[논문]사회적 혁신 기반 소셜벤처 생태계 활성화 전략

최용석; 백보현

doi:10.16972/apjbve.15.3.202006.1

사회적 혁신 기반 소셜벤처 생태계 활성화 전략
Strategies for Revitalizing Social Venture Ecosystem Based on Social Innovation Theory 원문보기

벤처창업연구= Asia-Pacific journal of business and venturing, v.15 no.3, 2020년, pp.1 - 17

최용석 (중앙대학교 산학협력단) , 백보현 (중앙대학교 문화예술경영학과)

초록
AI-Helper

현대사회가 당면한 다양한 문제를 해결할 새로운 주체로 '제4섹터(the fourth sector)'가 주목받고 있다. 제4섹터는 사회적경제 기업으로 대표되는 제3섹터의 지나친 정부 의존도와 서비스 모델 동형화의 문제점을 해결하고자 등장하였다(Howaldt & Schwarz, 2010). 이러한 제4섹터의 핵심 주체로서 소셜벤처가 언급되고 있다(경기연구원, 2018). 그러나 아직까지 소셜벤처에 대한 학술적·정책적 개념이 모호한 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 사회의 포용적 성장을 도모하기 위해 제4섹터로서의 소셜벤처 개념을 명확히 하고, 소셜벤처 생태계 활성화를 위한 발전전략을 연구하고자 한다. 이를 위해 선행연구를 토대로 제3섹터와 차별화된 소셜벤처의 개념을 정립하고, 생태계 활성화를 위한 중간지원조직의 중요성을 제시하였다. 나아가 생태계 활성화 전략을 제안하기 위해 소셜벤처 중간지원조직의 세부 유형을 도출하고, 사회혁신단계별 중간지원조직의 역할에 대해 제언하였다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

The Fourth Sector has been attracting attention as a means to solve the various problems plaguing modern society; it emerged to overcome the Third Sector's issues such as excessive reliance on the government and service model isomorphism, represented by social economy enterprises (Meadows, 1972; Howaldt & Schwarz, 2010). Social venture companies have been mentioned as key agents of the Fourth Sector (Gyeonggi Research Institute, 2018). However, the academic and policy concepts related to social ventures continue to be vague. Therefore, this study aims to clarify the concept of social ventures as part of the Fourth Sector, and research development strategies for the vitalization of the social venture ecosystem in an effort to encourage inclusive growth of society. To achieve these goals, it establishes the concept of social ventures differentiated from the Third Sector, based on previous studies, and presents the importance of an intermediate support organization for the ecosystem's vitalization. Furthermore, to propose strategies for said vitalization, the study derives detailed forms of social venture intermediate support organizations, and provides suggestions regarding their importance and roles through social innovation levels.

주제어

질의응답

핵심어	질문	논문에서 추출한 답변
	제4섹터의 등장배경은?	현대사회가 당면한 다양한 문제를 해결할 새로운 주체로 '제4섹터(the fourth sector)'가 주목받고 있다. 제4섹터는 사회적경제 기업으로 대표되는 제3섹터의 지나친 정부 의존도와 서비스 모델 동형화의 문제점을 해결하고자 등장하였다(Howaldt & Schwarz, 2010). 이러한 제4섹터의 핵심 주체로서 소셜벤처가 언급되고 있다(경기연구원, 2018).
	소셜벤처의 정의와 특성을 명확히 하는 연구가 필요한 이유는?	이러한 제4섹터로서의 소셜벤처의 정의 및 판별기준의 모호 함은 소셜벤처 시장의 성장과 생태계 활성화를 저해하는 요인이다. 따라서 소셜벤처의 정의와 특성을 명확히 하는 연구가 시급하다.
	제4섹터의 특징은?	제4섹터에 대한 논의는 2000년대 중반 이후 지속적으로 논의되어 오다가 2018년 다보스포럼에서 ‘공유의 미래’를 구축하기 위한 10대 과제 중 하나로 ‘제 4섹터 구축(building a fourth sector)’ 개념이 등장하면서 전 세계적으로 각광 받기 시작하였다. 제4섹터는 개념적으로 사회혁신의 필수요소인 가치기반의 사회성, 기술 기반의 혁신성 그리고 생태계 기반의 지속가능성을 갖추고 있기 때문에 기존의 제1, 2, 3섹터가 해결하지 못한 사회문제를 풀 수 있는 열쇠로 여겨지고 있다(Kania & Kramer, 2011; 주성수, 2017).

참고문헌 (60)

Battilana, J., Sengul, M., Pache, A. C., & Model, J.(2015). Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1658-1685.

