$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

청와대 국민청원 이용자 분석: 활용 동인을 중심으로
A Study on the Users of the National Petition to CheongWaDae: Focused on their Motivations 원문보기

정보화 정책 = Informatization policy, v.27 no.1 = no.102, 2020년, pp.92 - 114  

김태은 (Graduate School of Hanyang University) ,  모은정 (Policy Development Team of Federation of Middle-Market Enterprises of Korea) ,  양선모 (Public Administration of Graduate School of Hanyang University)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

본 연구는 국민들의 청와대 국민청원 활용 동인을 분석하는 것에 목적이 있다. 온라인 공간은 숙의민주주의 구현의 실험장으로 활용되어 왔다. 국민 신문고, 다음 아고라 등에서 다양한 여론이 형성되어 실제 국민들의 공감을 얻기도 했다. 문재인 정부 청와대는 국민들의 여론을 수렴하기 위한 방안으로 국민청원 사이트를 개설했다. 30일 동안 20만 명 이상 동의를 얻은 청원에 대해서 부처의 책임자 혹은 청와대 관계자가 직접 답변을 하는 방식으로 운영된다. 본 연구는 청와대 국민청원이 기존 여론 수렴 플랫폼과 어떤 차별성을 가지는지, 왜 국민들이 청와대 국민청원 서비스에 열광하는지 깊이 살펴보고자 한다. 이를 위해 본 연구는 혼합연구 방식을 도입하여 질적, 양적 분석을 수행했다. 먼저 표적 집단 면접을 통해서 청와대 국민청원 이용경험이 있는 사람들을 대상으로 경험을 측정 가능한 구성개념으로 요인화 했다. 그 다음 청와대 국민청원 이용 경험이 있는 우리나라 국민 156명을 대상으로 설문 조사를 실시했다. 분석결과 상징성, 유용성, 충족성, 신뢰 요인이 국민청원 활용 의도에 정(+)의 영향을 미침을 것을 확인하였다. 본 연구는 온라인의 숙의민주주의 플랫폼에서 이용자들의 실제 참여를 제고하기 위해서 기술적 측면 보다는 상징성, 유용성, 충족성, 신뢰 요인이 마련될 수 있어야 함을 주장하고자 한다. 더불어서 본 연구는 온라인 숙의민주주의 구현 과정으로 청와대 국민청원이 기존 여론 수렴 플랫폼과 어떠한 차별성이 있는지 살펴보고, 지속 이용에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 분석했다는 점에서 의의를 가진다고 할 수 있다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The purpose of this study is to analyze people's motivations to use the National Petition service of CheongWaDae, the Presidential Office of Korea. The online space has been used as a testbed of deliberative democracy. In fact, a wide variety of public opinions are being formed and gaining sympathy ...

주제어

표/그림 (5)

질의응답

핵심어 질문 논문에서 추출한 답변
숙의민주주의는 무엇인가? 숙의민주주의(Deliberative Democracy)는 사회에 등장한 이슈에 관해 더 많은 사람들이 토론하고 고민하면서 답을 내려가는 과정이라고 볼 수 있다. 숙의민주주의는 개인별로 이익만을 추구하던 방식을 공적인 영역에 사용할 수 있도록 변화시키는 것을 의미하며, 기존에 민주주의 모델의 맹점을 극복하는 것에 목표가 있다.
청와대 국민청원을 게시할 수 있는 조건이 있는가? 본 연구는 청와대 국민청원 서비스를 이용하는 개인 들의 활용 동인을 분석하는 것에 있다. 청와대 국민청원은 사회 관계망 서비스 계정을 가진 사람이라면 누구나 청원을 게시할 수 있다. 등록된 청원 중 30일간 20 만 명 이상의 추천을 받은 안건에 대해서는 청와대 담당 수석이나 해당 부처 최고 의사 결정권자가 직접 답변을 제공한다.
청와대 국민청원은 어떤 민주주의가 실현된 것이라고 볼 수 있는가? 등록된 청원 중 30일간 20 만 명 이상의 추천을 받은 안건에 대해서는 청와대 담당 수석이나 해당 부처 최고 의사 결정권자가 직접 답변을 제공한다. 온라인 공간에서 숙의민주주의(Deliberative Democracy)가 실현된 것이라고 해석해 볼 수 있다. 2017년 여름 서비스가 개시된 이래 청와대 국민청원에는 하루에도 수많은 개인들의 청원이 게시되고 있다.
질의응답 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (80)

  1. Bagozzi, R. & Yi, Y. (1988). "On the evaluation of structural equation models." Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94. 

