$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

[국내논문] 임상연구방법론에서 귀무가설과 대립가설, 귀류법에 대한 고찰과 한방이비인후과에서 베이지안 통계학의 활용
A Study on Null Hypothesis and Alternative Hypothesis, Reduction to Absurdity and Application of Bayesian Statistics in Korean Medicine Otolaryngology 원문보기

韓方眼耳鼻咽喉皮膚科學會誌 = The journal of Korean Medicine Ophthalmology & Otolaryngology & Dermatology, v.32 no.4, 2019년, pp.41 - 61  

남승표 (부산대학교 한의학전문대학원) ,  배재민 (부산대학교 한의학전문대학원) ,  권강 (부산대학교 한의학전문대학원 안이비인후피부과)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Background : The current medical statistics used in clinical research are the results of Fisher's significance test and the Neyman-Pearson hypothesis test, which were combined by psychologists. Also, in the philosophical background, it is related to Popper's falsificationism based hypothesis-deducti...

주제어

#Null and alternative hypothesis   #Reduction to Absurdity   #Bayesian Statistics   #Lakatos Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes   #Korean Medicine Otolaryngology  

표/그림 (5)

질의응답

핵심어 질문 논문에서 추출한 답변
statista는 무엇을 일컫는 말인가? 통계학의 Statistics란 단어의 어원은 『Folks 1981』1)에 의하면 라틴어인 status(국가를 의미하는 state)와statista(정치인을 의미하는 stateman)에서 온 것이다. 특히 statista는 국가의 업무를 관장하는 사람을 일컫는 말이었다1, 2). 통계학은 18세기의 영국의 정치산술학과 독일의 국세학에 뿌리를 두고 있으며, 초기 통계학은 국가나 민족을 경영하기 위하여 필요한 인구, 세금, 농지 등에 관한 자료를 효율적으로 구하고 분석하는 학문으로 시작하였다.
통계학의 Statistics란 단어의 어원은 무엇인가? 통계학의 Statistics란 단어의 어원은 『Folks 1981』1)에 의하면 라틴어인 status(국가를 의미하는 state)와statista(정치인을 의미하는 stateman)에서 온 것이다. 특히 statista는 국가의 업무를 관장하는 사람을 일컫는 말이었다1, 2).
가설(hypothesis)중 좋은 가설이란 어떤것을 이야기 하는가? 가설(hypothesis)은 연구자들이 변수 사이의 기대되는 관계를 분명하게 표현하는 방법이다3). 좋은 가설(연구가설)은 연구목적에 적합해야 하며, 개념(변수)들 간의 관계에 대해 진술하고 있어야 하고, 이들 개념(변수)들 간의 관계가 검정 가능해야 한다. 특히 검정 가능성이 가장 중요한 요건이다.
질의응답 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (69)

  1. Folks JJ. Ideas of Statistics. New York:John Wiley&Sons. 1981. 

  2. Park SH. The Past and Present of Statistical Study, and the Role and Vision of Data Science in the 4th Industrial Revolution Era. The National Academy Sciences(Natural Science). 2017;56(2):53-82. 

  3. Stacey Plichta Kellar, Elizabeth A. Kelvin. Statistical Methods for Health Care Research the 6th Edition. Paju:Koonja Publisher. 2017:72-3. 

  4. Jo HC. Misinterpretation about Hypothesis Setting and Hypothesis Tests. The Review of Industrial economics and Manegement. 1999. 

  5. Lee KH. Review on problems with null hypothesis significance testing in dental research and its alternatives. The Journal of the Korean academy of Pediatric dentistry. 2013;40(3):223-32. 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  6. Lee HK. Principles of Hypothesis Test I. Pediatric Infection and Vaccine. 1997;4(1):183-192. 

  7. Jo JK. The Biometry-Mendelian Controversy in the History of Statistics. Communications of the Korean Statistical Society. 2008;15(3):303-24. 

  8. Pearson K. On the fundamental conceptions of biology. Biometrika. 1902;1:320-44. 

    상세보기 crossref

  9. David salsbrug. The lady tasting tea : How Statistics Revolutionized Science in the Twentieth century. Paju:Jayu academy. 2012:20,22,29,82,114-16,124-7,129-31. 

