$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Estimating the Impacts of Investment in a National Open Repository on Funded Research Output in South Korea 원문보기

Journal of information science theory and practice : JISTaP, v.7 no.1, 2019년, pp.39 - 51  

Hwang, Hyekyoung (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information) ,  Seo, Tae-Sul (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information) ,  Han, Yong-Hee (Department of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Soongsil University) ,  Ko, Sung-Seok (Department of Industrial Engineering, Konkuk University)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Open access is a paradigm whereby the electronic versions of scholarly publications are made freely accessible without any restrictions. It is actively promoted globally and is also promoted domestically in accordance with this global trend. However, there is a growing need to evaluate existing acti...

주제어

표/그림 (8)

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Abrizah, A., Noorhidawati, A., & Kiran, K. (2017). Global visibility of Asian universities' open access institutional repositories. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 15(3), 53-73. 

  2. Armbruster, C. (2010). Implementing open access: Policy case studies. Retrieved December 7, 2018 from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id1685855. 

  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences (2014). Chinese Academy of Sciences policy statement on open access to articles from publicly funded scientific research projects. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 28(3), 230. 

  4. Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002). Read the Budapest Open Access Initiative. Retrieved December 7, 2018 from http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read. 

  5. Choi, J. H., & Cho, H. Y. (2005). The recent trends of open access movements and the ways to help the cause by academic stakeholders. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 22(3), 307-326. 

  6. Covey, D. T. (2009). Self-archiving journal articles: A case study of faculty practice and missed opportunity. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 9(2), 223-251. 

  7. Cox, A. M., & Tam, W. W. (2018). A critical analysis of lifecycle models of the research process and research data management. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(2), 142-157. 

  8. Davis, P. M., & Connolly, M. J. L. (2007). Institutional repositories: Evaluating the reasons for non-use of Cornell University's installation of DSpace. D-Lib Magazine, 13(3/4). doi:10.1045/march2007-davis. 

  9. Finch, J. (2012). Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: How to expand access to research publications. Report of the Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings. London: Home Office. 

  10. Hall, B. H., Mairesse, J., & Mohnen, P. (2010). Measuring the returns to R&D. In B. H. Hall, & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (pp. 1033-1082). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing. 

  11. Houghton, J. (2009). Open access: What are the economic benefits? A comparison of the United Kingdom, Netherlands and Denmark. Retrieved December 7, 2018 from https://ssrn.com/abstract1492578. 

  12. Houghton, J., Rasmussen, B., & Sheehan, P. (2010). Economic and social returns on investment in open archiving publicly funded research outputs. Washington, DC: Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition. Retrieved December 7, 2018 from http://sparc.arl.org/sites/default/files/vufrpaa.pdf. 

  13. Houghton, J., Rasmussen, B., Sheehan, P., Oppenheim, C., Morris, A., Creaser, C., Gourlay, A. (2009). Economic implications of alternative scholarly publishing models: Exploring the costs and benefits. A report to the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). Melbourne: Victoria University. Retrieved December 7, 2018 from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi10.1.1.177.5031&reprep1&typepdf. 

  14. Hwang, H G. (2017). Concept of open access and policy trend. IE Magazine, 24(4), 24-29. 

  15. Kim, J. (2010). Faculty self­archiving: Motivations and barriers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1909-1922. 

  16. Kim, S.-Y., Kim, J., Choi, H., & Hwang, H. (2016). An analysis on open access policies on publications funded by overseas public institutions. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(4), 209-229. 

  17. Koskinen, K., Lappalainen, A., Liimatainen, T., Niskala, A., Salminen, P.J., & Nevalainen, E. (2010). The current state of open access to research articles from the University of Helsinki. ScieCom Info, 6(4), 1-7. 

  18. Lawson, S. (2016). Report on offset agreements: Evaluating current JISC Collections deals. Year 1--evaluating 2015 deals. Retrieved December 7, 2018 from https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4047777.v1. 

  19. Mansfield, E. (1998). Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings. Research Policy, 26(7/8), 773-776. 

  20. Max Planck Institute (2003). Berlin declaration on open access to knowledge in the sciences and humanities. Retrieved December 7, 2018 from https://openaccess.mpg.de/Berlin-Declaration. 

  21. Morrison, H. (2012, October 6). Thank you, open access movement! September 30, 2012 Dramatic growth of open access [Web log post]. Retrieved December 7, 2018 from https://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com/2012/10/thankyou-open-access-movement.html. 

  22. Publishing and the Ecology of European Research. (2011). PEER economics report. Milano: Universit Bocconi. Retrieved December 7, 2018 from http://www.peerproject.eu/fileadmin/media/reports/PEER_Economics_Report.pdf. 

  23. Pinfield, S., Salter, J., Bath, P. A., Hubbard, B., Millington, P., Anders, J. H., & Hussain, A. (2014). Open­access repositories worldwide, 2005-2012: Past growth, current characteristics, and future possibilities. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(12), 2404-2421. 

  24. Research Information Network. (2008). Activities, costs and funding flows in the scholarly communications system in the UK: Report commissioned by the Research Information Network. Retrieved December 7, 2018 from http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/Activites-costs-flowsreport.pdf. 

  25. Roy, B. K., Biswas, S. C., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2012). Study of open access repositories: a global perspective. In Information-Innovation-Technology: Creating Seamless Linkages, 29th Convention & Conference of Society of Information Science. Silchar: National Institute of Technology. 

  26. Roy, B. K., Biswas, S. C., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2013). Global visibility of Indian open access institutional digital repositories. International Research: Journal of Library and Information Science, 3(1). 

  27. Roy, B. K., Biswas, S. C., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2016). Open access repositories for Indian universities: towards a multilingual framework. IASLIC Bulletin, 61(4), 150-161. 

  28. Salter, A. J., & Martin, B. R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review. Research Policy, 30(3), 509-532. 

  29. Schimmer, R., Geschuhn, K. K., & Vogler, A. (2015). Disrupting the subscription journals' business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access. Munchen: Max Planck Digital Library. 

  30. SCOAP3 Consortium. (2019). What is SCOAP3? Retrieved December 7, 2018 from https://scoap3.org/what-is-scoap3/. 

  31. Seo, T. S., Heo, S., & Noh, K. R. (2009). Public access policy for scholarly journal open access: KISTI knowledge report 4. Daejeon: Korea Institute Science and Technology Information. 

  32. Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312-320. 

  33. Tickell, A. (2016). Open access to research publications: Independent advice. London: Department for Business, Innovation & Skills. 

  34. Wani, Z. A., Gul, S., & Rah, J. A. (2009). Open access repositories: A global perspective with an emphasis on Asia. Chinese Librarianship: An International Electronic Journal, 27. Retrieved December 7, 2018 from http://www.iclc.us/cliej/cl27WGR.pdf. 

  35. Walters, T. O. (2007). Reinventing the library: How repositories are causing librarians to rethink their professional roles. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 7(2), 213-225. 

  36. Xia, J. (2007). Assessment of self-archiving in institutional repositories: Across disciplines. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(6), 647-654. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

LOADING...

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로