최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기과학교육연구지 : 경북대학교 과학교육연구소 = Journal of science education, v.44 no.1, 2020년, pp.92 - 111
황요한 (충남대학교) , 문공주 (서울대학교)
The 2015 revised science curriculum and NGSS (Next Generation Science Standard) suggest computational thinking as an inquiry skill or competency. Particularly, concern in computational thinking has increased since the Ministry of Education has required software education since 2014. However, there i...
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
STEAM 교육이란 무엇인가? | , 2015a,; NRC, 2010; 2012). 과학과의 STEAM 교육은 우리 생활에서 겪게 되는 과학 관련 쟁점이 무엇인지를 찾아, 쟁점과 관련된 요인들을 찾고, 각 요인이 가지는 비중을 결정하면서, 다양한 해결책을 찾아서 그 중 최적의 해결책이 무엇인지를 알아가는 과정이다. 이 과정에서 적절하게 컴퓨팅 사고를 접목하여 일련의 과정을 경험하게 한다면 학생들은 과학과에 적합한 새로운 컴퓨팅 사고를 경험할 수있다(Park et al. | |
'문제발견형'의 특징은 무엇인가? | 정리된 요소들을 이학 전문가들에게 제공하여 각 분야의 연구 과정과 컴퓨팅 사고 요소들을 접목하여 설명하게 한 후, 이를 기반으로 문제발견형 CT-SI 모형과 문제해결형 CT-SI 모형을 개발하였다. 개발된 두 모형은 이학 전문가들에 의해 모형의 단계가 각 분야의 연구에 활용 가능하다고 검토받았으며, '문제발견형'은 과학 연구 과정에서 정보를 선별하고 문제를 분석하는 과정과 이론적 연구에서 근거를 기반으로 하는 추론 연구 과정에 적합하다고 응답하였다. '문제해결형'은 과학의 일반적인 연구 과정 및 공학설계를 활용한 공학적 문제해결과정에 적합하다고 응답하였다. | |
문제발견형 CT-SI 모형과 문제해결형 CT-SI 모형이 어떤 역량을 길러줄 것으로 예상하는가? | 또한, 현장 교사 2인에 의해 중고등학교 현장 탐구 수업에 적용 가능함을 확인하였다. 본 연구에서 개발된 모형은 다양한 과학 교과의 탐구 활동과 연계할 수 있으며 이를 통해 2015 개정 교육과정에서 제시하고 있는 '자료의 수집, 분석 및 해석', ' 수학적 사고와 컴퓨터 활용' 역량을 길러줄 수 있을 것이다. |
Arden, G., & Vaegan (1983). Electroretinograms evoked in man by local uniform or patterned stimulation. Journal of physiology, 341(1), 85-104.
Bransford, J. D., & Stein, B. S. (1984). The IDEAL problem solver. New York, NY: Freeman.
Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New framework for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Proceeding of the 2012 American Educational Research Association Meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Retrieved from https://web.media.mit.edu/-kbrennan/files/Brennan_Resnick_AERA2012_CT.pdf
Brinda, T., Puhlmann, H., & Schulte, C. (2009). Bridging ICT and CS - Educational standards for computer science in lower secondary education. Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM SIGCSE conference on innovation and technology in computer science education, 288-292. New York, NY: ACM.
Burke, K., Poock, J., Greenbowe, T., & Hand, B. (2005). Training chemistry teaching assistants to use the science writing heuristic. Journal of College Science Teaching, 35(1), 36-41.
Cho, Y., Seong, J., & Lee, H. (2008). Creativity education: developing creative problemsolving abilities. Seoul: Ewha Womans University Press.
Choi, H. (2018). Domestic literature review on computational thinking development through software programming education. The Korean Society for Educational Technology, 34(3), 743-774.
Choi, S. (2016). A study on teaching-learning for enhancing computational thinking skill in terms of problem solving. The Korean Association of Computer Education, 19(1), 53-62.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston, MA : D. C. Heath & Co.
Feldhusen, J. F., & Treffinger, D. J. (1977). The role of instructional material in teaching creative thinking. Gifted Child Quarterly, 21(4), 450-459.
Foster, I. (2006). 2020 Computing: a two-way street to science's future. Nature, 440, 419.
Han, S., & Kim, H. (2019). A study on the change of the perception of students' computational thinking and scientific attitudes in earth science classes using a block-based coding. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 12(2), 131-140.
Harwood, W. S. (2004). A new model for inquiry. Journal of college science teaching, 33(7), 29-33.
Heo, M. (1984). Development of evaluation table for scientific exploration. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 4(1), 57-64.
Hwang, Y. (2015). Development of strategies for education about research design to student researchers in science and engineering through extraction of problem specification elements (Doctoral dissertation). Daegu: Kyoungpook National University.
Hwang, Y., Mun, K., & Park, Y. (2016). Study of perception on programming and computational thinking and attitude toward science learning of high school students through software inquiry activity: Focus on using scratch and physical computing materials. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(2), 325-335.
