$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

정보탐색이 신제품개발 과정 및 성과에 미치는 영향
The Effects of Information Search on New Product Development Process and Performance 원문보기

지식경영연구 = Knowledge Management Research, v.21 no.4, 2020년, pp.109 - 127  

심덕섭 (전남대학교 경영대학) ,  하성욱 (한성대학교 경영학부)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

본 연구는 정보탐색이 신제품개발 과정과 성과에 미치는 영향을 검증하기 위해 5개 기업의 82개 신제품개발과제에 대한 실증조사를 진행하였다. 정보탐색은 일반정보, 내부정보와 외부정보에 대한 탐색으로 구분하였고, 신제품개발과제의 성과는 기술성과와 시장성과로 구분하였다. 본 연구의 실증결과는 다음과 같다. 내부정보 탐색은 신제품개발과제의 기술지식을 증가시키고, 외부정보 탐색은 신제품개발과제의 시장지식을 증가시켰다. 신제품개발과제의 기술지식과 시장지식은 각각 기술성과를 향상시키고, 시장지식만이 시장성과를 향상시켰다. 전체적으로 신제품개발과제의 기술지식은 내부정보 탐색과 기술성과간의 관계를 완전 매개하였다. 신제품개발과제의 시장지식은 외부정보 탐색과 기술성과간의 관계를 완전 매개하고, 외부정보 탐색과 시장성과간의 관계를 완전 매개하였다. 기술지식 혹은 시장지식은 여기 언급된 조합 이외에 정보 탐색과 신제품개발 성과간의 어떤 관계도 매개하지 않았다. 연구결과에 대한 시사점과 향후 연구방향에 대해 논의하였다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This study empirically investigates the effects of information search on new product development (NPD) process and performance with a sample of 82 NPD projects in 5 firms. The information search is consisted of general sources, internal sources, and external sources. The performance is consisted of ...

주제어

참고문헌 (72)

  1. 고유미, 김지영, 정명호 (2013). 팀 네트워크 특성과 경계관리활동이 지식경영 성과에 미치는 영향: 팀 신뢰의 매개역할. 지식경영연구, 14(5), 101-120. 

  2. 김종주, 김보원 (2007). 신제품 개발 과정에서 연구 개발과 생산 간의 조정 및 협력과 두 부서의 환경 간 유사성에 관한연구. 경영학연구, 36(2), 297-324. 

  3. 설현도 (2004). 신제품 개발 과정에서 기술추격과 선도개발단계의 지식창출 패턴. 지식경영연구, 5(2), 25-51. 

  4. 우정, 한수진, 강민희 (2008). 소비자 가치 지식을 활용한 웰빙 신제품 개발에 관한 탐색적 연구. 지식경영연구, 9(3), 107-123. 

  5. 이모성, 엄기용 (2017). 정보원천의 중요도가 혁신성과에 미치는 영향: 기업규모별 비교를 중심으로. 경영과학, 34(4), 123-138. 

  6. 최원일, 김상조 (1998). 신제품개발전략, 과정 및 구조와 성과의 관계. 기술혁신연구, 6(1), 128-162. 

  7. Adams, M. E., Day, G. S., & Dougherty, D. (1998). Enhancing new product development performance: An organizational learning perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15, 403-422. 

  8. Allen, T. J. (1984). Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R&D organization. Cambridge, Mass.: M. I. T. Press. 

  9. Amable, B., Barre, R., & Boyer, R. (1997). Diversity, coherence and transformations of innovation systems. In R. Barre, M. Gibbons, J. Maddox(Sir), B. Martin & P. Papon (Eds.), Science in tomorrow's Europe (pp. 33-49). Paris: Economica International. 

  10. Amara, N., & Landry, R. (2005). Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: Evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey. Technovation, 25(3), 245-259. 

  11. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1987). Management issues facing new product teams in high-technology companies. In D. Lewin, D. Lipsky & D. Sokel (Eds.), Advances in industrial and labor relations (pp. 199-221). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 

  12. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1990). Beyond boundary spanning: Managing external dependence in product development teams. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 1, 119-135. 

  13. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell. D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634-665. 

  14. Astley, W. G., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1983). Central perspectives and debates in organization theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2), 245-273. 

  15. Avlonitis, G. J., Papastathopoulou, P. G., & Gounaris, S. P. (2001). An empirically-based typology of product innovativeness for new financial services: Success and failure scenarios. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, 324-342. 

  16. Bacon, G., Beckman, S., Mowery, D. C., & Wilson, E. (1994). Managing product definition in high-technology industries: A pilot study. California Management Review, 36(3), 32-56. 

  17. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. 

  18. Bommer, M., & Jalajas, D. S. (2004). Innovation sources of large and small technology-based firms. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51(1), 13-18. 

  19. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 343-378. 

  20. Burgleman, R. A. (1983). A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 223-244. 

  21. Calantone, R. J., & Di Benedetto, A. C. (1988). An integrative model of the new product development process: An empirical validation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 5, 201-215. 

  22. Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto, T. (1990). The power of product integrity. Harvard Business Review, 68(6), 107-118. 

  23. Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto, T. (1991). Product development performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. 

  24. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, 99(397), 569-596. 

  25. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. 

  26. Cooper, R. G. (1990). Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons, 33(3), 44-54. 

  27. Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1987). New products: What separates winners and losers? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4, 169-184. 

  28. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571. 

  29. Ebadi, Y. M., & Utterback, J. M. (1984). The effects of communication on technological innovation. Management Science, 30(5), 572-585. 

  30. Emmanuelides, P. A. (1993). Toward an integrative framework of performance in product development projects. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 10, 363-392. 

  31. Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499-517. 

