relieving overestimating tendency of synthetic MRC. Flow condition MRCs had a large distribution of the flow and this means accurate MRC could not be found. Baseflow separation using seasonal MRC is showing more reliability than the other one, however if certain technique added up to the flow condition MRC method to stabilize distribution of the streamflow, the flow conditions method could secure reliability as much as seasonal MRC method.
Baseflow which is one of the unmeasurable components of streamflow and slowly flows through underground is important for water resource management. Despite various separation methods from researches preceded, it is difficult to find a significant separation method for baseflow separation. This study applied the MRC method and developed the improved approach to separate baseflow from total streamflow hydrograph. Previous researchers utilized the whole streamflow data of study period at once to derive synthetic MRCs causing unreliable results. This study has been proceeded with total nine areas with gauging stations. Each three areas are selected from 3 domestic major watersheds. Tool for drawing MRC had been used to draw MRCs of each area. First, synthetic MRC for whole period and two other MRCs were drawn following two different criteria. Two criteria were set by different conditions, one is flow condition and the other is seasonality. The whole streamflow was classified according to seasonality and flow conditions, and MRCs had been drawn with a specialized program. The MRCs for flow conditions had low R2 and similar trend to recession segments. On the other hand, the seasonal MRCs were eligible for the baseflow separation that properly reflects the seasonal variability of baseflow. Comparing two methods of assuming MRC for baseflow separation, seasonal MRC was more effective for relieving overestimating tendency of synthetic MRC. Flow condition MRCs had a large distribution of the flow and this means accurate MRC could not be found. Baseflow separation using seasonal MRC is showing more reliability than the other one, however if certain technique added up to the flow condition MRC method to stabilize distribution of the streamflow, the flow conditions method could secure reliability as much as seasonal MRC method.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
문제 정의
, 2006) was applied and assessed applicability of MRCs following steps: (1) establishing criteria for MRC (seasonality and flow conditions); (2) deriving MRC with the criteria; (3) comparing the recession coefficient(k) of each MRCs; and (4) analyzing the applicability of the new approach. This research will significantly contribute to managing the streamflow fundamentally as well as calibrating and validating hydrologic models.
This study attempt to decrease the uncertainty of baseflow separation from the use of MRC containing whole recession curves of the study period. It was able to reflect rainfall characteristic by making MRC criteria considering seasonality and flow condition.
Thus the objective of this paper is to develop a new approach to separating baseflow from total stream hydrograph reasonably using various MRCs according to seasonality and flow conditions. To achieve this objective, the MRC deriving tool (Posavec et al.
제안 방법
This study attempt to decrease the uncertainty of baseflow separation from the use of MRC containing whole recession curves of the study period. It was able to reflect rainfall characteristic by making MRC criteria considering seasonality and flow condition. The derived MRCs were used for separating baseflow, which reflects seasonal characteristics and variability.
For these reasons, separating baseflow with a synthetic MRC for an entire study period could not derive precise results, especially for watersheds showing large flow fluctuations seasonally. To overcome this limitation, multiple MRCs were derived differently for seasons and flow conditions in this study.
대상 데이터
The spatial location of stations, stream networks, hydraulic structures, and streamflow data provided by WAMIS (Water Resources Management Information System) were considered. And nine stations were selected as study area, three gauging stations from three each major watershed, which have continuous five years(2011~2015) streamflow data (Han river basin - Panun, Yeojusi and Seoul station; Nakdong river basin - Macheon, Socheon and Sancheong station; Geum river basin - Guman, Yongchon and Hannaedari station) (Fig. 1).
이론/모형
Rutledge, 1998). This method derives an MRC as the representative recession trend for a whole study period using the matching strip method. The matching strip method has a great advantage to understand the recession trend clearly since it has been derived based on the graphical method.
후속연구
data as much as possible is important. And those with several flow regime MRCs with R2 value below 0.5 will needs a follow-up study for calibration with more streamflow data so more reliable result could be derived.
