참고문헌 (26)

1. Albe, V., Venturini, P. & Lascours, J. (2001). Electromagnetic concepts in mathematical representation of physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(2), 197-203. 

   상세보기

2. Airey, J. & Linder, C. (2017). Social semiotics in university physics education. In Multiple representations in physics education (pp. 95-122). Cham: Springer. 

3. Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction (Vol. 59). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 

4. Chang, J. & Song, J. (2015). A case study on the features of classroom norms formed in inquiry activities of elementary science classes. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(2), 303-312. 

   원문보기 상세보기

5. Jho, H., Jo, K. & Yoon, H.-G. (2017). Analysis of middle school students' visual representation competences for electric current. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 67(6), 714-724. 

   상세보기

6. Jo, K., Jho, H. & Yoon, H.-G. (2015) Analysis of visual representations related to electromagnetism in primary and secondary science textbooks. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 65(4), 343-357. 

   상세보기

7. Jo, K., Jho, H. & Yoon, H-G., (2017). Middle school students' interpretation, construction, and application of visual representations for magnetic field due to a current. Journal of Science Education, 41(1), 152-165. 

   원문보기 상세보기

8. Kang, H-S., Yoon, J. H. & Lee, D. H. (2008). Analysis on the uses of the external representations in the 3-6th grade science textbooks developed under the 7th national curriculum. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 27(2), 158-169. 

9. Kim, N., Chang, J. & Song, J. (2018). A comparison of the features of external representations presented in paper textbooks and digital textbooks: Focused on the 'Force' related units of middle school in the 2009 and 2015 national science curricula. School Science Journal, 12(3), 309-330. 

10. Lehrer, R., Schauble, L. E. O. N. A. & Petrosino, A. J. (2001). Reconsidering the role of experiment in science education. Designing for science: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings, 251-278. 

11. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. 

12. Noh, T., Yoon, M., Kang, H-S. & Han, J. (2007). Semiotic analysis of the inscriptions representing concept of atom and molecule in the 9th grade science textbooks. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 51(5), 423-432. 

    원문보기 상세보기

13. Park, J., Chang, J. & Song, J. (2016). Why did I cope with so?: A teacher's strategy to cope with anomalous situations in primary practical science lessons. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 35(3), 277-287. 

    원문보기 상세보기

14. Park, J., Chang, J., Tang, K. S., Treagust, D. F. & Won, M. (2020). Sequential patterns of students' drawing in constructing scientific explanations: Focusing on the interplay among three levels of pictorial representation. International Journal of Science Education, 1-26. 

15. Scott, P., Mortimer, E. & Ametller, J. (2011). Pedagogical link-making: A fundamental aspect of teaching and learning scientific conceptual knowledge. Studies in Science Education, 47(1), 3-36. 

    상세보기

16. Tang, K. S. (2016). The interplay of representations and patterns of classroom discourse in science teaching sequences. International Journal of Science Education, 38(13), 2069-2095. 

    상세보기

17. Tang, K. S., Delgado, C. & Moje, E. B. (2014). An integrative framework for the analysis of multiple and multimodal representations for meaning-making in science education. Science Education, 98(2), 305-326. 

    상세보기

18. Treagust, D. F., Duit, R. & Fischer, H. E. (Eds.). (2017). Multiple representations in physics education (Vol. 10). New York: Springer. 

19. Tytler, R., Prain, V., Hubber, P. & Waldrip, B. (2013). Constructing representations to learn in science. Rotterdam: Sense. 

20. Wong, C. L. & Chu, H. E. (2017). The conceptual elements of multiple representations: A study of textbooks' representations of electric current. In D. F. Treagust, R. Duit & H. E. Fischer (Eds.), Multiple representations in physics education (pp. 183-206). Cham: Springer. 

21. Yeo, J. & Gilbert, J. K. (2017). The role of representations in students' explanations of four phenomena in physics: Dynamics, thermal physics, electromagnetic induction and superposition. In D. F. Treagust, R. Duit & H. E. Fischer (Eds.), Multiple representations in physics education (pp. 255-287). Cham: Springer. 

22. Yoon, H-G. (2018). Development and validation of visual representation competence taxonomy. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 38(2), 161-170. 

23. Yoon, H-G. (2019). Analysis of elementary school students' visual representation competence for shadow phenomenon. Journal of The Korean Association for Science Education, 39(2), 295-305. 

24. Yoon, H.-G. Jo, K. & Jho, H. (2016). Middle school students' interpretation, construction, and application of visual representations for electrostatic induction. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 66(5), 580-589. 

    상세보기

25. Yoon, H-G., Jo, K. & Jho, H. (2017). Secondary science teachers' perception about and actual use of visual representations in the teaching of electromagnetism. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(2), 253-262. 

26. Yoon, H-G. & Park, J. (2018). Elementary school teachers' use of visual representations and their perceptions of the functions of visual representations. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 37(2), 219-231.