International Society for Technology in Education [ISTE] & Computer Science Teachers Association [CSTA]. (2011). Computational thinking in K-12 education teacher resource, 2nd Ed. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/docs/ct-documents/ctteacher-resources_2ed-pdf.pdf?sfvrsn2
International Society for Technology in Education [ISTE] & Computer Science Teachers Association [CSTA]. (2011). Computational thinking leadership toolkit 1st edition. Retrieved from http://csta.acm.org/Curriculum/sub/CurrFiles/471.11CTLeadershiptToolkit-SP-vF.pdf
Jeon, Y., & Kim, S. (2017). 2015 Revised curriculum and computational thinking. 2017 software education leader teacher training course. Daegu : KERIS.
Kalel?o?l, F., Gulbahar, Y., & Kukul, V. (2016). A framework for computational thinking based on a systematic research review. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 4(3), 583-596.
Kim, M., & Kim, S. (2018). Korean secondary students' computational thinking based on problem solving. Korean Association for Learner-centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(16), 807-830.
Kim, S. (2015). Development of scratch code analysis system for assessment about concepts of computational thinking. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education 18(6), 13-22.
Kim, S., & Kim, T. (2018). The effect of data literacy on students' learning motivation and academic achievement in secondary problem solving class based on computational thinking. The Korean Society for the Study of Teacher Education, 34(4), 125-144.
Kim, Y. (2013). Thinking ability education. Seoul: Yuwon Books.
Lee, A. (2019). Domestic research trend analysis of computing thinking. The Korea Contents Association, 19(8), 214-223.
Lee, C. (2017). Effects of computational thinking based real life problem solving learning on elementary school student's computational thinking. The Society of Korean Practical Arts Education Research, 23(4), 91-107.
Lee, J., Kim, J., & Kim, J. (2018). Effects of the experience in developing physics teaching materials based on computational thinking for improvement of science teachers' and pre-service teachers' technological pedagogical and content knowledge. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 68(2), 202-216.
Lee, K. (2019). Computational thinking education teaching method research for non-major subjects. The Korean Association of General Education, 13(1), 321-343.
Liu, J., & Wang, L. (2010). Computational thinking in discrete mathematics. Second International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science (ETCS), 1, 413-416.
Mansfield, R. S., & Busse, T. V. (1981). The psychology of creativity and discovery: Scientists and their work. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
Marshall, J. A., & Carrejo, D. J. (2008). Students' mathematical modeling of motion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(2), 153-173.
Ministry of Education [MOE]. (1997). Science curriculum. Seoul: Ministry of Education: 1997-15(9)
Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2015a). Guide of operating SW education. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2015b). The national curriculum for the primary and secondary schools. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2015c). Science curriculum. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
National Research Council [NRC]. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council [NRC]. (2010). Report of a workshop on the scope and nature of computational thinking. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Oh, K., & Ahn, S. (2013). A study on the problem-solving process model based on the computational thinking to improve creativity. The Korean Association of Computer Education Winter Conference Paper, 17(1), 183-186.
Park, S., & Ahn, S. (2016). An exploratory study of the competence of computational thinking: for software developer. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 19(5), 41-53.
Park, Y.-S., Jeong, D.-H., Yu, J.-Y., & Flick, L. (2015a). Application of computational thinking for activating STEAM education. Paper presented at the biannual meeting of Korean Earth Science Society, April 23-24, Chuncheon National University of Education, Chuncheon, Korea.
Park, Y.-S., Hwang, J.-K., & Flick, L. B. (2015b). The analysis of computational thinking in STEAM program about climate change and water shortage and suggestions in science education. Paper presented at the biannual meeting of Korean Earth Science Society, September 10-11, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea.
Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rezba R., Fiel, R., & Sprague, C. (1995). Learning and assessing science process skills. 3rd Ed. Dubuque, Iowa : Kendall/Hunt.
Rossman, J. (1931). The psychology of the inventor. Washington, DC: Inventor's Publishing Company.
RSC2017 (2017). Robot software challenge pre-description. Retrieved from http://rsc.education/2017/ko/tutorial/briefing.jsp
Sadler, T. D., Burgin, S., McKinney, L., & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning science through research apprenticeships: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 235-256.
Selby, C., & Woollard, J. (2013). Computational thinking: the developing definition. ITiCSE conference paper. University of Kent, Canterbury, England.
Selby, C. & Woollard, J. (2014). Refining an understanding of computational thinking. University of Southampton Institutional Repository. Retrieved from http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/372410
Shin, S., Kim, C., Park, N., Kim, K., Seong, Y., & Jeong, Y. (2016). Convergence organization strategies of the computational thinking in informatics curriculums. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education. 20(6), 607-616.
Sneider, C., Stephenson, C., Schafer, B., & Flick, L. (2014). Computational thinking in high school science classroom. The Science Teacher, 81(5), 53-60.
Song, H. (2007). Instructional Design Principles for Enhancing Creative Problem Solving Skills. The Korea Association of Yeolin Education, 15(3), 55-73.
Todd, R. D., Todd, K. R., & McCrory, D. L. (1996). Introduction to design and technology. New York, NY: Thomson Learning Tools.
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.
Wecker, C., Rachel, A., Heran-Dorr, E., Waltner, C., Wiesner, H., & Fischer, F. (2013). Presenting theoretical ideas prior to inquiry activities fosters theory-level knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(10), 1180-1206.
Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., & Orton, K. (2015). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 127-147.
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communication of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.