$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

시민과학 활동에 참여한 초등학생들의 과학 관련 정의적 특성 및 측정에 대한 인식 분석
A Study on Science-related Affective Characteristic and Perception of Measurement of Elementary Students Who Participated in Citizen Science Activities 원문보기

초등과학교육 = Journal of Korean elementary science education, v.39 no.2, 2020년, pp.168 - 182  

신정윤 (대전배울초등학교) ,  박상우 (청주교육대학교)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This study investigated how elementary students' science-related affective characteristics and their perception of measurement changed following participation in citizen science activities through a GLOBE program. Before and after the activities, test of positive experiences about science (PES) and ...

주제어

표/그림 (10)

질의응답

핵심어 질문 논문에서 추출한 답변
시민과학 활동의 교육적 목적과 효과가, 학생들에게 어떤 영향을 미치는가? , 2016; Toomey & Domroese, 2013). 시민과학 활동에 참여하는 학생들은 교실 밖 다양한 학습 사례를 경험하고, 실제적이고 직접적인 과학 활동을 하는 체험을 하게 되며(Jang, 2018), 과학적 소양을 증진시키는데 도움이 되는 것으로 나타났다(Krasny & Bonny, 2005). 또한, 시민과학 활동은 과학적 지식을 향상시키는데 눈에 띄게 효과적이며(Bonney et al., 2009), 탐구 능력을 향상시키는데도 도움이 된다는 연구 결과가 있다(Kobori et al., 2016). 
시민과학은 무엇인가? 시민과학(citizen science)은 전문적인 과학자가 아닌 일반 시민, 학생 또는 교사 등이 과학 연구의 모든 과정 또는 관찰, 측정 등의 일부 자료수집 과정에 함께 참여하는 프로그램을 지칭한다(Cooper et al., 2007; Prysby, 2001).
시민과학 활동이 사용되고 있는 분야는? , 2007; Prysby, 2001). 연구자들이 정한 프로토콜에 따라 시민과학 활동 참여자들이 자료를 수집하고 제출하여 다양하고 방대한 데이터베이스를 만들면 연구자들은 이를 분석하여 결과를 얻는 방식으로 전개되는데, 주로 많은 자료가 요구되는 생태학, 기상학, 천문학 등의 분야에서 활용되고 있다. 시민과학 활동이 확대됨에 따라 과학적 연구결과 뿐만 아니라, 시민과학 활동의 교육적 목적과 효과가 최근 주목받고 있다(Bonney et al.
질의응답 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Avard, M. M. & Clark, B. K. (2001). GLOBE in preservice and inservice teacher education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 49(5), 461-466. 

  2. Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J. & Wilderman, C. C.(2009). Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. Online Submission. 

  3. Bonney, R., Cooper, C. & Ballard, H. (2016). The theory and practice of citizen science: Launching a new journal. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice. 1(1). 

  4. Butler, D. M., & MacGregor, I. D. (2003). GLOBE: Science and education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 51(1), 9-20. 

  5. Cincera, J., Kroufek, R., Markova, K., Krepelkova, S. & Simonova, P. (2019). The GLOBE program: What factors influence students' and teachers' satisfaction with science education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1-17. 

  6. Congalton, R. G., Rowe, R. & Becker, M. (2001). The GLOBE Program Sixth Annual GLOBE Conference 22-27 July, 2001. Science Reports, 22, 27. 

  7. Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Phillips, T. & Bonney, R. (2007). Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecology and Society, 12(2), 1-11. 

  8. Herron, S. S. & Robertson, J. L. (2013). Using the GLOBE program to educate students on the interdependence of professional development?. Creative Education, 4(4A), 29. 

  9. Howland, D. & Becker, M. L. (2002). GLOBE-The science behind launching an international environmental education program. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(3), 199-210. 

  10. Jang, J. A. (2018). Development and application of citizen science-based urban environmental education program. graduate school of Korea National University of Education (Doctoral dissertation). Korea National University of Education, University, Chungbuk, Korea. 

  11. Jeong, E. Y. & Hong, M. Y. (2004). An analysis of the problems of experiment and observation in elementary science instruction. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 23(4), 287-286. 

  12. Ji, Y., Shim, H. P., Baek, J. & Park, H. Y. (2017). Science teachers' recognition of the changing school environment and challenges for teaching practices. Korean Association for Science Education, 37(6), 937-949. 

  13. Kang, H., Lee, S., Kim, H., Lee, S., Kwak, Y. & Shin, Y. (2019). The effects of national science leading school programs on students' positive experiences about science and teachers' perceptions of curriculum implementation factors affecting PES. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(2), 279-293. 

  14. Kim, M. & Cho, J. (2013). An analysis of the properties of affective achievement in science based on TIMSS and science teachers' perception. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(1), 46-62. 