  2. Bandura, A. (1977). "Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change." Psychological review, 84(2), 191. 

  3. Blumler, J. (1979). "The role of theory in uses and gratifications studies." Communication research, 6(1), 9-36. 

  4. Bradley, G. (1974). "Gratifications of television viewing and their correlates for British children." The Uses of Mass Communications Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research, 71-925. 

  5. Campbell, A., Gurin, G. & Miller, W. (1954). The voter decides. California: Praeger. 

  6. Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 

  7. Conway, M. (2000). Political participation in the United States. Cq Pr. 

  8. Cho, H. & Hong, I. (2010). "The Impact of Consumer Characteristics Upon Trust and Purchase Intentions in B2C E-marketplaces." Information Systems Review, 12(3), 49-73. 

  9. Cho, Y. & Jeong, Y. (2019). "An Empirical Study on Intention of the Sharing Economy Services." The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 19(3), 183-196. 

  10. Choi, J. (2012). "The Influence of SNS Use on Political Efficacy and Political Participation Among Korean College Students." Journal of Political Communication, 27, 369-408. 

  11. Choi, S. & Kwon, Y. (2012). "A Study of The Effects of Consumption Experiences on Brand Trust, Consumer Satisfaction, and Repurchase Intention : Focus on The Starbucks Coffee Shop." Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research, 24(4), 357-377. 

  12. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). "User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models." Management science, 35(8), 982-1003. 

  13. Deutsch, K. W. (1955). "Symbols of political community. Symbols and Society." Symbols and Society, 23-54. 

  14. Elder, C. D. & Cobb, R. W. (1983). The political uses of symbols. London: Longman Publishing Group. 

  15. Fischbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: AddisonWesley. 

  16. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). "Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics." Journal of marketing research, 382-388. 

  17. Heary, Eilis (2002). "The use of focus group interviews in pediatric health care research." Journal of pediatric psychology, 27(1), 47-57. 

  18. Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy. Stanford University Press, Trans. C. Park. (2010) Seoul: Humanitas Book. 

  19. Heo, J. & Park, S. (2014). "Study on the Interactivities of Digital Signage Users in the perspective of Uses and Gratification." Design Convergence Study, 13(1), 99-108. 

  20. Hoffman, D. L. & Novak, T. P. (1996). "Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations." Journal of marketing, 60(3), 50-68. 

  21. Hong, S. (2008). "A Study on Ukrainian Political Symbolism." The Journal of Slavic Studies, 23(3), 475-502. 

  22. Hong, S. (2011). "Theoretical complementation of deliberative democracy : With focus on republican-oriented alternative." Media Society, 19(2), 475-502. 

  23. Hong, W. (2014). "Reexamination of the Internet Public Sphere : Communication and Universal Pragmatism." Media Society, 10(4), 263-300. 

  24. Jang, Y. & Lee, E. (2010). "How Does Message Quality and Opinion Extremity Moderate the Effects of Exposure to Disagreement in Online Discussion?" Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 54(6), 422-443. 

  25. Jeon, B. & Kim, H. (2017). "An Exploratory Study on the Sharing and Application of Public Open Big Data." Informatization Policy, 24(3), 27-41. 

  26. Jeong, B. & Seong, J. (2005). "Science and Technology and Symbolic Politics." Korean Association For Policy Science, 9(1), 27-48. 

  27. Jeong, H. (2019). "An Exploratory Study of Collective E-Petitions Estimation Methodology Using Anomaly Detection: Focusing on the Voice of Citizens of Changwon City." Informatization Policy, 26(4), 85-106. 

  28. Jeong I. & Kim, J. (1998). "Re-conceptulization of U.S. Information Policies." The Korea Association for Policy Studies, 7(2), 33-59. 

  29. Jung, B. & Seong, J. (2005). "S&T and Symbol Politios." Korean Policy Sciences Review, 9(1), 27-48. 

  30. Kang, S., Lee, D. & Kim, H. (2008). "A Study on the Effect of an e-Learning Lecture System's Quality on a Learner's Flow and Participation." The Journal of internet electronic commerce research, 8(3), 211-237. 

  31. Katz, E., Haas, H. & Gurevitch, M. (1973). "On the use of the mass media for important things." American sociological review, 164-181. 