  32. Green, S. G. (1995). Top management support of R&D projects: A strategic leadership perspective. IEEE Transaction on Engineering and Management, 42(3), 223-232. 

  33. Griffin, A. (1997). PDMA research on new product development practices: Updating trends and benchmarking best practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4(6), 429-458. 

  34. Griffin, A., & Page, A. L. (1993). An interim report on measuring product development cycle time. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 291-308. 

  35. Gupta, A. K., Raj, S. P., & Wilemon, D. L. (1986). A model for studying R&D-Marketing interface in the product innovation process. Journal of Marketing, 50, 7-17. 

  36. Howell, J. M., & Shea, C. M. (2006). Effects of champion behavior, team potency, and external communication activities on predicting team performance. Group & Organization Management, 31(2), 180-211. 

  37. Imai, K., Ikujiro, N., & Takeuchi, H. (1985). Managing the new product development process: How Japanese companies learn and unlearn. In R. H. Hayes, K. Clark & Z. Lorent (Eds.), The uneasy alliance: Managing the productivity-technology dilemma (pp. 337-375). Boston: Harvard Business School Press. 

  38. Katz, R., & Khan, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. 

  39. Katz, R., & Tushman, M. L. (1981). An investigation into the managerial roles and career paths of gatekeepers and project supervisors in a major R&D facility. R&D Management, 23, 139-162. 

  40. Lee, M., & Na, D. (1994). Determinants of technical success in product development when innovative radicalness is considered. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11, 62-68. 

  41. Leifer, R., O'Connor, G. C., & Rice, M. (2001). Implementing radical innovation in mature firms: The role of hubs. Academy of Management Executive, 15(3), 102-113. 

  42. Leiponen, A., & Helfat, C. E. (2010). Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), 224-236. 

  43. Lynn, G. S., Reilly, R. R., & Akgun, A. E. (2000). Knowledge management in new product teams: Practices and outcomes. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47(2), 221-231. 

  44. Maidique, M. A., & Zirger, B. J. (1984). A study of success and failure in product innovation: The case of the US electronics industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 31(4), 192-203. 

  45. Markham, S. K. (2000). Corporate championing and antagonism as forms of political behavior: An R&D perspective. Organization Science, 11(4), 429-447. 

  46. Markham, S. K., Green, S. G., & Basu, R. (1991). Champions and antagonists: Relationships with R&D project characteristics and management. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 8(3-4), 217-242. 

  47. Mata, F. J., Fuerst, W. L., & Barney, J. B. (1995). Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 487-505. 

  48. Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Calantone, R. (1994). Determinants of new product performance: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11, 397-417. 

  49. Myers, S., & Marquis, D. G. (1969). Successful industrial innovations. National Science Foundation, Technical Report NSF 69-17, pp. 1-17. 

  50. Olson, E. M., Walker Jr, O. C., & Ruekert, R. W. (1995). Organizing for effective NPD: The moderating role of product innovativeness. Journal of Marketing, 59, 48-62. 

  51. Pinto, M. B., & Pinto, J. K. (1990). Project team communication and cross-functional cooperation in new program development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 7(3), 200-212. 

  52. Powell, T. C., & Dent-Micallef, A. (1997). Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 375-405. 

  53. Rothwell, R. (1994). Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. International Marketing Review, 11(1), 7-31. 

  54. Rubenstein, A. H., Chakrabarti, A. K., O'Keffe, R. D., Souder, W. E., & Young, H. C. (1976). Factors influencing innovation success at the project level. Research Management, 19(3), 15-20. 

  55. Scott, S. G. (1997). Social identification effects in product and process development teams. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 14(2), 97-127. 

  56. Shim, D., & Kim, Y. (2018). Champion behaviour and product innovation performance in Korea. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 26(2), 172-201. 

  57. Shu, S. T., Wong, V., & Lee, N. (2005). The effects of external linkages on new product innovativeness: An examination of moderating and mediating influences. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 13(3), 199-218. 

  58. Song, X. M., & Montoya-Weiss, M. M. (2001). The effect of perceived technological uncertainty on Japanese new product development. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 61-80. 

  59. Song, X. M., & Parry, M. E. (1996). What separates Japanese new product winners from losers. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13, 422-439. 

  60. Song, X. M., & Parry, M. E. (1997). A cross-national comparative study of new product development processes: Japan and the United States. Journal of Marketing, 61, 1-18. 

  61. Souder, W. E. (1987). Managing new product innovations. Lexington, MA: Lexington. 

  62. Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305. 

  63. Tushman, M. L. (1977). Technical communication in R&D laboratories: The impact of project work characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 20, 624-645. 

  64. Tushman, M. L. (1979). Work characteristics and subunit communication structure: A contingency analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 82-118. 

  65. Utterback, J. M., Allen, T. J., Holloman, J. H., & Sirbu Jr, M. A. (1976). The process of innovation in five industries in Europe and Japan. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 23(1), 3-9. 

  66. Van de Ven, A. H., & Ferry, D. L. (1980). Measuring and assessing organizations. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 

  67. Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor's perspective. In J. Katz & R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth (Vol. 3, pp. 119-138). Greewich, CT: JAI Press. 

  68. Veryzer Jr, R. W. (1998). Discontinuous innovation and the new product development process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15, 304-321. 

  69. Von Hippel, E. (1976). The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Research Policy, 5, 212-239. 

  70. Von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University. 

  71. Zahay, D., Griffin, A., & Fredericks, E. (2004). Sources, uses, and forms of data in the new product development process. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(7), 657-666. 

  72. Zirger, B. J., & Maidique, M. A. (1990). A model of new product development: An empirical test. Management Science, 36(7), 867-883. 

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로