  15. Kobori, H., Dickinson, J. L., Washitani, I., Sakurai, R., Amano, T., Komatsu, N. & Miller-Rushing, A. J. (2016). Citizen science: A new approach to advance ecology, education, and conservation. Ecological Research, 31(1), 1-19. 

  16. Kown, C. S., Hur, M., Yang, I. H. & Kim, Y. S. (2004). A cause analysis of learning environment variables of change in science attitudes on elementary and secondary school students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(6), 1256-1271. 

  17. Krasny, M. E. & Bonney, R. (2005). Environmental education through citizen science and participatory action research. In Johnson, E. & Mappin, M. (eds.), Environmental Education and advocacy. (pp. 292-320). UK: Cambridge University Press. 

  18. Lee, M. W., Kim, H. S. & Ludman, A. (2010). The present situation and science high school teachers' perception about field application of the GLOBE program in Korea. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 31(1), 63-70. 

  19. Lee, S. K., Son, J. W., Kim, J. H., Park, J., Seo, H. A., Shim, K. C., Lee, K. Y., Lee, B. & Choi, J. (2013). Characteristics of school science inquiry based on the case analyses of high school science classes. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(2), 284-309. 

  20. Lee, Y. B. & Shin, Y. J. (2019). The effect of 'science level-up' science classes with applied gamification factors on positive experiences about science (PES). Biology Education, 47(1), 97-106. 

  21. Means, B. (1998). Melding authentic science, technology, and inquiry-based teaching: Experiences of the GLOBE program. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7(1), 97-105. 

  22. Means, B., Coleman, E., Lewis, A., Quellmalz, E., Marder, C. & Valdes, K. (1997). GLOBE Year 2 evaluation: Implementation and progress. SRI International Menlo Park, CA. 

  23. Means, B., Penuel, W. R., Crawford, V. M., Korbak, C., Lewis, A., Murphy, R. F. & Yarnall, L. (2001). GLOBE Year 6 evaluation: Explaining variation in implementation. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. 

  24. Nam, K., Lee, B. & Lee, S. (2004). The effect of science journal writing on the science-related affective domain of scientifically gifted students at middle school level. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(6), 1272-1282. 

  25. Park, M. J. & Lee, Y. S. (2010). Development and application of science drawing program to improve science process skills. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(2), 186-194. 

  26. Penuel, W. R., Bienkowski, M., Gallagher, L., Korbak, C., Sussex, W., Yamaguchi, R. & Fishman, B. J. (2006). GLOBE Year 10 evaluation: Into the next generation. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. 

  27. Penuel, W., Bienkowski, M., Korbak, C., Molina, A., Russo, D., Shear, L. & Toyama, Y. (2005). GLOBE Year 9 evaluation: Implementation supports and student outcomes. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. 

  28. Penuel, W. R. & Means, B. (2004). Implementation variation and fidelity in an inquiry science program: Analysis of GLOBE data reporting patterns. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 294-315. 

  29. Prysby, M. D. (2001). Temporal and geographical variation in monarch egg and larval densities: An ecological application of citizen science. Master's thesis, University of Minnesota. 

  30. Radhakrishna, S., Binoy, V. V. & Kurup, A. (2014). The culture of environmental education: Insights from a citizen science experiment in India. Current Science, 107(2), 176-178. 

  31. Robin, J., Levine, E. & Riha, S. (2005). Utilizing satellite imagery and GLOBE student data to model soil dynamics. Ecological modelling, 185(1), 133-145. 

  32. Shin, Y., Kang, H., Kwak, Y., Kim, H., Lee, S. & Lee, S. (2017a). A comparative analysis of the test tools in science-related affective domains. Biology Education, 45(1), 41-54. 

  33. Shin, Y., Kang, H., Kwak, Y., Kim, H., Lee, S. & Lee, S. (2017b). Study on the development of test for indicators of positive experiences about science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(2), 335-346. 

  34. Silvertown, J. (2009). A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(9), 467-471. 

  35. Smolakova, N., Svajdaa, J., Korony, S. & Cincera, J. (2016). The benefit of the GLOBE program for the development of inquiry competence in the czech and slovak contexts. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(16), 9507-9519. 

  36. Soh, J. A., Jong, H. K. & Jung, Y. J. (2000). Investigation on the students' abilities of reading scales and conceptions related with measuring instruments and units. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(1), 1-11. 

  37. Toomey, A. H. & Domroese, M. C. (2013). Can citizen science lead to positive conservation attitudes and behaviors?. Human Ecology Review, 20(1), 50-62. 

  38. Wigbels, L. D. (2004). The GLOBE program: A worldwide student/scientist partnership in earth science research and education. In 54th International Astronautical Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, the International Academy of Astronautics, and the International Institute of Space Law (pp. P-2). 

  39. Winklerova, K., Cincera, J., Krepelkova, S. & Kroufek, R. (2018). The GLOBE program: Long-term memories of program-relevant experience. The Journal of Environmental Education, 49(5), 400-410. 

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로