  32. Kim, C. (2019). "Development and Validation of the Social Interest Inventory based on the Individual Psychology." Korea Journal of Counseling, 20(1), 39-65. 

  33. Kim, C., Kim, E. & Jun, J. (2004). "Relationships between Service Recovery Fairness, Trust, and Behavioral Intention among Family Restaurant Customers." Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research, 16(3), 267-286. 

  34. Kim, D. (2011). "A Study on Factors Affecting Social Network Service e-Service Quality." Journal of digital convergence, 9(3), 225-233. 

  35. Kim, J. (2005). "Differentiation of Cyber Public Sphere and Conditions for Deliberative Democracy." Korean Journal of Sociology, 39(2), 34-68. 

  36. Kim, N. & Kim, M. (2010). "The Effects of Wordof- Mouth Information Quality on Wordof- Mouth Effects in Online Tourism Context." Korean Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 19(4), 59-79. 

  37. Kim, S., Kim, D. & Park J. (2009). "Establishing the Concept of Cheng and Developing Its Scales in a Commercial Relationship." Korean Journal of Marketing, 24(3), 119-148. 

  38. Kim, T. & Choi, J. (2019). "The Effect of Perceived Personalization of Driving Style of Autonomous Vehicle on User's Trust and Intention to Use." The Journal of Digital Contents Society, 20(3), 586-596. 

  39. Kim, T. & Choi, S. (2019). "A Study on the Effect of Personal Recognition of Best Comment on Emotion Contagion on Online: Focused on Crypto-currency phenomenon of Korea." Legislation and Policy Studies, 11(1), 335-364. 

  40. Kim, Y. (2010). "Confidence Indicators and Evaluation Factors of Credibility According to the Types of Online Information." Journal of the Korean society for information management, 27(1), 7-24. 

  41. Kingdon, J. & Thurber, J. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown. 

  42. Kotler, P. & Gertner, D. (2002). "Country as brand, product, and beyond: A place marketing and brand management perspective." Journal of brand management, 9(4), 249-261. 

  43. Ku, D. (2013). Research Methodology. Gyeonggi: Hakhyunsa. 

  44. Ku, G. (2014). "A study of the impact of the types of political efficacy on media based political information seeking and voting intention." Journal of Political Communication. 33, 5-25. 

  45. Ku, J. (2000.) "Social and Cultural Symbolism of Brand." Journal of the Korean Society of Design Culture, 6(1), 1-15. 

  46. Kuem, H. & Joo, J. (2013). "Study on Impact of Technology Readiness Index and Political Psychology Variables of Voters on Mobile Voting Intention : Focus on Comparison of Voters of Different Generations. Cyber." Journal of Cybercommunication Academic Society, 30(4), 169-217. 

  47. Lasswell, H., Miriam, C. & Smith, T. (1950). A Study of Power: World Politics and Personal Insecurity. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. 

  48. Lee, C. & Hyun K. (2007). "Effects of Voters' Media Use on their Political Knowledge, Political Efficacy, and Political Disaffection." Journal of Communication Science, 7(4), 112-142. 

  49. Lee, H. & Lim, J. (2015). A Structural Model and AMOS 22. Seoul: Jyphyunjae. 

  50. Lee, J. & Kim, E. (2006). "Effects of Online Deliberation on Political Discussion Efficacy." Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 50(3), 393-423. 

  51. Lee, J. & Kim, Y. (2012). "The Relationship Between Professional Baseball Spectators' Experiential Consumption, Consumption Emotion, Customer Satisfaction, Trust, Attitude toward Team and Revisit Intention." Journal of Sport and Leisure Studies, 47(1), 265-280. 

  52. Lee, J., Kang, H. & Park, J. (2010). "The Determinants of Reuse Intention in e-Learning An Integrated Approach to Attitude and Flow." The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 10(3), 472-479. 

  53. Lee, Y. (1995). "'Information Superhighway' and the Change of production System in U.S." Regional Reserach, 4(3), 83-110. 

  54. Lechner, U. & Schmid, B. F. (2000). Communities and media-towards a reconstruction of communities on media. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 10-19). IEEE. 

  55. McQuail, D. & Windahl, S. (1981). Communication Model for the Study of Mass Communication. New York: Longman. 

  56. Moon, C. (2009). "The Study on the Political Symbols of 'Lee Myung-bak Administration' Policies including Government's PR factors - Analyzed focusing on major domestic paper's editorials." Journal of Political Communication, 15, 147-186. 