상세보기
Choi, J. K. & Yoon, S, E.(2018). A New Foundation for Social Innovation, the fourth Sector, Gyeonggi: Gyeonggi Research Institute.
Christensen, C. M., Baumann, H., Ruggles, R., & Sadtler, T. M.(2006). Disruptive innovation for social change. Harvard business review, 84(12), 94.

상세보기
Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M. E., & McDonald, R.(2015). What is disruptive innovation. Harvard Business Review, 93(12), 44-53.

상세보기
Davister, C., Defourny, J., & Gregoire, O.(2004). Work integration social enterprises in the European Union: an overview of existing models. Revue Internationale de l'Economie Sociale: Recma, 293, 24-50.
Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M.(2013). Social Innovation, Social Economy and Social Enterprise: What Can the European Debate Tell Us, In Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A. and Hamdouch, A. (Eds.), The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action. Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 40-52.
Edwards-Schachter, M. E., Matti, C., & Alcantara, E.(2012). Fostering quality of life through social innovation: A living lab methodology study case. Review of policy research, 29(6), 672-692.

상세보기
Escobar, J. J., & Gutierrez, A. C. M.(2011). Social economy and the fourth sector, base and protagonist of social innovation. CIRIEC-Espana, Revista de economia publica, social y cooperativa, (73), 33-60.
Eum Hyung Seek(2005). Social enterprise concept and implications in the European sense, Urbanity & Poverty, 76, 78-117.
European Union？The Young Foundation(2010). Study on Social Innovation.
Fourth Sector Development Initiative(2017). Overview 2017 World economic forum.
Fourth Sector Group(2020). The forth sector, retrieved 2020.06.29. from www.fourthsector.org.
Freeman, C.(1994). The economics of technical change. Cambridge journal of economics, 18(5), 463-514.

상세보기
Freeman, C.(1996). The greening of technology and models of innovation. Technological forecasting and social change, 53(1), 27-39.

상세보기
Freeman, C.(2013). Economics of industrial innovation. Routledge.
Frickel, S., Gibbon, S., Howard, J., Kempner, J., Ottinger, G., & Hess, D. J.(2010). Undone science: charting social movement and civil society challenges to research agenda setting. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35(4), 444-473.

상세보기
Geels, F. W.(2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research policy, 33(6-7), 897-920.

상세보기
Han, J. H., & Hang, B. Y.(2020). Determinants of Accelerators' Investment. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 31-44.

원문보기 상세보기
Haxeltine A., Jrgensen, M. S., Pel, B., Dumitru, A., Avelino, F., Bauler, T., Lema Blanco, I., Chilvers, J., Cipolla, C., Dorland, J., Elle, M., Garido, S., Kemp, R., Kunze, I., Longhurst, N., Pataki, G., Rach, S., Renema, J., Ruijsink, S., Strasser, T., Tawakol, D., Weaver, P. and Wittmayer J. M.(2016). On the agency and dynamics of transformative social innovation. TRANSIT working paper #7, TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169.
Hess, D. J.(2015). Undone science and social movements. Routledge international handbook of ignorance studies, 141-154.
Howaldt, J., & Schwarz, M.(2010). Social Innovation: Concepts, Research Fields and International Trends. Sozialforschungsstelle Dortmund.
Howaldt, J., Kaletka, C., & Schroder, A.(2016). Mapping the World of Social Innovation: A Global Comparative Analysis across Sectors and World Regions (July 2016). SI drive.
Ieromonachou, P., Potter, S., & Enoch, M.(2004). Adapting Strategic Niche Management for evaluating radical transport policies-the case of the Durham Road Access Charging Scheme. International Journal of Transport Management, 2(2), 75-87.

상세보기
Innobasque(2013). A regional index to measure social innovation.
Jang, S. H.(2017). A Theoretical Approach to Social Innovation: A Conceptual Typology and Implications, Journal of Korea technology innovation society, 20(4), 888-914.
Jang, W. B.(2008). Social economy as a new employment strategy. Health and Welfare Forum, 2008 (10), 55-63.
Joo, J. W., Jo, D. H., & Yoon, J. J.(2019). A survey of Social Ventures in Seoul and the Policy Suggestion. Seoul: Seoul research institution.
Joo, S. S.(2017). Social economy and social impact. Seoul: Hanyang University Press.
Kachlami, H.(2016). Social venture creation and the influence of commercial ventures. Social Enterprise Journal, 12(3), 347-367.