  10. Heo MH. History of statistics colloquium. Seoul:Freedom academy. 1991:9-5. 

  11. Lee KH. History of Probability and Statistics. J of Elementary Mathematics Educationb in Korea. 1997;1(1):53-65. 

  12. Fisher RA. The Design of Experiments. 1st ed. 1935. [The 9th edition published by Macmillan. New York, in 1971.] 

  13. Jo JK. Statistics, catch big data. Seoul: hankookmunhwasa publisher. 2017:222-24. 

  14. Jo JK. A Study on the History of Statistics in the Early Twentieth Century Focused on Statistical Tests and Psychology. Journal for History of Mathematics. 2013;26(4):277-99. 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  15. Gigerenzer G. Probabilistic Thinking and the Fight against Subjectivity, The Probabilistic Revolution. Vol. 1: Ideas in History (edited by L. Kruger, L. Daston, M. Heidelberger). MIT Press. 1987:11-33. 

  16. Gigerenzer G. Rationality for Mortals. How People Cope with Uncertainty. Oxford University Press. 2008. 

  17. Gigerenzer G, Murray DJ. Cognition as Intuitive Statistics. L. Erlbaum Associates. 1987. 

  18. Jo JK. History of the Error and the Normal Distribution in the Mid Nineteenth Century. Communications of the Korean Statistical Society. 2008:15(5):737-52. 

  19. An YO, Yu GY, Park BJ, et al. Epidemiology : The principles and applications. Seoul: Seoul National Univ. Publisher. 2015:254. 

  20. John Gribbin, Mary Gribbin. Science : a History in 100 Experiments. Seoul: Yeamoonarchive. 2017:15. 

  21. Oh KU. Study on Testing Hypothesis. The Korean Economic Review. 1989;17(1):45-59. 

  22. Lee JY. Medical statistics at a glance 3rd edition. Seoul:Epublic Publisher. 2010:50-2. 

  23. Compilation committee of clinical research methodology. Clinical research applications to practice. Seoul:Hyeonmun publisher. 2019:104. 

  24. Agresti A, Finlay B. Statistical methods for the social sciences. Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall. 1997. 

  25. SB Hulley, SR Cummings, WS Browner, DG Grady, TB Newmann. Designing Clinical Research the 4th Edition. Seoul:Koonja Publisher. 2015:58. 

  26. Noto Hiroshi. Clinical statistics ready for daily care. Seoul:Daehanuihagseojeog. 2009:105. 

  27. Cheong HB. Popper's Philosophy of Science and Methods of Value Inquiry. Research in Social Studies Education. 2017;24(1):1-10. 

  28. Popper, K. R. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, New York & Evanston: Harper & Row Publishers. 1963. 

  29. Cheong HB. A Study of an Inquiry Method of Knowledge in Social Studies Education Based on Popper's Searchlight Theory of Knowledge. Research in Social Studies Education. 2016;23(1):25-40. 

  30. Jang D. Kuhn & Popper : There is something special about Science. Seoul:Gimyeongsa. 2014:73-5,164. 

  31. Fisher, R. The Design of Experiments, 9th ed. New York:Macmillan. 1971[1935]. 

  32. S. Nassir Ghaemi. A Clinician's Guide to Statistics and Epidemiology in Mental Health. Seoul:Hwangsogeoleumacademy. 2015:98,99,105,247,249,265,266,269. 

  33. Jo HM. Secondary school mathematics teachers' understanding of proof by contradiction in evaluating students'proofs. Graduation school of Seoul National Univ. Master's degree. 2009:20. 

  34. Hwang JY, Shin BM. An Analysis of Teacher's Knowledge about Reductio Ad Absurdum - Focused on 'Subject Matter Knowledge' and 'Knowledge of Students' Understanding -. J. Korean Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. A. 2016;55(1):91-106. 

  35. Lee GD, Hong GJ. A study on improvement of introductions and Applications of 'Proof by contradiction' in testbooks. J Korea Society Educational Studies in Mathematics. School Mathematics. 2016;18(4):839-56. 

  36. S. G. Krantz, An Episodic History of Mathematics: Mathematical Culture through Problem Solving, Maa, 2010. 

  37. Hyun JS, Park CJ. Proof by Contradiction of Creative Research's Contradiction Resolution and the Representation with the Butterfly Diagram. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology. 2016;6(4):407-15. 

  38. Lee HK. Principles of Hypothesis Test II. Pediatric Infection and Vaccine. 1997;4(2):314-19. 

  39. Gelman A, Stern H. The difference between 'significant' and 'not significant' is not itself statistically significant. Am Statistician. 2006;60(4):28-31. 