참고문헌 (22)
Arnold, J. G., Allen, P. M. (1999). Automated Methods For Estimating Baseflow And Ground Water Recharge From Streamflow Records. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 35(2); 411-424. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb03599.x
Bae, D. H., Jeong, I. won, Kang, T. H., Noh, J. W. (2003). Automatic Parameter Estimation Considering Runoff Components On Tank Model. Journal of Korea Water Resource Association, 3(2003); 423-436. [Korean Literature]. doi:10.3741/JKWRA.2003.36.3.423
Berhail, S., Ouerdachi, L., Boutaghane, H. (2012). The Use Of The Recession Index As Indicator For Components Of Flow. Energy Procedia, 18; 741-750. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2012.05.090
Brodie, R. S., Hostetler, S. (2005). A Review Of Techniques For Analysing Baseflow From Stream Hydrographs. Proceedings of the NZHS-IAH-NZSSS 2005 conference, Vol. 28.
Cartwright, I., Morgenstern, U. (2015). Transit times from rainfall to baseflow in headwater catchments estimated using tritium: the Ovens River, Australia. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19(9); 3771-3785. doi:10.5194/hess-19-3771-2015
Chapman, T. (1999). A Comparison Of Algorithms For Stream Flow Recession And Baseflow Separation. Hydrological Processes, 13(5); 701-714. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(19990415)13:5 3.0.CO;2-2
Chiew, F. H. S. (2006). Estimation Of Rainfall Elasticity Of Streamflow In Australia. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 51(April); 613-625. doi:10.1623/hysj.51.4.613
Choi, Y. H., Park, Y. S., Ryu, J., Lee, D. J., Kim, Y. S., Choi, J., Lim, K. J. (2014). Analysis Of Baseflow Contribution To Streamflow At Several Flow Stations. Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment, 30(4); 441-451. [Korean Literature]. doi:10.15681/KSWE.2014.30.4.441
Kim, H. S., Han, M. S., Lee, D. R. (1999). Estimation And Analysis Of Base Flow Recession Characteristics. Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the Korea Water Resource Association, Korea Water Resource Association; 361-367. [Korean Literature].
Web Hydrograph Analysis Tool (WHAT) (2005). https://engineering.purdue.edu/mapserve/WHAT/
Ministry Consturction & Transportation. (2006). National Water Resource Plan.
Nagelkerke, N. J. (1991). A Note On A General Definition Of The Coefficient Of Determination Miscellanea A Note On A General Definition Of The Coefficient Of Determination, Biometrika, 78(3); 691-692.
Nathan, R. J., McMahon, T. A. (1990). Evaluation Of Automated Techniques For Base Flow And Recession Analyses. Water Resources Research, 26(7); 1465-1473. doi:10.1029/WR026i007p01465
Posavec, K., Bacani, A., Nakic, Z. (2006). A Visual Basic Spreadsheet Macro For Recession Curve Analysis, Ground Water, 44(5); 764-767. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2006.00226.x
Rutledge, A. T. (1998). Computer Programs for Describing the Recession of Ground-water Discharge and for Estimating Mean Ground-water Recharge and Discharge from Streamflow Records-Update, U.S. Geological Survey.
Rutledge, A. T. (2007). Update on the Use of The RORA Program for Recharge Estimation, Ground Water, 45(3); 374-382. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2006.00294.x
Schilling, K. E., Wolter, C. F. (2001). Contribution ff Base Flow to Nonpoint Source Pollution Loads in an Agricultural Watershed, Ground Water, 39(1); 49-58. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2001.tb00350.x
Sloto, R. a., Crouse, M. Y. (1996). Hysep: A Computer Program for streamflow hydrograph separation and analysis, U.S. Geological Survey.
Willems, P. (2009). A Time Series Tool To Support The Multi-criteria Performance Evaluation Of Rainfall-runoff Models. Environmental Modelling and Software, 24(3); 311-321. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.09.005
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.