상세보기
Kang, N. Y.(2011). Current Status and Implications of Japan's Intermediate Support Organization. 3rd Forum on the Revitalization of Social Enterprises in Rural Areas, Seoul: Regional Foundation.
Kang. M, J.(2017). The Theoretical, Empirical and Policy Foundation for Building Social Innovation in Europe. Seoul: Science and Technology Policy Institute.
Kania, J., & Kramer, M.(2011). Collective impact. FSG, 36-41.
Kim, T. G.(2013). Theorical and Practical Diversity Research of Social Enterprise: Focused on the Social Economy and Third Sector in Europe. Social enterprises and policy studies, 2(2), 23-49.
Korea Social Enterprise Promotion Agency(2016). Certified Social Enterprise Status Data. Retrieved 2020.04.06. from http://www.socialenterprise.or.kr/kosea/company.do
Lee, J. H., & Kim, B. K.(2016). An Analysis of the Technological Innovation and Influence Factors of Korean Knowledge-intensive Service Industry. Journal of Service Management, 17(3) 267-290.
Lisetchia, M., & Brancu, L.(2014). The entrepreneurship concept as a subject of social innovation. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 87-92.
Lurtz, K., Muller, S., & Ruede, D.(2013). Social Innovations: Expert Opinions on the Status Quo and Future Directions. World Vision Center for Social Innovation.
Mulgan, G.(2007). Ready or not?: taking innovation in the public sector seriously. Nesta.
Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G.(2010). The open book of social innovation, London: National endowment for science. technology and the art.
Nam, M. O.(2014). The Sustainability of Work Integration Social Enterprises in Korea. Social enterprises and policy studies, 3(2), 71-102.
No, D. M.(2007). The Present Situation and Challenges of the Korean Social Economy: Focused on the Settlement Process of Social Economy. Civil society and NGO, 5(2), 35-73.
Park, M. J.(2018). Driving forces of Social Innovation in Korea from a perspective of structuration theory: the case of Korean social ventures. doctoral dissertation, University of Seoul.
Park, M. J., & Kim, T. Y.(2018). An analysis of the role of social ventures in social innovation. Social Enterprise Research, 11(3), 3-30.
Saaty, T. L.(1996). The ANP for decision making with dependence and feedback.
Seo, J. M.(2011). Current Status and Challenges of Social Enterprise Interim Support Organizations. 3rd Forum on the Revitalization of Social Enterprises in Rural Areas, Seoul: Regional Foundation.
Shanmugalingam, C., Graham, J., Tucker, S., & Mulgan, G.(2010). Growing Social Ventures. The Young Foundation？Nesta.
Siebold, N., Gunzel-Jensen, F., & Muller, S.(2018). Balancing dual missions for social venture growth: a comparative case study. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1-25.
Song, Y. J., & Jang, Y. B.(2009). Social innovation and technology-intensive social enterprises. Journal of Technology Innovation, 17, 195-215.
Song. Y. J.(2013). Social and Technological System Theory and Science and Technology Innovation Policy. Journal of Technology Innovation, 16(1), 156-175.
Song. Y. J.(2016). Innovation Research and Social Innovation Theory. Trends and issues, (27), 1-29.
Song. Y. J., Jang, Y. B., & Sung, J. E.(2009). Social Innovation and Technology-based Social Enterprises. Seoul: Science and technology policy institution.
Stoner, J. A. F., & Wankel, C.(2007). Innovative approach to reducing global poverty. Information Age Publishing.
Sung, J. M., Hwang, J. O., & Ahn, J. Y.(2014). Social Enterprise Revitalization through Social Venture Support. Seoul: Ministry of Employment and Labor.
TEPSIE(2014). Social Innovation Theory and research: A Guide to researchers.
WEF(2018). The global competitiveness report.
Westley, F., & Antadze, N.(2010). Making a difference: Strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. Innovation Journal, 15(2): 1-19.
Yang, C. H.(2006). Theoretical Consideration on the Adoption of Innovation in Knowledge-Intensive Organizations: Based on the Case of Technology Fusion in Sectoral Innovation System. Journal of the Korean Society of Organization, 3(2), 103-122.
Yoon, J. H.(2017). Entrepreneurial ecosystem of social ventures: the emergence and effect on entrepreneurial activities. Kaist Open Acsess self-Archiving System,
Yoon, J. H., Park, J. H., & Bae, Z. T.(2017). A Study on the Influence of Start-up Ecosystem on the Entrepreneurial Activities of Social Venture: Focusing on the Social Valley in Seongsu-dong. Social Enterprise Research, 10(1), 91-134.
강민정(2018). 사회혁신 생태계의 현황과 발전 방안. 과학기술정책 연구원.

저자의 다른 논문 :

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증