  40. Royall RM. The effect of sample size on the meaning of significance tests. Am Statistician. 1986;40(4):313-15. 

  41. Hand DJ. Data mining: statistics and more?. Am Statistician. 1998;52(2):112-8. 

  42. Wang S, Campbell B. Mr. Bayes goes to Washington. Science. 2013;339:758-9. 

    상세보기 crossref

  43. Efron B. Why isn't everyone a Bayesian(with discussion)?. Am Statist. 1986;40(1):1-11. 

  44. Nurminen M, Mutanen P. Exact Bayesian analysis of two proportions. Scand J Stat. 1987;14(1)67-77. 

  45. Diaconis P, Freedman D. On the consistency of Bayes estimate (with discussion). Ann Math Stat. 1986;14(1):1-67. 

    상세보기 crossref

  46. Rhee YE. Bayesianism : The journey from rationality to objectivity. Seoul: Hangugmunhwasa. 2015. 

  47. Cheon HD. Is Science a Bayesian Machine? : A Critical Review of Rhee(2015)'s Bayesianism. The Korean Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2016;19(3):87-107. 

  48. Yeo YS. Luc Bovens and Stephen Hartmann Bayesian Epistemology - Formal epistemology and Bayesianism. Philosophy and Reality. 2006;3:262-71. 

  49. Yeo YS. Bayesianism and Eliminative Inductivism. Korean Journal of Logic. 2004;7(2):121-46. 

  50. Yeo YS. Bayesian Prior Probability and Scientific Objectivity. Philosophy inquiry. 2007;22:147-72. 

  51. Lee YC. From paradigm to reality : from Constructivism Science to Realistic Science realism. Journal of Governmental Studies. 2010;16(1):155-79. 

  52. Jha, Stefania R. The Bid to Transcend Popper, and the Lakatos-Polanyi Connection. Perspectives on Science. 2006:14(3):318-46. 

    상세보기 crossref

  53. Kim JS. Lakatos' Methodology of Scientific Research Program and The Rationality of 61 Science. Journal of the Society of Philosophical Studies. 1992;20:151-81. 

  54. Yang KE. Development of International Relations Theory Analyzed by Lacatos Research Methodology. Social Science Education Research. 2014;16:90-9. 

  55. Lakatos I. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Seoul:acanet. 2002:73,86,88-94,121. 

  56. Park IJ. The Development of Modern Evolutionary Theories from the Perspective of Lakatos' Research Program. Korea National University of Education. Master's Thesis. 2018:1-52. 

  57. Chalmers AF. What is this thing called Science?. Seoul:Seogwangsa. 2003:190. 

  58. The Society of Korean Medicine Ophthalmoliogy, Otolaryngology & Dermatology. Korean Medicine Ophthalmoliogy, Otolaryngology. Paju: Globoolks. 2019:185-7. 

  59. Yoshiyuki Wakui, Sadami Wakui. Statistical diagram. Seoul:Seongandang. 2018:134-5. 

  60. Rosenthal R. Effect size estimation, significance testing, and the file-drawer problem. J Parapsychol. 1992;56:57-8. 

  61. Vaughan GM, Corballis MC. Beyond tests of significance: Estimating strength of effects in selected ANOVA designs. Psychol Bulletin. 1969;72(3):204-13. 

    상세보기 crossref

  62. Park EJ. 'The Heuristic' and 'The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes' and 'The Philosophical Reconstruction of History of Science'. Philosophy of Science. 2002;8:185-99. 

  63. Jang D. There is something special about Science. Seoul:Gimyeongsa. 2008:164-165. 

  64. Lee TH. Overcoming dichotomous thinking for understanding Lao tse's Tao Re Ching. The Korean Journal of East West Science. 2015;18(1):1-13. 

  65. Rhee YE, Park IH. Bayesian Epistemology. Korean Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2015;18(2):1-14. 

  66. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. 2015;37:1-2. Available from : [URL] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01973533.2015.1012991. 

    상세보기 crossref

  67. Future & Science in Hangyeorye Newspaper company [cited 2019 April 5]. Available from : [URL] http://m.hani.co.kr/arti/science/science_general/888909.html 

  68. Science on [cited 2017 August 16]. Available from : [URL] http://scienceon.hani.co.kr/540289 

  69. Moon JJ, An GS, Kim SH, Eom HS, Ji GY, Kim JB. Sanghanron Jeonghae. Seoul: Kyunghee University Press. 1996:20. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로