  57. Moon, J. & Kim, Y. (2001). "Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context." Information & management, 38(4), 217-230. 

  58. Morgan, R. M. & Hunt, S. D. (1994). "The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing." Journal of Marketing. 58(3), 20-38. 

  59. Morrell, M. E. (2005). "Deliberation, democratic decision-making and internal political efficacy." Political Behavior, 27(1), 49-69. 

  60. Noh, J., Ched, A. & Seo, J. (2019). "Factors Influencing Social Media Use in Local Government." Informatization Policy, 26(3), 36-52. 

  61. Palmgreen, P. & Rayburn, J. (1984). "Merging uses and gratifications and expectancyvalue theory." Communication Research. 11(4), 537-562. 

  62. Parasuraman, A. & Colby, C. L. (2015). "An updated and streamlined technology readiness index: TRI 2.0." Journal of service research, 18(1), 59-74. 

  63. Park, S. & Kim, H. (2007). "Evaluation of Electronic Government at Waseda University in Japan." e-Government Focus, 2, National IT Industry Promotion Agency. 

  64. Park. S., Kim, J. & Jang, H. (2012). "An Empirical Study of a Social Network Service(SNS) Task-Media Fit and Performance in Political Field." Journal of Political Science and Communication, 15(2), 233-267. 

  65. Pfeffer, J. (1981). "Management as symbolic action: the creation and maintenance of organizational paradigm." Research in organizational behavior, 3, 1-52. 

  66. Pinkleton, B. E., Austin, E. W. & Fortman, K. K. (1998). "Relationships of media use and political disaffection to political efficacy and voting behavior." Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(1), 34-49. 

  67. Richardson, W. (2003). "Connecting political discussion to civic engagement: The role of civic knowledge, efficacy and context for adolescents." Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland. 

  68. Rogers, E. (1995). "Diffusion of Innovations: modifications of a model for telecommunications." In Die diffusion von innovationen in der telekommunikation, 25-38. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 

  69. Ryu, M. & Lee, Y. (2019). "Study on Use Intention of Chinese Unmanned Convenience Stores by Applying UTAUT and Theory of Experience Economy: Verifying the Moderating Effect of Reliability." Journal of Distribution and Management Research, 22(2), 5-15. 

  70. Seo, W.. Won, W. & Hong, J. (2010). "An Empirical Study on the Effects of SNS Website Quality Factors on the User Satisfaction, Intention of Continuous Use, and Intention of Wordsof-Mouth." The Journal of Business and Economics, 26(1), 99-132. 

  71. Shin, E. & Cho, W. (2019). "The effects of Wordof-mouth information and characteristics of social commerce hotel products on the customer's satisfaction, trust and use intention." International Journal of Tourism Management and Sciences, 34(2), 217-236. 

  72. Simon, P. (2013). Too big to ignore: the business case for big data (Vol. 72). John Wiley & Sons. 

  73. Song, H. & Ko. K. (2013). "The Quality of Social Network Service(SNS), Political Efficacy and the Acceleration of the Political Participation." The Korean Political Science Association, 12(1), 175-216. 

  74. Song, J. & Park, S. (2006). "A Study of the Impact of Media Importance, Political Involvement, Political Efficacy and Political Cynicism on the Voting Behavior." Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies, 20(3), 166-197. 

  75. Tsai, S. (2005). "Utility, cultural symbolism and emotion: a comprehensive model of brand purchase value." International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22(3), 277-291. 

  76. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. & Xu, X. (2012). "Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology." MIS quarterly, 157-178. 

  77. White, L. & Sintov, N. (2017). "You are what you drive: Environmentalist and social innovator symbolism drives electric vehicle adoption intentions." Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 99, 94-113. 

  78. Wixom, B. & Todd, P. (2005). "A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance." Information systems research, 16(1), 85-102. 

  79. Yang, G. & Park, T. (2007), "Effect of the Participation of Doctors and Pharmacists in the Policy Process on the Trust in the Ministry of Health & Welfare in Korea." Korean Public Administration Review, 41(4), 357-385. 

  80. You, J. & Park, C. (2009), "A Study on Chinese Consumer's the Acceptance Factors of Mobile Shopping Service." The Journal of internet electronic commerce research, 9(2), 81-106. 

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

BRONZE

출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로